| Citation: | GAO Yun-feng, LIU Ke-jiang, CHEN Xiang-yi. Method for allocation of loading and unloading equipment in container rail-water intermodal hub[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(9): 246-264. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.287 |
To improve the efficiency of loading and unloading equipment allocation in rail-water intermodal transport container terminals and to reduce carbon emissions generated by container truck operations, a multi-objective combinatorial optimization model was developed considering the spatiotemporal characteristics of container flows and the rail-ship arrival under a hybrid handling mode of rail-water direct transfer and rail-yard-water operation. The optimization objectives were to minimize equipment operating costs, the turnaround times of trains and ships, and carbon emissions from container truck movements. A dynamic zone-based allocation strategy was proposed for container trucks. A discrete time-period equipment allocation mechanism was also introduced. The allocation numbers of quay cranes, rail-mounted gantry cranes, rubber tyred gantry cranes, and container trucks were dynamically determined. A genetic algorithm based on time-period allocation rules was designed to solve the model. The model was validated using 24-hour operational data from a rail-water intermodal transport container terminal. The results indicate that, in the original case, when the loading and unloading time windows of trains and ships overlap, the proportion of rail-ship direct transfer reaches 82%, the utilization rates of quay cranes, rail-mounted gantry cranes, and rubber tyred gantry cranes increase by 15%-20%, and the workload of rubber tyred gantry cranes in the export container yard and railway import container yard decreases by 15% and 23%, respectively. It proves that rail-ship direct transfer is the preferred transshipment mode for rail-water intermodal transport, which can significantly improve the utilization rate of terminal handling equipment, with significant impact of direct transfer capacity on the rubber tyred gantry cranes in railway import container yards. When the number of container trucks allocated to the direct-transfer zone reduces from 8 to 2-4 units, the total cost increases by 1.2%-2.8% and carbon emissions from container truck movements rise by approximately 16%, which indicates that both total cost and carbon emissions are highly sensitive to direct transfer capacity. Furthermore, under a large-scale handling scenario involving 5 ships and 4 trains, equipment operating costs account for 84.12% of the total cost, whereas this proportion increases to 87.8% when the handling scale is reduced to 1 ship and 1 train. This suggests that the proposed dynamic equipment allocation mechanism is more effective in coordinating equipment resources under larger-scale operational conditions. Compared with directly solving the model using the MATLAB integer linear programming solver, the proposed algorithm lowers the total operating cost of the terminal by 19.1%. Compared with the standard genetic algorithm, it shortens the average solution time by 33.5% and improves the average solution quality by 37.62%, which indicates its superior stability and solution accuracy. An efficiency-oriented and environmentally friendly decision-making approach can be provided for equipment configuration in rail-water intermodal transport container terminals. By dynamically allocating equipment quantities, the rail-ship direct transfer capability can be enhanced and yard congestion and storage pressure can be alleviated.
| [1] |
JIANG M X, WU G X, ZHENG J P, et al. Container terminal berth-quay crane capacity planning based on Markov chain[J]. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 2021, 33(2): 267-281.
|
| [2] |
NEHME N, MADDAH B, KAYSI I A. An integrated multi-ship crane allocation in Beirut port container terminal[J]. Operational Research, 2021, 21(3): 1743-1761. doi: 10.1007/s12351-019-00539-4
|
| [3] |
TAN Z Y, ZHANG Q, YUAN Y, et al. A decision method on yard cranes transformation and deployment in green ports[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2022, 29(1): 323-346. doi: 10.1111/itor.13027
|
| [4] |
DING Y, YANG Y, HEILIG L, et al. Deployment and retrofit strategy for rubber-tyred gantry cranes considering carbon emissions[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 161: 107645.
|
| [5] |
LIN S M, ZHEN L, WANG W C. Planning low carbon oriented retrofit of diesel-driven cranes to electric-driven cranes in container yards[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2022, 173: 108681.
|
| [6] |
GHAREHGOZLI A, ZAERPOUR N, LI K P. Optimizing the number of deployed yard cranes in a container terminal[J]. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 2023, 61(1): 86-103. doi: 10.1080/03155986.2022.2106713
|
| [7] |
MA M Z, ZHAO W T, FAN H M, et al. Collaborative optimization of yard crane deployment and inbound truck arrivals with vessel-dependent time windows[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(11): 1650. doi: 10.3390/jmse10111650
|
| [8] |
ABOU KASM O, DIABAT A, CHOW J Y J. Simultaneous operation of next-generation and traditional quay cranes at container terminals[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 308(3): 1110-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.10.035
|
| [9] |
PENG Yun, LI Xiang-da, WANG Wen-yuan, et al. Review on energy saving and emission reduction strategies of green container ports[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(4): 28-46. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.04.003
|
| [10] |
GHAREHGOZLI A H, DE KOSTER R, JANSEN R. Collaborative solutions for inter terminal transport[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(21): 6527-6546. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1262564
|
| [11] |
STOJAKOVIĆ M, TWRDY E. Determining the optimal number of yard trucks in smaller container terminals[J]. European Transport Research Review, 2021, 13(1): 22. doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00482-6
|
| [12] |
ZHANG X J, ZENG Q C, YANG Z Z. Modeling the mixed storage strategy for quay crane double cycling in container terminals[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 94: 171-187. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.08.002
|
| [13] |
ANVARI B, ZIAKOPOULOS A, MORLEY J, et al. Comparison of Fleet size determination models for horizontal transportation of shipping containers using automated straddle carriers[M]. Handbook of Terminal Planning. Cham: Springer, 2020.
|
| [14] |
URIBE-MARTES C J, RIVERA-RESTREPO D X, FILIPPO A B, et al. Simulation model of internal transportation at a container terminal to determine the number of vehicles required[C]// Springer. Inventive Computation Technologies. Cham: Springer, 2020: 912-919.
|
| [15] |
CHARGUI K, ZOUADI T, FALLAHI AEL, et al. Berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling with worker performance variability and yard truck deployment in container terminals[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2021, 154: 102449. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102449
|
| [16] |
ZHANG Q, WANG S, ZHEN L. Yard truck retrofitting and deployment for hazardous material transportation in green ports[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 343(3): 981-1012.
|
| [17] |
CASTILLA-RODRÍGUEZ I, EXPÓSITO-IZQUIERDO C, MELIÁN-BATISTA B, et al. Simulation-optimization for the management of the transshipment operations at maritime container terminals[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 139: 112852. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112852
|
| [18] |
ZENGIN A, HAMDOON W. Simulation of cargo unloading problem: A case study on estimating the optimal number of trucks and cranes[J]. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 2022, 5(3): 404-414. doi: 10.35377/saucis...1173791
|
| [19] |
MAHPOUR A, NAZIFI A, MOHAMMADIAN AMIRI A. Development of optimization model to reduce unloading and loading time at berth in container ports[J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2021, 45(4): 2831-2840. doi: 10.1007/s40996-021-00590-2
|
| [20] |
LI J J, YAN L X, XU B W. Research on multi-equipment cluster scheduling of U-shaped automated terminal yard and railway yard[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(2): 417. doi: 10.3390/jmse11020417
|
| [21] |
YU Nan, GUO Zi-ying. Development of rail-water intermodal transport of China's ports under the new situation[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2021, 43(10): 35-41.
|
| [22] |
LIU Yong, ZHU Xiao-ning, ZHU Song-ya, et al. Allocation optimization model of the rail-mounted gantry crane in railway area by rail-water intermodal container transport[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2014, 38(5): 1135-1139.
|
| [23] |
YAN B C, XU M. Container flow template planning in seaport railway terminal with on-dock rails[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2023, 50(4): 538-561.
|
| [24] |
LI S Y, HAN X L. Collaborative scheduling of rail-mounted gantry crane and container truck in hybrid operation mode of rail-water intermodal terminal[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(05): 1506-1513.
|
| [25] |
WANG N Y, SHEN M R, WEI Y C. Research on handling equipment allocation of rail-sea intermodal transportation in container terminals[C]//IEEE. 2020 IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE). New York: IEEE, 2020: 530-535.
|
| [26] |
LI W F, WU Z T, YANG P F, et al. Collaborative scheduling optimization of equipment in multimodal transport harbor considering hybrid operation mode of "train-yard-vessel" and "train-vessel"[C]//IEEE. 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). New York: IEEE, 2022: 86-91.
|
| [27] |
YANG Y S, HE S, SUN S. Research on the cooperative scheduling of ARMGs and AGVs in a sea-rail automated container terminal under the rail-in-port model[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(3): 557. doi: 10.3390/jmse11030557
|
| [28] |
LIU Dao-kuan, LU Yong-li, SHEN Xue-ming, et al. A study on the optimization of the operation area of railway-water intermodal transport port in China[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2020, 42(5): 30-37.
|
| [29] |
YANG Zhong-zhen, ZHANG Er-zhuo, DU Yi-ying, et al. Review of multimodal transport logistics engineering based on bibliometrics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(2): 1-23. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.071
|
| [30] |
ZHOU Lei-lei, LIANG Cheng-ji, HU Xiao-yuan. Delivery truck strategy under uncertain interference constraints[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(3): 891-896.
|
| [31] |
ZHANG X J, GU Y, YANG Y Q, et al. Comparing the efficiency of two types of yard layout in container terminals[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(9): 7195. doi: 10.3390/su15097195
|
| [32] |
LAU H Y K, ZHAO Y. Integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 112(2): 665-682. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.015
|
| [33] |
NIE Yu-yang. Research on the optimization of container port operation equipment scheduling under "train-ship" direct access mode[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019: 87-89.
|
| [34] |
GUO Chan-chan. Research on container terminal core resource scheduling[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2014: 38-40.
|
| [35] |
ZHANG Xin, MAO Jing. Multilayer network-based resilience evaluation for China-Europe container sea-rail intermodal transport systems[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(9): 233-245.
|