Volume 25 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Xiao-feng, LI Xiao-long, DUAN Sheng-long, HU Jin-hua, YU Xing-guo, ZHANG Wen-jie, CHEN Ying. Mechanical response of tunnel structure to hole-breaking process of cross passage pipe jacking construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 94-108. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.007
Citation: LIU Xiao-feng, LI Xiao-long, DUAN Sheng-long, HU Jin-hua, YU Xing-guo, ZHANG Wen-jie, CHEN Ying. Mechanical response of tunnel structure to hole-breaking process of cross passage pipe jacking construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 94-108. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.007

Mechanical response of tunnel structure to hole-breaking process of cross passage pipe jacking construction

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.007
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52178401

Science and Technology Innovation Team Support Program for Henan Universities 23IRTSTHN014

Central Plains Talent Program in China 234200510014

Key Scientific Fund Project of Henan Province 252300421251

  • Received Date: 2024-10-21
  • Accepted Date: 2025-05-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-03-20
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-28
  • To investigate the influence mechanism of the hole-breaking process at the launching stage of pipe jacking on the mechanical response of the main tunnel structure, a three-dimensional simulation model for pipe jacking construction of the cross passage was established based on the construction project of the cross passage in Zhengzhou Metro Line 12. The accuracy of the established model was verified by comparison with field monitoring data. The effects of the hole-breaking construction during the launching stage of pipe jacking on the deformation of the main tunnel segments, internal forces, and bolt stress were studied. The evolution of the mechanical response of the main tunnel structure during the hole-breaking construction process was systematically analyzed. Research results show that the hole-breaking construction causes significantly greater disturbance in the circumferential direction of the segments than in the longitudinal direction, and the disturbance range extends approximately twice the diameter of the main tunnel on both sides of the opening. The 90° position of the semi-cutting ring is most affected by the hole-breaking construction. A distinct tensile stress zone is formed on its outer arc surface, with a maximum tensile stress of 9 MPa. The steel-concrete composite segment at this location ensures structural safety. The internal support system reduces the external soil and water pressure on the main tunnel, effectively lowering internal forces and deformation of the segments. As the segment cutting thickness increases, the transverse elliptical deformation of the lining ring gradually increases, and the bolt stress increases. Circumferential bolt stress is significantly higher than longitudinal bolt stress and approaches the yield strength. Internal forces at the upper and lower ends of the opening dramatically decrease, creating a pronounced cantilever effect. The lost load is transferred to less damaged adjacent ring through longitudinal bolts, leading to a significant increase in internal forces at the 90° position of the semi-cutting ring. This redistribution of internal force mainly occurs during the stage of cutting 3/4 of the segment thickness. The results provide important evidence for revealing the influence mechanism of the hole-breaking process in cross passage pipe jacking construction on the mechanical response of the main tunnel structure. The results also offer theoretical reference for the design and construction of similar projects in the future.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    QIN Bo-yu, GONG Dan-dan, CHEN Zhi-long. Current si-tuation, strategy, and conception for exploiting and using urban underground spaces for low-carbon development in China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2024, 44(7): 1337-1355.
    [2]
    QIAO Y K, PENG F L, LUAN Y P, et al. Rethinking underground land value and pricing: a sustainability perspec-tive[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 127: 104573. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104573
    [3]
    XU Ya-jie, CHEN Xiang-sheng. Current situation and pro-spect of comprehensive development of underground space in metro area[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(1): 1-12, 21.
    [4]
    LI Meng-kai, CAI Hai-bing, HONG Rong-bao, et al. Analy-sis and engineering application of freezing temperature field in planar skew connecting passage[J]. Journal of Railway Scien-ce and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 1374-1384.
    [5]
    LIU Xin, FENG Li-hua, REN Quan-jun, et al. Formation process of freezing wall of subway cross passage in seepage stratum and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2024, 55(4): 1463-1476.
    [6]
    LI Z M, CHEN J, SUGIMOTO M, et al. Numerical simu-lation model of artificial ground freezing for tunneling under seepage flow conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 92: 103035. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103035
    [7]
    CHEN Guan-ren, LI Dong-wei, CHEN Jun-hao, et al. Evo-lution law of freezing displacement field in ultra-long con-nected aisle in water-rich stratum[J]. Journal of Railway Sci-ence and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 3000-3013.
    [8]
    ZHOU J, ZHAO W Q, TANG Y Q. Practical prediction method on frost heave of soft clay in artificial ground freezing with field experiment[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 107: 103647. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103647
    [9]
    HUANG Da-wei, CHEN Hou-hong, XU Chang-jie, et al. Experimental study on influences of shield machine reception on existing shield tunnels during construction of connecting channels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(4): 784-793.
    [10]
    LI X L, LI P C, LIU X F, et al. Surface subsidence pattern of construction of pipe jacking in water-rich sand layer cross passage measured and numerical simulation analysis[J]. Structures, 2024, 60: 105949. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105949
    [11]
    CHEN Xiang-sheng, DING Hang, LI Fang-zheng, et al. Frost heave control measures for the frozen double-line tunnel undercrossing an operation station[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2024, 49(1): 172-180.
    [12]
    WU Yi-min, LIU Yan-an, WANG Heng, et al. Regression analysis of influence law of urban pavement settlement caused by underpass tunnel construction in Beijing[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(2): 176-186. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.02.013
    [13]
    DING Jian-min, DONG Zi-bo, MO Zhen-ze, et al. Field ex-perimental study on T-connected tunnel with pipe jacking method[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(1): 28-34.
    [14]
    ZHANG Fu-lin, LIU Zheng-hao, ZHU Yao-hong, et al. Stress characteristics and weakening analysis of T-joint of connection passage by mechanical excavation method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 116-119.
    [15]
    GUAN Pan-feng, GUO Zhen-kun, WU Peng-li, et al. Ana-lysis of mechanical behavior of shield tunnel openings based on shell-contact model[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2020, 57(5): 143-153.
    [16]
    QIU Ju-tao, SHEN Yu-sheng, ZHAO He-lin, et al. Experi-mental research on deformation and failure mechanism of deep-buried clay tunnels in urban areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42(11): 2765-2775.
    [17]
    CHEN Fan, WANG Ying-chao, ZHENG Shun-hua. Large-scale model experiment of ground collapse induced by water and sand gushing in subway tunnels[J]. China Civil Engi-neering Journal, 2023, 56(11): 174-183.
    [18]
    GAO Xiao-jing, LI Peng-fei, ZHANG Ming-ju, et al. Bear-ing characteristics and failure mechanism of partially failed segments in shield tunnels[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(11): 302-311.
    [19]
    LIU Xian, ZHANG Yu-meng, WANG Ru-lu. Discussion on deformation and failure of segmental metro tunnel linings[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(5): 118-128.
    [20]
    TAN Z S, LI Z L, TANG W, et al. Research on stress cha-racteristics of segment structure during the construction of the large-diameter shield tunnel and cross-passage[J]. Sym-metry, 2020, 12(8): 1246.
    [21]
    WANG Yi-xian, SHAN Sheng-biao, YUAN Hai-ping, et al. Mechanical model and numerical simulation for patulous-occlusive situation of joint of shield tunnel lining segment[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38(5): 158-166.
    [22]
    LIN Q T, LU D C, LEI C M, et al. Mechanical response of existing tunnels for shield under-crossing in cobble strata based on the model test[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 125: 104505.
    [23]
    ZHU Yao-hong, GAO Yi-min, DONG Zi-bo, et al. Full-scale experimental study on structural mechanism of T-con-nected tunnel constructed by pipe jacking method[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(9): 1392-1401.
    [24]
    ZHU Yao-hong, GAO Yi-min, DONG Zi-bo, et al. Full-sca-le experimental study on structural mechanism of T-connected tunnel constructed by shield method[J]. Tunnel Construc-tion, 2020, 40(1): 9-18.
    [25]
    ZHU Yao-hong, GAO Yi-min, LIU Xian. Study on the structural response of the main tunnel with deep cross pass-ages built by the mechanical method[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(5): 144-153.
    [26]
    LIU Xian, GAO Yi-min, ZHANG Jiao-long, et al. Structu-ral response of main tunnel linings during construction of connecting aisle by means of mechanized drilling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 951-960.
    [27]
    LU P, YUAN D J, JIN D L, et al. Centrifugal model tests on the structural response of the shield tunnel when con-structing cross passages by mechanical methods[J]. Tunnell-ing and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 128: 104621.
    [28]
    ZHU Yao-hong, GAO Yi-min, DONG Zi-bo, et al. Field te-st on structural mechanism of T-connected shield tunnel: a case study of connecting passage on Ningbo metro line No. 3[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(11): 1759-1768.
    [29]
    HUANG Yi, LIU Zheng-hao, MA Xian-feng, et al. Resear-ch on cutting test and numerical simulation of segments used in connection passage with mechanical excavation method[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(S1): 93-103.
    [30]
    WANG Ru, ZHAI Wu-zhou, NI Hai-bo, et al. Numerical si-mulation on mechanical response of tunnel portal with seg-ment lining in mechanized construction of cross passage of shield tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2023, 43(S1): 178-188.
    [31]
    ZHENG Zhen-ji, HUANG Shu-hua, CHEN Xiang-sheng, et al. Analysis of stress characteristics of specially lined seg-ment of superlarge-diameter shield main tunnel during mecha-nically excavating cross passage[J]. Modern Tunnelling Te-chnology, 2024, 61(1): 117-124.
    [32]
    SHI Cheng-hua, WANG Zu-xian, LIU Jian-wen, et al. Stu-dy on ultimate bearing capacity of shield tunnel based on da-mage model of concrete[J]. Journal of Central South Univer-sity (Science and Technology), 2022, 53(11): 4310-4325.
    [33]
    YA Bin, ZHOU Bing-wen, HUANG Bing-kun, et al. The research progress in predicting the elastic modulus of carbon nanotubes reinforced polymer composites[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2015, 46(11): 11001-11005.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (292) PDF downloads(23) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return