Volume 26 Issue 7
Jul.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DOU Hong-qiang, XIA Zhi-hao, GUO Shu-cheng, WANG Hao, GUO Chao-xu, JIAN Wen-bin. Motion characteristics and trajectories of rockfalls under successive rockfall-vegetation collisions on slopes[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(7): 111-121. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.015
Citation: DOU Hong-qiang, XIA Zhi-hao, GUO Shu-cheng, WANG Hao, GUO Chao-xu, JIAN Wen-bin. Motion characteristics and trajectories of rockfalls under successive rockfall-vegetation collisions on slopes[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(7): 111-121. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.015

Motion characteristics and trajectories of rockfalls under successive rockfall-vegetation collisions on slopes

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.015
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China U2005205

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2023J01423

Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention in Hilly Mountains Areas, MNR FJKLGH2023K006

More Information
  • Corresponding author: WANG Hao, professor, PhD, E-mail: h_wang@126.com
  • Received Date: 2025-04-23
  • Accepted Date: 2025-08-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-06-17
  • Publish Date: 2026-07-28
  • To investigate the interception effect of vegetation on rockfalls, reveal interaction patterns between rockfalls and vegetation, and explore rockfall motion characteristics and trajectory distribution under vegetation effects, a laboratory model test of continuous rockfall-vegetation collisions was designed and conducted based on similarity principles of rockfall motion. Based on mathematical and statistical methods, the distribution of rockfall trajectories and the changes in velocity and angle after collisions between rockfalls and vegetation were statistically evaluated and analyzed. Factors with significant effects on rockfall motion characteristics were quantitatively analyzed. The results show that, under non-vegetated conditions, rockfall trajectories are symmetrically distributed along the slope centerline. Under vegetated conditions, rockfall trajectories are characterized by an approximately normal distribution. After collisions with vegetation, rockfall velocity and energy are attenuated to varying degrees. The mean value of the velocity restitution coefficient is 0.497. The original motion direction is basically maintained by about 74.44% of rockfalls. Obvious rebound is observed in about 25.56% of rockfalls. The dispersion degree of rockfall landing points under non-vegetated conditions is significantly lower than that under vegetated conditions. Rockfall velocity at the slope-exit reference line is negatively correlated with the number of vegetation rows and the slope-surface friction coefficient. It is positively correlated with the slope gradient. Under the test conditions, when the number of vegetation rows is greater than 14, rockfall motion can be effectively blocked by vegetation. When the slope-surface friction coefficient is 0.087, the critical slope gradient for effective rockfall blocking is 5°. When the slope gradient is 20°, the critical slope-surface friction coefficient for effective rockfall blocking is 0.35 - 0.40. Rockfall motion characteristics and trajectories under continuous collisions with vegetation can be effectively reflected by the laboratory model test designed for continuous rockfall-vegetation collisions.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    YE P, YU B, CHEN W H, et al. Fracture characterization based on data fusion technology and its application in rockfall hazard assessment[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2024, 83: 208. doi: 10.1007/s12665-024-11517-1
    [2]
    GRABER A, SANTI P. Power law models for rockfall fre-quency-magnitude distributions: Review and identification of factors that influence the scaling exponent[J]. Geomorpho-logy, 2022, 418: 108463.
    [3]
    LUO Gang, CHENG Qian-gong, SHEN Wei-gang, et al. Research status and development trend of the high-altitude extremely-energetic rockfalls[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(3): 913-934.
    [4]
    XU Shi-qiang, SHE Xue-sen, WANG Si-chang. Free rolling model of stone on expressway slope[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(2): 14-17. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.02.003
    [5]
    WANG Dong-po, HE Qi-wei, LIU Yan-hui, et al. Research on the energy dissipation mechanism of rockfall impacts on the improved rockfall attenuator barrier[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021 42(12): 3356-3365, 3450.
    [6]
    MA Xian-dong, ZHOU Jian, ZHANG Lu-qing, et al. Dyna-mic response laws of flexible rockfall barriers based on move-ment characteristics of rockfall[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(12): 4559-4573.
    [7]
    LIU Cheng-qing, GUO Hao-yu. Sensitivity analysis of flexible shield structure under rockfall impact[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(1): 67-72.
    [8]
    YANG Lu, LI Shi-min, WU Zhi-min, et al. Dynamic analy-sis of rock-fall impact on shed tunnel structure[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(1): 25-30. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.01.005
    [9]
    WANG Lin-feng, ZHU Hong-zhou, SONG Nan-nan, et al. Impact signal dynamic characteristics of energy dissipation shed tunnel[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engi-neering, 2019, 19(5): 33-41. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.05.004
    [10]
    ZHANG Shu-ning. Research on the prevention and control measures of rolling stone disaster at the exit slope of expressway tunnel based on 3-D DDA[J]. Highway, 2023, 68(12): 275-280.
    [11]
    AKIN M, DINÇER I, OK A Ö, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of a rockfall ditch through 3-D probabilistic rockfall simulations and automated image processing[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 283: 106001. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106001
    [12]
    HUANG Run-qiu, LIU Wei-hua, GONG Man-fu, et al. Study of trees resistance effect test on rolling rock blocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(S1): 2895-2901.
    [13]
    MOOS C, FEHLMANN M, TRAPPMANN D, et al. Integ-rating the mitigating effect of forests into quantitative rockfall risk analysis - Two case studies in Switzerland[J]. Inter-national Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 32: 55-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.036
    [14]
    MONNET J M, BOURRIER F, DUPIRE S, et al. Suitabi-lity of airborne laser scanning for the assessment of forest protection effect against rockfall[J]. Landslides, 2017, 14(1): 299-310. doi: 10.1007/s10346-016-0687-5
    [15]
    DUPIRE S, BOURRIER F, MONNET J M, et al. Novel quantitative indicators to characterize the protective effect of mountain forests against rockfall[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 67: 98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.023
    [16]
    LU G, RINGENBACH A, CAVIEZEL A, et al. Mitigation effects of trees on rockfall hazards: Does rock shape matter?[J]. Landslides, 2021, 18(1): 59-77. doi: 10.1007/s10346-020-01418-2
    [17]
    MOOS C, BEBI P, SCHWARZ M, et al. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in mountains[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 177: 497-513. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.011
    [18]
    CAVIEZEL A, RINGENBACH A, DEMMEL S E, et al. The relevance of rock shape over mass : Implications for rockfall hazard assessments[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 5546. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25794-y
    [19]
    WU Y, WANG Z Q, LI X P, et al. Blocking-baffle mecha-nism of vegetation to rock avalanche on the forested slope of the east Sichuan-Tibet Mountains[J]. Landslides, 2024, 21(4): 845-860. doi: 10.1007/s10346-023-02206-4
    [20]
    DUPIRE S, BOURRIER F, MONNET J M, et al. The pro-tective effect of forests against rockfalls across the French Alps: Influence of forest diversity[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 382: 269-279. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.020
    [21]
    LANFRANCONI C, SALA G, FRATTINI P, et al. Assess-ing the rockfall protection efficiency of forests at the regional scale[J]. Landslides, 2020, 17(12): 2703-2721. doi: 10.1007/s10346-020-01458-8
    [22]
    GÓMEZ-GARCÍA P, MADRIGAL-GONZÁLEZ J, ARRIAGA F, et al. Quantifying the resistance of mixed-forests against natural hazards in the Pyrenees. [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 946: 174359. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174359
    [23]
    LIU Wan-li, YAN E-chuan, WEI Peng-fei, et al. Experi-mental study on rockfall and sensitivity analysis of influencing factors[J]. Mountain Research, 2021, 39(1): 47-58.
    [24]
    ZHONG Yan-li, XIANG Xi-qiong. Rolling stone simulation based on Rockyfor3D[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2019, 25(5): 15-18.
    [25]
    GAO Tian-yan, ZHANG Kai-sen, YE Jia-xin, et al. Effect of interface wettability and roughness on sliding friction beha-vior of PDMS[J]. Tribology, 2023, 43(7): 750-757.
    [26]
    XU Yan, WANG Li-guo, ZHANG Guang-an, et al. Effect of rubber surface roughness on the tribological properties of DLC film[J]. Surface Technology, 2023, 52(2): 225-232.
    [27]
    LI Peng, HU Cheng-liang, MENG Li-fen, et al. Influence of surface roughness on friction factor in cold forging[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2015, 22(5): 24-28.
    [28]
    ZHANG Guang-cheng, XIANG Xin, TANG Hui-ming. Field test and numerical calculation of restitution coefficient of rockfall collision[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(6): 1266-1273.
    [29]
    YAN Chang-gen, LIANG Zhe-rui, JIA Zhuo-long, et al. Review on surface protection technologies of loess slope[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(4): 1-22. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.04.001
    [30]
    ZHENG Lu, CHEN Yuan-rui, WU Yi-han, et al. Collision and fragmentation patterns of rockfalls under the influence of joints[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 729-749.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (104) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return