-
摘要: 应用多目标决策模糊优选理论, 研究了抢修方法、弹坑工程量等因素对机场最小起降带方案评判结果的影响, 建立了最小起降带模糊优选理论模型, 给出了相关参数的建议值。结合抢修实例对模型和参数进行了检验, 发现方案评判结果的优属度量化值由只考虑抢修时间影响的0.83提高为综合评判后的0.98。结果表明该模型可以较好地评价机场最小起降带方案的综合优劣程度, 所得决策结果与实际情况比较吻合。Abstract: This paper studied the evaluation of minimum operating strip(MOS) in the procedure of airfield rapid repair by fuzzy optimum decision-making theory, put forward a fuzzy optimum decision-making model of MOS. Applying the model, an example was analyzed. It is pointed that the final value of measuring best MOS increases from 0.83 to 0.98 only considering repair-time. The result indicates that the model is feasible, and can reasonably describe the result of evaluation.
-
表 1 定量指标特征值
Table 1. Characteristic values of quantitative indices
方案1 方案2 方案3 方案4 弹坑工程量/m3 1 047 1 200 1 100 1 400 MOS长度/m 1 518.9 1 677.5 1 677.5 1 518.9 表 2 定性指标二元相对比较级
Table 2. Relative comparison of qualitative indices
[f2(x1), f1(x2)] [f3(x1), f1(x3)] [f4(x1), f1(x4)] [f3(x2), f2(x3)] [f4(x2), f2(x4)] [f4(x3), f3(x4)] 未爆弹药 [0.9, 0.7] [0.9, 0.7] [0.9, 0.5] [0.8, 0.8] [0.7, 0.4] [0.7, 0.4] 抢修方法 [0.9, 0.8] [0.9, 0.9] [0.9, 0.7] [0.8, 0.9] [0.8, 0.7] [0.9, 0.7] 训练水平 [0.9, 0.7] [0.9, 0.9] [0.9, 0.8] [0.7, 0.9] [0.8, 0.7] [0.9, 0.8] 机械物资储备 [0.8, 0.9] [0.8, 0.8] [0.8, 0.9] [0.8, 0.7] [0.8, 0.9] [0.7, 0.8] 联络道分布 [0.6, 0.8] [0.6, 0.8] [0.7, 0.6] [0.8, 0.9] [0.8, 0.6] [0.9, 0.6] 维护补给 [0.8, 0.6] [0.8, 0.6] [0.8, 0.7] [0.6, 0.6] [0.6, 0.7] [0.6, 0.7] 弹坑修复要求 [0.8, 0.6] [0.8, 0.7] [0.8, 0.7] [0.7, 0.8] [0.7, 0.8] [0.8, 0.8] 尺寸扩展 [0.6, 0.8] [0.6, 0.8] [0.7, 0.8] [0.9, 0.9] [0.8, 0.7] [0.8, 0.7] 附属设施修复 [0.7, 0.6] [0.7, 0.6] [0.8, 0.9] [0.8, 0.8] [0.7, 0.9] [0.7, 0.9] 联络道补充 [0.6, 0.8] [0.6, 0.8] [0.7, 0.7] [0.8, 0.8] [0.7, 0.5] [0.7, 0.5] -
[1] 蔡良才. 机场规划设计[M]. 北京: 解放军出版社, 2002. [2] 陈守煜. 系统模糊决策理论与应用[M]. 大连: 大连理工大学出版社, 1994. [3] 陈守煜. 多目标决策系统模糊优选理论、模型与方法[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报, 2001, 22(3): 136-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBSL200103028.htmCHEN Shou-yu. A fuzzy optimum theory, model and approach for multiobjective decision making systems[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, 2001, 22(3): 136-140. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBSL200103028.htm [4] 许巍, 岑国平. 机场最小起降带的计算机辅助优选[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2003, 4(2): 20-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGC200302005.htmXU Wei, CEN Guo-ping. Optimum selection of airfield MOS with computer[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University, 2003, 4(2): 20-23. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGC200302005.htm [5] 高虹霓, 杨建军, 曹泽阳. 基于模糊AHP的道路选优评价方法研究[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2001, 2(2): 82-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGC200102023.htmGAO Hong-ni, YANG Jian-jun, CAO Ze-yang. The method of material provision optimizing path estimate on the basis of fuzzy AHP[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University, 2001, 2(2): 82-84. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJGC200102023.htm [6] 岑国平, 李明锋. 机场跑道长度可靠性设计方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(1): 62-65. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200401016CEN Guo-ping, LI Ming-feng. Reliability design method of airport runway length[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(1): 62-65. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200401016 [7] 李远富, 薛波, 易思蓉. 铁路线路设计方案综合优选决策系统的研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(2): 151-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGC200102013.htmLI Yuan-fu, XUE Bo, YI Si-rong. Development of system for synthetic optimal selection and decision making of variant projects in railway location[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2001, 16(2): 151-155. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGC200102013.htm [8] 魏朗, 高丽敏, 余强, 等. 驾驶员道路安全感受模糊评判模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(1): 102-105. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200401025WEI Lang, GAO Li-min, YU Qiang, et al. Fuzzy evaluating model of driver's road safety perception[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(1): 102-105. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200401025