-
摘要: 为了合理铺设土工格栅, 防止路基填挖交界处路面开裂, 分别建立不加格栅和加入不同层数、不同长度格栅的路基有限元计算模型, 分析了路面顶面的竖向位移和沿路线纵向水平应力应变以及格栅的应力应变。格栅的布设减小了路面顶面竖向位移, 分散了集中在填挖交界处的拉应力和拉应变, 各模型中格栅的最大拉应力均小于1 MPa, 最大拉应变均小于0.3%, 布设一层时的格栅或多层布设时的底层格栅, 拉应力和拉应变从路堑一侧到路堤一侧逐渐减小, 其余层格栅的拉应力和拉应变, 以靠近交界处路堑一侧最大。对计算结果的分析表明, 土工格栅消除或延缓了路面横向裂缝的发生, 布设一层时的格栅或多层布设时的底层格栅, 路堑一侧应长于路堤一侧, 其余层宜以交界处为轴对称布设。Abstract: In order to prevent pavement cracking at cut to fill location of subgrade, the treatment mechanism and proper layout of geogrid were studied by 3-D finite element method(FEM), subgrade FEM models with various lengths of geogrid and various number of geogrid layers were built, a model without geogrid was also built for comparison, the vertical displacement, longitudinal stain and stress of pavement surface and geogrid stain and stress were analyzed. Geogrid in subgrade reduces the vertical displacement of pavement surface, scatters the concentrated tensile strain and stress at cut to fill location. The maximum geogrid stress and strain of all models are below 1 MPa and 0.3% respectively. For one layer case and the bottom geogrid for multilayer cases, geogrid stress and strain are decreased gradually from cut to fill side. In the other layers, geogrid stress and strain at cut side near cut to fill location are maximum. It is discovered that geogrid eliminate or postpone the pavement transverse cracking, for one layer case, geogrid should be longer in cut side than in the fill side, the bottom geogrid should be longer in cut side than in fill side, and the others should be laid symmetrically for multilayer cases.
-
Key words:
- road engineering /
- subgrade /
- geogrid /
- cut to fill location /
- pavement cracking /
- 3-D FEM
-
表 1 有限元模型
Table 1. FEM models
模型编号 有否格栅 原地面坡度 格栅长度/m 加筋层数 填土高差/m TWJJ1-1 有 1∶1 20 1 24 TWJJ1-2 有 1∶1 10 2 24 TWJJ1-3 有 1∶1 15 2 24 TWJJ1-4 有 1∶1 20 2 24 TWJJ1-5 有 1∶1 25 2 24 TWJJ1-6 有 1∶1 20 3 24 TWJJ2-1 无 1∶1 — — 24 表 2 土的参数
Table 2. Parameters of soil
密度/(g·cm-3) 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 粘聚力/kPa 内摩擦角/(°) 膨胀角/(°) 1.924 50 0.35 126.12 30.650 30.650 表 3 土工格栅参数
Table 3. Parameters of geogrid
筋肋厚度/mm 纵向抗拉强度/(kN·m-1) 平均弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 土与格栅的摩擦系数 3.0 56.1 400 0 0.57 表 4 路面结构及材料参数
Table 4. Parameters of pavement structures and materials
结构层(自下而上) 厚度/cm 密度/(g·cm-3) 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 石灰稳定土 30 1.600 500 0.35 水泥石灰稳定碎石 18 2.000 1000 0.35 沥青混凝土 4+3 2.500 1500 0.35 计算模型采用值 55 1.845 800 0.35 -
[1] 周志刚, 郑健龙, 李强. 土工加筋材料处治填挖交界路基非均匀沉降设计方法研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16(1): 27—31. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2003.01.007Zhou Zhi-gang, Zheng Jian-long, Li Qiang. Study of the design method of using geonets totreat the unequal settlement of subgrade at the cut to fill location[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2003, 16(1): 27—31. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2003.01.007 [2] 高江平, 胡长水, 俞茂宏. 网状及条带式加筋土挡墙加筋应变的测试[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 24(5): 24—26. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2004.05.006Gao Jiang-ping, Hu Chang-shui, Yu Mao-hong. Testing of pulling strains of both striped and netted reinforcement wall[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 24(5): 24—26. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2004.05.006 [3] 高江平, 石兆旭, 俞茂宏. 网状与条带式加筋土挡墙墙面位移的测试[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 25(2): 42—45. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2005.02.010Gao Jiang-ping, Shi Zhao-xu, Yu Mao-hong. Testing of surface's displacement about netted and striped reinforced wall[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2005, 25(2): 42—45. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2005.02.010 [4] 杨晓华. 土工格室加固饱和黄土地基性状及承载力[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 24(3): 5—8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2004.03.002Yang Xiao-hua. Bearing capacity and behavior of saturated loess foundation reinforced by geocell[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 24(3): 5—8. (in Chi-nese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2004.03.002 [5] 周志刚, 郑健龙, 李强. 土工格网处理埂挖交界路基非均匀沉降的机理分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(5): 576—579. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2002.05.007Zhou Zhi-gang, Zheng Jian-long, Li Qiang. Analysis of the mechanism of using geonets to treat the unequal settlement of subgrade at the cut to fill location[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(5): 576—579. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2002.05.007 [6] 周志刚, 郑健龙, 李强. 土工格网处治填挖交界路基非均匀沉降的现场检测研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2003, 20(2): 16—19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2003.02.005Zhou Zhi-gang, Zheng Jian-long, Li Qiang. Study on treatment of uneven settlement by geogridin subgrade boundary area[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2003, 20(2): 16—19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2003.02.005 [7] 景宏君, 张斌. 黄土路基强度规律[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(2): 14—18. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200402004Jing Hong-jun, Zhang Bin. Loess subgrade strength law[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(2): 14—18. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200402004 [8] 葛折圣, 黄晓明. 含EPS夹层台背回填材料的离心模型试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(1): 11—14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2004.01.004Ge Zhe-sheng, Huang Xiao-ming. Centrifugal modeling test on abutment back fill with EPS inclusion[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(1): 11—14. (in Chi-nese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2004.01.004