-
摘要: 为了提高水泥混凝土桥面沥青混凝土铺装的使用寿命, 以复合梁试验评价不同的桥面沥青铺装结构的疲劳性能, 采用有限元法分析荷载作用下复合梁试件具有与实际梁体一致的应力响应, 并采用复合梁疲劳试验测试不同桥面沥青铺装层组合的疲劳寿命。由试验结果可知, 复合梁破坏模式与桥梁铺装实际破坏形式一致, 相同的铺装结构在加入防水粘结层后寿命可增长8倍, 铺装材料加入纤维可使疲劳寿命增长20%以上; SMA和纤维加筋的AC组合是本次试验中的最优结构。Abstract: In order to improve the life of cement concrete bridge deck pavement, compound beam test was used to research the fatigue characteristics of hot mixed asphalt (HMA) courses on bridge deck, finite element analysis (FEA) method was employed to make the mechanical response of compound beam accord with that of actual bridge deck under the same load, the fatigue test was done for compound beams with different pavement structures.Test result shows that the destroy process of compound beam is similar with that of actual bridge deck, the structure with waterproof and cohesive course has a fatigue life, which is 8 times longer than that of the structure without the course, the addition of fiber in the HMA can increase at least 20% of its fatigue life, the combination structure of stone matrix asphalt (SMA) and fiber reinforced asphalt concrete (AC) is the best pavement structure in the test.
-
表 1 结构组合方案
Table 1. Combination Structures
组号 铺装上层 铺装下层 粘结层 试件个数(上下层厚度/cm) 1 AK-13+纤维 AC-20Ⅰ+纤维 无 3 (4+6) 2 AK-13+纤维 AC-20Ⅰ+纤维 环氧沥青 3 (4+6) 3 AK-13A+纤维 AC-20Ⅰ+纤维 SBS改性沥青 3 (4+6) 4 AK-13A AC-20Ⅰ SBS改性沥青 3 (4+6) 5 AK-13A AC-20Ⅰ+纤维 SBS改性沥青 3 (4+6) 6 AK-13A+纤维 AC-20Ⅰ+纤维 SBS改性沥青 3 (5+6) 7 SMA-13 AC-20Ⅰ+纤维 SBS改性沥青 3 (5+6) 表 2 疲劳试验结果
Table 2. Fatigue Test Result
组号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 寿命/次 53068 73031 454460 328950 416258 475060 504268 -
[1] 高英. 长大桥沥青混凝土铺装结构形式及施工工艺研究[R]. 南京: 东南大学, 2003. [2] TP 8294, Standard Test Method for Determining the Fatigue Life of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Subjected to Repeated Flexural Bending[S]. [3] 王钧利. 桥面铺装疲劳性能参数及可靠性[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 24 (3): 39-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200403010.htmWANG Jun-li. Fatigue Performance Parameters and Reliability of Bridge Deck Pavement[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2004, 24 (3): 39-42. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200403010.htm [4] RAOTANGELLAS C S, CRAUS J, DEACONJ A, et al. Summary Report on Fatigue Response of Asphalt Mixtures-Prepared for Strategic Highway Research Program Project A-003-A[R]. California: University of California, 1990. [5] 陈先华, 黄卫, 王建伟, 等. 浇注式沥青混凝土铺装破坏原因[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4 (4): 5-9. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200404002CHEN Xian-hua, HUANG Wei, WANG Jian-wei, et al. Damage Causes of Mastic Asphalt Pavement on Orthotropic Steel Deck Plate[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4 (4): 5-9. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200404002 [6] 郑木莲, 王秉纲, 胡长顺. 多孔混凝土疲劳性能的研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2004, 17 (1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200401002.htmZHENG Mu-lian, WANG Bing-gang, HU Chang-shun. Study of Fatigue Property of Porous Concrete[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2004, 17 (1): 1-7. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200401002.htm [7] WALTERJ L, HICKS R, WILSONJ E. Impact of Variationsin Material Properties on Asphalt Pavement Life Evaluation of Warren-Scappoose Project[R]. Oregon: Oregon State University, 1981. [8] 许志鸿, 李淑明, 高英, 等. 沥青混合料疲劳性能研究[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2001, 1 (1): 20-24. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200101005XU Zhi-hong, LI Shu-ming, GAO Ying, et al. Research on Fatigue Characteristic of Asphalt Mixture[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2001, 1 (1): 20-24. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200101005 [9] 许永明, 张登良, 刘武斌. 沥青混合料疲劳性能影响因素的研究[J]. 石油沥青, 1995, 9 (4): 8-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-OILE200802003.htmXU Yong-ming, ZHANG Deng-liang, LIU Wu-bin. Study on the Effect Factors of Asphalt Mixs Fatigue Properties[J]. Asphalt, 1995, 9 (4): 8-14. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-OILE200802003.htm