-
摘要: 在对一卡多用系统规划方案、评价指标分析的基础上, 利用层次分析法建立了系统规划方案评价模型。结合南京市一卡多用系统的实施情况, 应用所建立的层次分析模型对规划方案进行排序, 确定的最佳决策方案符合实际, 表明该评价模型是合理有效的。Abstract: Based on the system planning and evaluation factors of multipurpose transit smart card system, the evaluating model of the system was proposed by AHP. With the practice in Nanjing city, the optimized application arrangement was calculated using the AHP model. The results show that the evaluating model is reasonable.
-
Key words:
- transit /
- multipurpose transit smart card system /
- evaluation /
- AHP
-
表 1 权重向量和一致性检验指标
Table 1. Weight and evaluation indices
I1 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 w1-F I2 f6 f7 f8 f9 f10 f11 w2-F I3 f12 f13 w3-F f1 1 2 2 2 2 0.510 0 f6 1 2 0 2 0 2 0.138 5 f12 1 2 0.750 0 f2 0 1 2 2 2 0.263 8 f7 0 1 0 2 0 2 0.072 4 f13 0 1 0.250 0 f3 0 0 1 2 2 0.129 6 f8 2 2 1 2 2 2 0.467 9 CI3=0;具有完全一致性 f4 0 0 0 1 2 0.063 6 f9 0 0 0 1 0 2 0.038 4 f5 0 0 0 0 1 0.032 9 f10 2 2 0 2 1 2 0.261 3 CI1=0.059 6;RI1=1.12;CR1=0.053 2 < 0.1 f11 0 0 0 0 2 1 0.021 4 CI2=0.076 4;RI2=1.24;CR2=0.061 6 < 0.1 
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 权重及一致性检验指标
Table 3. Weight and evaluation indices
fi 各方案对各指标的权重向量 CR f1 (0.40, 0.05, 0.25, 0.15, 0.09, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01)T 0.089 f2 (0.40, 0.09, 0.25, 0.15, 0.05, 0.02, 0.03, 0.01)T 0.089 f3 (0.30, 0.11, 0.23, 0.13, 0.11, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05)T 0.086 f4 (0.16, 0.11, 0.25, 0.25, 0.09, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04)T 0.012 f5 (0.09, 0.09, 0.24, 0.20, 0.09, 0.09, 0.09, 0.09)T 0.052 f6 (0.37, 0.03, 0.11, 0.11, 0.03, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11)T 0.014 f7 (0.29, 0.02, 0.19, 0.19, 0.02, 0.05, 0.19, 0.05)T 0.043 f8 (0.14, 0.19, 0.08, 0.08, 0.19, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08)T 0.001 f9 (0.24, 0.06, 0.14, 0.14, 0.06, 0.06, 0.24, 0.06)T 0.004 f10 (0.14, 0.19, 0.08, 0.08, 0.19, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08)T 0.001 f11 (0.19, 0.04, 0.19, 0.19, 0.04, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11)T 0.097 f12 (0.43, 0.09, 0.20, 0.20, 0.01, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02)T 0.001 f13 (0.125, 0.125, 0.125, 0.125, 0.125, 0.125, 0.125, 0.125)T 完全一致
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Daniel Fleishman, Carol Schweiger, David Lott, et al. Multipurpose Transit Payment Media[M]. Washington, D C: National Academy Press, 1998. [2] Goeddel D L. Benefits assessment of advanced public transportation system technologies[R]. Washington, D C: Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration, 2000. [3] Virginia Department of Transportation. Regional payment systems partnership action plan[R]. Washington, D C: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center/Multisystems, 2000. [4] 张宁, 王健. 地铁参与城市交通一卡通的研究[A]. 城市轨道交通发展研讨会论文集[C]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2003. [5] 卢宗华. 层次分析法中判断矩阵构造方法改进[J]. 系统工程, 1990, 8(1): 43-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCXT199001008.htmLU Zong-hua. Improvement on judgement matrix conformation method in AHP[J]. Systems Engineering, 1990, 8(1): 43-44. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCXT199001008.htm [6] 郭亚军. 综合评价理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 232
- HTML全文浏览量: 100
- PDF下载量: 180
- 被引次数: 0
