Kinetic energy uphill performance of heavy-haul train based on multi-particle model
-
摘要: 采用列车多质点纵向动力学模型, 研究了列车初速度、列车编组、坡道长度与坡度对列车动能闯坡性能的影响, 并与列车单质点模型进行了对比分析, 然后结合具体算例对比了2种模型在动能闯坡最大牵引质量方面的差异。分析结果表明: 列车闯坡初速度越大, 闯坡性能越优; 列车闯坡性能随列车编组、坡道长度与坡度的增大而变差; 2种模型列车闯坡最低速度的差异随列车闯坡初速度的减小而增加, 初速度为60km·h-1时单质点与多质点模型的列车闯坡最低速度相差5.29km·h-1; 列车编组、坡长与坡度越大, 单质点模型的计算结果越保守; 基于单质点模型的列车最大牵引质量为8 250t, 基于多质点模型的列车最大牵引质量为8 750t, 后者比前者增加了6.1%;建议采用列车多质点纵向动力学模型计算列车动能闯坡最大牵引质量。Abstract: Train multi-particle longitudinal dynamics model was used to analyze the influences of train initial speed, train marshalling, slope length and slope gradient on the kinetic energy uphill performance of train.A comparison between multi-particle model and single particle model was made.A specific example was given to illustrate the difference of the maximum tractive tonnages between the two models in the kinetic energy uphill.Analysis result indicates that the higher the uphill initial speed is, the better the uphill performance is.The uphill performance declines with the increases of train marshalling, slope length and slope gradient.The difference of train uphill lowest speed of two models increases with the decrease of train uphill initial speed.The difference of the uphill lowest speeds of two models is 5.29km·h-1 when the initial speed is 60km·h-1.The calculation result of single particle model is more and more conservative with the increases of train marshalling, slope length and slope gradient.Train maximum tractive tonnages are 8 250 t and 8 750 t based on single particle model and multi-particle model respectively, in which the latter is 6.1% higher than the former.It is suggested that the multi-particle longitudinal dynamics model can be adopted to calculate train maximum tractive tonnage in kinetic energy uphill.
-
图 8 不同初速度对列车闯坡性能的影响
Figure 8. Influence of different initial speeds on train uphill performance
图 9 不同编组对列车闯坡性能的影响
Figure 9. Influence of different marshallings on train uphill performance
图 10 不同坡长对列车闯坡性能的影响
Figure 10. Influence of different slope lengths on train uphill performance
图 11 不同坡度对列车闯坡性能的影响
Figure 11. Influence of different slope gradients on train uphill performance
图 13 单质点模型的牵引质量试凑法
Figure 13. Trial and error method for tractive tonnage of single particle model
图 14 多质点模型的牵引质量试凑法
Figure 14. Trial and error method for tractive tonnage of multi-particle model
表 1 列车编组及线路设置
Table 1. Train marshalling and track setting
表 2 线路参数设置
Table 2. Setting of track parameters
表 3 列车编组与牵引质量
Table 3. Train marshalling and tractive tonnage
-
[1] 张波. 襄渝线HXD1型电力机车牵引性能仿真及试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(5): 68-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.05.11ZHANG Bo. Simulation and test study on the traction performance of HXD1 electric locomotive on Xiang-Yu Line[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(5): 68-75. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.05.11 [2] 闫永平, 吴宜诚. 重载列车途停原因分析及对策[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2010, 30(4): 83-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2010.04.023YAN Yong-ping, WU Yi-cheng. Analysis on heavy haul train in-section halt and its countermeasures[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2010, 30(4): 83-86. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2010.04.023 [3] 董雪婷, 黄超. 大功率交流传动电力机车牵引特性分析[J]. 兰州交通大学学报, 2010, 29(1): 90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4373.2010.01.022DONG Xue-ting, HUANG Chao. Analysis of tractive characteristics of high-power AC transmission electric locomotives[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2010, 29(1): 90-94. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4373.2010.01.022 [4] HOWLETT P. Optimal strategies for the control of a train[J]. Automatica, 1996, 32(4): 519-532. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(95)00184-0 [5] LIU R, GOLOVITCHER I M. Enery-efficient operation of rail vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2003, 37(10): 917-932. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2003.07.001 [6] 李广峰. 基于牵引计算的机车优化操纵方案研究与应用[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2008, 28(5): 48-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2008.05.013LI Guang-feng. Research and application of locomotive optimization operation project based on the traction calculation[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2008, 28(5): 48-50. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2008.05.013 [7] 石红国. 线路纵断面化简对列车牵引质量的影响分析[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2013, 11(4): 45-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2013.04.008SHI Hong-guo. Influence of railway longitudinal section simplification on train traction load capacity[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2013, 11(4): 45-48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2013.04.008 [8] GEIKE T. Understanding high coupler forces at metro vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2007, 45(4): 389-396. doi: 10.1080/00423110701215085 [9] COLE C, SUN Y Q. Simulated comparisons of wagon coupler systems in heavy haul trains[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2006, 220(3): 247-256. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT35 [10] 马卫华, 宋荣荣, 揭长安, 等. 缓冲器阻抗特性对重载列车动力学性能的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11(2): 59-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2011.02.010MA Wei-hua, SONG Rong-rong, JIE Chang-an, et al. Influences of buffer impedance characteristics on dynamics performances for heavy haul train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(2): 59-64. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2011.02.010 [11] PIECHOWIAK T. Verification of pneumatic railway brake models[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2010, 48(3): 283-299. doi: 10.1080/00423110902780622 [12] 魏伟. 列车空气制动系统仿真的有效性[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2006, 27(5): 104-109. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2006.05.019WEI Wei. The validity of the simulation for train air brake system[J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(5): 104-109. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2006.05.019 [13] ANSARI M, ESMAILZADEH E, YOUNESIAN D. Longitudinal dynamics of freight trains[J]. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 2009, 16(1/2): 102-131. doi: 10.1504/IJHVS.2009.023857 [14] NASR A, MOHAMMADI S. The effects of train brake delay time on in-train forces[J]. Proceedings of the Institution ofMechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2010, 224(6): 523-534. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT306 [15] 石红国, 彭其渊, 郭寒英. 城市轨道交通牵引计算模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2005, 5(4): 20-26. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2005.04.005SHI Hong-guo, PENG Qi-yuan, GUO Han-ying. Traction calculation model of urban mass transit[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(4): 20-26. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2005.04.005 [16] ZHUAN X, XIA X. Cruise control scheduling of heavy haul trains[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(4): 757-766. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2006.872506 [17] CHOU M, XIA X, KAYSER C. Modelling and model validation of heavy-haul trains equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic brake systems[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2007, 15(4): 501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.09.006 [18] ZHAI Wan-ming. Two simple fast integration methods for large-scale dynamic problems in engineering[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1996, 39(24): 4199-4214. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961230)39:24<4199::AID-NME39>3.0.CO;2-Y [19] 黄运华, 李芾, 傅茂海, 等. 缓冲器特性曲线间断点算法比较[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2005, 40(1): 9-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2005.01.003HUANG Yun-hua, LI Fu, FU Mao-hai, et al. Comparison of algorithms for discontinuity on the characteristics curves of draft gears[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 40(1): 9-12. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2005.01.003 [20] WANG Kai-yun, HUANG Chao, ZHAI Wan-ming, et al. Progress on wheel-rail dynamic performance of railway curve negotiation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2014, 1(3): 209-220. doi: 10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30104-5 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 655
- HTML全文浏览量: 116
- PDF下载量: 692
- 被引次数: 0
