留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于BIM+智能压实的道基薄弱区分布对道面力学性能影响评价方法

戴轩 王呈智 蔡靖 乔洋 刘磊

戴轩, 王呈智, 蔡靖, 乔洋, 刘磊. 基于BIM+智能压实的道基薄弱区分布对道面力学性能影响评价方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(8): 202-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.323
引用本文: 戴轩, 王呈智, 蔡靖, 乔洋, 刘磊. 基于BIM+智能压实的道基薄弱区分布对道面力学性能影响评价方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2026, 26(8): 202-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.323
DAI Xuan, WANG Cheng-zhi, CAI Jing, QIAO Yang, LIU Lei. Evaluation method for effect of subgrade weak zone distribution on mechanical performance of pavement based on BIM and intelligent compaction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 202-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.323
Citation: DAI Xuan, WANG Cheng-zhi, CAI Jing, QIAO Yang, LIU Lei. Evaluation method for effect of subgrade weak zone distribution on mechanical performance of pavement based on BIM and intelligent compaction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 202-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.323

基于BIM+智能压实的道基薄弱区分布对道面力学性能影响评价方法

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.323
基金项目: 

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 3122026054

天津市企业科技特派员项目 25YDTPJC00370

天津市交通运输科技项目 2025-70

详细信息
    作者简介:

    戴轩(1988-),男,天津人,副教授,工学博士,E-mail: xdai@cauc.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    蔡靖(1975-),女,河北唐山人,教授,博士生导师,工学博士,E-mail: caijing75@163.com

  • 中图分类号: U416.1

Evaluation method for effect of subgrade weak zone distribution on mechanical performance of pavement based on BIM and intelligent compaction

Funds: 

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 3122026054

Tianjin Enterprise Science and Technology Special Commissioner Project 25YDTPJC00370

Tianjin Transportation Science and Technology Project 2025-70

More Information
Article Text (Baidu Translation)
  • 摘要: 为了量化道基压实度空间分布特征及其对道面力学性能的影响,本文对机场智能压实工程进行分析,建立了建筑信息模型(BIM)与智能压实信息融合应用框架,提出了评价道基压实空间分布的压实薄弱综合指数; 通过道基土体加州承载比试验,分析压实计值与道基反应模量的关系; 建立三维有限元数值分析模型,探究压实度空间分布对机场道面力学性能的影响; 最后形成基于BIM模型的智能压实-道面结构力学性能一体化分析方法。研究结果表明:相同压实薄弱区面积比下的薄弱区毗邻度指标可相差2.5倍,压实薄弱综合指数可反映压实通过率、压实薄弱程度、薄弱区空间分布的综合影响,压实薄弱综合指数随压实薄弱区面积比的增加而增大,离散程度也逐步增加; 道基反应模量与压实计值呈幂指数增长关系; 道面弯拉应力最大值随压实薄弱综合指数的增加而增大,且可用三次多项式进行描述; 通过参数化BIM建模、属性信息扩展、可视化编程、智能压实数据与BIM数据融合、BIM-力学模型一体化分析,实现依据智能压实数据、道面结构几何数据及机型荷载数据对运行期道面结构应力与服役寿命进行动态分析,从而提升道基压实水平。研究成果对扩展智能压实数据的价值、实现场道工程智能建造-运维一体化分析具有参考意义。

     

  • 图  1  智能压实系统组成

    Figure  1.  Composition of intelligent compaction system

    图  2  智能压实获取的压实数据空间分布

    Figure  2.  Space distribution of compaction data based on intelligent compaction

    图  3  BIM与智能压实融合应用框架

    Figure  3.  Integrated application framework of BIM and intelligent compaction

    图  4  加速度信号频域

    Figure  4.  Frequency domain of acceleration signal

    图  5  压实度与ECMV的量化关系

    Figure  5.  Quantitative relationship of compaction and ECMV

    图  6  压实薄弱区分布

    Figure  6.  Distribution of compaction weak zone

    图  7  PCWCIη的变化

    Figure  7.  Variation of PCWCI with η

    图  8  土体物理力学性质试验

    Figure  8.  Physical and mechanical properties test of soil

    图  9  TCBRK的关系

    Figure  9.  Relationship of TCBR and K

    图  10  刚性道面有限元模型(单位:m)

    Figure  10.  Finite element model of rigid pavement (unit: m)

    图  11  B737-800起落架构型(单位:mm)

    Figure  11.  Landing gear configuration of B737-800 (unit: mm)

    图  12  数值分析模型解与理论解对比

    Figure  12.  Comparison between numerical analysis model and theoretical solution

    图  13  σmaxPCWCI的关系

    Figure  13.  Relationship of σmax and PCWCI

    图  14  道基-道面结构参数化BIM建模

    Figure  14.  Parametric BIM modeling of subgrade-pavement structure

    图  15  智能压实数据与BIM模型的融合

    Figure  15.  Integration of intelligent compaction data and BIM model

    图  16  BIM信息与ABAQUS模型转换流程

    Figure  16.  Conversion process between BIM information and ABAQUS model

    表  1  道基土体的物理力学参数

    Table  1.   Physical and mechanical parameters of subgrade soil

    土性 含水量/% 天然重度/ (kN·m-3) 孔隙比 塑限指数 压缩系数 渗透系数/ (cm·s-1)
    粉质黏土 45 18.9 1.52 13.0 1.2 2.5×10-5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  数值分析模型参数

    Table  2.   Parameters of numerical analysis model

    位置 层厚/ m 弹性模量/ MPa 泊松比 土体黏聚力/kPa 土体内摩擦角/(°)
    面层 0.4 37 000 0.15
    基层 0.4 500 0.25
    道基 20.0 式(14)换算 0.30 30.4 18.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  机场跑道BIM模型基础属性定义

    Table  3.   Definition of basic attributes of airport runway BIM model

    属性名称 数据类型 说明
    PavementArea IfcAreaMeasure 道面板面积
    PavementVolume IfcVolumeMeasure 道面板体积
    VerticalSlope IfcPlaneAngleMeasure 纵坡坡度
    RunwayLayer IfcCountMeasure 跑道层数
    SurfaceCourseSlope IfcPlaneAngleMeasure 面层坡度
    SurfaceCourseThickness IfcPositiveLengthMeasure 面层厚度
    SurfaceCourseMaterial-Type IfcMaterialSelect 面层材料
    BaseCourseThickness IfcPositiveLengthMeasure 基层厚度
    BaseCourseMaterialType IfcMaterialSelect 基层材料
    CushionThickness IfcPositiveLengthMeasure 垫层厚度
    CushionMaterialType IfcMaterialSelect 垫层材料
    SubgradeThickness IfcPositiveLengthMeasure 道基厚度
    SubgradeMaterialType IfcMaterialSelect 道基材料
    ConstructionDate IfcDateTime 铺设时间
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  跑道智能压实评价扩展属性定义

    Table  4.   Definition of extended attributes for runway intelligent compaction evaluation

    属性名称 属性类型 数据类型 说明
    CompactionDegree IfcProperty- TableValue IfcCount- Measure 压实度
    CompactionMeterValue ECMV
    SubgradeResilient- Modulus 道基反应模量
    CompactionWeakness- AreaRatio 压实薄弱面积比
    CompactionWeakness- CompositeIndex PCWCI
    FlexuralTensileStress 弯拉应力
    ServiceLoadingTimes 允许作用次数
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  某机场各类机型起降架次

    Table  5.   Various types of aircraft take-off and landing sorties at an airport

    飞机机型 最大起飞质量/t 年总起降架次 占比/%
    B737-300 62.8 8 245 23.0
    B737-800 79.0 17 490 48.8
    A320-200 78.0 6 700 18.7
    A380-800 575.0 3 410 9.5
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 游庆龙, 凌建明, 袁捷, 等. 适应大型飞机的沥青道面结构有限元模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2012, 12(2): 18-23. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.02.003

    YOU Qing-long, LING Jian-ming, YUAN Jie, et al. Finite element model of flexible airport pavement structure for large aircraft[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(2): 18-23. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.02.003
    [2] 白桃, 安奕铭, 金光来, 等. 道路隐性病害三维探地雷达图谱轻量化识别改进算法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(4): 42-57.

    BAI Tao, AN YI-ming, JIN Guang-lai, et al. Improved algorithm for lightweight identification of 3D GPR images of hidden road defects[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 42-57.
    [3] 刘东海, 李欣, 刘强, 等. 基于压实实时监测的高填方基础薄弱区快速识别研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(4): 38-47.

    LIU Dong-hai, LI Xin, LIU Qiang, et al. Fast detection method for low-bearing-capacity area of high-filled subgrade based on real-time compaction monitoring[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(4): 38-47.
    [4] YUAN D L, LI S Y, REN L W. Evaluation study on the application effect of intelligent construction technology in the construction process[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(3): 1071. doi: 10.3390/su16031071
    [5] 钱劲松, 庞劲松, 费伦林, 等. 路基智能压实评价指标研究进展综述[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(3): 388-397.

    QIAN Jin-song, PANG Jin-song, FEI Lun-lin, et al. A review of research progress on intelligent compaction measurement values for subgrade[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2024, 52(3): 388-397.
    [6] 钱劲松, 杨以诚, 凌建明. 路基智能压实的地统计分析与空间均匀性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(10): 2859-2869.

    QIAN Jin-song, YANG Yi-cheng, LING Jian-ming. Geostatistical analysis and evaluation of subgrade spatial uniformity based on intelligent compaction technology[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(10): 2859-2869.
    [7] WANG X F, CHENG C, LI J L, et al. Automated monitoring and evaluation of highway subgrade compaction quality using artificial neural networks[J]. Automation in Construction, 2023, 145: 104663. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104663
    [8] WANG N, MA T, CHEN F, et al. Compaction quality assessment of cement stabilized gravel using intelligent compaction technology: A case study[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 345: 128100. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128100
    [9] 张军辉, 刘科, 杨豪, 等. 公路路基智能压实研究综述[J/OL]. 中国公路学报, 2026-02-09. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1313.u.20260206.1611.004.

    ZHANG Jun-hui, LIU Ke, YANG Hao et al. A review of the intelligent compaction for highway subgrade[J/OL]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2026-02-09. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1313.u.20260206.1611.004.
    [10] WANG X, DONG Q, ZHAO X K, et al. Prediction of remaining service life of cement concrete pavement in airfield runway[J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2024, 25(1): 150-167. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2023.2199878
    [11] ANJAN KUMAR S, ALDOURI R, NAZARIAN S, et al. Accelerated assessment of quality of compacted geomaterials with intelligent compaction technology[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 824-834. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.117
    [12] MEEHAN C L, CACCIOLA D V, TEHRANI F S, et al. Assessing soil compaction using continuous compaction control and location-specific in situ tests[J]. Automation in Construction, 2017, 73: 31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.017
    [13] TANG F L, MA T, GUAN Y S, et al. Parametric modeling and structure verification of asphalt pavement based on BIM-ABAQUS[J]. Automation in Construction, 2020, 111: 103066. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103066
    [14] 游庆龙, 黄之懿, 马靖莲, 等. 不均匀飞机轮载作用下沥青道面结构力学响应[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(1): 292-300.

    YOU Qing-long, HUANG Zhi-yi, MA Jing-lian, et al. Mechanical response of asphalt pavement structure under non-uniform aircraft wheel load[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(1): 292-300.
    [15] TANG F L, MA T, ZHANG J H, et al. Integrating three-dimensional road design and pavement structure analysis based on BIM[J]. Automation in Construction, 2020, 113: 103152. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103152
    [16] WEI B L, GUO C C, DENG M Y. An innovation of the Markov probability model for predicting the remaining service life of civil airport rigid pavements[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(17): 6082. doi: 10.3390/ma15176082
    [17] 王观虎, 蔡良才, 邵斌, 等. 机场水泥混凝土道面使用寿命的改进灰色预测模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2009, 9(3): 45-48. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2009.03.008

    WANG Guan-hu, CAI Liang-cai, SHAO Bin, et al. Modified gray prediction model of service life for airport cement concrete pavement[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(3): 45-48. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2009.03.008
    [18] WANG Y D, ZHAO J, GAO N, et al. A dynamic evaluation method for the development of intelligent construction technology in the construction field based on structural equation model-system dynamics model[J]. Buildings, 2024, 14(2): 417. doi: 10.3390/buildings14020417
    [19] 蔡良才, 王海服, 张罗利, 等. 基于累积损伤的机场道面剩余寿命预测模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(4): 1-6.

    CAI Liang-cai, WANG Hai-fu, ZHANG Luo-li, et al. Prediction model of remaining life for airport pavement based on cumulative damage[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(4): 1-6.
    [20] 王萌, 于群丁, 肖源杰, 等. 透水性基床级配碎石填料宏细观压实特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(8): 1701-1716.

    WANG Meng, YU Qun-ding, XIAO Yuan-jie, et al. Experimental investigation of macro-and meso-scale compaction characteristics of unbound permeable base materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(8): 1701-1716.
    [21] 徐照, 占鑫奎, 张星. BIM技术在装配式建筑预制构件生产阶段的应用[J]. 图学学报, 2018, 39(6): 1148-1155.

    XU Zhao, ZHAN Xin-kui, ZHANG Xing. Application of BIM technology in the manufacturing stage of precast elements of prefabricated construction[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2018, 39(6): 1148-1155.
    [22] 徐照, 康蕊, 孙宁. 基于IFC标准的建筑构件点云信息处理方法[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1068-1075.

    XU Zhao, KANG Rui, SUN Ning. IFC-based point-cloud information processing method for structural elements[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1068-1075.
    [23] 蔡靖, 王瀚雪, 戴轩, 等. 基于IFC标准的机场道面结构信息模型存储与传递方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2024, 50(10): 3042-3053.

    CAI Jing, WANG Han-xue, DAI Xuan, et al. Storage and transfer method of airport pavement structure information model based on IFC standard[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, 50(10): 3042-3053.
    [24] 罗丹, 黄晓琴, 冷费贤, 等. 数字孪生在交通基础设施智能建造中的应用与挑战[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2025, 25(3): 33-64.

    LUO Dan, HUANG Xiao-qin, LENG Fei-xian, et al. Applications and challenges of digital twin in intelligent construction of transportation infrastructure[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(3): 33-64.
    [25] 戴轩, 冯蒙, 蔡靖, 等. 机场刚性道面裂缝发展数字孪生模型及其应用[J/OL]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2026-01-05. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2025.0704.

    DAI Xuan, FENG Meng, CAI Jing, et al. Digital twin model of cracks development on airport rigid pavement and its application[J/OL]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2026-01-05. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2025.0704.
    [26] YAN Y, NI L, SUN L J, et al. Digital twin enabling technologies for advancing road engineering and lifecycle applications[J]. Engineering, 2025, 44(1): 184-206.
    [27] MENG W, ZHANG H, AI Q S, et al. CBR-RBR fusion based parametric rapid construction method of bridge BIM model[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2023, 57: 102086. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102086
    [28] BARAZZETTI L, BANFI F, BRUMANA R, et al. Creation of parametric BIM objects from point clouds using nurbs[J]. The Photogrammetric Record, 2015, 30(152): 339-362. doi: 10.1111/phor.12122
    [29] SONG H H, YANG G, LI H J, et al. Digital twin enhanced BIM to shape full life cycle digital transformation for bridge engineering[J]. Automation in Construction, 2023, 147: 104736. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104736
    [30] LIU P. Mountain rainfall estimation and BIM technology site safety management based on internet of things[J]. Mobile Information Systems, 2021, 2021(1): 1017200.
    [31] XU Z, ZHANG L, LI H, et al. Combining IFC and 3D tiles to create 3D visualization for building information modeling[J]. Automation in Construction, 2020, 109: 102995. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102995
    [32] 徐照, 徐夏炎, 李启明, 等. 基于WebGL与IFC的建筑信息模型可视化分析方法[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(2): 444-449.

    XU Zhao, XU Xia-yan, LI Qi-ming, et al. Combining WebGL and IFC to create 3D visualization for building information models[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 444-449.
    [33] 张建平, 余芳强, 李丁. 面向建筑全生命期的集成BIM建模技术研究[J]. 土木建筑工程信息技术, 2012, 4(1): 6-14.

    ZHANG Jian-ping, YU Fang-qiang, LI Ding. A modeling technology of integrated BIM for building lifecycle[J]. Journal of Information Technology in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2012, 4(1): 6-14.
    [34] LIU D H, LIN M, LI S. Real-time quality monitoring and control of highway compaction[J]. Automation in Construction, 2016, 62: 114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.11.007
    [35] 陈利满, 钟立楠. 毗邻连通和及环面作用[J]. 南开大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 50(5): 50-55.

    CHEN Li-man, ZHONG Li-nan. Adjacent connected sums and toms actions[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 50(5): 50-55.
    [36] LI T G, KONG L W, LIU B H. The California bearing ratio and pore structure characteristics of weakly expansive soil in frozen areas[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(21): 7576. doi: 10.3390/app10217576
    [37] POWELL W D, POTTER J F, MAYHEW H C, et al. The structural design of bituminous roads: 1132[R]. Crow-thorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, 1984.
    [38] 姚炳卿, 王威龙. 机场刚性道面当量单轮荷载的计算原理及其图表[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1989, 11(2): 43-53.

    YAO Bing-qing, WANG Wei-long. The calculating principles and charts of equivalent single wheel load for airport rigid pavements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(2): 43-53.
    [39] 戴轩, 蔡靖, 李香香, 等. 脱空尺寸对机场刚性道面的影响及其使用寿命分析[J]. 中外公路, 2022, 42(6): 47-52.

    DAI Xuan, CAI Jing, LI Xiang-xiang, et al. Influence of void size beneath airport concrete pavement and pavement life analysis[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2022, 42(6): 47-52.
    [40] WANG Q, DAVIS J. Airport pavement groove identification and analysis at NAPTF[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 723: 1003-1010. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.723.1003
  • 加载中
图(16) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  20
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-30
  • 录用日期:  2026-05-27
  • 修回日期:  2026-03-27
  • 刊出日期:  2026-08-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回