Preparation and characterization of carbon nanotubes reinforced volcanic ash-based geopolymer
-
摘要: 为研究多壁碳纳米管对火山灰基地聚合物的增强效果与机理,通过显微观察和图像识别对比了不同超声时间多壁碳纳米管分散液中团聚体的数量和面积,确定了适宜的超声分散时长;以不同顺序混合分散液、碱激发剂溶液和火山灰制备地聚合物,通过所得浆体的稠度试验、硬化试件的三点弯曲试验、单轴压缩试验研究了不同掺量、不同种类的多壁碳纳米管对地聚合物工作性能与力学性能的影响,并利用扫描电子显微镜-能谱仪、压汞试验对地聚合产物的微观形貌和孔隙结构进行表征。分析结果表明:随着超声时间的增加,多壁碳纳米管的分散效果改善明显,45 min超声后超过85%的团聚体面积减小至0~100 μm2,总团聚体面积占比小于1%,且平均面积小于50 μm2;先添加多壁碳纳米管分散液再添加碱激发剂溶液的材料混合顺序更有利于纤维的均匀分散和地聚合物工作性能的保持;多壁碳纳米管在0.10%质量掺量时,对火山灰基地聚合物流动度影响不大,且能够有效提升其力学性能;功能化的多壁碳纳米管由于具有更强的亲水性和润湿性,对浆体工作性能的影响更轻微,对硬化试件力学性能的提升更显著,28 d时抗折、抗压强度较参照组最高可分别提升31.0%、15.9%;微观检测结果显示,多壁碳纳米管在地聚合物中发挥了桥接、填充、成核作用,因而实现性能的改善。Abstract: To investigate the reinforcing effect and mechanism of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on volcanic ash-based geopolymer, the numbers and areas of aggregates of multi-walled carbon nanotubes dispersions at different ultrasonic times were compared by using microscopy and image recognition, and an appropriate ultrasonic dispersion time was determined. Geopolymers were prepared by mixing the dispersion, alkaline activator solution, and volcanic ash in different orders. The effects of different types and concentrations of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the workability and mechanical properties of the geopolymer were investigated by the consistency test of the slurry and the three-point bending test and the uniaxial compression test of hardened specimens. The micro-morphologies and pore structures of the geopolymer products were characterized by scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectrometer and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Analysis results show that the dispersion effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes improves with the increase of ultrasonic time. After 45 min ultrasonication, the areas of more than 85% aggregates decrease to 0-100 μm2, the total ratio of the aggregate areas is less than 1%, and the average area is less than 50 μm2. The order of adding multi-walled carbon nanotube dispersion before adding NaOH solution is more favorable for the uniform dispersion of fibers and the preservation of the geopolymer workability. At a mass content of 0.10%, the multi-walled carbon nanotubes have little effect on the flowability of volcanic ash-based geopolymer and can effectively enhance the mechanical properties. The functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes have stronger hydrophilicity and wettability, leading to a slighter impact on the workability of the slurry and a more significant improvement in the mechanical properties of the hardened specimens. The 28 d flexural and compressive strengths can increase by up to 31.0% and 15.9%, respectively, compared with the reference group. The microscopic test results show that multi-walled carbon nanotubes play bridging, filling, and nucleation roles in the geopolymer, thus achieving the improvement of the performance.
-
Key words:
- road engineering /
- geopolymer /
- consistency test /
- strength test /
- carbon nanotube /
- micromechanism
-
表 1 火山灰原料主要化学组成
Table 1. Main chemical compositions of volcanic ash material
种类 SiO2 FeO Al2O3 CaO Na2O K2O MgO TiO2 P2O5 MnO 含量/% 43.3 16.7 16.5 8.8 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.9 0.7 0.3 表 2 试验方案
Table 2. Experimental schemes
试验组 MWCNTs种类 质量掺量/% 混合顺序 P0 原始 0.00 先加MWCNTs分散液,再加NaOH溶液 P05 原始 0.05 先加MWCNTs分散液,再加NaOH溶液 P1 原始 0.10 先加MWCNTs分散液,再加NaOH溶液 P15 原始 0.15 先加MWCNTs分散液,再加NaOH溶液 C1 羧基化 0.10 先加MWCNTs分散液,再加NaOH溶液 H1 羟基化 0.10 先加MWCNTs分散液,再加NaOH溶液 P1-2 原始 0.10 加MWCNTs与NaOH的混合溶液 表 3 团聚体面积相关计算结果
Table 3. Calculation result related to areas of agglomerates
超声处理时长/min 团聚体面积占比/% 平均团聚体面积/μm2 最大团聚体面积/μm2 0 7.61 650 24 727 15 2.31 153 3 227 30 1.87 79 2 365 45 0.86 46 2 242 60 0.53 31 2 231 表 4 稠度试验结果
Table 4. Consistency test result
试验组 塌落度/mm 塌落扩展度/mm P0 113 201 P05 110 198 P1 106 195 P15 88 183 C1 107 196 H1 111 199 P1-2 35 表 5 MIP试验孔隙分布统计
Table 5. Pore size distribution statistics in MIP test
试验组 累计进汞量/ (mL·g-1) 平均孔径/ nm 2~50 nm孔隙占比/% 大于50 nm孔隙占比/% 孔隙率/ % P0 0.1230 48.67 5.12 15.57 20.87 P1 0.1152 47.76 5.02 15.05 20.07 C1 0.1089 30.60 6.87 11.58 18.45 H1 0.0949 27.71 6.28 12.12 18.40 -
[1] 付立娟, 杨勇, 卢静华. 水泥工业碳达峰与碳中和前景分析[J]. 中国建材科技, 2021, 30(4): 80-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCKJ202104025.htmFU Li-juan, YANG Yong, LU Jing-hua. Prospect analysis of carbon peaking and carbon neutralization in cement industry[J]. China Building Materials Science and Technology, 2021, 30(4): 80-84. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCKJ202104025.htm [2] FEIZ R, AMMENBERG J, BAAS L, et al. Improving the CO2 performance of cement, Part Ⅰ: utilizing life-cycle assessment and key performance indicators to assess development within the cement industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 98: 272-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.083 [3] DAVIDOVITS J. Global warming impact on the cement and aggregates industries[J]. World Resource Review, 1994, 6(2): 263-278. [4] KANTARCI F, TÜRKMEN İ, EKINCI E. Optimization of production parameters of geopolymer mortar and concrete: a comprehensive experimental study[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 228: 116770. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116770 [5] DAVIDOVITS J. Geopolymers[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 1991, 37(8): 1633-1656. doi: 10.1007/BF01912193 [6] DUXSON P, MALLICOAT S W, LUKEY G C, et al. The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 292(1): 8-20. [7] SHI Xiao-shuang, WANG Qing-yuan, ZHAO Xiao-ling, et al. Discussion on properties and microstructure of geopolymer concrete containing fly ash and recycled aggregate[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 450-451: 1577-1583. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.450-451.1577 [8] DAVIDOVITS J. Geopolymer chemistry and sustainable development[C]//Geopolymer Institute: Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer. Saint-Quentin: Geopolymer Institute, 2005: 9-17. [9] EL-GAMAL S M A, SELIM F A. Utilization of some industrial wastes for eco-friendly cement production[J]. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2017, 12: 9-17. [10] JIANG Chen-hui, WANG Ai-ying, BAO Xu-fan, et al. A review on geopolymer in potential coating application: materials, preparation and basic properties[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 32: 101734. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101734 [11] ALANAZI H, YANG Mi-jia, ZHANG Da-lu, et al. Bond strength of PCC pavement repairs using metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 65: 75-82. [12] HUSEIEN G F, MIRZA J, ISMAIL M, et al. Geopolymer mortars as sustainable repair material: a comprehensive review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 80: 54-74. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.076 [13] 徐建军, 吴开胜, 赵大军. 用于道路修复加固的地聚合物注浆材料的研制[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2016, 43(3): 26-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-702X.2016.03.007XU Jian-jun, WU Kai-sheng, ZHAO Da-jun. Development of geopolymer grouting material for road repair and reinforcement[J]. New Building Materials, 2016, 43(3): 26-28. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-702X.2016.03.007 [14] ZHOU Si-qi, LU Chen-hong, ZHU Xing-yi, et al. Upcycling of natural volcanic resources for geopolymer: comparative study on synthesis, reaction mechanism and rheological behavior[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 268: 121184. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121184 [15] DJOBO J N Y, ELIMBI A, TCHAKOUTÉ H K, et al. Volcanic ash-based geopolymer cements/concretes: the current state of the art and perspectives[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(5): 4433-4446. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8230-8 [16] IBRAHIM M, JOHARI M A M, MASLEHUDDIN M, et al. Influence of composition and concentration of alkaline activator on the properties of natural-pozzolan based green concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 201: 186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.117 [17] WANG Kai-tuo, LEMOUGNA P N, TANG Qing, et al. Lunar regolith can allow the synthesis of cement materials with near-zero water consumption[J]. Gondwana Research, 2017, 44: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.11.001 [18] KONSTA-GDOUTOS M S, METAXA Z S, SHAH S P. Multi-scale mechanical and fracture characteristics and early-age strain capacity of high performance carbon nanotube/cement nanocomposites[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(2): 110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.007 [19] PAN Z, SANJAYAN J G, RANGAN B V. Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2011, 63(10): 763-771. doi: 10.1680/macr.2011.63.10.763 [20] BAI Tao, LIU Bo-wen, WU Yan-guang, et al. Mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer with glass fiber reinforcement and vibration preparation[J]. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2020, 544: 120173. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120173 [21] EL-SAYED T A, SHAHEEN Y B I. Flexural performance of recycled wheat straw ash-based geopolymer RC beams and containing recycled steel fiber[J]. Structures, 2020, 28: 1713-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.10.013 [22] GUO Xiao-lu, PAN Xue-jiao. Mechanical properties and mechanisms of fiber reinforced fly ash-steel slag based geopolymer mortar[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 179: 633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.198 [23] SINGH N B, SAXENA S K, KUMAR M. Effect of nanomaterials on the properties of geopolymer mortars and concrete[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5(3): 9035-9040. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.10.018 [24] LI Zhi-peng, FEI Ming-en, HUYAN Chen-xi, et al. Nano-engineered, fly ash-based geopolymer composites: an overview[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 168: 105334. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105334 [25] ABBASI S M, AHMADI H, KHALAJ G, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of a metakaolinite-based geopolymer nanocomposite reinforced with carbon nanotubes[J]. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(14): 15171-15176. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.080 [26] SAAFI M, ANDREW K, TANG P L, et al. Multifunctional properties of carbon nanotube/fly ash geopolymeric nanocomposites[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 49: 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.007 [27] LI Fa-ping, YANG Zhe-ming, ZHENG Ao-han, et al. Properties of modified engineered geopolymer composites incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes(MWCNTs) and granulated blast furnace slag(GBFS)[J]. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(10): 14244-14259. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.008 [28] LI Fa-ping, LIU Li-sheng, YANG Zhe-ming, et al. Physical and mechanical properties and micro characteristics of fly ash-based geopolymer paste incorporated with waste granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401: 123339. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123339 [29] KHATER H M, ABD EL GAWAAD H A. Characterization of alkali activated geopolymer mortar doped with MWCNT[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 102: 329-337. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.121 [30] ROVNANÍK P, ŠIMONOVÁ H, TOPOLÁŘ L, et al. Carbon nanotube reinforced alkali-activated slag mortars[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 119: 223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.051 [31] ROVNANÍK P, ŠIMONOVÁ H, TOPOLÁŘ L, et al. Effect of carbon nanotubes on the mechanical fracture properties of fly ash geopolymer[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 151: 321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.360 [32] KONSTA-GDOUTOS M S, METAXA Z S, SHAH S P. Highly dispersed carbon nanotube reinforced cement based materials[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(7): 1052-1059. [33] METAXA Z S, KONSTA-GDOUTOS M S, SHAH S P. Carbon nanofiber cementitious composites: effect of debulking procedure on dispersion and reinforcing efficiency[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2013, 36: 25-32. [34] SOUZA D J, YAMASHITA L Y, DRANKA F, et al. Repair mortars incorporating multiwalled carbon nanotubes: shrinkage and sodium sulfate attack[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017, 29(12): 04017246. [35] ZHAO Li, GUO Xin-li, LIU Yuan-yuan, et al. Investigation of dispersion behavior of GO modified by different water reducing agents in cement pore solution[J]. Carbon, 2018, 127: 255-269. [36] DA LUZ G, GLEIZE P J P, BATISTON E R, et al. Effect of pristine and functionalized carbon nanotubes on microstructural, rheological, and mechanical behaviors of metakaolin-based geopolymer[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 104: 103332. [37] 范杰, 李庚英, 王中坤. 表面处理碳纳米管对水泥砂浆性能影响的研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2019, 46(8): 43-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXJZ201908012.htmFAN Jie, LI Geng-ying, WANG Zhong-kun. Effect of surface treatment of carbon nanotubes on the properties of cement mortar[J]. New Building Materials, 2019, 46(8): 43-47. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXJZ201908012.htm [38] GUNASEKARA C, SETUNGE S, LAW D W. Long-term mechanical properties of different fly ash geopolymers[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2017, 114(3): 743-752. [39] LI Li-xiang, LI Feng. The effect of carbonyl, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups on the capacitance of carbon nanotubes[J]. New Carbon Materials, 2011, 26(3): 224-228. [40] PYATINA T, SUGAMA T. Use of carbon microfibers for reinforcement of calcium aluminate-class F fly ash cement activated with sodium meta-silicate at up to 300 ℃[J]. The Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 2015, 39: 209-216. [41] LAWLER J S, WILHELM T, ZAMPINI D, et al. Fracture processes of hybrid fiber-reinforced mortar[J]. Materials and Structures, 2003, 36(3): 197-208. [42] ZHANG Rong-rong, ZHOU Si-qi, LI Feng, et al. Mechanical and microstructural characterization of carbon nanofiber-reinforced geopolymer nanocomposite based on lunar regolith simulant[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2022, 34(1): 04021387. [43] FEHERVARI A, MACLEOD A J N, GARCEZ E O, et al. On the mechanisms for improved strengths of carbon nanofiber- enriched mortars[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 136: 106178. [44] WANG Bao-min, ZHANG Yuan, GUO Zhi-qiang, et al. Controlling the optimum surfactants concentrations for dispersing carbon nanofibers in aqueous solution[J]. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2013, 87(13): 2253-2259. -