留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于旋转壳理论的波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁剪应力分析

姚常伟 王春生

姚常伟, 王春生. 基于旋转壳理论的波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁剪应力分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(5): 139-153. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.268
引用本文: 姚常伟, 王春生. 基于旋转壳理论的波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁剪应力分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(5): 139-153. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.268
YAO Chang-wei, WANG Chun-sheng. Analysis of shear stress for curved composite steel box girders with corrugated webs based on theory of shells of revolution[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(5): 139-153. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.268
Citation: YAO Chang-wei, WANG Chun-sheng. Analysis of shear stress for curved composite steel box girders with corrugated webs based on theory of shells of revolution[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(5): 139-153. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.268

基于旋转壳理论的波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁剪应力分析

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.268
基金项目: 

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 300102214904

详细信息
    作者简介:

    姚常伟(1984-),男,黑龙江七台河人,工学博士研究生,E-mail:ycw_08@163.com

    通讯作者:

    王春生(1972-),男,黑龙江绥化人,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,E-mail:wcs2000wcs@163.com

  • 中图分类号: U441.5

Analysis of shear stress for curved composite steel box girders with corrugated webs based on theory of shells of revolution

Funds: 

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 300102214904

More Information
Article Text (Baidu Translation)
  • 摘要:

    为精确计算波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁的竖向剪应力并量化各分项效应贡献,提出一种同时考虑波形钢腹板抗弯、初始曲率及曲率沿梁宽变化的剪应力计算方法。基于旋转壳理论,推导出包含弯曲、自由扭转、约束扭转翘曲与畸变翘曲分量的剪应力解析公式;采用能量变分法建立控制微分方程,并通过有限差分法求解;通过结构平面曲率、加载位置及截面尺寸的参数分析,探明该类弯梁剪应力分布规律与关键表征指标。研究结果表明:解析值与文献试验值及有限元值吻合良好;与忽略曲率影响的常规方法相比,所提方法对自由扭转剪应力和畸变翘曲剪应力的计算准确度分别提高5.0%和13.8%;梁轴平曲线半径R与梁宽B之比(R/B)小于10时弯扭耦合效应显著,而R/B≥70时可忽略,建议将10和70作为该效应显著与可忽略的关键界限值。基于所提解析公式得到的剪应力偏载系数为1.33,表明偏载效应显著,设计中需重点考虑。若忽略约束扭转与畸变效应,外腹板总剪应力计算结果虽偏于保守,但平均误差将达3.3%~9.0%,精细化分析中应计入二者影响。所建立的解析公式及获得的规律,可为波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁的设计计算提供理论参考。

     

  • 图  1  波形腹板钢箱组合梁桥

    Figure  1.  Composite steel box girder bridge with corrugated webs

    图  2  截面几何参数

    Figure  2.  Geometric parameters of the cross-section

    图  3  波形钢腹板几何形状及参数

    Figure  3.  Geometry and parameters of corrugated steel web

    图  4  截面计算示意

    Figure  4.  Schematic of cross-section calculation

    图  5  旋转壳示意

    Figure  5.  Schematic of shells of revolution

    图  6  旋转壳比拟示意

    Figure  6.  Schematic of the shells of revolution analogy

    图  7  微段示意

    Figure  7.  Schematic of infinitesimal segment

    图  8  剪应力解析公式建立流程

    Figure  8.  Establishment process of analytical formulas of shear stress

    图  9  试验梁三维示意(内偏载,单位:mm)

    Figure  9.  Three-dimensional schematic of test girder (under inner eccentric loading, unit: mm)

    图  10  剪应变测点布置(单位:mm)

    Figure  10.  Layout of shear strain gauges (unit: mm)

    图  11  外腹板剪应力分布对比

    Figure  11.  Comparison of shear stress distributions in outer webs

    图  12  有限元模型

    Figure  12.  Finite element model

    图  13  剪应力分布对比

    Figure  13.  Comparison of shear stress distributions

    图  14  总剪应力随径宽比的变化曲线

    Figure  14.  Variation of total shear stress with radius-to-width ratio

    图  15  总剪应力随腹板倾角的变化曲线

    Figure  15.  Variation of total shear stress with web inclination angle

    图  16  自由扭转剪应力分布

    Figure  16.  Distribution of shear stress due to free torsion

    图  17  畸变翘曲剪应力分布

    Figure  17.  Distribution of shear stress due to distortional warping

    图  18  总剪应力随截面高度的变化曲线

    Figure  18.  Variation curves of total shear stress with section height

    图  19  剪应力随腹板厚度的变化曲线

    Figure  19.  Variation of shear stress with web thickness

    图  20  剪应力比ζ随宽径比的变化曲线

    Figure  20.  Variation of shear stress ratio ζ with width-to-radius ratio

    表  1  波形钢腹板几何参数值

    Table  1.   Geometric parameters of corrugated steel web mm

    类型 aw bw lw hhw tw rw
    1200型 330 270 1 200 200 8~20 15tw
    1600型 430 370 1 600 220 10~36 15tw
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同加载工况下截面A-A剪应力对比

    Table  2.   Shear stress comparison for section A-A under different loading conditions

    测点 外偏载 内偏载 中心加载
    试验值/MPa 解析值/MPa 相对差值/% 试验值/MPa 解析值/MPa 相对差值/% 试验值/MPa 解析值/MPa 相对差值/%
    1 36.8 35.5 -3.5 20.6 20.0 -2.9 29.7 27.7 -6.7
    2 33.7 35.7 5.9 18.7 20.2 8.0 26.2 27.9 6.5
    3 33.7 35.7 5.9 18.7 20.2 8.0 26.5 27.9 5.3
    4 32.4 35.7 10.2 18.8 20.2 7.4 26.3 27.9 6.1
    5 32.3 35.5 9.9 19.1 20.0 4.7 26.7 27.7 3.7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同加载工况下截面B-B剪应力对比

    Table  3.   Shear stress comparison for section B-B under different loading conditions

    测点 外偏载 内偏载 中心加载
    试验值/MPa 解析值/MPa 相对差值/% 试验值/MPa 解析值/MPa 相对差值/% 试验值/MPa 解析值/MPa 相对差值/%
    1 - 30.7 - - 15.8 - 20.9 23.3 11.5
    2 31.2 30.8 -1.3 16.1 15.9 -1.2 23.4 23.4 0.0
    3 29.7 30.9 4.0 15.7 16.0 1.9 23.3 23.4 0.4
    4 27.8 30.9 11.2 14.6 16.0 9.6 23.2 23.4 0.9
    5 27.5 31.0 12.7 14.4 16.1 11.8 21.9 23.6 7.8
    注:“-”表示数据缺失。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  截面A-A剪应力对比

    Table  4.   Shear stress comparison for Section A-A MPa

    测点 总剪应力 弯曲剪应力 自由扭转剪应力
    常规方法 本文方法 试验 常规方法 本文方法 常规方法 本文方法
    1 28.6 27.7 29.7 15.2 15.3 13.6 12.5
    2 28.8 27.9 26.2 15.4 15.5 13.6 12.5
    3 28.8 27.9 26.5 15.4 15.5 13.6 12.5
    4 28.8 27.9 26.3 15.4 15.5 13.6 12.5
    5 28.6 27.7 26.7 15.1 15.3 13.6 12.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  截面B-B剪应力对比

    Table  5.   Shear stress comparison for Section B-B MPa

    测点 总剪应力 弯曲剪应力 自由扭转剪应力
    常规方法 本文方法 试验 常规方法 本文方法 常规方法 本文方法
    1 23.3 23.3 20.9 14.9 15.0 9.6 8.8
    2 23.4 23.4 23.4 15.1 15.2 9.6 8.8
    3 23.4 23.4 23.3 15.1 15.2 9.6 8.8
    4 23.4 23.4 23.2 15.1 15.2 9.6 8.8
    5 23.6 23.6 21.9 14.8 14.9 9.6 8.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  控制截面挠度对比

    Table  6.   Comparison of deflections at control sections

    加载工况 挠度 控制截面
    L/4 L/2 3L/4
    外偏载 试验值/mm 2.0 3.1 2.0
    有限元值/mm 1.8 2.8 1.8
    相对差值/% -5.7 -8.9 -9.2
    中心加载 试验值/mm 1.6 2.7 1.7
    有限元值/mm 1.6 2.5 1.6
    相对差值/% -0.1 -5.3 -4.9
    内偏载 试验值/mm 1.3 2.1 1.3
    有限元值/mm 1.4 2.2 1.4
    相对差值/% 9.7 4.1 11.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  外腹板剪应力对比

    Table  7.   Shear stress comparison for outer web

    腹板位置/m 解析值/MPa 有限元值/MPa 相对差值/ %
    弯曲 自由扭转 约束扭转 畸变 总应力
    1.5 -5.2 -4.7 0.01 0.5 -9.3 -8.7 6.9
    1.3 -5.3 -4.7 0.01 0.6 -9.4 -9.1 3.3
    0.8 -5.3 -4.7 0.01 0.6 -9.4 -9.4 0.0
    0.2 -5.2 -4.7 0.01 0.5 -9.4 -9.4 0.0
    0.1 -5.0 -4.7 0.01 0.3 -9.4 -8.4 11.9
    注:相对差值为总应力值与有限元值的相对差值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  内腹板剪应力对比

    Table  8.   Shear stress comparison for inner web

    腹板位置/m 解析值/MPa 有限元值/MPa
    弯曲 自由扭转 约束扭转 畸变 总应力
    1.5 5.3 -5.2 0.01 0.7 0.8 1.3
    1.3 5.4 -5.2 0.01 0.7 0.9 0.6
    0.8 5.4 -5.2 0.01 0.7 0.9 0.1
    0.2 5.3 -5.2 0.01 0.7 0.9 1.3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  9  外偏载工况下剪应力对比

    Table  9.   Comparison of shear stresses under outer eccentric loading

    腹板位置/m 解析值/MPa 有限元值/MPa 相对误差/ %
    弯曲 自由扭转 约束扭转 畸变 总应力
    1.5 -5.3 -7.2 0.01 0.4 -12.0 -11.7 2.6
    1.3 -5.4 -7.2 0.01 0.4 -12.1 -12.2 -0.8
    0.8 -5.4 -7.2 0.01 0.4 -12.1 -12.6 -4.0
    0.2 -5.4 -7.2 0.01 0.4 -12.1 -12.5 -3.2
    0.1 -5.1 -7.2 0.01 0.2 -12.1 -11.5 5.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  10  内偏载工况下剪应力对比

    Table  10.   Comparison of shear stresses under inner eccentric loading

    腹板位置/m 解析值/MPa 有限元值/MPa 相对误差/ %
    弯曲 自由扭转 约束扭转 畸变 总应力
    1.5 -5.0 -2.3 0.01 0.7 -6.6 -6.2 6.5
    1.3 -5.1 -2.3 0.01 0.7 -6.7 -6.6 1.5
    0.8 -5.2 -2.3 0.01 0.7 -6.7 -6.8 -1.5
    0.2 -5.1 -2.3 0.01 0.6 -6.7 -6.8 -1.5
    0.1 -4.9 -2.3 0.01 0.4 -6.8 -5.6 21.4
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王春生, 王晓平, 朱经纬, 等. 波形钢腹板管翼缘组合梁抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2019, 49(1): 18-23.

    WANG Chun-sheng, WANG Xiao-ping, ZHU Jing-wei, et al. Experimental research on flexural behavior of steel and concrete composite girders with a rectangular tubular up-flange and a corrugated steel web[J]. Bridge Construction, 2019, 49(1): 18-23.
    [2] 陈康明, 黄汉辉, 吴庆雄, 等. 波形钢腹板-钢管混凝土桁式弦杆组合梁桥疲劳性能[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2022, 22(5): 200-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.05.012

    CHEN Kang-ming, HUANG Han-hui, WU Qing-xiong, et al. Fatigue performance of composite girder bridge with corrugated steel webs-concrete filled steel tubular truss chords[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(5): 200-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.05.012
    [3] 陈宏彬, 黄光铃, 陈宜言, 等. 变截面连续波形钢腹板-平钢底板组合梁桥应力偏载系数研究[J]. 世界桥梁, 2025, 53(2): 111-118.

    CHEN Hong-bin, HUANG Guang-ling, CHEN Yi-yan, et al. Research on stress eccentric load coefficients of continuous composite girder bridge with corrugated steel webs and flat steel bottom plates[J]. World Bridges, 2025, 53(2): 111-118.
    [4] 董桔灿, 陈宜言, BRISEGHELLA Bruno, 等. 波形钢腹板-双管弦杆-混凝土板组合连续箱梁受弯性能[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2016, 16(3): 35-45. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.03.005

    DONG Ju-can, CHEN Yi-yan, BRISEGHELLA B, et al. Flexural behaviors of composite continuous box-girder with corrugated steel webs, double concrete filled steel tubular chords and concrete slabs[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(3): 35-45. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.03.005
    [5] 李宏江. 波形钢腹板PC组合箱梁几个特殊问题研究进展[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2018, 26(2): 440-454.

    LI Hong-jiang. Review on special issues in prestressed concrete box girders with corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2018, 26(2): 440-454.
    [6] 李宏江. 波形钢腹板预应力混凝土组合箱梁扭转与畸变研究进展[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 38(7): 59-67.

    LI Hong-jiang. Review on torsion and distortion in prestressed concrete box girders with corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38(7): 59-67.
    [7] ZHOU M, LIAO J C, AN L. Shear properties of tapered box girders with steel trapezoidally corrugated webs considering resal effect[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25: 04019126. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001516
    [8] 吴启明, 肖玉凤, 郭宗明, 等. 单箱多室波形钢腹板组合箱梁腹板剪力分配理论[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2021, 23(8): 61-66, 75.

    WU Qi-ming, XIAO Yu-feng, GUO Zong-ming, et al. Shear force distribution on the web of single-box multi-cell composite girders with corrugated steel webs[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2021, 23(8): 61-66, 75.
    [9] 冀伟, 黄逸航, 罗奎, 等. 单箱双室变截面波形钢腹板组合梁剪应力分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2024, 21(3): 1090-1101.

    JI Wei, HUANG Yi-hang, LUO Kui, et al. Analysis of shear stress of single-box double-cell variable cross-section composite box beams with corrugated steel web[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 1090-1101.
    [10] 邓文琴, 毛泽亮, 刘朵, 等. 单箱三室波形钢腹板悬臂梁扭转与畸变分析及试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(2): 173-181.

    DENG Wen-qin, MAO Ze-liang, LIU Duo, et al. Analysis and experimental study on torsion and distortion of single box three-cell cantilever girder with corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(2): 173-181.
    [11] 张元海, 孙成成. 波形钢腹板箱梁考虑腹板局部纵向刚度影响的扭转效应分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 51(2): 195-201.

    ZHANG Yuan-hai, SUN Cheng-cheng. Analysis on the torsion effect of box girders with corrugated steel webs considering local longitudinal stiffness of webs[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 51(2): 195-201.
    [12] WANG C, ZHANG Y L, ZHANG X, et al. Coupled bending- torsion behaviour of single-box multi-cell curved composite box-girders with corrugated-steel-webs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 196: 107411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107411
    [13] ZHANG Y L, WANG C, ZHANG X, et al. Exact distortional behaviour of single-box multicell curved composite box girders with corrugated steel webs in the elastic stage[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 297: 116961. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116961
    [14] 许立言, 郭婷, 张屹垚, 等. 曲线波形钢腹板组合箱梁空间受力性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2023, 44(增1): 165-173.

    XU Li-yan, GUO Ting, ZHANG Yi-yao, et al. Study on spatial mechanical behavior of curved composite box girder with corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(S1): 165-173.
    [15] LIU S M, DE CORTE W, DING H S, et al. A comparison of the mechanical properties of curved box girders with corrugated steel webs to curved box girders with concrete webs[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2022, 25(10): 2103-2120. doi: 10.1177/13694332221088948
    [16] 王春生, 姚常伟. 基于旋转壳理论和横隔板实际刚度的波形腹板钢箱组合弯梁畸变行为分析[J/OL]. 土木工程学报, 2025, https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.25050320.

    WANG Chun-sheng, YAO Chang-wei. Distortional behavior analysis of curved composite steel box girders with corrugated webs based on rotating shell theory and effective diaphragm stiffness[J/OL]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2025, https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.25050320.
    [17] YAO C W, WANG C S, ZHANG W T. A theoretical model of bending-torsion coupling behavior for curved composite box girders with corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2026, 239: 110220. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2025.110220
    [18] BASHER M, SHANMUGAM N E, KHALIM A R. Horizontally curved composite plate girders with trapezoidally corrugated webs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(6): 947-956. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.01.015
    [19] YOSSEF N M. A new approach to estimate the shear strength of curved corrugated steel webs[J]. Structures, 2020, 24: 400-414. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.028
    [20] ZHANG Z, TANG Y, LI J, et al. Torsional behavior of box-girder with corrugated web and steel bottom flange[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 167: 105855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105855
    [21] BHASKAR K, VARADAN T K. A higher-order theory for bending analysis of laminated shells of revolution[J]. Computers & Structures, 1991, 40(4): 815-819.
    [22] 李国豪. 大曲率薄壁箱梁的扭转和弯曲[J]. 土木工程学报, 1987, 20(1): 65-75.

    LI Guo-hao. Torsion and bending of thin-walled box girder with great initial curvature[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1987, 20(1): 65-75.
    [23] ZHU L, KAI-LEUNG SU R, LI M J. Finite beam element with 26 DOFs for curved composite box girders considering constrained torsion, distortion, shear lag and biaxial slip[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 232: 111797. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111797
    [24] 张元海, 李乔. 曲线箱梁考虑剪滞效应时的弯扭分析[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(10): 123-129.

    ZHANG Yuan-hai, LI Qiao. Flexural-torsional analysis of curved box-girders with the consideration of the shear lag effect[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(10): 123-129.
    [25] CAMPO-RUMOROSO I, RAMOS-GUTIÉRREZ Ó R, CAMBRONERO-BARRIENTOS F. Distortion analysis of horizontally curved trapezoidal box girder bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 282: 115798. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115798
    [26] 李夏元, 万水, 付理想, 等. 一种考虑波形钢腹板等效剪切变形自由度的新型箱梁单元[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(5): 385-398. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.05.025

    LI Xia-yuan, WAN Shui, FU Li-xiang, et al. A novel box girder beam element considering equivalent shear deformation freedom of corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(5): 385-398. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.05.025
    [27] WANG C S, ZHANG W T, LI H T, et al. Shear lag effect of twin Ⅰ-shaped composite girders in cable-stayed bridges[J]. Thin-walled Structures, 2022, 180: 109822. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109822
    [28] WANG C S, ZHANG W T, YANG M Y. Shear lag effect of composite girders in cable-stayed bridges under dead loads[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 281: 115752. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115752
    [29] 刘素梅. 波形钢腹板组合曲线箱梁力学性能理论及试验研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2020.

    LIU Su-mei. Theoretical and experimental study on the mechanical properties of curved composite box girders with corrugated steel webs[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2020.
    [30] 李宏江. 波形钢腹板箱梁扭转与畸变的试验研究及分析[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2003.

    LI Hong-jiang. Experimental study and analysis on torsion and distortion of box-girder with corrugated steel webs. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2003.
    [31] NASSR A A, ABD-EL-RAHIM H H A, KAISER F, et al. Topology optimization of horizontally curved box girder diaphragms[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 256: 113959. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113959
    [32] 赵秋, 李天宇, 陈宜言. 波形钢腹板组合箱梁桥抗剪承载力计算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(5): 154-165. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.044

    ZHAO Qiu, LI Tian-yu, CHEN Yi-yan. Calculation of shear capacity of corrugated steel web combination box girder[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(5): 154-165. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.044
    [33] ARICI M, GRANATA M F, LONGO G. Symplectic analysis of thin-walled curved box girders with torsion, distortion and shear lag warping effects[J]. Thin-walled Structures, 2022, 175: 109244. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109244
  • 加载中
图(20) / 表(10)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  59
  • HTML全文浏览量:  27
  • PDF下载量:  12
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-11-26
  • 录用日期:  2026-03-20
  • 修回日期:  2026-01-25
  • 刊出日期:  2026-05-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回