Volume 25 Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FAN Bing-hui, SUN Qi, CHEN Bao-chun, CHEN Kang-ming. Robustness design of multi-span through tied-arch bridge considering systemic hanger failure[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 204-217. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.013
Citation: FAN Bing-hui, SUN Qi, CHEN Bao-chun, CHEN Kang-ming. Robustness design of multi-span through tied-arch bridge considering systemic hanger failure[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 204-217. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.013

Robustness design of multi-span through tied-arch bridge considering systemic hanger failure

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.013
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52078137

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2024J01355

More Information
  • Corresponding author: CHEN Bao-chun (1958-), male, professor, PhD, baochunchen@fzu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2024-02-18
  • Publish Date: 2025-04-28
  • To investigate the dynamic impact of systemic hanger failure on the multi-span through tied-arch bridge, firstly, three numerical calculation methods were employed to simulate the effects of hanger breakage: the LS-DYNA restart method, the element birth and death method, and the full-dynamic analysis method. The simulated effects were then compared with dynamic response data of the hanger breakage test to identify the optimal method for modeling systemic hanger failure. Secondly, to enhance the robustness and prevent progressive collapse in multi-span through tied-arch bridge structures, two structural systems were proposed: the simply-supported continuous structure and the rigid integral tied-arch structure. The failure simulation method was employed to compare the dynamic response of the remaining structure under systemic hanger failure before and after structural transformation. Additionally, the Simple-Johnson-Cook model was utilized to simulate the damage process of the bridge and determine the final damage mode of the structure. On this basis, the progressive collapse and damage mechanism of the structure under systemic hanger failure was further investigated. Research results show that the error between the simulation results and the test data of the LS-DYNA restart method is relatively small, enabling better simulation of conditions when the hanger experiences instantaneous damage. For the simply-supported continuous structure, in the event of systemic hanger failure, the final damage extent of the bridge system is the lowest, and the force transmission path is extended, effectively delaying the damage process of the structure, reducing the risk of progressive collapse accidents, and providing additional time for traffic evacuation. However, for the rigid integral tied-arch structure, due to the high initial stiffness, stress concentration may occur, leading to premature local failure of the bridge system. Consequently, the simply-supported continuous structure can be utilized in the design of newly constructed multi-span through tied-arch bridges or readily applied to enhance the robustness of existing bridges through the installation of replaceable joints on pier tops.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SUN J P, TAN Z H, ZHANG J J, et al. Parameter sensitivity study on static and dynamic mechanical properties of the spatial y-shaped tied arch bridge[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2023, 23(2): 458-479. doi: 10.1007/s13296-022-00705-z
    [2]
    ZHANG Z Y, LONG P H. Calculation and analysis of through concrete filled steel tubular tied arch bridge[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2148(1): 012064. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2148/1/012064
    [3]
    FAN C C, ZHENG Y X, WANG B L, et al. Damage identification method for tied arch bridge suspender based on quasi-static displacement influence line[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 200: 110518. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110518
    [4]
    FAN B H, WANG G, CHEN B C, et al. Robustness-based condition evaluation framework for through tied-arch bridge[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2023, 37(2): 06023001. doi: 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4048
    [5]
    Yuecheng District Government Office of Shaoxing City. Local collapse event of bridge under construction in urban section of Hang-Shao-Tai Expressway[EB/OL]. Zhejiang Government Service Network, (2021-05-08)[2024-02-18]. https://www.sxyc.gov.cn/art/2021/5/11/art_1228990952_59033371.html.
    [6]
    FAN B H, SU J Z, Chen B C. Condition evaluation for through and half-through arch bridges considering robustness of suspended deck systems[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(5): 962-976. doi: 10.1177/1369433220945835
    [7]
    DENG Hai-bin, CHEN Wen, WANG Xiao-ming. Research on structural robustness for cable-stayed bridge without back-stays[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 29(3): 13-20.
    [8]
    FAN B H, WANG S G, CHEN B C. Dynamic effect of Tie-bar failure on through tied arch bridge[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2020, 34(5): 04020089. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001492
    [9]
    SHEN Rui-li, FANG Kai, GUAN Kuai. Robustness analysis of self-anchored suspension bridge with loss of a single sling[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(6): 35-39.
    [10]
    WU Qing-xiong, YU Yin-gen, CHEN Bao-chun. Dynamic analysis for cable loss of a rigid-frame tied through concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(15): 144-149.
    [11]
    SOPHIANOPOULOS D S, MICHALTSOS G T, CHOLEVAS H I. Static and dynamic responses of suspended arch bridges due to failure of cables[J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2019, 89(11): 2281-2312. doi: 10.1007/s00419-019-01576-3
    [12]
    CHEN Bao-chun, LIU Jun-ping. Review of construction and technology development of arch bridges in the world[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(1): 27-41. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.01.002
    [13]
    CHEN Bao-chun, HUANG Fu-yun, XUE Jun-qing, et al. Review on research of jointless bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(5): 1-40. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.05.001
    [14]
    ZHENG Xiao-bo, ZHAO Yu, HE Shuan-hai, et al. Calculating method of structural robustness of double-tower cable-stayed bridge with steel truss girder[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(5): 27-38. https://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/0aacfb04-6864-496e-b9c5-34e4e6105ecd
    [15]
    BONTEMPI F. Elementary concepts of structural robustness of bridges and viaducts[J]. Journal of civil structural health monitoring, 2019, 9(5): 703-717.
    [16]
    CHEN Bao-chun, FAN Bing-hui, YU Yin-gen, et al. Robustness design of concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges[J]. Bridge Construction, 2016, 46(6): 88-93.
    [17]
    FAN Bing-hui, CHEN Bao-chun, WU Qing-xiong. Technical condition evaluation of half-through and through arch bridges considering robustness[J]. Bridge Construction, 2018, 48(5): 64-68.
    [18]
    CHEN Kang-ming, WU Qing-xiong, LUO Jian-ping, et al. Test on robustness strengthening for suspended deck system in half-through and through arch bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 95-113. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.006
    [19]
    HE Guo-meng, ZHU Shi-feng, LIU Ang, et al. Transforming a suspended deck system to a continuous girder system for basket-handle arch bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2022, 52(6): 147-154.
    [20]
    WU W Q, WANG H, ZHU Y J. New hanger design approach of tied-arch bridge to enhance its robustness[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(11): 4547-4554.
    [21]
    YUN G J, LIU C G. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the deep-water bridge piers under combined earthquakes and wave actions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 261: 112076.
    [22]
    CHEN Yi-yan, TANG Guo-dong, LIAO Guang-ming. Study on failure safety suspender systems of arch bridges[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2008(1): 44-50.
    [23]
    ALEX S, LUKAS E, ANDREA F. Modelling progressive collapse of timber buildings[J]. Structures, 2024, 62: 106279.
    [24]
    STAROSSEK U. Progressive collapse of structures: nomenclature and procedures[J]. Structural Engineering International, 2006, 16(2): 113-117.
    [25]
    GHOSN M, MOSES F, FRANGOPOL D M. Redundancy and robustness of highway bridge superstructures and substructures[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2010, 6(1/2): 257-278.
    [26]
    PÉREZ-CLAROS E, ANDRAWES B. Concrete bridge deck reinforced with textured and nontextured epoxy-coated bars[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2023, 28(6): 04023023.
    [27]
    NAVABIAN N, BESKHYROUN S. Investigation on dynamic behaviour of a full-scale reinforced concrete bridge subjected to strong earthquakes using an automated analysis platform[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2019, 15(4): 504-523.
    [28]
    ZHENG Ying-ren, YE Hai-lin, XIAO Qiang, et al. Stability analysis of seismic slopes and tunnels based on full dynamic analysis method[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2010, 30(S1): 279-285.
    [29]
    CHEN Kang-ming, WU Qing-xiong, LUO Jian-ping, et al. Equivalent static calculation method for concrete filled steel tubular arch bridges considering dynamic effect of suspenders fracture[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56(6): 63-74.
    [30]
    FAN B H, WANG S G, CHEN B C. Robustness assessment framework for through tied-arch bridge considering tie-bar failure[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(5): 04022028.
    [31]
    ZHONG Bo. Study on Effective Numerical model for damage and progressive collapse analysis of RC structures under blast loading[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2017.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (857) PDF downloads(56) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return