强震作用下近断层桥梁桩基动力响应

冯忠居; 张聪; 何静斌; 关云辉; 袁枫斌

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.04.012

强震作用下近断层桥梁桩基动力响应

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.04.012

1.
长安大学公路学院，陕西西安 710064
2.
中国电力建设集团有限公司西北勘测设计研究院有限公司，陕西西安 710064
3.
陕西建工机械施工集团有限公司，陕西西安 710064
4.
北京建达道桥咨询有限公司，北京 102308

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51708040

海南省交通科技项目 HNZXY2015-045R

详细信息

作者简介:
冯忠居(1965-)，男，山西万荣人，长安大学教授，工学博士，从事桥梁桩基与岩土工程研究

通讯作者:
张聪(1994-)，男，河南焦作人，长安大学工学博士研究生

中图分类号: U443.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 704
- HTML全文浏览量: 162
- PDF下载量: 76
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-21
- 刊出日期: 2022-08-25

Dynamic response of bridge pile foundation near fault under strong earthquake

1.
School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
2.
Northwest Engineering Co., Ltd., Power China, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
3.
SCEGC Mechanized Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
4.
Beijing JianDa Road and Bridge Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing 102308, China

Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51708040

Hainan Transportation Technology Project HNZXY2015-045R

More Information

Author Bio:
FENG Zhong-ju(1965-), male, professor, PhD, ysf@gl.chd.edu.cn

ZHANG Cong(1994-), male, doctoral student, zhangcong@chd.edu.cn

Article Text (Baidu Translation)

摘要

摘要: 为探明强震作用下断层上、下盘桥梁桩基动力响应差异，依托海南省海文大桥工程，通过振动台模型试验，研究了0.15g~0.60g地震动强度作用下断层上、下盘桩基的桩身加速度、桩顶相对位移、桩身弯矩响应规律差异与桩基损伤特征。研究结果表明：在不同地震动强度作用下，断层上、下盘桩基的桩顶加速度峰值相差0.291~0.488 m·s^-2，桩顶加速度放大系数相差0.067~0.195，原因为断层对两侧岩土体影响范围存在差异与桩周岩土体“非线性”差异；随着地震动强度的增大，断层上、下盘桩基的桩顶相对位移差值逐渐增大，最大差值为0.77 mm；断层上、下盘桩基的弯矩最大值相差5.294~82.932 kN·m，且弯矩最大值均出现在覆盖层软硬土交界面与基岩面附近，原因在于下盘作为稳定盘，受上盘土体挤压作用，对下盘岩土体的振动剪切有一定抑制作用；地震动强度为0.35g时，断层上、下盘桩的最大弯矩均未超过抗弯承载力，满足海文大桥抗震设防烈度Ⅷ度(0.35g)的要求；地震动强度为0.35g~0.45g时，断层上盘桩的基频变化幅度较小，地震动强度为0.50g~0.60g时，断层上盘桩的基频显著降低，在桩顶与承台连接处、软硬土层界面与基岩面附近出现裂缝，说明此时桩基已发生损伤。可见，断层上盘桩基的桩身加速度峰值、桩顶相对位移与桩身弯矩动力响应指标均大于下盘桩基，断层上、下盘桩基动力响应变化规律差异显著，体现出显著的“断层上盘效应”，因此，强震作用下近断层桥梁桩基础抗震设计时，应着重考虑断层上盘桩基础的抗震承载能力。
- 桥梁工程 /
- 桩基础 /
- 振动台试验 /
- 强震 /
- 断层破裂带 /
- 动力响应
Abstract: In order to find out the difference in the dynamic responses of bridge piles on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault under a strong earthquake, relying on the Haiwen Bridge project in Hainan Province, the shaking table model test was carried out to study the response differences of pile acceleration, pile top relative displacement and pile bending moment response laws, and the piles damage characteristics on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault under the action of 0.15g-0.60g ground motion intensity. Research result shows that the difference between pile top peak accelerations on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault is 0.291-0.488 m·s^-2, and the difference in the amplification factor of pile top acceleration is 0.067-0.195 under the different ground motion intensities. The reason is the difference in the influence range of the fault on the rock and soil mass on both sides and the "non-linear" difference of the rock and soil mass around the pile. With the increase of earthquake intensity, the difference between the pile top relative displacements on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault increases gradually, and the maximum difference is 0.77 mm. The difference between the maximum bending moments of the pile foundations on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault is 5.294-82.932 kN·m, and the maximum bending moment occurs at the interface of soft and hard soil and near the bedrock surface. The reason is that the footwall, as a stable plate, is squeezed by the soil mass of the hanging wall, which has a certain inhibitory effect on the vibration and shear of the rock and soil mass of the footwall. When the ground motion strength is 0.35g, the maximum bending moment of the pile on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault does not exceed the bending bearing capacity, which meets the requirement of seismic fortification intensity Ⅷ of Haiwen Bridge(0.35g). When the ground motion intensity is 0.35g-0.45g, the pile fundamental frequency on the hanging wall of the fault has a small variation range. When the ground motion intensity is 0.50g-0.60g, the pile foundation frequency on the hanging wall decreases significantly. The cracks appear at the connection between the pile top and cap, the interface between the soft and hard soil layer, and the bedrock surface, which shows that the piles have been damaged. In summary, the acceleration of pile, the relative displacement of pile top, and the bending moment of pile on the hanging wall are larger than those on the footwall. The dynamic response changes of the piles on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault are significantly different, which shows significant "the hanging wall effect of fault". Therefore, in the seismic design of bridge pile foundation near the fault under strong earthquake, the seismic capacity of hanging wall pile foundation should be considered.
- bridge engineering /
- pile foundation /
- shaking table test /
- strong earthquake /
- fault fracture zone /
- dynamic response

HTML全文

图 1 桩基础与断层相对位置

Figure 1. Relative position of pile foundation and fault

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 叠层剪切式模型箱

Figure 2. Laminated shear model box

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 土体剪切波速测试

Figure 3. Shear wave velocity test of soil

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 模型桩

Figure 4. Model pile

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 模型桩布置

Figure 5. Layout of model piles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 0.35g-5010波

Figure 6. 0.35g-5010 wave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同强度地震动作用下桩身加速度峰值

Figure 7. Peak accelerations of piles under ground motions with different intensities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 桩顶加速度峰值与放大系数

Figure 8. Peak acceleration and amplification factors of pile tops

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 桩顶相对位移变化规律

Figure 9. Variation laws of relative displacements at pile tops

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 桩身弯矩峰值变化规律

Figure 10. Variation laws of peak bending moments of piles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 桩身弯矩最大值

Figure 11. Maximum bending moments of piles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 抗弯承载能力安全度

Figure 12. Safety degrees of flexural bearing capacity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 断层上盘桩(38-1^#)傅里叶谱

Figure 13. Fourier spectrums of 38-1^# pile on hanging wall of fault

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 断层上盘38-1^#桩基频变化规律

Figure 14. Variation law of foundation frequency of 38-1^# pile on hanging wall of fault

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 桩基损伤

Figure 15. Damage of pile foundation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 振动台技术指标

Table 1. Technical specifications of vibrating table

性能	台面尺寸/mm	振动模式	频率范围/Hz	模型载重/t	抗倾覆力矩/(kN·m)	最大加速度幅值(满载)/g		最大速度幅值/(cm·s^-1)		最大位移幅值/mm
参数	5 000×5 000	正弦、随机地震动	0.5~50	0~30	300	水平向	1.0	水平向	50	水平向	80
参数	5 000×5 000	正弦、随机地震动	0.5~50	0~30	300	纵向	0.7	纵向	40	纵向	50

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 试验物理量相似常数

Table 2. Similarity constants of test physical quantities

分类	物理量	相似常数
荷载	速度	0.18
	时间	0.18
	加速度	1
	人工质量	100 kg
	重力加速度	1
几何形状	频率	5.48
	线位移	1/30
	线尺寸	1/30
材料特征	应力	1
	应变	1
	泊松比	1
	弹性模量	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 模型土参数

Table 3. Model soil parameters

模型土	密度/(g·cm^-3)	含水率/%	压缩模量/MPa	孔隙比	黏聚力/kPa	内摩擦角/(°)
淤泥质黏土	1.67	49.8	3.78	1.32	10.2	4
砂砾	1.94	23.2	4.68	0.91	13.3	25
卵石土	2.03	31.5	24.00	0.73	8.0	39

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 土体剪切波速

Table 4. Shear wave velocities of soils m·s^-1

土体		淤泥质黏土	砂砾	卵石土	微风化花岗岩/混凝土	破碎带/碎石
剪切波速	原型	136	263	526	899
剪切波速	模型	138	276	539	917	120

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 模型桩参数

Table 5. Model pile parameters

桩身材料	桩长/cm	桩径/cm	桩身钢筋直径/mm	配筋率/%
C35混凝土	180	8	4	2.4

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	FENG Zhong-ju, HUO Jian-wei, HU Hai-bo, et al. Research on corrosion damage and bearing characteristics of bridge pile foundation concrete under a dry-wet-freeze-thaw cycle[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(6): 1-13.
[2]	JIANG Guan, FENG Zhong-ju, ZHAO Rui-xin, et al. Case study on safety assessment of rockfall and splash stone protective structures for secondary excavation of highway slope[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(2): 1-9.
[3]	冯忠居, 陈慧芸, 袁枫斌, 等. 桩-土-断层耦合作用下桥梁桩基竖向承载特性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(2): 36-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.02.004 FENG Zhong-ju, CHEN Hui-yun, YUAN Feng-bin, et al. Vertical bearing characteristics of bridge pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling action[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(2): 36-48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.02.004
[4]	FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, DONG Yun-xiu, et al. Effect of steel casing on vertical bearing characteristics of steel tube-reinforced concrete piles in loess area[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(14): 2874. doi: 10.3390/app9142874
[5]	DONG Yun-xiu, FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, et al. The horizontal bearing capacity of composite concrete-filled steel tube piles[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020(1): 1-15.
[6]	何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 等. 强震区桩-土-断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202007026.htm FENG Zhong-ju, HE Jing-bin, DONG Yun-xiu, et al. Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202007026.htm
[7]	SOMERVILLE P G, SMITH N F, GRAVES R W, et al. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 1997, 68(1): 199-222 doi: 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199
[8]	WANG G Q, ZHOU X Y, ZHANG P Z, et al. Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(1): 73-96 doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00047-1
[9]	LU Chih-hung, LIU Kuang-yen, CHANG Kuo-chun. Seismic performance of bridges with rubber bearings: lessons learnt from the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan Earthquake[J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2011, 34(7): 889-904. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2011.591920
[10]	FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, ZHAO Rui-xin, et al. Experiments on reducing negative skin friction of piles[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019(4): 1-10.
[11]	张永亮, 冯鹏飞, 陈兴冲, 等. 基于静-动力分析相结合方法的桥梁桩基础地震反应分析及抗震性能评价[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(S1): 325-329, 343. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.05.S062 ZHANG Yong-liang, FENG Peng-fei, CHEN Xing-chong, et al. Seismic response analysis and seismic performance evaluation on bridge pile foundations based on the method combined static with dynamic analysis[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(S1): 325-329, 343. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.05.S062
[12]	栾茂田, 孔德森, 杨庆, 等. 层状土中单桩竖向简谐动力响应的简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(3): 375-380. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.03.008 LUAN Mao-tian, KONG De-sen, YANG Qing, et al. Simplified analytic method of vertical harmonic response of single pile embedded in layered soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(3): 375-380. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.03.008
[13]	刘林超, 杨骁. 地震作用下饱和土-桩-上部结构动力相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(1): 120-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201201020.htm LIU Lin-chao, YANG Xiao. Dynamic interaction of saturated soil-pile-structure system under seismic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33 (1): 120-128. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201201020.htm
[14]	许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 等. 液化场地-结构动力相互作用振动台试验发展与回顾[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2019, 45(5): 502-514. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD201905012.htm XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, et al. Review on shaking table test of dynamic interaction of liquefiable site-structures system: retrospect and prospect[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2019, 45(5): 502-514. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD201905012.htm
[15]	冯忠居, 董芸秀, 何静斌, 等. 强震作用下饱和粉细砂液化振动台试验[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(9): 186-192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201909028.htm FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HE Jing-bin, et al. Shaking table test of saturated fine sand liquefaction under strong earthquake[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51(9): 186-192. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBX201909028.htm
[16]	刘闯, 冯忠居, 张福强, 等. 地震作用下特大型桥梁嵌岩桩基础动力响应[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(4): 53-62. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.04.006 LIU Chuang, FENG Zhong-ju, ZHANG Fu-qiang, et al. Dynamic response of rock-socketed pile foundation for extra-large bridge under earthquake action[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(4): 53-62. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.04.006
[17]	冯忠居, 王溪清, 李孝雄, 等. 强震作用下的砂土液化对桩基力学特性影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(1): 71-84. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.01.008 FENG Zhong-ju, WANG Xi-qing, LI Xiao-xiong, et al. Effect of sand liquefaction on mechanical properties of pile foundation under strong earthquake[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(1): 71-84. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.01.008
[18]	DONG Yun-xiu, FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, et al. Seismic response of a bridge pile foundation during a shaking table test[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2019, 2019(2): 1-16.
[19]	蔡奇鹏, 吴宏伟, 胡平, 等. 跨越走滑断层黏土地层动力响应离心机试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(7): 2424-2432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201807014.htm CAI Qi-peng, WU Hong-wei, HU Ping, et al. Centrifuge experimental study of dynamic responses of clay stratum overlying a strike-slip fault[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 2424-2432. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201807014.htm
[20]	MAKRIS N, TAZOH T, YUN X, et al. Prediction of the measured response of a scaled soil-pile-superstructure system[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1997, 16(2): 113-124.
[21]	闫孔明, 刘飞成, 张建经, 等. 地震作用下含倾斜软弱夹层边坡内群桩的弯曲变形研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(8): 1966-1976. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201708016.htm YAN Kong-ming, LIU Fei-cheng, ZHANG Jian-jing, et al. Bending deformation of pile group in the slope with intercalated weak layer under seismic excitations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(8): 1966-1976. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201708016.htm
[22]	宋波, 谢明雷, 李吉人. 不同桩基形式高桩码头地震动力损伤振动台试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51(S2): 28-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2018S2005.htm SONG Bo, XIE Ming-lei, LI Ji-ren. Study of seismic dynamic damage on pile-supported wharf with different types of piles by shaking table test[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(Sup 2): 28-34. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2018S2005.htm
[23]	谢文, 孙利民, 楼梦麟. 多点激励下桩-土-斜拉桥全模型振动台试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(5): 79-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201905007.htm XIE Wen, SUN Li-min, LOU Meng-lin. Shaking table test on a pile-soil-cable-stayed bridge full model under multi-support excitations[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(5): 79-89. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201905007.htm
[24]	江辉, 王志, 白晓宇, 等. 近、远场强震下深水桥梁-群桩基础的非线性响应及损伤特性[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(24): 13-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201724003.htm JIANG Hui, WANG Zhi, BAI Xiao-yu, et al. Nonlinear responses and damage characteristics for group-piles foundation of a deep-water bridge under strong near-fault and far-field earthquakes[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(24): 13-22. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201724003.htm
[25]	贾鹏, 王兰民, 万征, 等. 某桥梁桩基础的抗震计算研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2018, 40(2): 258-264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ201802011.htm JIA Peng, WANG Lan-min, WAN Zheng, et al. Seismic calculation and analysis of the pile foundation of a certain bridge[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2018, 40(2): 258-264. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ201802011.htm
[26]	李雨润, 闫志晓, 张健, 等. 饱和砂土中直群桩动力响应离心机振动台试验与简化数值模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(6): 1252-1264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX202006015.htm LI Yu-run, YAN Zhi-xiao, ZHANG Jian, et al. Centrifugal shaking table test and numerical simulation of dynamic responses of straight pile group in saturated sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(6): 1252-1264. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX202006015.htm
[27]	ZHANG Cong, FENG Zhong-ju, GUAN Yun-hui, et al. Study on liquefaction resistance of pile group by shaking table test[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 2022(12): 1-12.
[28]	陈国兴, 王志华, 左熹, 等. 振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(1): 89-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201001017.htm CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(1): 89-97. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201001017.htm
[29]	伍小平, 孙利民, 胡世德, 等. 振动台试验用层状剪切变形土箱的研制[J]. 同济大学学报, 2002, 30(7): 781-785. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ200207000.htm WU Xiao-ping, SUN Li-min, HU Shi-de, et al. Development of laminar shear box used in shaking table test[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2002, 30(7): 781-785. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ200207000.htm
[30]	袁林娟, 刘小生, 汪小刚, 等. 振动台土-箱结构模型动力特性及反应的解析分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(6): 1038-1042. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201206013.htm YUAN Lin-juan, LIU Xiao-sheng, WANG Xiao-gang, et al. Analytic solution of dynamic characteristics and responses of soil-box model for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(6): 1038-1042. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201206013.htm