Volume 26 Issue 8
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HE Yin-zhang, LI Yi-lin, ZHAO Xiao-kang, ZHANG Jiu-peng, LI Yan. Prediction model for performance decay of airport runways based on CNN-xLSTM-Attention[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 190-201. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.325
Citation: HE Yin-zhang, LI Yi-lin, ZHAO Xiao-kang, ZHANG Jiu-peng, LI Yan. Prediction model for performance decay of airport runways based on CNN-xLSTM-Attention[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 190-201. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.325

Prediction model for performance decay of airport runways based on CNN-xLSTM-Attention

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.325
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52502429

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LI Yan, research assistant, PhD, E-mail: mhly@nwpu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-12-18
  • Accepted Date: 2026-05-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-01-26
  • Publish Date: 2026-08-28
  • To accurately predict the performance decay trend of airport runways under complex working conditions, a combined CNN-xLSTM-Attention prediction model was established based on an improved deep learning architecture. A convolutional neural network was utilized to extract local features of multi-source input data such as environment, load, and structure, and an xLSTM model containing dual branches of sLSTM and mLSTM was introduced to enhance the capturing ability for temporal dependencies. On this basis, an Attention mechanism was combined to dynamically focus on key time steps and feature variables, and a Bayesian optimization algorithm was adopted to automatically search for key hyperparameters, thereby constructing a high-precision pavement condition index (PCI) decay prediction framework. Using measured time-series data from two runways in China, covering 6 types of key indicators such as service time, rainfall, and traffic load, the prediction accuracy and generalization ability of different models were calculated and analyzed, and SHAP and a generalized additive model were introduced to analyze the nonlinear influence mechanisms of key features. The research results indicate that compared to the traditional LSTM and single improved models, the CNN-xLSTM-Attention model has the optimal comprehensive performance, effectively solving the long-sequence gradient problem and the feature coupling challenge; the coefficient of determination (R2) of the test set reaches 0.923; the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is only 1.778%. The explanatory analysis reveals that service time (contribution rate of 44.8%) and annual average rainfall (contribution rate of 33.6%) are the primary factors dominating the decay of PCI; traffic load and temperature indicators show a significant threshold effect; increasing the surface course thickness has a significant inhibitory effect on delaying the decay. It is thus evident that the established pavement performance prediction model and its explanatory analysis method can accurately capture the temporal evolution patterns and key influence mechanisms of PCI, providing reliable data support for the phased scientific maintenance and operational decisions of airport runways.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    LING Jian-ming, FANG Yi-xin, ZHANG Jia-ke, et al. Framework and key technologies of airport smart runway‍[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(2): 120-128.
    [2]
    HOU T X, LIU S F, MAO W Y, et al. Stochastic vibration analysis of aircraft-rigid pavement system under random aircraft parameters‍[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2026, 27(1): 2666268. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2026.2666268
    [3]
    RAGUSA E, COSTA A, DI GRAZIANO A. Exploring new computational strategies for managing maintenance activities of airport pavement systems‍[J]. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2024, 17(1): 80-101. doi: 10.1007/s42947-022-00222-6
    [4]
    SHI Bao-hua, XU Wei, QI Yong, et al. Management and preventive maintenance countermeasures of airport asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(2): 74-79.
    [5]
    SONG Y, WANG Y D, HU X, et al. An efficient and explainable ensemble learning model for asphalt pavement condition prediction based on LTPP dataset‍[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(11): 22084-22093. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3164596
    [6]
    SHOLEVAR N, GOLROO A, ESFAHANI S R. Machine learning techniques for pavement condition evaluation‍[J]. Automation in Construction, 2022, 136: 104190. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104190
    [7]
    LI J L, YIN G H, WANG X F, et al. Automated decision making in highway pavement preventive maintenance based on deep learning[J]. Automation in Construction, 2022, 135: 104111. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104111
    [8]
    SUN X, WANG H L, MEI S L. Explainable highway performance degradation prediction model based on LSTM[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2024, 61: 102539. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2024.102539
    [9]
    CHEN S T, CAO J D, WAN Y, et al. A novel CPO-CNN-LSTM based deep learning approach for multi-time scale deflection basin area prediction in asphalt pavement‍[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 458: 139540. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139540
    [10]
    DENG Y, SHI X M. Short-term predictions of asphalt pavement rutting using deep-learning models‍[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 2024, 150(2): 04024004. doi: 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1409
    [11]
    WU Y N, ZHANG Q F, WANG Y, et al. Advanced hybrid CNN-GRU model for IRI prediction in flexible asphalt pavements[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 2025, 151(2): 04025003. doi: 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1570
    [12]
    LI J L, ZHANG Z S, WANG X F, et al. Intelligent decision-making model in preventive maintenance of asphalt pavement based on PSO-GRU neural network‍[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 51: 101525. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101525
    [13]
    BECK M, PÖPPEL K, SPANRING M, et al. xLSTM: Extended long short-term memory‍[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024, 37: 107547-107603.
    [14]
    HAN C J, MA T, GU L H, et al. Asphalt pavement health prediction based on improved transformer network‍[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24(4): 4482-4493. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3229326
    [15]
    ZHANG Bing, ZHOU Dan-dan, SUN Jian, et al. Bus arrival time prediction model based on bidirectional long short-term memory network‍[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2023, 23(2): 148-160.
    [16]
    OYEWOLA D O, AKINWUNMI S A, OMOTEHINWA T O. Deep LSTM and LSTM-Attention Q-learning based reinforcement learning in oil and gas sector prediction‍[J]. Knowledge-based Systems, 2024, 284: 111290. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111290
    [17]
    MH/T 5024—2019‍, Technical Specification for Airport Pavement Evaluation and Management[S].
    [18]
    LI Y, ZOU Z B, ZHANG J P, et al. Study on the evolution of airport asphalt pavement integrated distress based on association rule mining‍[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 369: 130565. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130565
    [19]
    LI Long-hai, WU Si-ming. Evaluation of airport rigid pavement grades and parameter sensitivity‍[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Sciences), 2026, 45(2): 14-23.
    [20]
    BHANDARI S, LUO X H, WANG F. Understanding the effects of structural factors and traffic loading on flexible pavement performance‍[J]. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2023, 12(1): 258-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.004
    [21]
    KIRANYAZ S, AVCI O, ABDELJABER O, et al. 1D Convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey‍[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 151: 107398. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398
    [22]
    ZHANG Ying-chao, AN Ran, CHEN Xin, et al. Wind speed prediction along high-speed railway based on multi-time-interval wind speed fluctuation process division‍[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(3): 362-379.
    [23]
    WANG Xiao-ming, WANG Fan, ZHAI An, et al. Bayesian decision method of inspection and maintenance planning for deteriorating RC bridges‍[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(3): 130-143. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.03.008
    [24]
    HE Y Z, GAO S J, LI Y, et al. Adaptive machine learning framework: Predicting UHPC performance from data to modelling[J]. Results in Engineering, 2025, 27: 106724. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106724
    [25]
    LI Z Q. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost‍[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2022, 96: 101845. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845
    [26]
    HE Yin-zhang, SU Hao-ran, HAO Ning-yuan, et al. A predictive and analytical framework for ultra-high performance concrete properties using machine learning and SHAP modeling‍[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2026, 39(4): 261-282.
    [27]
    YANG X, ZHANG J Q, LIU W B, et al. Automation in road distress detection, diagnosis and treatment‍[J]. Journal of Road Engineering, 2024, 4(1): 1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jreng.2024.01.005
    [28]
    PINHEIRO M G, MADEIRA S C, FRANCISCO A P. Short-term electricity load forecasting: A systematic approach from system level to secondary substations‍[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 332: 120493. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120493

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (128) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return