Methods of Hamburg wheel tracking tests for asphalt mixture
-
摘要: 采用4种不同的沥青混合料, 分别在水浴和空气浴2种试验环境下进行50℃和60℃的汉堡车辙试验, 分析了水和温度对车辙深度的影响。进行不同试件厚度以及板式试件和SGC成型的圆柱试件的车辙试验, 分析了试件厚度和成型方式对车辙深度的影响。分析结果表明: 水环境和提高温度都会加速车辙的产生, 50℃水浴和60℃空气浴车辙深度判定系数R2大于0.93;结合沥青应用情况, 建议B级沥青采用45℃, A级沥青采用50℃, 改性沥青采用60℃的试验温度; 40 mm厚度的试件车辙深度显著偏大, 试验中不宜采用; SGC成型的圆柱试件与板式试件试验结果判定系数R2达0.95以上, 可以代替板式试件进行抗车辙性能评价。Abstract: Four kinds of asphalt mixtures were made and Hamburg wheel tracking tests were conducted with the specimens in the water and in the air at 50 ℃ and 60 ℃ individually, the influence of water and temperature on rutting depth was analyzed. The tests were carried on to analyze the influence of specimen thickness and molding ways on rutting depth. The result indicates that water and raising test temperature can accelerate rutting appearance. The correlation coefficients are over 0.93 when the specimens are in the water at 50 ℃ and in the air at 60 ℃. According to the application of asphalt types, the right test temperatures of B-grade asphalt, A-grade asphalt and modified asphalt are 45 ℃, 50 ℃ and 60 ℃ respectively. The rutting depth of 40 mm-thickness specimen is much larger than that of others, which is not applicable for experiments.The test result of SGC cylindrical specimen has good relationship with that of plate specimen, their correlation coefficient is more than 0.95, so it can be used to evaluate the rut-resistance of asphalt mixture instead of plate specimen.
-
Key words:
- road material /
- asphalt mixture /
- Hamburg wheel tracking test /
- test method /
- test environment /
- specimen thickness /
- molding way
-
表 1 沥青基本指标
Table 1. Basic indices of asphalts
表 2 沥青混合料级配
Table 2. Gradations of asphalt mixtures
表 3 50 ℃水浴混合料的车辙深度
Table 3. Rutting depths of mixture specimens in water at 50 ℃
表 4 60℃水浴不同沥青混合料的车辙深度
Table 4. Rutting depths of mixture specimens in water at 60℃
表 5 60 ℃空气浴不同沥青混合料的车辙深度
Table 5. Rutting depths of mixture specimens in air at 60 ℃
表 6 不同厚度试件车辙深度
Table 6. Rutting depths of different thickness specimens
表 7 不同成型方式的车辙深度
Table 7. Rutting depths with different molding ways
-
[1] 钱振东, 舒富民. 高模量沥青稳定碎石性能试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2009, 9 (3): 24-28. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200903004QI ANZhen-dong, SHUFu-min. Performance experiments of high-modulus asphalt treated base[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9 (3): 24-28. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200903004 [2] 郑南翔, 牛思胜, 许新权. 重载沥青路面车辙预估的温度-轴载-轴次模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2009, 22 (3): 7-13. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2009.03.002ZHENG Nan-xiang, NIU Si-sheng, XU Xin-quan. Temperature, axle load and axle load frequency model of rutting prediction of heavy-duty asphalt pavement[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22 (3): 7-13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2009.03.002 [3] 曹林涛, 李立寒, 孙大权, 等. 沥青混合料车辙试验评价指标研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2007, 29 (11): 14-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WHGY200711006.htmCAO Lin-tao, LI Li-han, SUN Da-quan, et al. Research of evaluation indexes for asphalt mixtures wheel tracking test[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2007, 29 (11): 14-17. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WHGY200711006.htm [4] 彭波, 袁万杰, 陈忠达. 用车辙系数评价沥青混合料的抗车辙性能[J]. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 33 (12): 84-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNLG200512019.htmPENG Bo, YUAN Wan-jie, CHEN Zhong-da. Evaluation of anti-wheel-rutting performance of asphalt mixture by using wheelruttingindex[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 33 (12): 84-86. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNLG200512019.htm [5] 李明国, 牛晓霞, 申爱琴. 山区高速公路沥青路面的抗车辙能力[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 26 (6): 19-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.06.005LI Ming-guo, NI U Xiao-xia, SHEN Ai-qin. Anti-rut ability of asphalt pavement on mountain freeway[J]. Journal of Chang an University: Natural Science Edition, 2006, 26 (6): 19-22. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.06.005 [6] LU Qing, HARVEYJ T. Evaluation of moisture sensitivity of hot mix asphalt by flexural beamfatigue test[C]∥ MASAD E, PANOSKALTSIS V P, WANG Lin-bing. Asphalt Concrete: Si mulation, Modeling and Experi mental Characterization. Reston: ASCE, 2006: 124-133. [7] CHOWDHURY A, BUTTONJ W, WIKANDERJ P. Variability of Hamburg wheel tracking devices[R]. Texas: Texas Transportation Institute, 2004. [8] YANG Jun, YI N Chao-en. Laboratory study of porous asphalt mixture made with rubber bitumen[C]∥ CHEN D H, ESTAKHRI C, ZHA Xu-dong, et al. Material, Design, Construction, Maintenance and Testing of Pavement. Reston: ASCE, 2009: 22-31. [9] YILDIRI M Y, JAYAWICKRAMA P W, HOSSAI N M S, et al. Hamburg wheel-tracking database analysis[R]. Texas: Texas Transportation Institute, 2006. [10] 张争奇, 袁迎捷, 王秉纲. 沥青混合料旋转压实密实曲线信息及其应用[J]. 中国公路学报, 2005, 18 (3): 1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2005.03.001ZHANG Zheng-qi, YUAN Ying-jie, WANG Bing-gang. Information of gyratory compaction densification curve of asphalt mixture and its application[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2005, 18 (3): 1-6. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2005.03.001 -