| Citation: | ZHANG Xin, MAO Jing. Multilayer network-based resilience evaluation for China-Europe container sea-rail intermodal transport systems[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(9): 233-245. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.072 |
A resilience evaluation model from a multilayer network perspective was proposed to quantitatively analyze the resilience evolution law of the sea-rail intermodal transport system under different disturbance scenarios and recovery strategies. Based on real-world data of trains and shipping routes, a China-Europe sea-rail intermodal container transport network was constructed. Connectivity and transport efficiency were employed as evaluation indicators of system resilience, and a resilience simulation model considering different node recovery timings and recovery priorities was developed to simulate the resilience evolution law of the China-Europe sea-rail intermodal network. Heterogeneous influences of different disturbance scenarios on system resilience were revealed. Without recovery strategies, the network exhibits weak interference resistance under targeted attacks, and failures of a few critical hub nodes cause substantial decline in overall efficiency, with the network's resilience indicators lower than those of dedicated rail or sea networks. Under random failures, the network demonstrates strong interference resistance, with resilience indicators exceeding 0.8. Implementing recovery strategies significantly enhances the disturbance resistance of the network. However, a critical threshold exists for recovery timing. When the recovery timing of the failed node exceeds this threshold, system recovery costs increase exponentially and overall recovery time extends significantly. Distinct recovery strategies yield differential effects. Under targeted attacks, prioritizing node recovery based on degree centrality provides the greatest system resilience improvement, while prioritizing node recovery based on betweenness centrality achieves the lowest recovery cost intensity. The findings reveal the resilience evolution law of the China-Europe sea-rail intermodal transport network and provide a theoretical basis for enhancing the resilience of intermodal transport systems under emergencies and disasters.
| [1] |
YANG Zhong-zhen, ZHANG Er-zhuo, DU Yi-ying, et al. Review of multimodal transport logistics engineering based on bibliometrics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engi-neering, 2026, 26(2): 1-23. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.071
|
| [2] |
DU Qiang, LIU Yu-xi, LIANG Chun-ying, et al. Optimiza-tion of site selection for China railway express assembly center from a low-carbon perspective[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026-03-12.
|
| [3] |
LIU X M, LI D Q, MA M Q, et al. Network resilience[J]. Physics Reports, 2022, 971: 1-108.
|
| [4] |
GONÇALVES L A P J, RIBEIRO P J G. Resilience of urban transportation systems. Concept, characteristics, and methods[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 85: 102727. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102727
|
| [5] |
WANG Lie-hui, YE Fei, ZHENG Yuan-bo. The assessment of Sino-US container shipping network evolution and vulne-rability[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(5): 136-144.
|
| [6] |
GUAN Xiao-guang, LI Zhen-fu, DING Chao-jun, et al. Robustness of global network of container terminals[J]. Navigation of China, 2021, 44(2): 84-89.
|
| [7] |
ZHANG Jie-shu, WU Yuan-li, LI Zhi-ping. Impact of the red sea crisis on the resilience of the container shipping net-work[J]. Navigation of China, 2026, 49(3): 168-175.
|
| [8] |
WAN C P, TAO J L, YANG Z L, et al. Evaluating recovery strategies for the disruptions in liner shipping networks: A resilience approach[J]. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2022, 33(2): 389-409. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-05-2021-0263
|
| [9] |
ZHOU X Y, SUN J L, FU H R, et al. Resilience analysis of the integrated China-Europe freight transportation network under heterogeneous demands[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2024, 186: 104130. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104130
|
| [10] |
LI H W, QI L, WANG M D, et al. Operational resilience modeling of cross-border freight railway systems: A study of strategies to improve proactive and reactive capabilities[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2025, 257: 110856. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.110856
|
| [11] |
ZHANG Yu-zhao, KANG Huan-huan, DENG Yu-lu. Vulne-rability analysis of cascading failure of Sino-Europe Sea-rail transport network from perspective of multi-layer network[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2025, 61(5): 298-308.
|
| [12] |
WANG Xing-long, LIU Yang. Resilience measurement and analysis of aviation multi-layer network[J]. Complex Sys-tems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(2): 31-38.
|
| [13] |
DUAN Xiao-hong. Coupling analysis of subway system vulnerability factors based on multi-layer complex network[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2023, 30(5): 93-102, 120.
|
| [14] |
HE Z D, NAVNEET K, VAN DAM W, et al. Robustness assessment of multimodal freight transport networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 207: 107315.
|
| [15] |
MAJDANDZIC A, BRAUNSTEIN L A, CURME C, et al. Multiple tipping points and optimal repairing in interacting networks[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 10850. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10850
|
| [16] |
TANG Liang, JIAO Peng, LI Ji-kang, et al. Cascading fai-lure mechanism and robustness of complex networks with recovery strategy[J]. Control and Decision, 2018, 33(10): 1841-1850.
|
| [17] |
JIN L J, CHEN J, CHEN Z L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on China's international liner shipping network based on AIS data[J]. Transport Policy, 2022, 121: 90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.006
|
| [18] |
LI Cong-dong, YUAN Zhi-feng, DENG Yuan, et al. Dyna-mic strategy of adding link for cascading failure in complex work[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2016, 33(8): 2324-2327, 2338.
|
| [19] |
ZHANG Xin, LI Shuang-fei, SUN Dai-yuan. Vulnerability analysis of China-Europe container sea-rail intermodal trans-port network[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safe-ty, 2023, 41(3): 48-58.
|
| [20] |
BÖTTCHER L, LUKOVIC M, NAGLER J, et al. Failure and recovery in dynamical networks[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 41729. doi: 10.1038/srep41729
|
| [21] |
WANG S P, WANG H Y, MA X S, et al. Resilience analy-sis and recovery strategy for interdependent automated con-tainer port networks under cascading failures[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2026, 265: 111495.
|