Volume 26 Issue 8
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Fei-long, JIANG Chang-shan, YANG Shan, MENG Xian-feng. Dynamic response characteristics of tunnel-subgrade structure under high-speed rail and aircraft dynamic loads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 73-87. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.326
Citation: LI Fei-long, JIANG Chang-shan, YANG Shan, MENG Xian-feng. Dynamic response characteristics of tunnel-subgrade structure under high-speed rail and aircraft dynamic loads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 73-87. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.326

Dynamic response characteristics of tunnel-subgrade structure under high-speed rail and aircraft dynamic loads

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.326
Funds:

Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 52532011

Key R&D Program of Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology 202303AA080011

More Information
  • Corresponding author: MENG Xian-feng, professor of engineering, E-mail: 879904131@qq.com
  • Received Date: 2025-12-16
  • Accepted Date: 2026-05-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-03-11
  • Publish Date: 2026-08-28
  • To investigate the dynamic response characteristics under coupled dynamic loads of aircraft and trains during the underpassing of a high-speed rail tunnel through an airport airfield, with the Chongqing-Kunming High-Speed Railway underpassing Kunming Changshui Airport as the background, a "tunnel, pavement, surrounding rock, and subgrade" three-dimensional refined finite element model was established using ABAQUS. Vibration loads from CRH380 trains were implemented using Abaqus's tabular function, while aircraft taxi loads of the A380-800 were modelled with a Fortran-based DLOAD user subroutine. The dynamic equations were solved based on the Newmark-β method. Response characteristics of structure and subgrade were systematically compared under three working conditions: aircraft taxiing, train vibration, and their coupling. By arranging monitoring points at different depths of the subgrade and characteristic locations of the tunnel lining, response laws such as peak dynamic displacement, vertical dynamic stress, dynamic acceleration, and lining internal forces were obtained. Research results indicate that under coupled dynamic loads, the vertical displacement of the subgrade above the tunnel crown presents an "inverted trough-shaped" distribution. The transient peak reaches 48.33 mm, and it decays approximately linearly with depth. The coupling effect significantly expands the dynamic influence range. Based on the criterion of dynamic stress being 10% of the self-weight stress, the influence depth increases to 31.53 m, which is 2.93 times that under the aircraft taxiing load. Based on the acceleration threshold of 0.1 m·s-2, the influence depth of the surrounding rock at the tunnel bottom is 22.2 m, which is 1.28 times that under the train vibration load. The acceleration response of the subgrade exhibits spatial heterogeneity; the acceleration in the upper subgrade shows an approximate linear attenuation with an influence depth of less than 24.2 m, whereas that in the surrounding rock at the tunnel bottom exhibits an exponential attenuation. The lining displacement is primarily controlled by the train vibration, and the additional influence of the aircraft taxiing load is negligible. Under coupled conditions, the dynamic tensile stress at the arch foot is 530 kPa, which is far below the material strength. The minimum safety factor of the full lining cross-section reaches 720.62, indicating a sufficient safety reserve. A dual threshold control criterion of a peak acceleration of 0.1 m·s-2 and a dynamic stress of 10% self-weight stress is proposed, and the established coupled analysis method provides a theoretical basis for the vibration safety assessment and design optimization of underpass projects beneath air-rail intermodal hubs.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZHOU Zheng-feng, LING Jian-ming. Finite element model of airport rigid pavement structure based on ABAQUS[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(3): 39-44. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2009.03.007
    [2]
    ZHANG Jia-feng, QIAN Jian-gu, LÜ Xi-lin, et al. Influence scope of airport runway ground under aircraft moving loads [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S1): 101-104.
    [3]
    WANG Zhi-xin, WANG Bo, LI Hao, et al. The additional stress of layered foundation caused by aircraft load and its influence scope on the underpass tunnel[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(S1): 258-264, 271.
    [4]
    LI F L, JIANG C S, CAI G Q, et al. Impact of aircraft load on additional stress depth in soil foundations beneath cement-concrete pavements[J]. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 2024, 42(8): 7893-7910.
    [5]
    LING Dao-sheng, ZHANG Fan, ZHAO Yun, et al. Dynamic response analysis of inhomogeneous subgrade subjected to moving aircraft loads [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(2): 97-109.
    [6]
    TANG C X, LU Z, YAO H L, et al. Vibration characteristics of unsaturated runways under moving aircraft loads[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability & Dynamics, 2021, 21(5): 2150065.
    [7]
    LOPRENCIPE G, ZOCCALI P. Comparison of methods for evaluating airport pavement roughness[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019, 20(7): 782-791. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2017.1345554
    [8]
    TIAN Y, LIU S F, LIU L, et al. Optimization of international roughness index model parameters for sustainable runway[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4): 2184. doi: 10.3390/su13042184
    [9]
    LIU S F, LING J M, TIAN Y, et al. Random vibration analysis of a coupled aircraft/runway modeled system for runway evaluation[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(5): 2815. doi: 10.3390/su14052815
    [10]
    BAZI G, HAJJ E, ULLOA-CALDERON A, et al. Finite element modelling of the rolling resistance due to pavement deformation[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2020, 21(3): 365-375. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2018.1480778
    [11]
    LING Jian-ming, WANG Zeng-yi, LIU Shi-fu, et al. Dynamic load predictive model for aircraft taxiing excitation and landing impact[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 1-19.
    [12]
    ZHENG Fei, WENG Xing-zhong. Calculating methods of stress for cement concrete pavement slab under plane loads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(4): 8-15. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2010.04.002
    [13]
    MU Yi-fan, XIA Hai-ting, HU Gui-zhang, et al. Analysis of dynamic response and influencing factors of airport rigid pavement under impact load[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(7): 3029-3037.
    [14]
    WEI Bao-li, GUO Cheng-chao, CUI Can. Random vibration analysis of airport pavement in condition of aircraft taxing[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(16): 101-106.
    [15]
    WANG Xing-tao, CHEN Jian-feng, YE Guan-bao, et al. Mechanical responses of Boeing 747 running on runways[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2016, 16(2): 1-9. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.02.001
    [16]
    CAI Jing, ZHANG Xin, LI Yue. Analysis on dynamic response of runway structure layers under multiple aircraft types' impact[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2020, 52(6): 930-936.
    [17]
    LIU Shi-fu, ZHAO Jia-fu, HOU Tian-xin, et al. Mechanism of uneven excitation on the dynamic response of aircraft-runway system[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2025, 44(10): 198-207.
    [18]
    HUANG Bo, WANG Yu, SHENG Wen-jun, et al. Dynamic response of runway during aircraft braking taxiing[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53(8): 3052-3061.
    [19]
    NAM B H. In-situ super accelerated pavement test for the fatigue evaluation of in-service airfield rigid pavement—A case study at Mecham Airport[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 353: 129115. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129115
    [20]
    WANG H, LI M Y, GARG N, et al. Multi-wheel gear loading effect on load-induced failure potential of airfield flexible pavement[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2020, 21(6): 805-816. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2018.1511783
    [21]
    PARK H W, KIM D H, SHIM C S, et al. Behavior of airport concrete pavement slabs exposed to environmental loadings[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(7): 2618. doi: 10.3390/app10072618
    [22]
    DONG Q, WANG J H, ZHANG X M, et al. Dynamic response analysis of airport pavements during aircraft taxiing for evaluating pavement bearing capacity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2021, 22(9): 736-750. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A2000378
    [23]
    HU C, WENG X Z, ZHANG J, et al. Experimental study on fatigue strength of airport concrete pavement slab[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 270: 121493. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121493
    [24]
    ROBINSON W J, HOWARD I L, TINGLE J S, et al. Analysis of full-scale geosynthetic reinforced airfield pavement subjected to accelerated aircraft loading[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 2020, 146(3): 04020052. doi: 10.1061/JPEODX.0000212
    [25]
    WEI Xiao-gang, YANG Liu-chuan, LIU Hui-li, et al. Research on influencing factors of structural stability of airport runway underpass tunnel[J]. Industrial Construction, 2022, 52(1): 165-173.
    [26]
    WEI Xiao-gang, QIN Zhi-fan, WANG Shi-ao, et al. Stability analysis of tunnel structure under the action of aircraft running[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(8): 3425-3437.
    [27]
    LI Fei-long, JIANG Chang-shan, CAI Guo-qing, et al. Effect of aircraft taxiing load on dynamic response of cement concrete pavement and underpass [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57(S2): 80-87.
    [28]
    SUN Xiao-jing, TAN Zhong-sheng, ZHOU Si-zhen, et al. Analysis of the dynamic influence of aircraft load on a tunnel structure[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2018, 55(1): 156-163.
    [29]
    BA Zhen-ning, FU Zhan-yuan, FU Ji-sai, et al. Measurement and analysis of the influence of metro train vibration on the ancient wooden structures of north palace gate of the Summer Palace [J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2023, 36(6): 1602-1612.
    [30]
    CHEN Juan, SONG Yao, GAO Guang-yun, et al. Actual testing study on ground vibration characteristics under combined load actions of high-speed trains passing through viaduct and subway trains [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2025, 44(13): 97-105.
    [31]
    WU Xue, ZHOU Xing-long, ZHONG Rui, et al. Influence of 350 km/h high speed train under-crossing airport on runway area pavement[J]. Railway Engineering, 2021, 61(8): 154-158.
    [32]
    GAO Meng, LI Jia-wen, LI Dan-yang. Analysis of vibration response characteristics of saturated foundation under moving load of double-track trains[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2025, 45(3): 228-235.
    [33]
    Airports Department of Civil Aviation Administration of China. Impact analysis of railway and urban rail transit under-crossing airport flight area[R]. Beijing: Airports Department of Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2022: 7-43.
    [34]
    GOLOV E, EVTYUKOV S, PROTSUTO M, et al. Influence of the road surface roughness (according to the international roughness index) on road safety[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2022, 63: 999-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.099
    [35]
    YANG L C, WEI X G, FA J Y, et al. Numerical study of influencing factors of safety and stability of tunnel structure under airport runway[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(20): 10432. doi: 10.3390/app122010432
    [36]
    GAO Feng, FU Gang, HU Wen-liang. Influence of moving aircraft loads on airport tunnel[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Sciences), 2012, 31(2): 218-222.
    [37]
    PAN Chang-shi, PANDE G N. Preliminary deterministic finite element study on a tunnel driven in loess subjected to train loading[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1984, 17(4): 19-28, 18.
    [38]
    LIU Jing-bo, WANG Zhen-yu, DU Xiu-li, et al. Three-dimensional visco-elastic artificial boundaries in time domain for wave motion problems[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22(6): 46-51.
    [39]
    MA Sheng-jie, CHI Ming-jie, CHEN Hong-juan, et al. Implementation of viscous-spring boundary in ABAQUS and comparative study on seismic motion input methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(7): 1445-1457.
    [40]
    LU Fei-yun. Research on stratum spring parameters and stratum boundary in dynamic calculation of underground structure[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020: 44-48.
    [41]
    MIN Bo. Study on the cracking characteristic of asymmetric double-arch tunnel linings and its influence on structural bearing capacity[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021: 24-26.
    [42]
    LI F L, JIANG C S, CAI G Q, et al. Study on force characteristics and safety of segment structure and bolts with and without cavity behind lining with multi-field coupling[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(8): 2108. doi: 10.3390/buildings13082108

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (164) PDF downloads(34) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return