Volume 26 Issue 8
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LING Jian-ming, WANG Zeng-yi, LIU Shi-fu, CEN Ye-bo. Dynamic load predictive model for aircraft taxiing excitation and landing impact[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 1-19. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.053
Citation: LING Jian-ming, WANG Zeng-yi, LIU Shi-fu, CEN Ye-bo. Dynamic load predictive model for aircraft taxiing excitation and landing impact[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 1-19. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.053

Dynamic load predictive model for aircraft taxiing excitation and landing impact

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.053
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China U2333208

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Shi-fu, associate professor, PhD, E-mail: sfliu@tongji.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-04-23
  • Accepted Date: 2025-09-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-07-24
  • Publish Date: 2026-08-28
  • To accurately predict the dynamic load effect of the aircraft on the airport runway, full-scale virtual prototype models of seven representative civil aircraft types were developed using ADAMS/Aircraft. Multi-state ground movement simulations of the aircraft were conducted, including the taxiing excitation under different taxiing speeds and runway roughness conditions during the takeoff stage, and the landing impact under different sink rates and pitch angles during the landing stage. Dynamic load coefficients under different conditions were calculated, and the influence rules of multiple factors were revealed. A predictive model for the dynamic load coefficient was established through mechanical derivation and regression analysis. The sum of the mean value and three times the standard deviation of the dynamic load coefficient of taxiing excitation was taken as the upper limit value, and the most unfavorable conditions of taxiing excitation and landing impact were analyzed. Research results indicate that the dynamic load coefficient of aircraft taxiing excitation follows a normal distribution. The mean value decreases with the increase of taxiing speed, and the standard deviation increases with the increase of runway roughness and taxiing speed. The fitting accuracies of the predictive models for the mean value and standard deviation of the dynamic load coefficient are higher than 0.997 and 0.948, respectively. Under the most unfavorable condition, the sensitive speed and the maximum dynamic load coefficient of the aircraft increase with the aggravation of the deterioration degree of runway roughness. Under the combined action of lift and runway unevenness, the maximum dynamic load during aircraft taxiing is greater than the static load. The peak value of the dynamic load coefficient of aircraft landing impact significantly increases with the increase of sink rate and slightly decreases with the increase of pitch angle. The fitting accuracy of the predictive model for the peak value of the dynamic load coefficient of landing impact is higher than 0.971. Because the maximum landing weight of the aircraft is less than the maximum takeoff weight, the maximum impact dynamic load during normal landing is less than the maximum dynamic load during takeoff taxiing. However, when the aircraft approaches the limit sink rate, the maximum impact dynamic load is higher than the maximum dynamic load of taxiing. Thus, it is necessary to consider them simultaneously when analyzing the most unfavorable condition. The established predictive model for aircraft dynamic loads can provide more reasonable load parameters for runway design and analysis.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CAI Liang-cai, WANG Hai-fu, ZHANG Luo-li, et al. Prediction model of remaining life for airport pavement based on cumulative damage[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(4): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2014.04.001
    [2]
    LOPRENCIPE G, ZOCCALI P. Comparison of methods for evaluating airport pavement roughness[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019, 20(7): 782-791. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1345554
    [3]
    HOU T X, LIU S F, LING J M, et al. Vibration response law of aircraft taxiing under random roughness excitation[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(13): 7386. doi: 10.3390/app13137386
    [4]
    MENG Xian-feng, LUO Meng, JIANG Hui, et al. Numerical simulation of aircraft landing and dynamic load characteristics of airport pavement[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(1): 308-318.
    [5]
    LUO Meng. Study on numerical simulation of aircraft landing impact and dynamic response characteristics of runway[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2023: 74.
    [6]
    YOU Qing-long, LING Jian-ming, YUAN Jie, et al. Finite element model of flexible airport pavement structure for large aircraft[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(2): 18-23.
    [7]
    WANG Xing-tao, CHEN Jian-feng, YE Guan-bao, et al. Mechanical responses of Boeing 747 running on runways[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(2): 1-9.
    [8]
    DONG Z J, MA X Y, SHAO X Z. Airport pavement responses obtained from wireless sensing network upon digital signal processing[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 19(5): 381-390. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1402601
    [9]
    HANKE C R. The simulation of a large jet transport aircraft, Volume 1 - Mathematical model[R]. Washington DC: NASA, 1971: 1.
    [10]
    BARNES A G, YAGER T J. Simulation of aircraft behaviour on and close to the ground[R]. Brussels: AGARD, NATO, 1985: 53.
    [11]
    LEI Ji-chao, SHI Xin-gang, CAI Liang-cai, et al. A quarter landing gear taxiing model based on filtered white noise method[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 21(3): 12-18.
    [12]
    ZHU Li-guo, CHEN Jun-jun, YUAN Jie, et al. Taxiing load analysis of aircrafts based on virtual prototype[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(12): 1873-1879, 1888.
    [13]
    LIU S F, TIAN Y, LIU L, et al. Improvement of Boeing bump method considering aircraft vibration superposition effect[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(5): 2147. doi: 10.3390/app11052147
    [14]
    QIAN Jin-song, PAN Xiang-wei, CEN Ye-bo, et al. Aircraft taxiing dynamic load induced by runway roughness[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(20): 176-184, 269.
    [15]
    QIAN Jin-song, CEN Ye-bo, LIU Dong-liang, et al. Measurement method of all-wave airport runway roughness[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 84-93. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.05.007
    [16]
    XU Jin-yu, ZHAO Guo-fan. Study of dynamic load coefficient of airfield's cement concrete pavement[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 1997, 37(3): 367-370.
    [17]
    LIANG Lei, GU Qiang-kang, LIU Guo-dong, et al. Using ADAMS to assess dynamic load of pavement during aircraft landing[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 47(3): 502-508.
    [18]
    CUI Yun-hua, CEN Guo-ping, LIANG Lei. Study on the characteristics dynamic load of new aircraft landing[J]. Computer Simulation, 2020, 37(4): 15-21.
    [19]
    MENG Xian-feng, ZHAO Xing-yan, JIANG Hui, et al. Dynamic load characteristics of an airport runway bridge during aircraft landing based on co-simulation[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(2): 105-113.
    [20]
    CHEN Jun-jun. Study of airport pavement roughness evaluation based on virtual prototype[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2017: 25.
    [21]
    ZHANG Zhe-kai. Study on the applicability of runway smoothness evaluation criteria - Considering the superposition effect of aircraft taxi dynamic response[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2020: 33.
    [22]
    LING Jian-ming, LIU Shi-fu, YUAN Jie, et al. Applicability of IRI based evaluation of airport pavement roughness[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(1): 20-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.01.003
    [23]
    VAN GELDER P A, STET M J A. Evaluation methods for longitudinal evenness of runway pavements: NLR-TP-2009-190[R]. Amsterdam: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, 2009: 7.
    [24]
    DODDS C J, ROBSON J D. The description of road surface roughness[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1973, 31(2): 175-183. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80373-6
    [25]
    PAWAR P R, MATHEW A T, SARAF M R. IRI (international roughness index): An indicator of vehicle response[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5(5): 11738-11750. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.143
    [26]
    ZHU Li-guo. Simulation and expression of dynamic behavior of rigid pavement based on virtual prototype of large aircrafts[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2017: 51.
    [27]
    CEN Ye-bo. Distribution characteristics of additional stress on subgrade under randomly excited aircraft loads[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2020: 47.
    [28]
    HUDSPETH S, STAPLETON D, BALLEW J, et al. DOT/FAA/TC-18/8: Boeing 737-800 final surface roughness study data collection[R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2017: 23.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (289) PDF downloads(60) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return