Volume 26 Issue 3
Mar.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Hai-yan, ZHANG Jian, OUYANG Jie, YUAN Xun-ming. MPC-based control strategy for conflict resolution between vehicles and aircraft on airport[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 159-170. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.090
Citation: ZHANG Hai-yan, ZHANG Jian, OUYANG Jie, YUAN Xun-ming. MPC-based control strategy for conflict resolution between vehicles and aircraft on airport[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 159-170. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.090

MPC-based control strategy for conflict resolution between vehicles and aircraft on airport

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.090
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China U2333204

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFB1600504

More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHANG Jian, professor, PhD, E-mail: jianzhang@seu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-08-30
  • Accepted Date: 2025-11-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-11-06
  • Publish Date: 2026-03-28
  • To address the frequent conflicts between airport ground service vehicles and aircraft at intersections of taxiways and roadways, a model predictive control (MPC)-based conflict resolution method was proposed for airport autonomous vehicles and aircraft. The typical operation scenarios of ground vehicle-aircraft intersections on the airport were analyzed. The longitudinal dynamic constraints of vehicles and the safety boundary requirements of aircraft in conflict situations were clarified. On this basis, the period when the aircraft and its safety clearance passed through the conflict area was defined as a dynamic red light time window constraint. With the objectives of minimizing vehicle energy consumption and maximizing traffic efficiency, an MPC model for vehicle was established. A sequential quadratic programming method was employed to solve the nonlinear constrained optimization problem in a rolling manner, thereby generating optimal speed and acceleration control sequences for vehicles in real time. Simulation experiments were conducted using real-world scenario data from Tianjin Binhai International Airport. Multiple sets of random operating conditions were also designed for comparative analysis. Research results show that, with the proposed MPC strategy, the vehicle can avoid potential conflicts with aircraft. Compared with conventional human driving and idealized human driving, the average energy consumption is reduced by 14.81% and 14.27%, respectively, and the average travel time is shortened by 6.48% and 5.70%. The trajectory smoothness and control performance are both significantly superior. These findings indicate that the proposed conflict resolution control strategy not only enhances the safety and efficiency of airport ground vehicle operations but also provides practical theoretical support and technical reference for the future application and popularization of autonomous vehicles on airports.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Xinhua News Agency. 2024: Two major transport production indicators of China's civil airports reached record highs [EB/OL]. The State Council of the People's Republic of China, (2025-04-22). https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202504/content_7020309.htm.
    [2]
    YI Kui, ZHANG Yu-le, ZHUANG Xia, et al. Review of the analysis of current situation and research on development trends of civil aviation vehicle dispatch[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(36): 15321-15333.
    [3]
    AN Xin, LIU Yi. The application prospect of vehicle-road collaborative autonomous driving technology in civil aviation airport[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(4): 57-61, 67.
    [4]
    SHVETSOV A V. Analysis of accidents resulting from the interaction of air and ground vehicles at airports[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2021, 59: 21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.093
    [5]
    GUO R J, WU J W, JI F, et al. Analysis of traffic safety in airport aircraft activity areas based on Bayesian networks and fault trees[J]. Digital Transportation and Safety, 2024, 3(1): 8-18. doi: 10.48130/dts-0024-0002
    [6]
    JI Yu-chu, YAN Zong-ji. Operation control strategy of specialized vehicles at apron lane intersection[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2025, 39(3): 226-234.
    [7]
    DENG W, ZHANG L R, ZHOU X B, et al. Multi-strategy particle swarm and ant colony hybrid optimization for airport taxiway planning problem[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 612: 576-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.08.115
    [8]
    LIANG M, DELAHAYE D, MARECHAL P. Conflict-free arrival and departure trajectory planning for parallel runway with advanced point-merge system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95: 207-227. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.006
    [9]
    LI Hui-ying, ZHANG Ming, LIU Si-han, et al. Aircraft taxiing path planning based on differences in conflict types[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2022, 46 (3): 400-405.
    [10]
    XU Ao-yang, ZHAO Hao-ran, MA Xue, et al. Research on aircraft conflict resolution methods based on minimum fuel consumption[J]. Technology Innovation and Application, 2023, 13(10): 17-20.
    [11]
    BAO Dan-wen, YAO Xin-yu, LIU Jian-rong, et al. Operation planning method for airport support vehicle collision avoidance based on dynamic priority[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2024, 41(4): 99-107.
    [12]
    ZHAO N N, LI N, SUN Y, et al. Research on aircraft surface taxi path planning and conflict detection and resolution[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021: 9951206.
    [13]
    TANG Tie-qiao, CAO Feng, WANG Peng, et al. Theoretical advances and application challenges of sustainable aircraft taxiing technology[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(1): 8-30.
    [14]
    HE Shu, LU Chao-yang, WANG Yan-yan, et al. Lateral runway airport based on improved genetic algorithm glide path optimization[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21 (20): 8695-8701.
    [15]
    KANG Rui, YANG Kai. Assessment on cross conflict of vehicle and aircraft considering driving modes[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2023, 19(2): 218-223.
    [16]
    CHANG Xin, MA Guang-hui, GAO Jian-shu, et al. Collision warning method for unmanned aerial vehicles in airports based on collision probability[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(11): 4776-4785.
    [17]
    LUO Q, LIU H M, LIU C, et al. Multi-strategy cooperative scheduling for airport specialized vehicles based on digital twins[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 15533. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66350-0
    [18]
    LIU Y H, WU J J, TANG J, et al. Scheduling optimisation of multi-type special vehicles in an airport[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2022, 10(1): 954-970. doi: 10.1080/21680566.2021.1983484
    [19]
    ZHANG J C, CHONG X L, WEI Y Z, et al. Optimization of apron support vehicle operation scheduling based on multi-layer coding genetic algorithm[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(10): 5279. doi: 10.3390/app12105279
    [20]
    BAO D W, ZHOU J Y, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Mixed fleet scheduling method for airport ground service vehicles under the trend of electrification[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2023, 108: 102379. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102379
    [21]
    FU W G, LI J W, LIAO Z, et al. A bi-objective optimization approach for scheduling electric ground-handling vehicles in an airport[J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2025, 11(4): 209.
    [22]
    ZHOU J N, WU Y X, CAO Z G, et al. Learning large neighborhood search for vehicle routing in airport ground handling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023, 35(9): 9769-9782. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2023.3249799
    [23]
    ZHANG Feng, TANG Xiao-peng, LIU Bing-fei. An optimization method for scheduling autonomous potable water service vehicles at airfields[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(2): 82-90.
    [24]
    XING Zhi-wei, LI Si, LUO Qian. Formation control model of airport pavement deicing vehicles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(4): 182-190. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.04.017
    [25]
    HULT R, ZANON M, GROS S, et al. Optimal coordination of automated vehicles at intersections: Theory and experiments[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2019, 27(6): 2510-2525. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2871397
    [26]
    SOMAN S, ZANON M, BEMPORAD A. Learning-based stochastic model predictive control for autonomous driving at uncontrolled intersections[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 26(2): 1538-1546. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3510041
    [27]
    BAUTISTA-MONTESANO R, GALLUZZI R, RUAN K R, et al. Autonomous navigation at unsignalized intersections: a coupled reinforcement learning and model predictive control approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 139: 103662. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2022.103662
    [28]
    XU Man-chen, YU Di, ZHAO Li, et al. Autonomous driving decision-making at signal-free intersections based on MAPPO[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Information Science Edition), 2024, 42(5): 790-798.
    [29]
    LIBERATI F, DONSANTE M, TORTORELLI A. Single intersection MPC traffic signal control in presence of automated vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2025, 33(4): 1432-1446. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2024.3449188
    [30]
    LI Bing-bing, ZHUANG Wei-chao, LIU Hao-ji, et al. Research on eco-driving control strategy of connected electric vehicle based on learning-MPC[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(10): 453-462.
    [31]
    ZHAO Shu-en, LENG Yao, SHAO Yi-ming. Explicit model predictive control of multi-objective adaptive cruise of vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(3): 206-216. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.03.019
    [32]
    BAO Dan-wen, CHEN Zhuo, YAO Xin-yu, et al. Pro-active real-time scheduling approach of apron vehicles based on mixed strategy[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 251-265. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.018
    [33]
    BI Jun, HUI Jing, CHENG Pei-xuan, et al. Optimization method of personnel allocation plan for apron cargo support[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 254-266. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.018

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (96) PDF downloads(20) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return