-
摘要: 针对目前路面状况等级评价方法中存在主观影响因素过多、权重不确定性等问题, 根据影响路面状况的路面状况指数、行驶质量指标、路面强度系数、路面抗滑能力系数等主要指标, 提出了一种基于物元模型的路面状况等级综合评价方法。以路面状况等级、评价指标及其特征值构造物元模型, 并根据计算出的综合关联度实现对各路面状况等级的综合评判。实例表明该模型能准确地反映路面状况, 是可行的, 有一定的推广应用价值。Abstract: There are more subjective factors and their weights can not been accurately decided in current evaluation model for pavement condition. A new evaluation system based on matter-elements-analysis was developed. In this system, the evaluation indices, such as pavement condition, pavement strength, anti-slippery, were constructed, and their characteristic values were calculated to reveal their synthetic relation degrees. According to those values and degrees, the pavement condition can be evaluated accurately. Applied results show that this method is scientific and reliable.
-
Key words:
- road engineering /
- pavement /
- grade /
- matter elements model /
- relational degree /
- weight
-
表 1 路面状况指标原始数据
Table 1. Original data of pavement condition indices
路段 长度/m PCI PBI SFC 1 320 21.35 3.2 0.493 2 470 89.56 3.2 0.539 3 1 340 90.20 3.8 0.605 4 1 125 99.85 1.7 0.612 5 650 98.55 1.2 0.593 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 路况等级评价分级指标
Table 2. Indices of pavement grade evaluation
指标 N1 (优) N2 (良) N3 (中) N4 (差) SFC 85~100 70~85 55~70 0~55 σ 0~2.0 2.0~3.5 3.5~4.5 4.5~10.0 F > 0.5 0.4~0.5 0.3~0.4 0~0.3
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 资建民, 江滔. 路面状况综合评价的灰色方法[J]. 华中科技大学学报, 2002, 30(3): 62-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZLG200203020.htmZI Jian-min, JIANG Tao. Gray method of the comprehensive evaluation for road surface condition[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2002, 30(3): 62-64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZLG200203020.htm [2] 蔡文. 物元模型及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1994. [3] 周勇, 李倩. RS和GIS支持的农用土地物元综合评价[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1999, 5(3): 75-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQS199903014.htmZHOU Yong, LI Qian. Comprehensive evaluation of agricultral lands based on RS and GIS[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 5(3): 75-80. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQS199903014.htm [4] JTJ 073-96, 公路养护技术规范[S]. [5] 王锦国, 周志芳. 可拓评价方法在环境质量综合评价中的应用[J]. 河海大学学报, 2002, 30(1): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HHDX200201003.htmWANG Jin-guo, ZHOUZhi-fang. Application of extension of method to comprehensive assessment of environmental quality[J]. Journal of Hohai University, 2002, 30(1): 15-18. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HHDX200201003.htm [6] 马士宾, 魏连雨. 沥青路面状况属性综合评价[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 22(4): 16-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200204004.htmMA Shi-bin, WEI Lian-yu. Attribute synthetic assessment system for asphalt pavement condition[J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 22(4): 16-18. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200204004.htm [7] 姚祖康. 路面管理系统[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1992. [8] 梁军, 蒋薇. 模糊综合评价方法改进及其在交通管理规划中的应用[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2002, 2(4): 68-72. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200204015LIANG Jun, JIANG Wei. An improvementon fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and its use in urban traffic planning[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2002, 2(4): 68-72. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200204015 -
点击查看大图
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 277
- HTML全文浏览量: 96
- PDF下载量: 213
- 被引次数: 0
