Volume 26 Issue 4
Apr.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Gu-hao, CAO Yu-long, ZHOU Zhi-chong, XIE Han-chen. Dynamic safety separation calculation method for low-altitude logistics UAVs considering wind disturbance effects[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(4): 68-78. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.164
Citation: ZHAO Gu-hao, CAO Yu-long, ZHOU Zhi-chong, XIE Han-chen. Dynamic safety separation calculation method for low-altitude logistics UAVs considering wind disturbance effects[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(4): 68-78. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.164

Dynamic safety separation calculation method for low-altitude logistics UAVs considering wind disturbance effects

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.164
More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHAO Gu-hao, associate professor, PhD, E-mail: zhaoguhao_1986@163.com
  • Received Date: 2025-08-28
  • Accepted Date: 2026-01-23
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-11-22
  • Publish Date: 2026-04-28
  • When low-altitude logistics unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operate in complex wind field environments, wind disturbance significantly affects flight trajectories, making traditional fixed safety separation methods difficult to meet actual operational requirements. Therefore, a dynamic safety separation calculation method considering wind disturbance effects was proposed. A wind disturbance attitude angle coupling model was established. By analyzing the influence mechanism of wind speed on UAV attitude angles, the coupling relationships of yaw angle, pitch angle, and roll angle with wind speed components were derived. A position deviation prediction model under wind disturbance was constructed. Global Positioning System (GPS) and inertial measurement unit data were employed for parameter fitting to establish quantitative relationships of lateral, longitudinal, and vertical position deviations with wind speed. A dynamic safety separation calculation method was proposed to dynamically adjust horizontal and vertical safety separations according to real-time wind field information and flight parameters. The result shows that the standard deviations of lateral, longitudinal, and vertical position deviations are 0.88, 1.32, and 0.91 m, respectively, with all model prediction errors within 1.5 m. Under the same traffic flow conditions, compared with the traditional fixed separation methods, the dynamic safety separation calculation method reduces the number of potential conflicts by approximately 37% while maintaining a safety margin above 95%. This method can effectively respond to the impact of wind disturbance on UAV flight trajectories, significantly improving the operational safety and airspace utilization efficiency of low-altitude logistics UAVs. It can provide theoretical support for trajectory planning, conflict detection, and airspace management.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: Separation standards-I[J]. Journal of Navigation, 1997, 50(3): 436-447. doi: 10.1017/S0373463300019068
    [2]
    BROOKER P. Longitudinal collision risk for ATC track systems: A hazardous event model[J]. Journal of Navigation, 2006, 59(1): 55-70. doi: 10.1017/S0373463305003516
    [3]
    WANG Xing-long, WANG You-jie. Safety interval evaluation for multi-aircraft eVTOL in urban low altitude[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 268-283.
    [4]
    ZHANG Jian, ZHAO Yi-fei, LU Fei, et al. Research on crossing operation separation of urban logistics UAVs at same altitude based on Event model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 99-105.
    [5]
    CHEN Yun-xiang, ZHANG Jian-ping, WANG Zhi-yuan, et al. Safety separation calculation model for multi-rotor drones in low-altitude airspace based on avoidance strategy[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(11): 349-365.
    [6]
    HAN Yun-xiang, TANG Xin-min, HAN Song-chen. Conflict resolution model of optimal flight for fixation airway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(1): 115-120, 126. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.01.018
    [7]
    LIU Ming-yuan, ZHANG Xing-jian, GENG Zeng-xian. Calibration method of safe takeoff interval for logistics UAVs based on speed error[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(9): 3959-3967.
    [8]
    TAO Jiang, CAO Yun-feng. UAV obstacle avoidance path-following method under time-varying wind disturbance at low altitudes[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51(1): 175-182.
    [9]
    LU Ming-xing, LI Zhan-fang. Research on adaptive trajectory tracking strategy of UAV under wind disturbance[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2025(10): 328-334, 339.
    [10]
    WANG Li-li, YANG Jie. Research on assessment method of safety separation for logistics UAVs based on position error probability model[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2022, 18(3): 184-192.
    [11]
    ZHANG Hong-hai, LI Bo-wen, LIU Hao, et al. Demarcation method of safety separation for multi-rotor UAV in free airspace[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(10): 3149-3156.
    [12]
    LI Shan, ZHANG Hong-hai, LI Zhuo-lun. Planning method for three-dimensional air route network of urban low-altitude logistics drones[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(4): 50-67. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.037
    [13]
    LI Nan, SUN Lin-shi, JIAO Qing-yu, et al. The method for determining the safety separation of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(26): 11463-11472.
    [14]
    WANG J, YANG J, YANG Z. Dynamics modeling and simulation of multi-rotor UAV based on the composite wind field model[C]//IEEE. 2022 13th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety (ICRMS). New York: IEEE, 2022: 127-134.
    [15]
    ALLOUCH A, KOUBAA A, ABBES T, et al. Dynamic separation for UAV traffic management in urban environments[C]//IEEE. 2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). New York: IEEE, 2019: 1214-1223.
    [16]
    ZENG Y, ZHANG R, LIM T J. Machine learning-based position error prediction for UAV navigation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(6): 6123-6134.
    [17]
    PANG B, HU Q, NIE J, et al. Adaptive separation assurance for urban air mobility using deep reinforcement learning[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2023, 132: 108048. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.108048
    [18]
    WEI Zhi-qiang, AN Xin. A dynamic collision avoidance method for UAVs using value iteration[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 215-227. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.153
    [19]
    DAMATO E, MATTEI M, NOTARO I. Distributed reactive model predictive control for collision avoidance of unmanned aerial vehicles in civil airspace[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2020, 97: 185-203.
    [20]
    LEE S, CHOI J, KIM D. Risk field-based separation assurance for unmanned aircraft systems in urban airspace[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24(5): 5428-5441.
    [21]
    ZHAO Xin-yi, WANG Yan-tao, ZHAO Yi-fei. Autonomous avoidance decision and control for eVTOL based on non- cooperative games[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(3): 198-214. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.093
    [22]
    ZHAO L, DELAHAYE D, SBIHI M. Block chain-enabled distributed separation negotiation for autonomous drones[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2024, 158: 104445. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104445

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (538) PDF downloads(41) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return