Volume 25 Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Tao, XIAO Yuan-jie, WANG Xiao-ming, CHEN Yu-liang, MENG Fan-wei, HE Qing-yu, YANG Jian-xiong. Performance and whole life cycle environmental impact assessment of cement-stabilized permeable recycled aggregate subgrade[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 322-339. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.021
Citation: YANG Tao, XIAO Yuan-jie, WANG Xiao-ming, CHEN Yu-liang, MENG Fan-wei, HE Qing-yu, YANG Jian-xiong. Performance and whole life cycle environmental impact assessment of cement-stabilized permeable recycled aggregate subgrade[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 322-339. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.021

Performance and whole life cycle environmental impact assessment of cement-stabilized permeable recycled aggregate subgrade

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.021
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52178443

National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFC3807205

Hunan Provincial Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars 2024JJ2073

Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province 2024AQ2010

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2024ZZTS0109

More Information
  • Corresponding author: XIAO Yuan-jie (1984-), male, professor, PhD, yjxiao@csu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2024-03-28
  • Publish Date: 2025-04-28
  • To promote the widespread application of recycled aggregates derived from building demolition wastes (BDWs) in road engineering, a whole life cycle assessment method was applied. The cost and environmental impacts of the blending proportions of recycled aggregates and auxiliary cementitious materials on cement-stabilized permeable recycled aggregate (CPRA) during the four stages of raw material production, engineering construction, road maintenance, and service completion were further analyzed. In combination with laboratory compressive strength, permeability coefficient, four-point bending test, freezing resistance test, and compression resilience tests, the CPRA was compared with the traditional cement-stabilized aggregate (TCSA) subgrade materials from multi-performance and multi-dimensional perspectives. Research results show that the compressive strength and permeability coefficient can meet the requirements of China's road standards when the CPRA is used with recycled aggregate partially substituted for natural aggregate. The proportion of recycled aggregate reaches 60% by optimizing the ratio of cementitious materials in the mixture. The CO2 emissions of cement-stabilized materials during raw material production account for 87%-91% of the total CO2 emissions throughout the whole life cycle. The CO2 emissions during cementitious material production account for 95% of the total CO2 emissions of raw material production. The CO2 emissions can be effectively reduced by using auxiliary cementitious materials to partially replace cement and employing recycled aggregates. Compared with the three groups of materials with 0 recycled aggregate content, the three groups of CPRA with 30% recycled aggregate content can reduce the total cost by 8%-20% and CO2 emissions by 3%-15%. The three groups of CPRA with 60% recycled aggregate content can reduce the total cost by 24%-34% and CO2 emissions by 3%-23% compared with the three groups of materials with 0 recycled aggregate content. The replacement of cement with auxiliary cementitious materials with a proportion of 10%-32% decreases the CO2 emission of the mixture by 8%-17% but increases SO2 and NOx emissions by 14%-81% and 21%-106%, respectively. The total cost of CPRA is lower than that of TCSA. The research indicates that when the dosage of cementitious materials is controlled within the range of 7%-8%, the CPRA demonstrates superior whole life cycle carbon emission performance. The research findings will provide a reference for the application of recycled aggregates from BDWs in fully permeable subgrade as well as the measurement of carbon emission data and the design of material ratios.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    LIU Z, DENG Z, HE G, et al. Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China[J]. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2022, 3: 141-155.
    [2]
    DANISH A, ALI MOSABERPANAH M. A review on recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) characteristics to promote RCA utilization in developing sustainable recycled aggregate concrete (RAC)[J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2021, 26(13): 6505-6539.
    [3]
    DIAS A, NEZAMI S, SILVESTRE J, et al. Environmental and economic comparison of natural and recycled aggregates using LCA[J]. Recycling, 2022, 7(4): 43. doi: 10.3390/recycling7040043
    [4]
    GUAN Bo-wen, WU Jia-yu, CHEN Hua-xin, et al. Test of coverage rate of residual mortar on recycled aggregate and its influence on permeability of concrete[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(10): 155-165.
    [5]
    HABIBI A, TAVAKOLI H, ESMAEILI A, et al. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete mixtures: a critical review[J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2023, 27(3): 1285-1303. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2022.2078885
    [6]
    JAIN S, SINGHAL S, PANDEY S. Environmental life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling: a case of urban India[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 155: 104642. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104642
    [7]
    GHANBARI M, ABBASI A M, RAVANSHADNIA M. Production of natural and recycled aggregates: the environmental impacts of energy consumption and CO2 emissions[J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2018, 20(2): 810-822. doi: 10.1007/s10163-017-0640-2
    [8]
    TEFA L, BIANCO I, BLENGINI G A, et al. Integrated and comparative Structural-LCA analysis of unbound and cement-stabilized construction and demolition waste aggregate for subbase road pavement layers formation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 352: 131599. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131599
    [9]
    LIANG X, CUI S H, LI H, et al. Removal effect on stormwater runoff pollution of porous concrete treated with nanometer titanium dioxide[J]. Transportation Research Part D—Transport and Environment, 2019, 73: 34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.06.001
    [10]
    YU T J, LIU D G, ZHANG H T, et al. Influence of pore water phase change on service performance for permeable pavement in Sponge City[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2021, 84(12): 3769-3779. doi: 10.2166/wst.2021.459
    [11]
    LI H, YANG J, YU X Q, et al. Permeability prediction of pervious concrete based on mix proportions and pore characteristics[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 395: 132247. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132247
    [12]
    LI L G, FENG J J, ZHU J, et al. Pervious concrete: effects of porosity on permeability and strength[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2021, 73(2): 69-79. doi: 10.1680/jmacr.19.00194
    [13]
    LI Q F, ZHOU Z M, DONG J B, et al. Comparison of runoff control performance by five permeable pavement systems in Zhenjiang, Yangtze River Delta of China[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2022, 27(10): 05022011. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002202
    [14]
    WANG J J, WEI J J, LIU Z S, et al. Life cycle assessment of building demolition waste based on building information modeling[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 178: 106095. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106095
    [15]
    QIN Y H, HE Y H, HILLER J E, et al. A new water-retaining paver block for reducing runoff and cooling pavement[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 199: 948-956. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.250
    [16]
    ALSUBIH M, ARTHUR S, WRIGHT G, et al. Experimental study on the hydrological performance of a permeable pavement[J]. Urban Water Journal, 2017, 14(4): 427-434. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2016.1176221
    [17]
    ANTUNES L N, GHISI E, SEVERIS R M. Environmental assessment of a permeable pavement system used to harvest stormwater for non-potable water uses in a building[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 746: 141087. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141087
    [18]
    JIKE N D, XU C J, YANG R J, et al. Pervious concrete with secondarily recycled low-quality brick-concrete demolition residue: engineering performances, multi-scale/phase structure and sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 341: 130929. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130929
    [19]
    ZAETANG Y, SATA V, WONGSA A, et al. Properties of pervious concrete containing recycled concrete block aggregate and recycled concrete aggregate[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 111: 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.060
    [20]
    KAPLAN G, GULCAN A, CAGDAS B, et al. The impact of recycled coarse aggregates obtained from waste concretes on lightweight pervious concrete properties[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 28(14): 17369-17394. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11881-y
    [21]
    YANG L X, KOU S C, SONG X F, et al. Analysis of properties of pervious concrete prepared with difference paste-coated recycled aggregate[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 269: 121244. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121244
    [22]
    Federal Highway Administration. Pavement life-cycle assessment framework. FHWA-HIF-16-014[R]. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016.
    [23]
    BRE Global. Product Category Rules (PCR) for Type Ⅲ EPD of Construction Products to EN 15804+A2[M]. London: BRE Global, 2023.
    [24]
    CHEN X D, WANG H. Life-cycle assessment and multi-criteria performance evaluation of pervious concrete pavement with fly ash[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 177: 105969. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105969
    [25]
    WANG H, WU J J, ZHU X, et al. Energy-environment- economy evaluations of commercial scale systems for blast furnace slag treatment: dry slag granulation vs. water quenching[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 171: 314-324. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.079
    [26]
    HOU H M, ZHANG S, GUO D F, et al. Synergetic benefits of pollution and carbon reduction from fly ash resource utilization-based on the life cycle perspective[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 903: 166197. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166197
    [27]
    HE Z H, HAN X D, ZHANG M Y, et al. A novel development of green UHPC containing waste concrete powder derived from construction and demolition waste[J]. Powder Technology, 2022, 398: 117075. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.117075
    [28]
    NAYIR S, BAHADIR Ü, TOĞAN V. Investigation of global warming potential of concrete with silica fume and blast furnace slag[J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2024, 48(4): 1965-1975. doi: 10.1007/s40996-023-01264-x
    [29]
    CHANDRAPPA A K, BILIGIRI K P. Pervious concrete as a sustainable pavement material- research findings and future prospects: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 111: 262-274. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.054
    [30]
    GAO S, HUANG K N, CHU W C, et al. Feasibility study of pervious concrete with ceramsite as aggregate considering mechanical properties, permeability, and durability[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(14): 5127.
    [31]
    SEIFEDDINE K, AMZIANE S, TOUSSAINT E. State of the art on the hydraulic properties of pervious concrete[J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2023, 24(11): 2561-2596.
    [32]
    SHE L, WEI M, YOU X Y. Multi-objective layout optimization for sponge city by annealing algorithm and its environmental benefits analysis[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 66: 102706.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (329) PDF downloads(40) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return