-
摘要: 分析了FYT涂膜类防水粘结材料的基本性质, 测定了它的具体技术指标, 通过室内剪切与拉拔试验, 确定了FYT的最佳用量与最佳用量范围, 研究了温度、界面粗糙度和水对FYT路用性能的影响, 并与其他常用防水粘结材料进行了路用性能对比分析。分析结果表明: FYT-1#最佳洒布量为1.4~1.5 kg.m-2, FYT-2#的最佳洒布量为0.10~0.15 kg.m-2; FYT在25℃时的抗剪强度与抗拉强度是60℃时的7~8倍; 当遇水浸泡后, FYT抗剪强度损失3.0%, 拉拔强度损失7.5%;FYT与同步碎石粘结性能相差不大, 而与其他防水粘结材料相比, 其抗剪强度与拉拔强度均高出3~4倍。可见, FYT具有优良的路用性能。Abstract: The basic properties of FYT waterproof were analyzed.Its specific technical indices were measured.Its optimum amount and optimum dosage range were determined by shear test and pullout test in laboratory.The influences of temperature, interfacial roughness and water on the pavement performance of FYT waterproof were studied systematically.Comparison test analysis for FYT waterproof and the others used in common were carried out.Analysis result shows that optimum spreading volume for FYT-1# is 1.4~1.5 kg·m-2, and that for FYT-2# is 0.10~0.15 kg·m-2.The shear strength and tensile strength of FYT at 25 ℃ is 7~2times of that at 60 ℃.The losses of shear strength and tensile strength of FYT are respectively 3.0% and 7.5% after soaking in water.Comparing with other waterproofs, except for synchronous crushed stone, its shear strength and tensile strength are 3~4 times of that of the others.Obviously, FYT has good pavement performance.
-
Key words:
- pavement material /
- FYT /
- pavement performance /
- laboratory test /
- comparative analysis
-
表 1 技术指标
Table 1. Technical indices
性能指标 FYT-1# FYT-2# 外观 棕褐色乳液, 搅拌棒上无沾附颗粒, 色泽均匀 均匀, 细腻, 无杂质, 无结块 固体含量/% ≥45 ≥65 低温柔性 -25℃, 2 h, 绕10 mm圆棒一周无裂纹 -30 ℃, 10 d, 绕3 mm圆棒一周无裂纹 粘结强度(20 ℃)/MPa ≥0.3 ≥1.0 耐热性 160 ℃, 30 min, 涂膜不流淌, 无滑动, 无气泡 180 ℃, 5 h, 涂膜不流淌, 无滑动, 无气泡 抗剪强度(25 ℃, 剪切角α=40°)/MPa ≥0.3 ≥1.0 不透水性(0.3 MPa, 30 min) 不透水 不透水 抗低温冻融柔性 -20 ℃~20 ℃, 2 h, 3次循环, 无裂纹 -20 ℃~20 ℃, 2 h, 3次循环, 无裂纹 耐碱性(在2% NaOH中浸15 d) 无变化 无变化 耐酸性(在2% H2SO4中浸15 d) 无变化 无变化 耐盐性(在10% NaCl中浸15 d) 无变化 无变化 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 强度试验结果
Table 2. Strength test results
工况 剪切试验 拉拔试验 抗剪强度/MPa 平均值/MPa 抗拉强度/MPa 平均值/MPa 正常情况 0.636 5 0.635 0 0.489 7 0.486 9 0.629 8 0.481 5 0.638 7 0.489 5 模拟降雨后 0.616 2 0.615 9 0.457 8 0.450 4 0.612 8 0.444 3 0.618 7 0.449 1
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 徐勤武, 胡长顺, 王虎. 混凝土桥面复合式铺装层受力分析和设计[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 27(4): 28-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200704006.htmXU Qin-wu, HU Chang-shun, WANG Hu. Mechanic analysisand design of composite type overlay on concrete bridgepavement[J]. Journal of Chang an University: Natural ScienceEdition, 2007, 27(4): 28-32. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200704006.htm [2] 王涓. 水泥混凝土桥面沥青混凝土铺装防水粘结层的性能研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2004.WANG Juan. Study on the properties of bituminous waterprooflayer on the concrete bridge deck pavement[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2004. (in Chinese) [3] 赵建武, 张永红, 张雷, 等. FYT-1改进型沥青基涂料在首都机场T3航站楼的应用[J]. 施工技术, 2007, 36(10): 86-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGJS200710036.htmZHAO Jian-wu, ZHANG Yong-hong, ZHANG Lei, et al. Application of FYT-1 i mproved asphalt coatingin Beijing CapitalInternational Airport Terminal 3[J]. Construction Technology, 2007, 36(10): 86-87. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGJS200710036.htm [4] 马涛, 黄晓明, 居浩. 桥面防水粘结材料性能研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2007, 24(1): 43-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200701010.htmMA Tao, HUANG Xiao-ming, JU Hao. Research on theperformance of waterproof and cohesive layer[J]. Journal ofHighway and Transportation Research and Development, 2007, 24(1): 43-46. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200701010.htm [5] 祝海燕, 王选仓. 旧水泥路面薄层沥青罩面结构层间剪应力分析[J]. 辽宁省交通高等专科学校学报, 2006, 8(4): 1-2. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LJTX200604002.htmZHU Hai-yan, WANG Xuan-cang. Shearing stress analysisof thin asphalt overlays on old cement concrete pavement[J]. Journal of Liaoning Provincial College of Communications, 2006, 8(4): 1-2. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LJTX200604002.htm [6] 高金岐, 罗晓辉, 徐世法, 等. 沥青粘结层抗剪强度试验分析[J]. 北京建筑工程学院学报, 2003, 19(1): 66-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6011.2003.01.016GAOJin-qi, LUO Xiao-hui, XUShi-fa, et al. Test and analysisof shearing strength of bituminous membrane[J]. Journal ofBeijing Institute of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2003, 19(1): 66-71. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6011.2003.01.016 [7] 高英, 黄晓明, 许涛. 水泥混凝土桥梁沥青混凝土铺装层的疲劳性能[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006, 6(1): 39-43. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200601008GAO Ying, HUANG Xiao-ming, XU Tao. Fatigue charac-teristic of asphalt concrete pavement on cement concretebridge deck[J]. Journal of Traffic and TransportationEngineering, 2006, 6(1): 39-43. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200601008 [8] 张起森, 李宇峙, 邵腊根, 等. 厦门海沧大桥桥面沥青铺装层直道疲劳试验研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2001, 14(1): 60-65, 72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200101013.htmZHANG Qi-sen, LI Yu-shi, SHAO La-gen, et al. Research onfatigue testsin the direct track for the asphalt deck pavement ofXiamen Haicang Steel Bridge[J]. China Journal of Highway andTransport, 2001, 14(1): 60-65, 72. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200101013.htm [9] WALTER R, OLESENJ F, STANG H, et al. Analysis ofan orthotropic deck stiffened with a cement-based overlay[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2007, 12(3): 350-363. [10] 宋金华, 王立新, 田集体, 等. 沥青混凝土桥面铺装层材料性能的试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2008, 25(2): 55-58, 63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200802011.htmSONG Jin-hua, WANG Li-xin, TI ANJi-ti, et al. Test studyon properties of cohesive materials on bridge deck asphaltpavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Researchand Development, 2008, 25(2): 55-58, 63. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200802011.htm [11] 刘国杰, 黄晓明. 特大桥梁沥青铺装层层间稳定性试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2007, 24(6): 29-32, 36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200706006.htmLI U Guo-jie, HUANG Xiao-ming. Research on the interfacestability of tack coat in the long-span concrete bridge deckpavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Researchand Development, 2007, 24(6): 29-32, 36. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200706006.htm -
点击查看大图
图(14) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 602
- HTML全文浏览量: 196
- PDF下载量: 282
- 被引次数: 0
