Volume 26 Issue 3
Mar.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHANG Xin, TANG Yao, TANG Xin-min, GAO Jian-shu, YAO Zhi-hong. Throughput envelopment analysis of urban low-altitude vertiports based on multi-commodity flow model[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 106-117. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.087
Citation: CHANG Xin, TANG Yao, TANG Xin-min, GAO Jian-shu, YAO Zhi-hong. Throughput envelopment analysis of urban low-altitude vertiports based on multi-commodity flow model[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 106-117. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.087

Throughput envelopment analysis of urban low-altitude vertiports based on multi-commodity flow model

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.087
Funds:

Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Program 25JCLQJC00080

More Information
  • Corresponding author: TANG Xin-min, professor, PhD, E-mail: xmtang@cauc.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-07-14
  • Accepted Date: 2025-11-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-10-15
  • Publish Date: 2026-03-28
  • To explore the takeoff and landing mode selection and influencing factors for throughput of urban low-altitude vertiports, a vertiport multi-commodity flow model was constructed. The impact of the number of touchdown and lift-off facilities (TLOF) and the number of boarding gates on the throughput of vertiports was systematically analyzed. The quantitative calculation of facility utilization rate and the generation of surface throughput envelope map were performed. On this basis, the optimal quantity configuration of support facilities was revealed. The performance differences under different takeoff and landing modes were compared to provide a scientific basis for optimizing the facility configuration of vertiports. The utilization efficiency of surface space was improved and the intensive design and operation of vertiports were achieved. The research results show that the reasonable range of the number of boarding gates in a single TLOF vertiport is 4 - 5. At this time, the utilization of TLOF is 92% and 100%, respectively. The utilization of boarding gates is 55% and 57%, respectively. The waiting rate of boarding gates is 7% and 12%, respectively. Compared with 4 boarding gates, 5 boarding gates provide higher utilization of facilities, but lead to significant departure queues. The independent takeoff and landing mode of multiple TLOF vertiports has the most significant improvement on the surface throughput, which is 57% and 135% higher than that of the single takeoff and landing mode among 2 - 3 TLOF vertiports considered. The influence of TLOF number on throughput is limited under the single takeoff and landing mode. The parallel takeoff and landing mode demonstrates the same throughput growth and maximum unbalanced approach growth as the independent takeoff and landing mode. However, the envelope area of the former is smaller than that of the latter. The research results can provide theoretical and methodological support for calculating the throughput of urban air traffic vertiports, designing infrastructure schemes, and making operational control decisions, thus promoting the standardized development of low-altitude infrastructure construction.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    XU Zhi-gang, SHEN Dan-dan, GAO Ying, et al. Review of multimodal transport research based on bibliometrics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 37-60. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.003
    [2]
    CHEN L T, WANDELT S, DAI W B, et al. Scalable vertiport hub location selection for air taxi operations in a metropolitan region[J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2022, 34(2): 834-856. doi: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1109
    [3]
    SUN X Q, WANG S, ZHANG X J, et al. LAERACE: Taking the policy fast-track towards low-altitude economy[J]. Journal of the Air Transport Research Society, 2025, 4: 100058. doi: 10.1016/j.jatrs.2025.100058
    [4]
    WANG Jun-tong, BAO Dan-wen, ZHOU Jia-yi, et al. Low-altitude airspace planning: A review and prospect[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(11): 82-107.
    [5]
    LIAO Xiao-han, QU Wen-qiu, XU Chen-chen, et al. A review of urban air mobility and its new infrastructure low-altitude public routes[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(24): 6-34.
    [6]
    LAARMANN L, THOMA A, MISCH P, et al. Automotive safety approach for future eVTOL vehicles[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2023, 14(2): 369-379. doi: 10.1007/s13272-023-00655-0
    [7]
    ZELINSKI S. Operational analysis of vertiport surface topology[C]//IEEE. 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). New York: IEEE, 2020: 1-10.
    [8]
    SU P Y, MAHESHWARI C, TUCK V M, et al. Incentive-compatible vertiport reservation in advanced air mobility: An auction-based approach[C]//IEEE. 2024 IEEE 63rd Confe-rence on Decision and Control (CDC). New York: IEEE, 2024: 7720-7727.
    [9]
    RIMJHA M, TRANI A. Urban air mobility: Factors affecting vertiport capacity[C]//IEEE. 2021 Integrated Communi-cations Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS). New York: IEEE, 2021: 1-14.
    [10]
    ESCRIBANO MACIAS J, KHALIFE C, SLIM J, et al. An integrated vertiport placement model considering vehicle sizing and queuing: A case study in London[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2023, 113(C): 102486.
    [11]
    ZHANG Hong-hai, YI Jia, LI Shan, et al. Review on research of low-altitude airspace capacity evaluation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(6): 78-93. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.06.003
    [12]
    ZHANG Hong-hai, LI Jing-yu, FEI Yu-han, et al. Design method for vertical take off and landing procedures for logistics UAVs in urban areas[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2022, 13(5): 1-10.
    [13]
    PREIS L, HORNUNG M. Vertiport operations modeling, agent-based simulation and parameter value specification[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11(7): 1071. doi: 10.3390/electronics11071071
    [14]
    PREIS L. Estimating vertiport passenger throughput capacity for prominent eVTOL designs[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2023, 14(2): 353-368. doi: 10.1007/s13272-023-00650-5
    [15]
    WEI Zhi-qiang, XIAO Xin-long. Vertiport operational task planning model and capacity estimation method[J/OL]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astro-nautics, 2024, https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0249.
    [16]
    VASCIK P D, HANSMAN R J. Development of vertiport capacity envelopes and analysis of their sensitivity to topological and operational factors[C]//AIAA. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2019: AIAA2019-0526.
    [17]
    CHEN Zheng-lei, CHONG Xiao-lei, LIU Chao-jia, et al. Runway capacity evaluation based on multi-agent modeling and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Trans-portation Engineering, 2023, 23(6): 244-256. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.06.016
    [18]
    BERTSIMAS D, PATTERSON S S. The traffic flow manage-ment rerouting problem in air traffic control: A dynamic network flow approach[J]. Transportation Science, 2000, 34(3): 239-255. doi: 10.1287/trsc.34.3.239.12300
    [19]
    ZHANG H H, FEI Y H, LI J Y, et al. Method of vertiport capacity assessment based on queuing theory of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(1): 709.
    [20]
    DANG Qing-qing, LI Huan, WANG Guang-qiu, et al. A review on development of vertiport for urban air mobility[J/OL]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2025.0301.
    [21]
    BAO Dan-wen, SHANG Jing-xuan, WEI Da, et al. Joint scheduling model for dual-target takeoff and landing of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) under funnel-shaped airspace structure[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2025, 23(4): 36-49.
    [22]
    ZHANG Z G, LU X H, ZHANG Y C, et al. Research on collision risk between light unmanned arial vehicles and aircraft windshield[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 40(5): 534-546.
    [23]
    ZHANG Hong-hai, LI Bo-wen, LIU Hao, et al. Demar-cation method of safety separation for multi-rotor UAV in free airspace[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(10): 3149-3156.
    [24]
    WANG Xing-long, WANG You-jie. Safety interval evalua-tion for multi-aircraft eVTOL in urban low altitude[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 275-290.
    [25]
    LI Cheng-long, QU Wen-qiu, LI Yan-dong, et al. Overview of traffic management of urban air mobility (UAM) with eVTOL aircraft[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(4): 35-54. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.04.003

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (93) PDF downloads(25) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return