JIA De-jun, LI Fan-chun. Influence of dynamics effect on safety of cable in wreck up-righting project[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 89-100. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.009
Citation: JIA De-jun, LI Fan-chun. Influence of dynamics effect on safety of cable in wreck up-righting project[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 89-100. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.009

Influence of dynamics effect on safety of cable in wreck up-righting project

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.01.009
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    JIA De-jun(1990-), male, doctoral student, junge_tt@163.com

    LI Fan-chun(1960-), male, professor, PhD, lee_fc@126.comlee_fc@126.com

  • Received Date: 2017-08-21
  • Publish Date: 2018-02-25
  • In order to study the influence of dynamics effect on the safety of wreck up-righting project, cable tension was introduced as the evaluation index of the safety.Four hypotheses were made, including that the hanging point of lifting arm was be fixed, the seabed in research area was rigid, the effect of superstructure was ignored, and restoring force and external loads were only considered in establishing the quasi-static model of up-righting wreck.Cable tensions, ship weight, cable stiffness, cable-winded velocity and wave loads were taken as variables.Cable tensions in wreck up-righting project were calculated by using the time-domain analysis method while considering dynamics effect.Based on the maximum calculated cable tensions, the influences of ship weight, cable stiffness, cable-winded velocity and wave loads on cable tensions were analyzed, and the safety of up-righting project was evaluated.Calculation result shows that in wreck up-righting project, the maximum cable tension increases when ship weight, cable stiffness and cable-winded velocity increase, and has linear relationship with cable-winded velocity, approximate linear relationship with ship weight, and nonlinear relationship with cable stiffness.When cable-winded velocity increases from 0.001 m·s-1 to 0.020 m·s-1, theincrement of the maximum cable tension increases by 22 times, so the dynamics effect cannot be ignored in the safety evaluation of wreck up-righting project.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    PAN De-wei, SUN De-ping, LIN Cheng-xin, et al. Analysis and computation for salvaging wrecked ship by hoisting machinery[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2014, 40 (4): 7-12. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7736.2014.04.002
    [2]
    PAN De-wei, LIN Cheng-xin, SUN De-ping, et al. Uprighting process analysis of big-angle tilted aground ship[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15 (2): 50-58. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2015.02.008
    [3]
    PAN De-wei, LIN Cheng-xin, SUN De-ping, et al. Calculation method of grounding ship during righting process[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14 (4): 53-63. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201404007
    [4]
    PAN De-wei, LIN Cheng-xin, SUN De-ping, et al. Calculation and analysis of righting capsized vessel based on GHSsoftware[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2014 (6): 78-83. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2014.06.012
    [5]
    DROBYSHEVSKI Y. A note on uprighting of a ship floating upside-down[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31 (11/12): 1447-1467.
    [6]
    GONZALEZ M M, SOBRINO P C, ALVAREZ R T, et al. Fishing vessel stability assessment system[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 41 (1): 67-78.
    [7] 王道能, 毕远涛. GHS软件在救助打捞工程中的应用[C]//中国国际救捞论坛组委会. 第六届中国国际救捞论坛论文集. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2010: 169-171. WANG Dao-neng, BI Yuan-tao. A brief introduction on GHSsoftware in wreck removal operation[C]//China International Rescue and Salvage Committee. Proceedings of the 6th China International Rescue and Salvage Conference. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2010: 169-171. (in Chinese).
    [8]
    VARELA J M, RODRIGUES J M, SOARES C G. On-board decision support system for ship flooding emergency response[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 29: 1688-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.154
    [9]
    ZHANG Sheng-ming. Plate tearing and bottom damage in ship grounding[J]. Marine Structures, 2002, 15 (2): 101-117. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00021-1
    [10]
    WIESLAW G. The ships impact in ground of port water area[J]. R and RATA, 2008, 1 (2): 61-67.
    [11]
    NGUYEN T H, AMDAHL J, LEIRA B J, et al. Understanding ship-grounding events[J]. Marine Structures, 2011, 24 (4): 551-569. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.07.001
    [12]
    GALOR W. The model of ship movement while touching the sea-bed[J]. International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 2007, 1 (4): 413-418.
    [13]
    WANG Ge, ARITA K, LIU D. Behavior of a double hull in a variety of standing or collision scenarios[J]. Marine Structures, 2000, 13 (2): 147-187.
    [14]
    NAM M, KIM J, LEE J, et al. Cooperative control system of the floating cranes for the dual lifting[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2018, 10 (4): 95-102.
    [15]
    REHN C F, PETTERSEN S S, ERIKSTAD S O, et al. Investigating tradeoffs between performance, cost and flexibility for reconfigurable offshore ships[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 147 (10): 546-555.
    [16]
    PATERSON J, D'AMICO F, THIES P R, et al. Offshore wind installation vessels-a comparative assessment for UKoffshore rounds 1and 2[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 148 (11): 637-649.
    [17]
    HARIS S, AMDAHL J. Analysis of ship-ship collision damage accounting for bow and side deformation interaction[J]. Marine Structures, 2013, 32 (1): 18-48.
    [18]
    SUN Bin, HU Zhi-qiang, WANG Ge. An analytical method for predicting the ship side structure response in raked bow collisions[J]. Marine Structures, 2015, 41 (4): 288-311.
    [19]
    OZGUC O, DAS P K, BARLTROP N. A comparative study on the structural integrity of single and double side skin bulk carriers under collision damage[J]. Marine Structures, 2005, 18 (7/8): 511-547.
    [20]
    TIKHONOV V S, LEBEDEV V I, KOTOV A V. Numerical simulation of longitudinal tackle oscillations when salvaging sunken vessels from deep water[J]. Ocean Engineering, 1997, 24 (7): 605-621.
    [21]
    CUMMINS W E. The impulse response function and ship motions[R]. Hamburg: Department of the Navy David Taylor Model Basin, 1962.
    [22]
    MA Xiao-jian. Motion responses of a moored ship and mooring line force in open pier[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese).
    [23]
    LIU C L. Ocean sediment holding strength against breakout of partially embedded objects[C]//ASCE. Proceedings of 2nd Conference on Civil Engineering in Oceans. Reston: ASCE, 1969: 105-117.
    [24]
    LUO Gao-gui. Study on mooring simulation and calculation of pontoon in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014. (in Chinese).
    [25]
    ALSOS H S, AMDAHL J. On the resistance of tanker bottom structures during standing[J]. Marine Structures, 2007, 20 (4): 218-237.
    [26]
    NGUYEN T H, GARRE L, AMDAHL J, et al. Monitoring of ship damage condition during standing[J]. Marine Structures, 2011, 24 (3): 261-274.
    [27]
    PEDERSEN P T, ZHANG Sheng-ming. Effect of ship structure and size on grounding and collision damage distributions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2000, 27 (11): 1161-1179.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (896) PDF downloads(348) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return