Volume 26 Issue 8
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SUN Ke, QIAN Zhong-hao, YU Miao, XING Zhi-wei. Resilience-oriented communication topology optimization for airport snow removal IoV networks[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 243-258. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.403
Citation: SUN Ke, QIAN Zhong-hao, YU Miao, XING Zhi-wei. Resilience-oriented communication topology optimization for airport snow removal IoV networks[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(8): 243-258. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.403

Resilience-oriented communication topology optimization for airport snow removal IoV networks

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.403
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China U2333205

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 3122023006

More Information
  • Corresponding author: XING Zhi-wei, professor, PhD, E-mail: cauc_xzw@163.com
  • Received Date: 2025-12-24
  • Accepted Date: 2026-06-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-04-29
  • Publish Date: 2026-08-28
  • In response to the collaborative control failure and operational efficiency degradation caused by communication node failures in airport snow removal cluster operations, a resilience enhancement method was proposed based on the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) topology optimization and dynamic formation reconfiguration. First, the dynamic interaction characteristics of snow removal operations were analyzed. A mission process-oriented performance evaluation metric was defined. Based on this, a resilience assessment model was developed for the snow removal cluster operations. Second, to enhance the invulnerability of the communication network under damaged conditions, the node degree variance was introduced as a structural survivability index. On this basis, a mixed integer semi-definite programming model for IoV topology optimization was formulated. Convex relaxation techniques were applied to decompose this NP-hard problem into a degree matrix optimization problem based on integer quadratic programming and a graph feasible solution problem based on semi-definite programming, thus achieving efficient solutions under complex constraints. Furthermore, to address the issue of coverage gaps caused by node failures, a dynamic contractive reconfiguration strategy based on remapping was designed to achieve the timely closure of physical operational gaps through the rapid self-healing of the logical topology. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves the system's fault tolerance. In a 6-node stochastic network experiment, the optimized topological structure maintains basic formation configuration functions even under an extreme condition of 50% node loss, with the operational resilience improved by 13.1% after optimization. Further Monte Carlo statistics and parameter sensitivity analysis indicate that the node degree variance can reflect the network connectivity retention ability in a statistical sense. The vehicle lateral spacing and minimum overlap width have a significant impact on the effective coverage width. The effectiveness of topology optimization design in enhancing the operational resilience of connected airport vehicles under harsh environmental conditions is validated.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    FAKHFAKH F, TOUNSI M, MOSBAH M. Vehicle platooning systems: Review, classification and validation strategies[J]. International Journal of Networked and Distributed Computing, 2020, 8(4): 203-213. doi: 10.2991/ijndc.k.200829.001
    [2]
    AN Xin, LIU Yi. The application prospect of vehicle-road collaborative autonomous driving technology in civil aviation airport[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(4): 57-61, 67.
    [3]
    SHVETSOV A V. Analysis of accidents resulting from the interaction of air and ground vehicles at airports[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2021, 59: 21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.093
    [4]
    JIANG Xian-cai, ZHANG Xin-yue, LI Meng-ying. Coope-rative control method for connected and automated vehicle platoons in urban road networks[J/OL]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025-12-11. https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.112.
    [5]
    PETERS A A, MIDDLETON R H, MASON O. Leader tracking in homogeneous vehicle platoons with broadcast delays[J]. Automatica, 2014, 50(1): 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.09.034
    [6]
    JIANG Xia, ZENG Xian-lin, SUN Jian, et al. Survey and prospects of distributed optimization in multi-agent systems[J]. Scientia Sinica (Informationis), 2025, 55(12): 2965-2990.
    [7]
    AI X L, YU J Q. Flatness-based finite-time leader-follower formation control of multiple quadrotors with external distur-bances[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 92: 20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.060
    [8]
    WEN Qiang, WANG Zheng-wu, WU Ju-qiang, et al. Design of a multi-platoon longitudinal-lateral coupling DMPC controller and dynamic lane-changing control[J/OL]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025-12-09. https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.116.
    [9]
    ZHANG Hai-lun, WANG Jian-qiang, FU Rui, et al. Ecodriving cooperative control for CAVs at signalized intersections based on online recognition of behavioral patterns[J/OL]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025-12-10. https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.129.
    [10]
    JIAO Jian-fang, ZHENG Zhi-hui, BAO Duan-hua. Fixedtime formation of multiple mobile robots with velocity constraint[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(11): 125-132.
    [11]
    GOU Jin-zhan, LIANG Tian-jiao, TAO Cheng-gang, et al. Formation control and aggregation method of UAV based on consensus theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, 50(5): 1646-1654.
    [12]
    FANG X, LI X L, XIE L H. Angle-displacement rigidity theory with application to distributed network localization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2021, 66(6): 2574-2587. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2020.3012630
    [13]
    GONG X, LI X X, SHU Z, et al. Resilient output formation-tracking of heterogeneous multiagent systems against general Byzantine attacks: A twin-layer approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2024, 54(4): 2566-2578. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2023.3281902
    [14]
    GUERRERO-BONILLA L, SALDAÑA D, KUMAR V. Design guarantees for resilient robot formations on lattices[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2019, 4(1): 89-96. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2018.2881231
    [15]
    ZHOU H D, TONG S C. Fuzzy adaptive resilient formation control for nonlinear multiagent systems subject to DoS attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2024, 32(3): 1446-1454. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2023.3327140
    [16]
    GONG X, BASIN M V, FENG Z G, et al. Resilient time-varying formation-tracking of multi-UAV systems against composite attacks: A two-layered framework[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2023, 10(4): 969-984. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123339
    [17]
    CHU J, ZHOU Z, GUO J. Optimal reconfiguration of formation flying using a direct sequential method[J]. IFAC-PapersOn-Line, 2017, 50(1): 9398-9404. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1453
    [18]
    AJORLOU A, MOEZZI K, AGHDAM A G, et al. Two-stage energy-optimal formation reconfiguration strategy[J]. Automatica, 2012, 48(10): 2587-2591. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.06.059
    [19]
    AJORLOU A, MOEZZI K, AGHDAM A G, et al. Two-stage time-optimal formation reconfiguration strategy[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2013, 62(6): 496-502.
    [20]
    WANG J N, XIN M. Integrated optimal formation control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(5): 1731-1744. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2012.2218815
    [21]
    LUI D G, PETRILLO A, SANTINI S. Leader tracking control for heterogeneous uncertain nonlinear multi-agent sys-tems via a distributed robust adaptive PID strategy[J]. Non-linear Dynamics, 2022, 108(1): 363-378. doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07240-w
    [22]
    LIAO F, TEO R, WANG J L, et al. Distributed formation and reconfiguration control of VTOL UAVs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2017, 25(1): 270-277. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2547952
    [23]
    WANG J, PAMBUDI S, WANG W Y, et al. Resilience of IoT systems against edge-induced cascade-of-failures: A net-working perspective[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6(4): 6952-6963. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2913140
    [24]
    LEVITIN G, XING L D, DAI Y S. Optimizing dynamic performance of multistate systems with heterogeneous 1-out-of-N warm standby components[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2018, 48(6): 920-929. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2633808
    [25]
    YANG Y, HUANG H B, LI G, et al. A systematic review of resilience assessment and enhancement of urban integrated transportation networks[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2025, 129: 104420. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104420
    [26]
    DU Y C, WANG H, GAO Q, et al. Resilience concepts in integrated urban transport: A comprehensive review on multi-mode framework[J]. Smart and Resilient Transportation, 2022, 4(2): 105-133. doi: 10.1108/SRT-06-2022-0013
    [27]
    MADNI A M, JACKSON S. Towards a conceptual frame-work for resilience engineering[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2009, 3(2): 181-191. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397
    [28]
    ORDOUKHANIAN E, MADNI A. Model-based approach to engineering resilience in multi-UAV systems[J]. Systems, 2019, 7(1): 11. doi: 10.3390/systems7010011
    [29]
    CHENG C C, BAI G H, ZHANG Y A, et al. Resilience evaluation for UAV swarm performing joint reconnaissance mission[J]. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2019, 29(5): 053132. doi: 10.1063/1.5086222
    [30]
    XING L D, JOHNSON B W. Reliability theory and practice for unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023, 10(4): 3548-3566. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3218491
    [31]
    GU J J, SU T, WANG Q H, et al. Multiple moving targets surveillance based on a cooperative network for multi-UAV[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2018, 56(4): 82-89. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700422
    [32]
    WANG X H, ZHANG Y, WANG L Z, et al. Robustness evaluation method for unmanned aerial vehicle swarms based on complex network theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(1): 352-364. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.025
    [33]
    LIN Bing-quan, LIU Lei, LI Hua-feng, et al. Secure cluster control of UAVs under DoS attacks based on APF and DDPG algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(4): 1241-1248.
    [34]
    ZHAO Chang-xiao, FANG Yu-lin, WANG Ke-nian. BiTCN-based DoS attack detection method for UAV command and control link[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2026, 47(1): 249-265.
    [35]
    FENG Q, LIU M, SUN B, et al. Resilience measure and formation reconfiguration optimization for multi-UAV systems[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(6): 10616-10626. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3326552
    [36]
    FENG Q, HAI X S, SUN B, et al. Resilience optimization for multi-UAV formation reconfiguration via enhanced pigeon-inspired optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(1): 110-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.10.029
    [37]
    WU C X, DENG H Z, WU H Q, et al. Enhancing resilience of unmanned autonomous swarms through game theory-based cooperative reconfiguration[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2025, 260: 110951.
    [38]
    HU T Z, ZONG Y, LU N Y, et al. Toward the resilience of UAV swarms with percolation theory under attacks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2025, 254: 110608.
    [39]
    GENG S Y, LIU S F. An agent-based framework for resilience analysis of service networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2025, 1: 25.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (128) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return