Integrative evaluation index system for preventive maintenance timing of asphalt pavement
-
摘要: 为了合理确定沥青路面预防性养护措施的最佳实施时机, 分析了沥青路面使用性能评价指标与预防性养护工程特点, 建立了基于路面状况指数、行驶质量指数、抗滑系数及车辙的路面使用性能综合评价指标体系。考虑到不同路面所处的地理环境及所承担的荷载组合与交通量的差异, 根据道路的实际状况, 应用灰色关联度理论确定各分项指标的权重。某高速公路4个单项指标的权重系数计算结果分别为0.27、0.21、0.25与0.27, 表明增加的车辙指标是反映沥青路面使用初期特点的控制指标, 确定的分指标权重值可使预防性养护时机的选择更具针对性。Abstract: In order to decide the best timing of preventive maintenance of asphalt pavement, the evaluation indices of service performance and the characters of preventive maintenance were analyzed, an integrative evaluation index system of the timing was set up based on integrating pavement condition index, ride quality index, anti-skid coefficient and asphalt rutting index.The differences of traffic volumes, road environments and compound loads aimed at different roads were considered, the weight coefficients of subentry indices were computed by applying grey relation theory based on the practical status of road.Computation result shows that weight coefficients are 0.27, 0.21, 0.25 and 0.27 respectively, rutting index is a vital controlling target to reflect the nature of young asphalt pavement, and the weight values of subentry indices enable the selection time of the preventive maintenance more pertinent and practicable.
-
Key words:
- pavement engineering /
- asphalt pavement /
- preventive maintenance /
- evaluation index
-
表 1 路面性能指标检测值
Table 1. Measurement values of pavement performance indices
路况指标 2000年 2001年 2002年 2003年 2004年 2005年 IPCI0 98.35 88.63 84.98 82.57 79.75 75.85 IIRI0 1.883 1.916 2.021 2.201 2.375 2.479 ISFC0 62.47 57.28 50.49 43.30 32.71 24.93 IARI0 4.7 5.9 7.3 9.5 10.9 12.4 表 2 路面性能指标转换值
Table 2. Conversion values of pavement performance indices
路况指标Xi 2000年 2001年 2002年 2003年 2004年 2005年 xi(1) xi(2) xi(3) xi(4) xi(5) xi(6) IPQI 92.40 89.10 83.70 79.70 73.60 68.40 IPCI 98.35 88.63 84.98 82.57 79.75 75.85 IRQI 91.04 90.94 90.65 90.11 89.57 89.24 ISFC 92.03 89.02 83.62 75.78 60.34 47.24 IARI 83.72 81.37 78.31 72.81 68.88 64.35 表 3 始点零化数据
Table 3. Zero clearing of initial data
Xi Xi(n) xi(1) xi(2) xi(3) xi(4) xi(5) xi(6) X0 0.00 -3.30 -8.70 -12.70 -18.80 -24.00 X1 0.00 -9.72 -13.37 -15.78 -18.60 -22.50 X2 0.00 -0.10 -0.39 -0.93 -1.47 -1.80 X3 0.00 -3.01 -8.41 -16.25 -31.69 -44.79 X4 0.00 -2.35 -5.41 -10.91 -14.84 -19.37 表 4 绝对关联度中间数据
Table 4. Middle data of absduteness relation
Xi Xi(n) xi(1) xi(2) xi(3) xi(4) xi(5) xi(6) X0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 X1 0.00 6.42 4.67 3.08 0.20 1.50 X2 0.00 3.20 8.31 11.77 17.33 22.20 X3 0.00 0.29 0.29 3.55 12.89 20.79 X4 0.00 0.95 3.29 1.79 3.96 4.63 表 5 初值化数据
Table 5. Initialization data
Xi Xi(n) xi(1) xi(2) xi(3) xi(4) xi(5) xi(6) X0 1.000 0.964 0.906 0.863 0.797 0.740 X1 1.000 0.901 0.864 0.840 0.811 0.771 X2 1.000 0.999 0.996 0.990 0.984 0.980 X3 1.000 0.967 0.909 0.823 0.656 0.513 X4 1.000 0.972 0.935 0.870 0.823 0.769 -
[1] 董瑞琨, 孙立军, 彭勇. 路面预防性养护时机确定方法探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(3): 31-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK200403008.htmDong Rui-kun, Sun Li-jun, Peng Yong. Probe into determination of the appropriate time of pavement preventive maintenance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14(3): 31-35. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK200403008.htm [2] 姚玉玲, 任勇, 陈拴发. 沥青路面的预防性养护时机[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 26(6): 34-38. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.06.008Yao Yu-ling, Ren Yong, Chen Shuan-fa. Preventive maintenance timing of asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2006, 26(6): 34-38. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.06.008 [3] JTJ 073.2-2001, 公路沥青路面养护技术规范[S]. [4] 张永清, 贾双盈. 高等级公路沥青路面性能评价方法[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 25(2): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200502002.htmZhang Yong-qing, Jia Shuang-ying. Evaluation method for asphalt pavement performance of freeway[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 25(2): 11-15. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200502002.htm [5] 李福普. 高速公路沥青路面的早期损坏与预防性养护[J]. 石油沥青, 2005, 19(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-OILE200501001.htmLi Fu-pu. Preventive maintenance of asphalt pavementsin expressways[J]. Petroleum Asphalt, 2005, 19(1): 1-6. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-OILE200501001.htm [6] 董瑞琨, 孙立军, 彭勇, 等. 基于沥青路面功能性能的预防性养护时机指标[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(2): 292-295. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE200502029.htmDong Rui-kun, Sun Li-jun, Peng Yong, et al. Indexes for timing of asphalt pavement preventive maintenance (PPM) based on pavement functional performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(2): 292-295. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE200502029.htm [7] 马士宾, 魏连雨, 杨春风. 沥青路面状况属性综合评价[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 22(4): 16-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2002.04.005Ma Shi-bin, Wei Lian-yu, Yang Chun-feng. Attribute synthetic assessment systemfor asphalt pavement condition[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2002, 22(4): 16-19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2002.04.005 [8] 胡霞光, 王秉纲. 两种基于遗传算法的路面性能综合评价方法[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 22(2): 6-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200202001.htmHu Xia-guang, Wang Bing-gang. Application of two genetic algorithms based method in pavement performance synthetic evaluation[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2002, 22(2): 6-9. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200202001.htm [9] 蒋红妍, 戴经梁. 道路路况评价的物元模型[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 25(1): 29-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200501007.htmJiang Hong-yan, Dai Jing-liang. Matter element model for evaluating pavement condition[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 25(1): 29-32. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200501007.htm [10] 陈荫三. 高速公路运输量研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2005, 18(2): 94-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL20050200I.htmChen Yin-san. Study of freeway transportation volume[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2005, 18(2): 94-98. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL20050200I.htm [11] 刘思峰. 灰色系统理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999. [12] 王鹏, 曾凡奇, 黄晓明. 沥青高温性能指标的灰色关联度分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006, 6(3): 32-36. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2006.03.008Wang Peng, Zeng Fan-qi, Huang Xiao-ming. Grey relation degree analysis of high-temperature performance indexes ofasphalt[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(3): 32-36. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2006.03.008 [13] 陈斌, 魏庆曜, 高利, 等. 基于多级关联灰度模型的公路建设社会经济环境影响评价[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16(1): 77-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200301018.htmChen Bin, Wei Qing-yao, Gao Li, et al. Assessment of social and economic environment of highway construction on multistep associated gray model[J]. China Journal of Highway andTransport, 2003, 16(1): 77-81. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200301018.htm [14] 孙燕, 陈森发, 黄鹍. 基于灰色评价理论的自适应最优路径选择[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16(4): 87-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200304019.htmSun Yan, Chen Sen-fa, Huang Kun. Adaptive optimal route selection based on gray evaluation theory[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2003, 16(4): 87-90. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200304019.htm [15] 李学红. 高速公路沥青路面预防性养护计划研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007. [16] 杜顺成, 戴经梁. 沥青混合料永久变形评价指标[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19(5): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200605004.htmDu Shun-cheng, Dai Jing-liang. Permanent deformation evaluation index of asphalt mixture[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19(5): 18-22. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200605004.htm [17] 王惠勇, 陈宇亮, 芮勇勤. 基于物元模型分析方法的路面状况综合评价[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(2): 6-9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2004.02.002Wang Hui-yong, Chen Yu-liang, Rui Yong-qin. Matter-elements-analysis method of comprehensive evaluation for pavement condition[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(2): 6-9. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2004.02.002
计量
- 文章访问数: 284
- HTML全文浏览量: 113
- PDF下载量: 217
- 被引次数: 0