Volume 25 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
QIN Shi-qiang, LI Yue-xian, GONG Jun-hu, MAO Ling, WANG Qiu-ping. Static performance test of new separated beam-track slab structure for high-speed maglev[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 135-147. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.010
Citation: QIN Shi-qiang, LI Yue-xian, GONG Jun-hu, MAO Ling, WANG Qiu-ping. Static performance test of new separated beam-track slab structure for high-speed maglev[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 135-147. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.010

Static performance test of new separated beam-track slab structure for high-speed maglev

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.010
More Information
  • Corresponding author: QIN Shi-qiang (1987-), male, associate professor, PhD, shiqiangqin@whut.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2024-07-22
  • Accepted Date: 2025-05-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-02-28
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-28
  • To address the complex manufacturing process, high construction difficulty, and difficulty in adjusting track surface alignment in the integrated beam-track structure for high-speed maglev, a new separated beam-track slab (abbreviated as separated beam-track slab) was proposed. A full-scale model test of the separated beam-track slab was designed and conducted to characterize its static performance. Displacement and stress of the grid concrete slab, reinforcement, and steel fastener system under various load levels were measured. Bearing capacity, failure characteristics, and stress distribution in critical regions were analyzed. A refined finite element model of the slab was established using ABAQUS. Sensitivity analyses were performed for structural parameters. Effects of reinforcement diameter and shear stud diameter on static performance were investigated. Displacements and stress distributions under different diameters were compared, and reasonable structural parameters were suggested. Analysis results show that the slab is in a linear elastic state under the design load, with a peak displacement of 0.11 mm. The concrete lateral beam shows micro-cracks for the first time under three times the design load. Under five times the design load, the slab remains operable in a cracked state, with a peak displacement of 0.46 mm, which is below the allowable limit of 0.516 mm. The slab meets the design requirement and has a sufficient capacity margin. Under normal operational state, the maglev train load is mainly borne by the concrete slab. Stress mechanisms of components are clear, and local effects are apparent. Increasing reinforcement diameter can enhance global stiffness and reduce component stress, while shear stud diameter has a minimal effect on static performance. These findings provide reference values for the design of the new separated beam-track slab.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    XIONG Jia-yang, DENG Zi-gang. Research progress of high-speed maglev rail transit[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 177-198. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.01.008
    [2]
    XIONG Jia-yang, SHEN Zhi-yun. Rise and future development of Chinese high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 6-29. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.002
    [3]
    DING S, EBERHARD P, SCHNEIDER G, et al. Development of new electromagnetic suspension-based high-speed maglev vehicles in China: historical and recent progress in the field of dynamical simulation[J]. International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics, 2023, 3(2): 97-118. doi: 10.1002/msd2.12069
    [4]
    LI F, SUN Y, XU J, et al. Control methods for levitation system of EMS-type maglev vehicles: an overview[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(7): 2995. doi: 10.3390/en16072995
    [5]
    XIONG Jia-yang, SHEN Zhi-yun, CHI Mao-ru, et al. Review on high-speed maglev train technology[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 1-23. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.001
    [6]
    WU Xiang-ming. Construction of Shanghai maglev demonstration line[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2002, 30(7): 814-818.
    [7]
    YU Hao-wei, KOU Jun-yu, LI Yan. Adaptability and engineering development of 600 km/h high-speed maglev in China[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2020, 37(12): 16-20, 88.
    [8]
    MU Han-lin, ZHANG Yi-min, XU Xu-bao, et al. Study on construction scheme of high-speed maglev railway test line[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2023, 40(8): 44-49.
    [9]
    WU Wei-fan. Comparison analysis of main technical parameters between the high-speed maglev and high-speed wheel rail system[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2023, 67(11): 16-23.
    [10]
    ZHAI Wan-ming, ZHAO Chun-fa, CAI Cheng-biao. On the comparison of dynamic effects on bridges of maglev trains with high-speed wheel/rail trains[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2001, 1(1): 7-12. https://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200101002
    [11]
    NI Ping, XU Chao-chao, HE Jun, et al. Vertical coupling vibration analysis of ultra high-speed maglev vehicle guideway[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 1361-1368.
    [12]
    FU Shan-qiang, LIANG Xin, DING San-san. Dynamic mechanism and vibration response of high-speed maglev vehicle guideway coupling system[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2023, 51(3): 314-320, 384.
    [13]
    HUANG J Y, WU Z W, SHI J, et al. Influence of track irregularities in high-speed maglev transportation systems[J]. Smart Structures and Systems, 2018, 21(5): 571-582.
    [14]
    ZHANG L, HUANG J Y. Dynamic interaction analysis of the high-speed maglev vehicle/guideway system based on a field measurement and model updating method[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 180: 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.031
    [15]
    HAN Yan, BU Xiu-meng, WANG Li-dong, et al. High-speed maglev train-track beam coupled system track irregularity sensitive wavelengths[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(5): 1-11, 19.
    [16]
    CHEN Chen, XU Jun-qi, RONG Li-jun, et al. Nonlinear dynamics characteristics of maglev vehicle under track random irregularities[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(4): 115-124. https://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200101002
    [17]
    SUN Y G, HE Z Y, XU J Q, et al. Dynamic analysis and vibration control for a maglev vehicle-guideway coupling system with experimental verification[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 188: 109954. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109954
    [18]
    JIANG Wei-li, GAO Mang-mang. Study of the effect of track beam parameters on vertical coupled dynamic response of maglev vehicle-viaduct[J]. China Railway Science, 2004, 25(3): 71-75.
    [19]
    DAI J, LIM J G Y, ANG K K. Dynamic response analysis of high-speed maglev-guideway system[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 2023, 11(6): 2647-2658.
    [20]
    WANG Miao, SONG Zhen-sen, TENG Nian-guan. Lateral coupling vibration of high-speed maglev train and flexible guideway-beam[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(2): 301-309.
    [21]
    WEN Quan, WANG Chun-jiang, SUN Xiang-dong, et al. Temperature field and deformation of high-speed maglev prestressed overall guideway beam[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 1168-1176.
    [22]
    ZHAO Chun-fa, ZHAI Wan-ming, CAI Cheng-biao. Maglev vehicle/elevated-beam guideway vertical coupling dynamics[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2001, 23(5): 27-33.
    [23]
    LIANG Xin, MA Wei-hua. Comparative analysis of two kinds of magnet-track relationship of maglev vehicle and guideway interaction[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(4): 845-851.
    [24]
    YANG Guo-jing, ZHENG Xiao-long, LI Yan. Research on the structural selection of high-speed maglev guideway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2021, 38(2): 68-73.
    [25]
    REN Xu-dong, HUANG Jing-yu, ZHANG Zi-yang, et al. Field test and dynamic characteristics research of 600 km/h high-speed maglev vehicle-track coupled vibration[J]. Rolling Stock, 2021, 59(6): 6-11.
    [26]
    GONG J H. Structural form and dynamic characteristics of high-speed maglev separated track beam[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 2022, 10(6): 2283-2291.
    [27]
    MO Ran, TENG Nian-guan. Temperature deformation of composite track girder of high speed maglev[J]. Railway Engineering, 2020, 60(11): 16-20, 32.
    [28]
    GONG Jun-hu, XIE Hai-lin, YAN Ju-ping. Design and innovation of beam-track separated bridge and track in high-speed maglev[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 564-571.
    [29]
    LIU Lin-ya, CUI Wei-tao, QIN Jia-liang, et al. Effects of rail pad viscoelasticity on vibration and structure-borne noise of railway box girder[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(3): 134-145. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.03.007
    [30]
    WANGK K, ZHAO C H, WU B, et al. Fully-scale test and analysis of fully dry-connected prefabricated steel-UHPC composite beam under hogging moments[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 197: 109380.
    [31]
    CHEN Hai, GUO Zi-xiong, LIU Yang, et al. Study on the shear resisting mechanism and strength for an innovative composite shear connector[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(3): 159-168.
    [32]
    SU Qing-tian, DU Xiao, LI Chen-xiang, et al. Tests of basic physical parameters of steel-concrete interface[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(4): 499-506.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (143) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return