组合交通标志信息量阈值研究

刘小明; 王蔚; 姜明; 魏中华

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.01.017

组合交通标志信息量阈值研究

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2016.01.017

1.
北京工业大学北京市交通工程重点实验室，北京 100124
2.
交通运输部公路科学研究院道路安全重点实验室，北京 100088

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51208008

中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目 20159030

交通运输部科技项目 2015439223040

详细信息

作者简介:
刘小明(1964-), 男, 江苏扬中人, 北京工业大学教授, 从事交通运输与安全研究

中图分类号: U491.52
计量
- 文章访问数: 780
- HTML全文浏览量: 177
- PDF下载量: 580
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-09-10
- 刊出日期: 2016-02-25

Investigation of information quantity threshold on combined traffic signs

1.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Road Safety, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China

More Information

Author Bio:
LIU Xiao-ming (1964-), male, professor, +86-10-65292298, liuxm@mot.gov.cn

Article Text (Baidu Translation)

摘要

摘要: 针对组合交通标志信息量阈值缺乏量化依据的问题, 设计了包含指路标志与车道行驶方向标志的组合标志, 测定了被试者视认组合标志的正确率及反应时间, 得到组合标志的信息量阈值, 并通过试验对模拟结果进行了验证。分析结果表明: 车道数为3~7时, 被试者对组合标志视认的正确率分别为94.17%、93.13%、93.50%、87.50%、86.07%, 反应时间分别为2 437.54、2 514.01、2 634.18、3 600.75、3 836.21 ms; 指路标志中一条路名信息的视认反应时间相当于组合标志中5个箭头的视认反应时间, 均为0.5 s;指引图形较简单的组合标志信息量阈值为6条路名信息, 指引图形较复杂的组合标志信息量阈值为5条路名信息, 指路标志若与车道行驶方向标志组合设置则应相应减少路名信息。
- 交通工程 /
- 组合标志 /
- 信息量阈值 /
- 指路标志 /
- 车道行驶方向标志 /
- 模拟试验
Abstract: Aiming at lacking quantitative basis for information quantity threshold of combined traffic signs, combined signs containing guide sign and lane directional sign were designed.The subjects'visual cognition accuracy and reaction time of combined signs were measured.The information quantity threshold of combined signs was obtained and tests were carried out to verify simulation results.Analysis result shows that when lane numbers are 3-7, the subjects'visual cognition accuracies of combined signs are 94.17%, 93.13%, 93.50%, 87.50%, 86.07% respectively, and reaction times are 2 437.54, 2 514.01, 2 634.18, 3 600.75, 3 836.21 ms respectively.The visual cognition reaction time of information for one road name in guide sign is equal to that of five arrows in combined signs, both are 0.5 s.The information quantity threshold of combined signs is equal to information quantity for six road names when guide picture is simple, and the information quantity threshold of combined signs is equal to information quantity for five road names when guide picture is complex.If guide sign and lane directional sign are combined, the information of road name should be decreased correspondingly.
- traffic engineering /
- combined sign /
- information quantity threshold /
- guide sign /
- lane directional sign /
- simulation test

HTML全文

图 1 组合标志设计形式

Figure 1. Design from of combined signs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 试验流程

Figure 2. Test process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 车道行驶方向标志

Figure 3. Lane directional signs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 车道行驶方向标志视认试验

Figure 4. Visual cognition test of lane directional signs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 组合标志

Figure 5. Combined signs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 模拟场景

Figure 6. Simulation scenario

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 车辆换道

Figure 7. Lane changing of vehicle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 试验现场

Figure 8. Test field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 组合标志视认试验

Figure 9. Visual cognition test of combined signs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 SPSS软件探测的异常值

Figure 10. Outliers detected by SPSS software

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 反应时间的均值及标准差

Figure 11. Mean values and standard deviations of reaction times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 标志示例

Figure 12. Sign samples

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 试验场景

Figure 13. Test scenarios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 视认节点

Figure 14. Visual cognition nodes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 距离误差

Figure 15. Distance error

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 被试者数据

Table 1. Subjects'data

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 数据统计分析

Table 2. Statistical analysis of data

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 方差齐性检验

Table 3. Homogeneity of variance test

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 单因素方差分析

Table 4. Analysis of single factor variance

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 多重比较分析

Table 5. Multiple comparative analysis

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	Federal Highway Administration. Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2009.
[2]	GB 5768.2—2009, 道路交通标志和标线第2部分: 道路交通标志[S]. GB 5768.2—2009, road traffic signs and markings—Part 2: road traffic signs[S]. (in Chinese).
[3]	AL-MADANI H. Influence of drivers'comprehension of posted signs on their safety related characteristics[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2000, 32(4): 575-581. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00084-6
[4]	PURDUSKI J M, RYS M J. Evaluations of a new Advance Flagger traffic sign[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1999, 24(1): 107-114. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00092-4
[5]	邓兴栋. 城市道路指路标志信息选取方法研究[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2010, 26(1): 97-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJX201001018.htm DENG Xing-dong. Research on selection method of the urban road directional sign information[J]. Journal of Transport Science and Engineering, 2010, 26(1): 97-102. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJX201001018.htm
[6]	杨曼娟, 吴玲涛, 唐琤琤. 指路标志中外文文字对视认性的影响研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27(9): 117-120, 126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2010.09.021 YANG Man-juan, WU Ling-tao, TANG Cheng-cheng. Study of influence of foreign characters in guide signs on legibility[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(9): 117-120, 126. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2010.09.021
[7]	蒋海峰, 韩文元, 张智勇. 交通指路标志字高与视认性关系研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2009, 26(7): 115-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2009.07.023 JIANG Hai-feng, HAN Wen-yuan, ZHANG Zhi-yong. Study of relationship between word height and recognition for traffic guide signs[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2009, 26(7): 115-120. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2009.07.023
[8]	祖永昶, 李娅, 王运霞, 等. 城市道路指路标志信息量限值研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2012, 30(6): 38-42. doi: 10.3963/j.issn1674-4861.2012.06.008 ZU Yong-chang, LI Ya, WANG Yun-xia, et al. An approach to limit value of information amount for urban guide signs[J]. Journal of Transportation Information and Safety, 2012, 30(6): 38-42. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.issn1674-4861.2012.06.008
[9]	GORDON D A. The assessment of guide sign informational load[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1981, 23(4): 453-466. doi: 10.1177/001872088102300408
[10]	LIU Y C. A simulated study on the effects of information volume on traffic signs, viewing strategies and sign familiarity upon driver's visual search performance[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2005, 35(12): 1147-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.06.009
[11]	杜志刚, 潘晓东, 郭雪斌. 交通指路标志信息量与视认性关系[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2008, 8(1): 118-122. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200801023 DU Zhi-gang, PAN Xiao-dong, GUO Xue-bin. Relationship between information quantity and visual cognition of traffic guide sign[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2008, 8(1): 118-122. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200801023
[12]	袁伟, 付锐, 马勇, 等. 车速与标志文字高度对驾驶人视觉搜索模式的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11(1): 119-126. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201101020 YUAN Wei, FU Rui, MA Yong, et al. Effects of vehicle speed and traffic sign text height on drivers'visual search patterns[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(1): 119-126. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201101020
[13]	CHAPMAN P, UNDERWOOD J, ROBERTS K. Visual search patterns in trained and untrained novice drivers[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2002, 5(2): 157-167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847802000141
[14]	林雨, 潘晓东, 方守恩. 指路标志信息量与认知性关系研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2005, 3(3): 73-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC200503011.htm LIN Yu, PAN Xiao-dong, FANG Shou-en. Relationship between information quantum of traffic guide sign and its cognition[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2005, 3(3): 73-77. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTGC200503011.htm
[15]	CHRYSLER S T, WILLIAMS A A, FUNKHOUSER D S, et al. Driver comprehension of diagrammatic freeway signs[R]. Austin: Texas Department of Transportation, 2007.
[16]	GORDON D A. Evaluation of diagrammatic guide signs[J]. Highway Research Record, 1972(414): 30-41.
[17]	JIANG Ming, ZHOU Rui. The research of the information quantity checking standard of the guide symbols in the Chinese traffic guide signs based on the apperceive characteristics of Chinese drivers[C]∥ASCE. ICCTP 2011: Towards Sustainable Transportation Systems. Reston: ASCE, 2011: 1881-1887.
[18]	交通部公路科学研究院. 交通标志视认性关键特征参数及数学模型[R]. 北京: 交通部公路科学研究院, 2008. Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport. Key parameters and mathematical models of traffic signs visibility[R]. Beijing: Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, 2008. (in Chinese).
[19]	米子川. 基于图形分析方法的函数型数据异常值检验实证研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2014, 29(6): 18-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJLT201406003.htm MI Zi-chuan. An empirical study on outliers test of functional data based on graph description tools[J]. Statistics and Information Forum, 2014, 29(6): 18-24. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJLT201406003.htm
[20]	程利, 杜巍. 眼动仪在广告心理学的应用研究[J]. 商业经济, 2008(2): 51-52, 84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJSY200802021.htm CHENG Li, DU Wei. Application on eye-movement apparatus in advertisement psychology[J]. Business Economy, 2008(2): 51-52, 84. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJSY200802021.htm