CAI Liang-cai, ZHOU Shao-hui, XU Wei, CEN Guo-ping, YANG Wen-shan. Loading performances of pavement with assembled aluminum mats[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(6): 1-9. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.06.001
Citation: CAI Liang-cai, ZHOU Shao-hui, XU Wei, CEN Guo-ping, YANG Wen-shan. Loading performances of pavement with assembled aluminum mats[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(6): 1-9. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.06.001

Loading performances of pavement with assembled aluminum mats

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.06.001
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    CAI Liang-cai(1960-), male, professor, PhD, +86-29-84787008, Liangcai07@126.com

  • Received Date: 2015-08-12
  • Publish Date: 2015-12-25
  • The strength of assembled aluminum mat was detected by four-point bending loading test.Two soil test sections with different strengths were built.Four aluminum honeycombsandwich mats with different thicknesses and strengths were paved on the test sections to simulate different pavements with assembled aluminum mats at expedient airfield.Light and heavy aircraft loads were simulated by using loaded cart.The deformations and ruts of the pavements under different loading times were measured and the control indexes were that the maximum rutting depth reached 30 mm and 20% mats were damaged.Experimental result indicates that the effective moduli of mats 1-4 are 1 616, 1 862, 2 064 and 2 328 MPa respectively.When mats 1-4 are installed over single-layer stabilized soil base and loaded by 75 kN, the vertical deformations of the pavements are respectively 35, 19, 10 and 12mm after 400 loading times, and the relative maximum ruts are respectively 50, 28, 16 and 10 mm after 500 loading times.When mats 1-4 are installed over double-layer stabilized soil base and loaded by 150 kN, thevertical deformation of the pavement with mat 4is 16 mm after 1 000 loading times, the relative maximum ruts of the pavements with mats 3 and 4 are 36 and 24 mm respectively, and the horizontal joints of mats sink obvious.Under the same base condition and loading times, mat 1 made of 3003 aluminum alloy is easier to damage compared with mats 2-4 made of 6A 02 aluminum alloy, and the pavement constructed by mat 1is easier to fail than the others.When mats 1-4 are installed over single-layer stabilized soil base and loaded by 75 kN, the matting pavements can meet the using requirements of light aircrafts.When mat 4 is installed over double-layer stabilized soil base, the matting pavement can meet the using requirements of heavy aircrafts.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    DOVER M D, ANDERSON M, BROWN R W. Recent advances in matting technology for military runways[C]∥ASCE. The 27th Annual International Air Transport Conference. Reston: ASCE, 2002: 1-10.
    [2]
    COE C J, READ D L, MYERS J A. Mat instrumentation, finite-element analysis, and mat anchoring system reliability study, volumeⅡ[R]. Panama City: Tyndall Air Force Base, 1988.
    [3]
    WEI Wu. Research on matting material and configuration used in expedient airfield[D]. Xi’an: Air Force Engineering University, 2002. (in Chinese).
    [4]
    SMITH J C, GONZALEZ C R, SMITH D M. Analysis of Korean F-16aircraft opearating on AM-2landing mat[R]. Vicksburg: US Army Corps of Engineers, 1997.
    [5]
    ZHAO Wen-qi. Research on reinforced soil in construction of expedient airfield[D]. Xi'an: Air Force Engineering University, 2003. (in Chinese).
    [6]
    FORST D C. Decks for rapid runway mat application[R]. Dayton: Wright-Patterson AFB, 2007.
    [7]
    CHENG Chuan-long. Aluminum honeycomb matting system design and mechanics test[D]. Xi’an: Air Force Engineering University, 2014. (in Chinese).
    [8]
    MERRITT D K, CULLOUGH F M, BURNS N H, et al. The feasibility of using precast concrete panels to expedited highway pavement construction[R]. Austin: Texas Department of Transportation, 2000.
    [9]
    CHANG L, CHEN Y T, LEE S. Using precast concrete panels for pavement construction in Indiana[R]. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 2004.
    [10]
    Ministry of Defence. Concrete block paving for airfields[R]. West Midlands: Ministry of Defence, 2005.
    [11]
    PRIDDYA L P, BLYA P G, JACKSONB C J, et al. Fullscale field testing of precast portland cement concrete panel airfield pavement repairs[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2014, 15(9): 840-853. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.893320
    [12]
    SAPOZHNIKOV N, ROLLINGS R. Soviet precast prestressed construction for airfields[C]∥FAA. 2007Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference. Atlantic City: FAA, 2007: 1-11.
    [13]
    GARTRELL C A. Full scale instrumented testing and analysis of matting systems for airfield parking ramps and taxiways[R]. Vicksburg: US Army Corps of Engineers, 2007.
    [14]
    GARTRELL C A, NEWMAN J K, ANDERTON G L. Performance measurements of pavement matting systems by full-scale testing over differing soil strengths[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2009, 21(10): 561-568. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:10(561)
    [15]
    DOYLE J D, HOWARD I L, GARTRELL C A. Full-scale instrumented testing and three-dimensional modeling of airfield matting systems[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2014, 14(2): 161-170. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000272
    [16]
    SHI Bao-hua, NING Wen-pu, XU Wei, et al. Application of con-aid stabilizer in expedient airfield pavement[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(2): 25-33. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2013.02.004
    [17]
    DAI Sheng-rui. Research on application of con-aid stabilizer in expedient airfield pavement[D]. Xi’an: Air Force Engineering University, 2011. (in Chinese).
    [18]
    CEN Guo-ping, CHENG Chuan-long, XU Wei, et al. Experimental study on the bearing capacity of the aluminum honeycomb sandwich panel[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University: Natural Science Edition, 2014, 15(4): 1-4. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3516.2014.04.001
    [19]
    ZHANG Xian-min, DONG Qian, LU Yao-zhi. Mechanical responses of pavement under aircrafts with different main landing gears[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 49(4): 675-681. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.04.018
    [20]
    ZHAN Xian-min, XUE Hua-xin, DONG Qian, et al. Influencing depth under aircraft loads of runway[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 40(4): 427-432. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJHK201404001.htm
    [21]
    SHAN Jing-song, LI Hui, JIANG Han-wan. Mechanical characteristics and design method of interlocking concrete block pavement[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(4): 9-17. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201504002
    [22]
    HAN Qian-yong. Development of 3003aluminum alloy foil for containers[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2010, 38(6): 29-31. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHJJ201006007.htm
    [23]
    GONZALEZ C R, RUSHING T W. Development of a new design methodology for structural airfield mats[J]. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2010, 3(3): 102-109.
    [24]
    HUANG Wei-ye, ZHANG Ya-men, CAO Bing, et al. Force analysis and bearing capacity test of asphalt pavement of highway runway[J]. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, 2015, 32(11): 63-67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201511028.htm
    [25]
    WANG Zhen-hui, CAI Liang-cai, LIU Xiao-jun, et al. An analysis of airfield thin layer asphalt pavement for loading stress and displacement[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 8(5): 9-12. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGC200705002.htm

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1514) PDF downloads(836) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return