3-D numerical analysis of influence of layer modulus on structural responses of asphalt pavements
-
摘要: 目前关于路面结构层模量对路面结构力学响应影响的研究一般是利用弹性层状理论进行分析。从三维数值分析的角度, 分别从路表弯沉、面层和基层内的压应力及拉应力等方面说明了结构层模量及基层条件对路面结构力学响应的影响。分析认为路面各结构层模量的提高能减小路面表面弯沉, 较高的基层模量会增大面层内的压应力, 较高的底基层模量能减小基层底面的拉应力。有关分析结果对路面结构的设计和施工具有参考价值Abstract: At present, influence of layer modulus on structural responses of asphalt pavements is analyzed using general Burmister theory. However, pavement responses under axle loading is three dimensional (3D) in nature. Using 3-D numerical simulation, this paper reports the impact of pavement structural module on pavement surface deflection, compressive stress and tensile stress at the bottom of surface and base respectively. The results indicate that the higher layer modulus are, the lower surface deflectiones, the higher base's module can result in great vertical compressive stress at asphalt layer, and the higher subgrade's module can result in lower tensile stress at the bottom of base. The analysis results have great value to design and construction of asphalt pavements.
-
Key words:
- pavement mechanics /
- module /
- 3-D numerical analysis /
- surface deflection /
- stress
-
图 3 不同方案下沿路面横向分布的路表竖向位移
Figure 3. Vertical displacements along pavement cross section in different scenarios
图 4 轮隙中心下沿路面深度分布的竖向位移
Figure 4. Vertical displacements along pavement depth at center of dual tires
图 5 不同方案下路面结构层内竖向压应力
Figure 5. Vertical compressive stress of surface lay in different scenarios
表 1 计算分析方案
Table 1. Analysis scenarios
结构层 各计算方案结构层模量/MPa 1# 2# 3# 4# 5# 6# 7# 8# 上面层 1500 1500 1500 1000 2500 1500 1500 1500 中面层 1200 1200 1200 800 1800 1200 1200 1200 下面层 1200 1200 1200 800 1800 1200 1200 1200 基层 1500 500 2500 1500 1500 1500 500 500 底基层 800 800 800 800 800 200 200 200 土基 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 80 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 各计算方案下的路表弯沉
Table 2. Surface deflection of pavement structures
计算方案 1# 2# 3# 4# 5# 6# 7# 8# 路表弯沉(A)/0.01 mm -24.36 -29.89 -22.88 -25.83 -23.12 -31.28 -38.72 -29.79
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 各计算方案下路面结构层内压应力
Table 3. Compressive stress of pavement structure in different scenarios /MPa
计算方案 1# 2# 3# 4# 5# 6# 7# 8# 中面层底压应力 -0.454 -0.397 -0.473 -0.468 -0.423 -0.438 -0.384 -0.385 面层底压应力(B) -0.303 -0.260 -0.318 -0.368 -0.327 -0.339 -0.294 -0.295 基层底压应力(C) -0.082 -0.086 -0.079 -0.104 -0.087 -0.072 -0.074 -0.079 土基表面压应力(D) -0.014 -0.016 -0.013 -0.018 -0.015 -0.017 -0.020 -0.026
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 各计算方案下路面结构层内拉应力
Table 4. Tensile stress of pavement structure in different scenarios /MPa
计算方案 1# 2# 3# 4# 5# 6# 7# 8# 下面层底拉应力(B) -0.050 0.018 -0.080 -0.088 -0.030 -0.069 0.067 0.069 基层底拉应力(C) 0.024 -0.005 0.044 0.028 0.037 0.141 0.052 0.046
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] JTJ014-1997, 公路沥青路面设计规范[S]. [2] 沙庆林. 高速公路沥青路面早期破坏现象及防治[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2001. [3] 杨群, 黄晓明. 基层模量对路面性能的影响分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 36(4)81-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX200104018.htmYANG Qun, HUANG Xiaoming. Influence of road base's module on pavement performance[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2001, 36(4): 81-83. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX200104018.htm [4] 凌建明, 邬洪波, 徐飞龙. 二灰碎石分层特性对沥青路面结构性能的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(3): 292-295. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ200203010.htmLING Jian-ming, WU Hong-bo, XU Fei-long. Responses of asphalt pavement to layer-built characteristics of lime-flyash concrete as base course[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 30 (3): 292-295. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ200203010.htm [5] Baoshan Huang, Louay N Mohammad, Masood Rasoulian. 3-D numerical simulation of asphalt pavement at Louisiana accelerated loading facility(ALF)[A]. In 80th Annual Meeting (CD-ROM)[C]. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. [6] Tunwin Svasdisant, Michael Schorsch, Gilbert Y Baladi. Mechanistic analysis of top-down cracks in asphalt pavements[A]. In 81st Annual Meeting (CD-ROM)[C]. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002. [7] Sam Helwany, John Dyer, Joe Leidy. Finite element analysis of flexible pavements[J]. J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 1998, 124 (5): 491-499. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:5(491) [8] Raj V Siddharthan, Jian Yao, Peter E Sebaaly. Pavement strain from moving dynamic 3D load distribution[J]. J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 1998, 124(6): 557-565. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:6(557) [9] 陆辉. 轮载作用下沥青路面结构三维非线性有限元分析方法的研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2001. [10] 孙立军, 张宏超, 刘黎萍, 等. 沥青路面初期损坪特点和机理分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(4): 416-421. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ200204006.htmSUN Li-jun ZHANG Hong-chao, LIU Li-ping, et al. Characteristics and mechanism of initial failures on asphalt pavementdesign method for heavy-duty road (part 1)[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 30 (4): 416-421. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ200204006.htm [11] Reid M D, Imbabi M S, Coutellier D. Effects of joint geometry on response of asphaltic plug joints[J]. J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 1998, 124(4): 311-318. [12] 四川省交通厅公路规划勘测设计研究院. 成都绕城高速公路西段设计报告[R]. 成都: 四川省交通厅公路规划勘测设计研究院, 1998. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 348
- HTML全文浏览量: 128
- PDF下载量: 461
- 被引次数: 0
