Volume 26 Issue 2
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Yang, CHEN Jun-ting, YAO En-jian, LIU Dong-mei. Resilience evaluation method of external transportation network of integrated transit hub cluster under time-varying demand[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(2): 155-169. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.148
Citation: YANG Yang, CHEN Jun-ting, YAO En-jian, LIU Dong-mei. Resilience evaluation method of external transportation network of integrated transit hub cluster under time-varying demand[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(2): 155-169. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.148

Resilience evaluation method of external transportation network of integrated transit hub cluster under time-varying demand

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.148
Funds:

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2024JBZY009

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52432011

More Information
  • Corresponding author: YAO En-jian, professor, PhD, E-mail: enjyao@bjtu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-07-31
  • Accepted Date: 2026-01-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-01-06
  • Publish Date: 2026-02-28
  • To scientifically evaluate the resilience of the external transportation network of the integrated hub cluster, a travel resilience measurement indicator was proposed, covering three dimensions: robustness, redundancy and resilience. The multimodal traffic network passenger flow assignment method was employed to characterize the influence results of different node attack and recovery strategies. The travel resilience measurement method was constructed. Taking the integrated transit hub cluster in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration as an example, an example verification was carried out. Research results show that, the external comprehensive transportation network has been basically formed between the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration and the core cities of typical urban agglomerations such as Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chengdu. The overall anti-interference and recovery capabilities are strong. The unit travel resilience is generally higher than 0.95 under different disturbance scenarios. Taking a single-node recovery time of 1 h in October 7th (National Day) as an example, the network recovery effect of the node strength recovery strategy is the best, with the network resilience of 0.990 2 and only 140 2 people affected, which is significantly superior to other strategies. In the morning peak period, due to the large network load and low redundancy of shifts, the resilience decreases to 0.976 1, lower than that in the afternoon and evening peaks. In most cases, the network resilience reduces with the longer single-node recovery time, while the number of affected people also increases. For different dates, resilience is affected by both the dispersion of passenger flow distribution and network redundancy. According to the TOPSIS method, the highest resilience is 0.983 2 on National Day, while the lowest resilience is 0.974 6 at weekends. The proposed resilience evaluation method can provide a scientific basis for analyzing the potential traffic capacity of multimodal traffic networks such as inter-hub railways, civil aviation and urban transport, and rationally allocating transportation emergency response resources.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    YAO En-jian, CHEN Jun, YANG Yang, et al. Progress and prospects of coordinated development of integrated passenger transportation hub clusters[J]. Science and Technology Foresight, 2023, 2(3): 97-105.
    [2]
    WANG H W, PENG Z R, WANG D S, et al. Evaluation and prediction of transportation resilience under extreme weather events: A diffusion graph convolutional approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 115: 102619. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102619
    [3]
    MA Z A, YANG X, WU J J, et al. Measuring the resilience of an urban rail transit network: A multi-dimensional evaluation model[J]. Transport Policy, 2022, 129: 38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.003
    [4]
    POO M C, YANG Z L, DIMITRIU D, et al. An advanced climate resilience indicator framework for airports: A UK case study[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 101: 103099. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103099
    [5]
    BAI X W, MA Z J, ZHOU Y M. Data-driven static and dynamic resilience assessment of the global liner shipping network[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2023, 170: 103016. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103016
    [6]
    WANG N X, WU M, YUEN K F. A novel method to assess urban multimodal transportation system resilience considering passenger demand and infrastructure supply[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 238: 109478.
    [7]
    XU P C, LU Q C, XIE C, et al. Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: The role of function dependency in metro and bus systems[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2024, 179: 103907. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103907
    [8]
    MA Shu-hong, WU Ya-jun, CHEN Xi-fang. Structural resilience of multimodal transportation networks in urban agglomerations: A case study of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration network[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(7): 1228-1235.
    [9]
    CHEN X F, MA S H, CHEN L, et al. Resilience measurement and analysis of intercity public transportation network[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 131: 104202. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2024.104202
    [10]
    ASHJA-ARDALAN S, ALESHEIKH A A, SHARIF M, et al. Resilience of urban road networks to climate change: A spatial-topological approach[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2025, 148: 104948. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2025.104948
    [11]
    ZHANG Xin, MAO Jing. Multilayer network-based resilience evaluation for China-Europe sea-rail intermodal container transport systems[J/OL]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.072.
    [12]
    XU Z Z, CHOPRA S S. Network-based assessment of metro infrastructure with a spatial-temporal resilience cycle framework[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 223: 108434.
    [13]
    GAOW, HU X W, WANG N H. Resilience analysis in road traffic systems to rainfall events: Road environment perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 126: 104000. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.104000
    [14]
    ZHOU L, CHEN Z H. Measuring the performance of airport resilience to severe weather events[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 83: 102362. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102362
    [15]
    TANG Shao-hu, ZHU Wei, CHENG Guang, et al. Safety resilience assessment of urban road traffic system under rainstorm waterlogging[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 143-150.
    [16]
    QIN Y F, GUO J K, LIANG M X, et al. Resilience characteristics of port nodes from the perspective of shipping network: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2023, 237: 106531.
    [17]
    KNOESTER M J, BEŠINOVIĆN, AFGHARI A P, et al. A data-driven approach for quantifying the resilience of railway networks[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2024, 179: 103913. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103913
    [18]
    AGHABABAEI M T, COSTELLO S B, RANJITKAR P. Measures to evaluate post-disaster trip resilience on road networks[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 95(C): 103154.
    [19]
    MA Min, HU Da-wei, SHU Lan, et al. Resilience assessment and recovery strategy on urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 396-404.
    [20]
    LUAN X J, EIKENBROEK O A L, CORMAN F, et al. Passenger social rerouting strategies in capacitated public transport systems[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2024, 188: 103598. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103598
    [21]
    BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497
    [22]
    LU Q C. Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 117: 227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.015
    [23]
    NIU Xiao-liang. Functional loss evaluation of urban transportation system in the post-earthquake emergency period based on time-varying traffic demand[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2022.
    [24]
    WANG Liang. Measuring method and evolution law of cross-city transportation network resilience[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (195) PDF downloads(22) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return