Effect of hygrothermal aging on transverse impact mechanical properties of BFRP adhesive joints
Article Text (Baidu Translation)
-
摘要: 为了给车辆粘接结构的碰撞安全提供参考, 选取玄武岩纤维复合材料(BFRP)制作了单搭接接头; 根据车辆服役环境, 选取温度/湿度为80℃/30%和80℃/95%两种环境(GWCS和GWGS), 对接头分别进行了0、5、10和15 d的老化, 通过准静态拉伸测试了失效载荷和失效形式随时间的变化规律; 利用差示扫描量热法分析了BFRP和粘接剂在老化前、后的玻璃态转变温度; 对未老化和老化15 d后的接头进行了冲击能量为0、20、40和60 J的横向冲击试验, 分析了能量吸收、最大冲击载荷和最大变形随冲击能量的变化规律, 同时测试了接头失效载荷和失效形式的变化规律。分析结果表明: GWCS环境下, 老化后接头失效载荷下降比较小, 粘接剂发生后固化反应, BFRP发生分子链断裂, 接头更容易发生基体开裂或者纤维撕裂; GWGS环境下, 老化能明显加速接头性能的退化, 容易造成粘接剂与BFRP界面发生水解和膨胀, 老化15 d后失效载荷下降了54.99%, 失效断面为界面与内聚为主的混合失效; GWCS环境下, 老化后接头具有较好的承受冲击载荷和抵抗变形的能力, 冲击后失效载荷变化不大; GWGS环境下, 老化后接头受横向冲击影响明显, 承受冲击载荷和抵抗变形的能力较差, 在60 J冲击后接头表面损伤严重, 失效载荷下降明显, 下降幅度为58.71%, 失效断面为界面与内聚为主的混合失效, 损伤裂纹较为明显。可见, 车辆服役过程中, 粘接结构需尽量避免受高温高湿环境的作用, 尤其注意横向冲击对老化后粘接结构的影响。Abstract: In order to provide a reference for crash safety of vehicle adhesive structure, the BFRP was selected to make single lap joints. According to the service environment of vehicle, the joints were aged for 0, 5, 10 and 15 d in two environments with the temperatures and humidities of 80 ℃/30%(GWCS) and 80 ℃/95%(GWGS), respectively. The change rules of failure load and failure mode with time were tested by using the quasi-static tensile test. The glass transition temperatures of BFRP and adhesive before and after aging were analyzed by using the differential scanning calorimetry. The transverse impact tests with the impact energies of 0, 20, 40 and 60 J were carried out for the joints which were unaged or aged for 15 d. The variation rules of energy absorption, the maximum impact load and the maximum deformation with the impact energy were analyzed, and the change rules of joint failure load and failure mode were also tested. Analysis result shows that after aging in the GWCS environment, the failure loads of joints decrease slightly, and the post-curing reaction of adhesive and the molecular chain fracture of BFRP occur, which makes the joints more prone to the matrix cracking or fiber tearing. In the GWGS environment, aging can obviously accelerate the degradation of joint performance, and easily cause hydrolysis and expansion of the interface between adhesive and BFRP. After 15 d of aging, the failure loads decrease by 54.99%, and the mixed failure of interface and cohesion occurs. After aging in the GWCS environment, the joints have good resistance to the impact load and deformation, and the failure loads change little after impact. After aging in the GWGS environment, the joint is obviously affected by the transverse impact, and its ability to bear the impact load and resist deformation is poor. After the impact of 60 J, the joint surface damages seriously, and the failure load decreases significantly, with the decrement rate of 58.71%. The mixed failure of interface and cohesion occurs, and the damage crack is obvious. It can be seen that in the process of vehicle service, the adhesive structure should avoid the effect of high-temperature and high-humidity environment, especially the influence of transverse impact on the aging adhesive structure.
-
图 6 老化前、后粘接接头宏观断面和SEM形貌
Figure 6. Macroscopic sections and SEM morphologies of adhesive joints before and after aging
图 8 能量吸收、最大冲击载荷和最大变形随冲击能量的变化曲线
Figure 8. Change curves of energy absorption, maximum impact load and maximum deformation with impact energy
图 9 粘接接头在冲击作用后的载荷-位移曲线
Figure 9. Load-displacement curves of adhesive joints after impact
图 12 粘接接头在不同冲击能量下的损伤形貌
Figure 12. Damage morphologies of adhesive joints under different impact energies
图 13 未老化接头在冲击能量作用后的失效断面
Figure 13. Failure sections of unaged adhesive joints after action of impact energy
图 14 GWCS老化后接头在冲击能量作用后的失效断面
Figure 14. Failure sections of aged joints after action of impact energy in GWCS environment
图 15 GWGS老化后接头在冲击能量作用后的失效断面
Figure 15. Failure sections of aged joints after action of impact energy in GWGS environment
表 2 玄武岩纤维单向布参数
Table 2. Parameters of BFRP unidirectional fabric
拉伸强度/MPa 杨氏模量/GPa 延伸率/% 公称厚度/mm 单纤维直径/μm 2 100 105 2.6 0.115 13 
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 树脂固化后材料参数
Table 3. Material parameters of resin after curing
拉伸强度/MPa 压缩强度/MPa 弯曲强度/MPa 玻璃化转变温度/℃ 600~700 1 260~1 300 800~940 90~100
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] RIBEIRO M L, TITA V, VANDEPITTE D. A new damage model for composite laminates[J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(2): 635-642. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.031 [2] LU Zhang-yu, XIAN Gui-jun. Combined effects of sustained tensile loading and elevated temperatures on the mechanical properties of pultruded BFRP plates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 150: 310-320. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.026 [3] FIORE V, ALAGNA F, DI BELLA G, et al. On the mechanical behavior of BFRP to aluminum AA6086 mixed joints[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 48: 79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.12.009 [4] FIORE V, ALAGNA F, GALTIERI G, et al. Effect of curing time on the performances of hybrid/mixed joints[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 45: 911-918. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.016 [5] ALTALMAS A, EL REFAI A, ABED F. Bond degradation of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars exposed to accelerated aging conditions[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 81: 162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.036 [6] HESHMATI M, HAGHANI R, AL-EMRANI M, et al. Durability of bonded FRP-to-steel joints: effects of moisture, de-icing salt solution, temperature and FRP type[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 119: 153-167. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.049 [7] 谭伟, 那景新, 范以撒, 等. 考虑温度和载荷影响的动车信息窗粘接结构寿命预测[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(6): 101-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.06.011TAN Wei, NA Jing-xin, FAN Yi-sa, et al. Adhesive structure life prediction of EMU information window considering influence of temperature and load[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportion Engineering, 2019, 19(6): 101-110. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.06.011 [8] JOHN S J, KINLOCH A J, MATTHEWS F L. Measuring and predicting the durability of bonded carbon fibre/epoxy composite joints[J]. Composites, 1991, 22(2): 121-127. doi: 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90670-C [9] ZHANG Fan, YANG Xin, WANG Hui-ping, et al. Durability of adhesively-bonded single lap-shear joints in accelerated hygrothermal exposure for automotive applications[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, 44: 130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.009 [10] ZHANG Fan, WANG Hui-ping, HICKS C, et al. Experimental study of initial strengths and hygrothermal degradation of adhesive joints between thin aluminum and steel substrates[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, 43: 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.001 [11] KORTA J, MLYNIEC A, UHL T. Experimental and numerical study on the effect of humidity-temperature cycling on structural multi-material adhesive joints[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015, 79: 621-630. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.020 [12] POPINEAU S, RONDEAU-MOURO C, SULPICE-GAILLET C, et al. Free/bound water absorption in an epoxy adhesive[J]. Polymer, 2005, 46(24): 10733-10740. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.008 [13] SAYER M, BEKTAS N B, SAYMAN O. An experimental investigation on the impact behavior of hybrid composite plates[J]. Steel Construction, 2010, 92(5): 1256-1262. [14] PARK H, KIM H. Damage resistance of single lap adhesive composite joints by transverse ice impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37(2): 177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.08.005 [15] REIS P N B, SOARES J R L, PEREIRA A M, et al. Effect of adherends and environment on static and transverse impact response of adhesive lap joints[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2015, 80: 79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.004 [16] VAIDYA U K, GAUTAM A R S, HOSUR M, et al. Experimental-numerical studies of transverse impact response of adhesively bonded lap joints in composite structures[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2006, 26(3): 184-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.013 [17] KIM J S, CHUNG S K. A study on the low-velocity impact response of laminates for composite railway bodyshells[J]. Composite Structures, 2007, 77(4): 484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.020 [18] SAYMAN O, ARIKAN V, DOGAN A, et al. Failure analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints under transverse impact and different temperatures[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 54: 409-414. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.017 [19] SAYMAN O, SOYKOK I F, DOGAN T, et al. Effects of axial impacts at different temperatures on failure response of adhesively bonded woven fabric glass fiber/epoxy composite joints[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2014, 49(11): 1331-1344. [20] APALAK M K, YILDIRIM M. Effect of adhesive thickness on transverse low-speed impact behavior of adhesively bonded similar and dissimilar clamped plates[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2011, 25(19): 2587-2613. doi: 10.1163/016942411X556015 [21] KIM H, KAYIR T, MOUSSEAU S L. Mechanisms of damage formation in transversely impacted glass-epoxy bonded, lap joints[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2005, 39(39): 2039-2052. [22] AKDERYA T, KEMIKIOGLU U, SAYMAN O. Effects of thermal ageing and impact loading on tensile properties of adhesively bonded fibre/epoxy composite joints[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 95: 117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.073 [23] SILVA L F M D, ADAMS R D. Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2007, 27(3): 227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001 [24] SILVA L F M D, LOPES M J C Q. Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29(5): 509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009 [25] NA Jing-xin, MU Wen-long, QIN Guo-feng, et al. Effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of adhesively bonded basalt FRP-aluminum alloy joints in the automotive industry[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2018, 85: 138-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.027 [26] RIEGER J. The glass transition temperature Tg of polymers—comparison of the values from differential thermal analysis (DTA, DSC) and dynamic mechanical measurements (torsion pendulum)[J]. Polymer Testing, 2001, 20(2): 199-204. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9418(00)00023-4 [27] PLAZEK D J, FRUND Z N. Epoxy resins (DGEBA): the curing and physical aging process[J]. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 1990, 28(4): 431-448. doi: 10.1002/polb.1990.090280401 [28] BUCH X, SHANAHAN M E R. Influence of the gaseous environment on the thermal degradation of a structural epoxy adhesive[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2000, 76(7): 987-992. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000516)76:7<987::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-1 [29] QIN Guo-feng, NA Jing-xin, MU Wen-long, et al. Effect of continuous high temperature exposure on the adhesive strength of epoxy adhesive, CFRP and adhesively bonded CFRP-aluminum alloy joints[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018: 43-55. [30] 肖琳. 高低温循环作用后CFRP层合板力学性能演变研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014.XIAO Lin. Study on mechanical properties evolution of CFRP laminates after high and low temperature cycling[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese). -
点击查看大图
图(15) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 889
- HTML全文浏览量: 195
- PDF下载量: 3006
- 被引次数: 0
