-
摘要: 针对公路建设项目综合评价权重确定的一般方法(AHP)计算量大, 主观性强的缺点, 提出了一种改进的AHP算法。该方法在改进层次分析法的基础上, 得出各位专家赋予的相对于上一层次同一指标本层次各指标的权重, 运用熵值理论对各专家评估水平赋予权重, 最后得到指标的合成权重。实例计算结果表明: 在综合评价体系中自然环境影响水平下水环境影响程度、大气环境影响程度、声环境影响程度3个指标权重分别为0.3946、0.3290、0.2760, 这说明此方法在全面考虑各种因素对专家评估水平影响的条件下, 克服了AHP法主观性强的缺点, 有效地计算了3个因素的相对重要程度, 该方法可行。Abstract: In order to overcome the large computing and subjectivity of analytical hierarchy process(AHP), this paper put forward a new method of weight value determination in the comprehensive evaluation of highway construction. According to the advanced AHP, the weight values given by every expert of the indices could be received, they were determinated by entropy theory, then the synthetic weight values were received. Applying the method, the weight values of three indices were 0.394 6, 0.329 0 and 0.276 0 under the effect levels of natural environment, which were the influence degrees of water environment, atmosphere environment and sound environment. The computing results show the weight values of the factors can be computed, the subjectivity of AHP is overcome, the method is feasible.
-
Key words:
- traffic planning /
- comprehensive evaluation /
- indices weight values /
- advanced AHP /
- entropy method
-
[1] 周伟, 王选仓. 道路经济与管理[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1998. [2] 萨蒂T L. 层次分析法在资源分配、管理和冲突分析中的应用[M]. 北京: 煤碳工业出版社, 1998. [3] 王瑛, 孙林岩, 陈宏. 基于两阶段的物流系统综合评价DEA/AHP法[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 23(3): 79-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200303022.htmWang Ying, Sun Lin-yan, Chen Hong. Logistics synthesis evaluating on DEA/AHP two-stage model[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2003, 23(3): 79-84. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200303022.htm [4] 许国志. 系统科学[M]. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 2000. [5] 韩立岩, 汪培庄. 应用模糊数学[M]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社, 1998. [6] 王炜, 过秀成. 交通工程学[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2000. [7] 张生瑞. 公路交通可持续发展系统分析与评价[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2002. [8] 马荣国, 刘洪营, 梁国华. 城市客运交通结构评价指标[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(1): 87-91. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200401022Ma Rong-guo, Liu Hong-ying, Liang Guo-hua. Evaluation indices on urban passenger transportation structure[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(1): 87-91. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200401022 [9] 周伟, 向前忠. 城市网规划后评价理论与方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16(1): 99-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ201002051.htmZhou Wei, Xiang Qian-zhong. Theory and method for post-evaluation of highway network planning[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2003, 16(1): 99-103. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ201002051.htm -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 212
- HTML全文浏览量: 52
- PDF下载量: 371
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
