-
摘要: 为了解长江下游苏通公路大桥地基土工程特性, 基于大量的室内土工试验和回归分析方法, 研究了水下地基粘性土的变形参数和强度参数特性。发现粘性土的变形参数和强度参数的变异系数比物理参数的变异系数大; 压缩模量与天然孔隙比、天然含水量、干密度等物理参数成指数关系, 相关系数大于0.87;压缩系数与3个物理参数成线性关系, 相关系数超过0.91;粘聚力与3个物理参数成较好的指数关系, 相关系数大于0.84, 而内摩擦角与物理参数间的相关关系差, 线性相关系数小于0.41。Abstract: In order to understand the engineering properties of cohesive clay in the foundation of Sutong highway large bridge in the lower reaches of Yangtze River, the deformation and strength parameters were studied based on a large number of geotechnical tests and regression analysis method.Study result shows that the variation coefficients of deformation and strength parameters for cohesive clay are larger than those of physical parameters; there is good exponential correlativity between compression module and three physical parameters that are natural pore-solid ratio, natural water content and dry density, the correlativity coefficients are more than 0.87;there is linear correlativity between compression coefficient and three physical parameters, the correlativity coefficients are more than 0.91;there is better exponential correlativity between cohesion and three physical parameters, their correlativity coefficients are more than 0.84;while the correlativity between internal friction angle and three physical parameters is bad, their linear correlativity coefficients are less than 0.41.
-
Key words:
- cohesive clay /
- experimental study /
- deformation parameters /
- strength parameters
-
表 1 参数统计
Table 1. Statistic of parameters
物理力学指标 粘土 粉质粘土 范围 平均值 变异系数 范围 平均值 变异系数 天然含水量/% 25.3~39.5 33.4 0.10 18.3~39.5 34.3 0.08 天然密度/(g·cm-3) 1.79~1.99 2.08 0.02 1.79~2.08 1.82 0.02 天然孔隙比 0.517~1.092 0.628 0.05 0.529~1.108 1.004 0.08 压缩系数/MPa-1 0.06~0.54 0.18 0.12 0.08~0.54 0.36 0.24 压缩模量/MPa 9.49~29.10 14.52 0.14 3.83~21.52 5.82 0.22 粘聚力/kPa 10~165 45 0.15 10~126 39 0.31 内摩擦角/(°) 8.2~28.8 17.4 0.21 7.2~29.4 19.0 0.32 -
[1] Gabr MA, Hossain MS, Barlaz M A. Shear strength parame-ters of municipal solid waste withleachate recirculation[J]. Jour-nal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(4): 478-484. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(478) [2] Park HI, Park B, Lee S R, et al. Parameter evaluation andperformance comparison of MSWsettlement prediction mod-els in various landfill types[J]. Journal of Environmental En-gineering, 2007, 133(1): 64-72. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:1(64) [3] Lee K, Prezzi M, Ki m N. Subgrade design parametersfromsam-ples prepared with different compaction methods[J]. Journal ofTransportation Engineering, 2007, 133(2): 82-89. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:2(82) [4] 张云. 修正剑桥模型参数对计算结果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(3): 441-444. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.03.020Zhang Yun. Effects of parameters of modified Cambridgemodel on computed results[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(3): 441-444. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.03.020 [5] Johari A, Habibagahi G, Ghahramani A. Prediction of soil-water characteristic curve using genetic programming[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(5): 661-665. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(661) [6] Pradeep U, Kurup E P. Griffin prediction of soil compositionfrom CPT data using general regression neural network[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2006, 20(4): 281-289. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2006)20:4(281) [7] 王钊, 陆士强. 强度和变形参数的变化对土工有限元计算的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(12): 1 892-1 894. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.12.005Wang Zhao, Lu Shi-qiang. Effects of variation of strengh anddeformation parameters on calculation results of FEMfor soilengineering[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(12): 1 892-1 894. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2005.12.005 [8] 王东耀, 刘丽萍, 叶万军. 山渣料路用性能试验[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 27(1): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200701003.htmWang Dong-yao, Liu Li-ping, Ye Wan-jun. Road perform-ance experi ment of rock slag mixture[J]. Journal of Chang anUniversity: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 27(1): 15-18. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200701003.htm [9] 沙爱民, 陈开圣, 邓湘河. 公路工程湿陷性黄土地基评价方法[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 27(4): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200704000.htmSha Ai-min, Chen Kai-sheng, Deng Xiang-he. Evaluationmethod of highway subgrade at collapsedloess[J]. Journal ofChang an University: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 27(4): 1-5. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200704000.htm [10] 唐朝生, 刘义怀, 施斌, 等. 新老路基拼接中差异沉降的数值模拟[J]. 中国公路学报, 2007, 20(2): 13-17. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2007.02.003Tang Chao-sheng, Liu Yi-huai, Shi Bin, et al. Numericalsi mulation on defferential settlement of jointing of new andold roadbed[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2007, 20(2): 13-17. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2007.02.003 [11] 施成华. 隧道开挖及疏水引起的地表沉降与变形[J]. 中国公路学报, 2007, 20(1): 91-95. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2007.01.017Shi Cheng-hua. Ground surface settlement and deformationcaused by tunnel excavation and dewatering[J]. China Jour-nal of Highway and Transport, 2007, 20(1): 91-95. (in Chi-nese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2007.01.017 [12] 俞永华, 谢永利, 杨晓华, 等. 土工格室柔性搭板处治的路桥过渡段差异沉降三维数值分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2007, 20(4): 12-18. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2007.04.003Yu Yong-hua, Xie Yong-li, Yang Xiao-hua, et al. Three-di-mensional numerical analysis of geocell flexible approach slabfor treating differential settlement at bridge-subgrade transi-tion section[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2007, 20(4): 12-18. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2007.04.003 [13] 李又云, 刘保健, 谢永利. 饱和软土地基固结沉降的现场测试[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 26(6): 1-5. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.06.001Li You-yun, Liu Bao-jian, Xie Yong-li. Spot test of consoli-dation settlement of soft clay foundation[J]. Journal ofChang an University: Natural Science Edition, 2006, 26(6): 1-5. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.06.001 [14] 李进军, 黄茂松, 王育德. 交通荷载作用下软土地基累积塑性变形分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19(1): 1-5. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2006.01.001Li Jin-jun, Huang Mao-song, Wang Yu-de. Analysis ofcumulative plastic deformation of soft clay foundation undertraffic loading[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19(1): 1-5. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2006.01.001 [15] 岳鹏飞, 申爱琴, 祁秀林. 桥台背路基沉降理论计算[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 26(5): 30-34. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.05.008Yue Peng-fei, Shen Ai-qin, Qi Xiu-lin. Calculating theory ofsettlement of bridge approach embankment[J]. Journal ofChang an University: Natural Science Edition, 2006, 26(5): 30-34. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2006.05.008 [16] 赵明华, 肖燕, 陈昌富, 等. 考虑土体蠕变特性的桥台软基变形分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19(2): 56-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200602009.htmZhao Ming-hua, Xiao Yan, Chen Chang-fu, et al. Analysisof deformation on soft subsoil around bridge abut ment consid-ering soil creep property[J]. China Journal of Highway andTransport, 2006, 19(2): 56-61. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200602009.htm [17] 杨果林, 丁加明. 膨胀土路基的胀缩变形模型试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19(4): 23-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200604004.htmYang Guo-lin, Ding Jia-ming. Model test on expansion andshrinkage deformation in expansive soil roadbed[J]. ChinaJournal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19(4): 23-29. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200604004.htm [18] 王东耀, 折学森, 叶万军, 等. 高速公路软基最终沉降预测的范例推理方法[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 26(1): 20-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200601004.htmWang Dong-yao, She Xue-sen, Ye Wan-jun, et al. Case-based reasoning approach to settlement of expressway on softfoundation[J]. Journal of Chang an University: Natural Sci-ence Edition, 2006, 26(1): 20-24. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL200601004.htm [19] 高建敏, 翟婉明, 徐涌. 有碴轨道下沉变形参数影响分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2007, 7(4): 15-20. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200704004Gao Jian-min, Zhai Wan-ming, Xu Yong. Analysis of param-eters effect on settlement of ballasted track[J]. Journal ofTraffic and Transportation Engineering, 2007, 7(4): 15-20. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200704004