高速公路主线收费站可变限速控制

蒲云; 胡路; 蒋阳升; 朱娟秀; 彭博

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.05.016

高速公路主线收费站可变限速控制

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2012.05.016

蒲云^1,,
胡路^{1, 2},
蒋阳升^{1, 2},
朱娟秀^{1, 2},
彭博^{1, 2}

1.
西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院，四川成都 610031
2.
西南交通大学综合运输四川省重点实验室，四川成都 610031

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51108391

详细信息

作者简介:
蒲云(1962-), 男, 重庆人, 西南交通大学教授, 工学博士, 从事智能运输系统研究

中图分类号: U491.54
计量
- 文章访问数: 1123
- HTML全文浏览量: 187
- PDF下载量: 2418
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-05-08

Variable speed-limit control before expressway mainline toll station

PU Yun^1
,,
HU Lu^{1, 2},
JIANG Yang-sheng^{1, 2},
ZHU Juan-xiu^{1, 2},
PENG Bo^{1, 2}

1.
School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China
2.
Comprehensive Transportation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China

More Information

Author Bio:
PU Yun(1962-), male, professor, PhD, +86-28-87601715, ypu@swjtu.edu.cn

Article Text (Baidu Translation)

摘要

摘要: 以事故率最小为目标, 以费用与速度限制为约束条件, 建立可变限速控制优化模型, 确定可变信息板数目与相应的可变限速值。采用交通波理论模型计算可变信息板设置间距, 并利用Vissim仿真软件对模型进行验证。利用不同交通流量下的单向双车道6个收费窗口的高速公路, 进一步模拟可变限速控制与静态限速控制。试验结果表明: 在高速公路主线收费站排队广场前应设4块可变信息板, 设置间距分别为1 293、2 695、4 056m, 仿真结果与交通波理论模型计算值的相对误差最小为3.9%, 最大为9.5%;可变限速控制中, 通过车辆数较静态限速控制增长51.82%, 行程时间与排队长度分别平均缩短15.81%、18.98%, 验证了本文设计体系的合理性。
- 高速公路 /
- 主线收费站 /
- 可变限速控制 /
- 交通波理论 /
- 可变信息板 /
- 事故率 /
- Vissim仿真
Abstract: An optimization model of variable speed-limit control with the object of the least accident rate and the limitations of cost and speed was set up, in which the number of variable message signs and corresponding variable limit speeds were determined. The distances between variable message signs were computed by using the traffic wave model, and the optimization model was verified by using the simulation software Vissim. For different traffic flows, variable speed-limit control and static speed-limit control were simulated on the expressway with two-lanes and six toll windows in single direction. Analysis result shows that when 4 variable message signs with setting separation distances of 1 293, 2 695 and 4 056 m apart are installed before the queuing square of expressway mainline toll station, the minimum relative error between simulation result and calculated values of traffic wave model is 3.9%, and the maximum is 9.5%. Compared with static speed-limit control, passing vehicle number in variable speed-limit control rises by 51.82%, average travel time and queue length decrease by 15.81% and 18.98% respectively, which proves that the model is reasonable.
- expressway /
- mainline toll station /
- variable speed-limit control /
- traffic wave theory /
- variable message sign /
- accident rate /
- Vissim simulation

HTML全文

图 1 可变限速控制示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of variable speed control

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 Vissim仿真获得的最大排队长度

Figure 2. Maximum queue lengths obtained by Vissim simulation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 两种限速控制方法的对比

Figure 3. Comparison of 2 speed-limit control methods

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同信息板数目对应的综合事故率与限速值

Table 1. C and v_ifor different message sign numbers

n/块	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
C/(10^-6次·pcu^-1·km^-1)	8.80	1.51	0.93	0.76	0.68	0.63	0.59	0.57	0.56	0.55
v_i/(km·h^-1)	15	70, 10	90, 60, 15	100, 70, 40, 15	100, 80, 60, 40, 10	100, 80, 60, 40, 20, 10	110, 90, 80, 60, 40, 20, 10	110, 100, 90, 80, 70, 50, 30, 15	110, 100, 100, 90, 80, 70, 50, 30, 10	110, 100, 90, 80, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 安全车速

Table 2. Safer speeds km·h^-1

v₁	v₂	v₃	v₄
40	30	20	10

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 各检测器处的v_ai

Table 3. v_aiat each detector km·h^-1

v_a1	v_a2	v_a3	v_a4
-20	-25	-35	-45

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 各检测器附近的T_i

Table 4. T_inearby each detector h

T₁	T₂	T₃	T₄
0.250 000	0.153 846	0.071 006	0.021 848

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 各控制分区长度

Table 5. Length of each control zone m

l₁	l₂	l₃	l₄
≥5 000+210=5 210	≥3 846+210=4 056	≥2 485+210=2 695	≥1 083+210=1 293

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 Vissim仿真参数

Table 6. Vissim simulation parameters

仿真时间/s	数据记录间隔/s	排队广场长度/m	单向双车道高峰流量/(pcu·h^-1)	高峰流量持续时间/s	6窗口收费站服务率/(pcu·h^-1)	车种结构/%
						小汽车	中型车	大型车
3 600	50	170	3 900	1 200	2 570	75	20	5

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 交通波模型与模拟的排队长度

Table 7. Queue lengths of traffic wave model and simulation

控制分区	1	2	3	4
计算排队长度/m	5 000	3 846	2 485	1 083
仿真排队长度/m	4 811	4 069	2 709	1 198
相对误差/%	3.90	5.40	8.20	9.50

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 两种限速控制的Vissim仿真参数

Table 8. Vissim simulation parameters of 2 speed-limit controls

控制方法	数据记录间隔/s	路段和排队广场长度/m	单向流量变动范围/(pcu·h^-1)	流量持续时间/s	仿真时间/s	6窗口收费站服务率/(pcu·h^-1)	车种结构/%
控制方法	数据记录间隔/s	路段和排队广场长度/m	单向流量变动范围/(pcu·h^-1)	流量持续时间/s	仿真时间/s	6窗口收费站服务率/(pcu·h^-1)	小汽车	中型车	大型车
可变限速	50	8 000, 170	1 500~2 500	3 600	3 600	2 500	65	25	10
静态限速	50	8 000, 170	1 500~2 500	3 600	3 600	2 500	65	25	10

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(14)

[1]	李嘉, 方霞. 高速公路出入口设计与安全性研究[J]. 中南公路工程, 2003, 28(2): 31-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGL200302009.htm LI Jia, FANG Xia. Study on design and safety of freeway exit and entrance[J]. Central South Highway Engineering, 2003, 28(2): 31-34. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGL200302009.htm
[2]	林小涵, 关宏志. 公路收费站ETC系统改造项目经济费用效益计算方法的研究[J]. 公路, 2012, 6(6): 156-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201206037.htm LIN Xiao-han, GUAN Hong-zhi. A study on economic cost-benefit analysis method for ETC improvement project of high-way toll station[J]. Highway, 2012, 6(6): 156-163. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201206037.htm
[3]	GB 5768.3—2009, 道路交通标志和标线[S]. GB 5768.3—2009, road traffic signs and markings[S]. (in Chinese).
[4]	王薇, 杨兆升, 赵丁选. 有限阶段马尔可夫决策的可变限速控制模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11(5): 109-114. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201105017 WANG Wei, YANG Zhao-sheng, ZHAO Ding-xuan. Control model of variable speed limit based on finite horizon Markov decision-making[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(5): 109-114. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201105017
[5]	SHI Hua-jing, ZILIASKOPOULOS A. Traffic flow control using variable speed limits[C]∥ASCE. Proceedings of the Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies. Guilin: ASCE, 2002: 658-665.
[6]	牛树云, 刘浩, 冯建刚, 等. 基于模糊约束的可变信息板点位布设优化[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(3): 98-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCXT201003016.htm NIU Shu-yun, LIU Hao, FENG Jian-gang, et. al. The opti-mization of the planning and positioning of VMS based on fuzzy constrained conditions[J]. Systems Engineering, 2010, 28(3): 98-102. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCXT201003016.htm
[7]	尚华艳, 黄海军, 高自友. 基于元胞传输模型的可变信息标志选址问题研究[J]. 物理学报, 2007, 56(8): 4342-4347. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2007.08.006 SHANG Hua-yan, HUANG Hai-jun, GAO Zi-you. Locating the variable message signs by cell transmission model[J]. Acta Physica Shinic, 2007, 56(8): 4342-4347. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2007.08.006
[8]	CHIU Y C, HUYNH N. Location configuration design for dynamic message signs under stochastic incident and ATISscenarios[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2007, 17(1): 33-50.
[9]	ABDEL-ATY M, CUNNINGHAM R J, GAYAH V V, et al. Dynamic variable speed limit strategies for real-time crash risk reduction on freeways[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Reseach Board, 2008(2078): 108-116.
[10]	钟连德, 孙小端, 陈永胜, 等. 高速公路V/C与事故率关系研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2007, 33(1): 37-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD200701008.htm ZHONG Lian-de, SUN Xiao-duan, CHEN Yong-sheng, et al. Research on the relationship between V/Cand crash rate on freeway[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2007, 33(1): 37-40. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD200701008.htm
[11]	侯典建, 孙小端, 贺玉龙. 高速公路车速离散性与事故率的关系研究[J]. 交通标准化, 2010(224): 70-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH201013020.htm HOU Dian-jian, SUN Xiao-duan, HE Yu-long. Relationship between speed difference and crash rate on freeway[J]. Transport Standardization, 2010(224): 70-72. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTBH201013020.htm
[12]	钟连德, 孙小端, 陈永胜, 等. 高速公路大、小车速度差与事故率的关系[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2007, 33(2): 185-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD200702015.htm ZHONG Lian-de, SUN Xiao-duan, CHEN Yong-sheng, et al. The Relationships between crash rates and average speed difference between cars and large vehicles on freeway[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2007, 33(2): 185-188. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD200702015.htm
[13]	田根平. 高等级公路收费站通行能力评价研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2008. TIAN Gen-ping. Evaluation studies on traffic capacity of highlevel highway toll station[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2008. (in Chinese).
[14]	孔惠惠, 秦超, 李新波, 等. 交通事故引起的排队长度及消散时间的估算[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2005, 27(5): 65-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDYS200505027.htm KONG Hui-hui, QIN Chao, LI Xin-bo, et al. Estimation of queue length and dispersing time caused by traffic accident[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2005, 27(5): 65-67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDYS200505027.htm