-
摘要: 为准确评价航空公司竞争力, 提出了多级模糊综合评价方法, 分析了航空公司竞争力的含义与影响因素, 建立了网络型航空公司竞争力评价指标体系, 运用层次分析法确定各层次指标权重。确定指标隶属度时, 定性指标采用模糊统计法, 数量化指标分为正向指标、适中指标与负向指标分别予以确定。分析结果表明: 评价指标体系科学合理, 多级模糊综合评价方法能够很好地解决评价指标与评价等级判定的模糊性问题, 评价结果能够客观地反映航空公司竞争力的总体水平, 航空公司可以根据评价结果有针对性地进行竞争力的培育与建设工作。Abstract: In order to evaluate airline's competitiveness exactly, a multilevel-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proposed, the denotation of airline's competitiveness and its effect factors were analyzed, and a competitiveness evaluation index system of network airline was built, in which the weights of evaluation indices were determined by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). The membership grades of qualitative indices were determined with statistical method of fuzziness, positive index, neutral index and negative index were applied to define the membership grades of quantitative indices. Analysis result indicates that the system is reasonable, the method can resolve the fuzzinesses of evaluation indices and rating levels appropriately, the evaluation result can reflect the general level of airline's competitiveness objectively, and the airline can cultivate its competitiveness exactly according to the result.
-
表 1 RI值
Table 1. RI values
阶数 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RI 0.000 0.000 0.580 0.901 1.120 1.240 1.320 1.410 1.450 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 评价指标体系权重
Table 2. Weights of evaluation index system
准则层 准则层权重 指标层 指标层权重 运营规模U1 0.094 可用吨公里u11 0.271 总资产u12 0.609 总周转量u13 0.120 运营管理U2 0.112 单位员工运输吨公里u21 0.118 飞机日利用率u22 0.322 枢纽市场控制能力u23 0.560 航线网络U3 0.193 网络连通性u31 0.376 网络密度u32 0.396 网络平均航线距离u33 0.228 服务质量U4 0.253 空中服务水平u41 0.310 地面服务水平u42 0.207 安全水平u43 0.483 生产效益U5 0.348 单位可用吨公里成本u51 0.270 单位运输吨公里收入u52 0.313 资产利润率u53 0.417
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 各评价指标隶属度
Table 3. Membership grades of evaluation indices
指标 等级 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 可用吨公里u11 0.07 0.12 0.23 0.58 0.00 总资产u12 0.04 0.17 0.41 0.38 0.00 总周转量u13 0.11 0.17 0.47 0.25 0.00 单位员工运输吨公里u21 0.18 0.32 0.41 0.09 0.00 飞机日利用率u22 0.11 0.12 0.34 0.22 0.11 枢纽市场控制能力u23 0.09 0.13 0.37 0.21 0.20 网络连通性u31 0.16 0.27 0.41 0.11 0.05 网络密度u32 0.07 0.21 0.40 0.17 0.15 网络平均航线距离u33 0.00 0.08 0.37 0.41 0.14 空中服务水平u41 0.00 0.31 0.39 0.17 0.13 地面服务水平u42 0.00 0.32 0.41 0.20 0.07 安全水平u43 0.23 0.64 0.13 0.00 0.00 单位可用吨公里成本u51 0.17 0.21 0.21 0.40 0.01 单位运输吨公里收入u52 0.15 0.32 0.35 0.10 0.08 资产利润率u53 0.14 0.26 0.37 0.17 0.06
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Good D H, Roler L H, Sickles R C. Airline efficiency differences between Europe and the US: implications for the pace of ECintegration and domestic regulation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 80(3): 508-518. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00134-X [2] Monteiroa L, Macdonald S. From efficiency to flexibility: the strategic use of information in the airline industry[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1996, 5(3): 169-188. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(96)80002-3 [3] Oum T N, Yu Chun-yan, Zhang An-ming. Global airline alliances: international regulatory issues[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2001, 7(1): 57-62. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00034-X [4] Scheraga C A. Operational efficiency versus financial mobility in the global airline industry: a data envelopment and tobit analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2004, 38(5): 383-404. [5] Oum T N, Fu Xiao-wen, Yu Chun-yan. New evidences on airline efficiency and yields: a comparative analysis of major North American air carriers and its implications[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2): 153-164. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.002 [6] 沈滨, 伍青生. 提高中国航空公司竞争力的分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 2003, 24(4): 33-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLGD200304007.htmShen Bin, Wu Qing-sheng. Analysis of enhancing the competitiveness of China s airlines[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology: Social Sciences, 2003, 24(4): 33-37. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLGD200304007.htm [7] 刘世锦, 冯飞. 中国产业发展跟踪研究[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2001. [8] 包随义. 加快培育和提升我国航空运输企业的核心竞争力[J]. 中国民用航空, 2005, 6(11): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MHJJ200511008.htmBao Sui-yi. Nurture and enhance core competitiveness of Chinese air transport enterprises[J]. China Civil Aviation, 2005, 6(11): 23-26. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MHJJ200511008.htm [9] 刘少成, 郑兴无, 颜明池. 中国民航企业竞争力研究(一)[J]. 中国民用航空, 2005, 6(7): 10-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MHJJ200507003.htmLiu Shao-cheng, Zheng Xing-wu, Yan Ming-chi. Competence research on Chinese civil aviation enterprises(1)[J]. China Civil Aviation, 2005, 6(7): 10-18. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MHJJ200507003.htm [10] 李艳伟, 于剑. 世界航空公司商业模式的发展及启示[J]. 综合运输, 2007, 29(6): 63-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSZH200706017.htmLi Yan-wei, Yu Jian. The world airlines business model and the implication to China airlines[J]. Comprehensive Transportation, 2007, 29(6): 63-66. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSZH200706017.htm [11] 刘世彦, 吴林江. 企业竞争力指标体系的建立与评价[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2001, 16(1): 29-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJLT200101007.htmLiu Shi-yan, Wu Lin-jiang. Astudy on the establishing and evaluation of corporation competenceindex system[J]. Statistics and Information Tribune, 2001, 16(1): 29-33. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJLT200101007.htm [12] 袁家新, 程龙生. 企业竞争力及其评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2003, 18(5): 38-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJC200305020.htmYuan Jia-xin, Cheng Long-sheng. The corporation competence and its evaluation[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2003, 18(5): 38-39. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJC200305020.htm [13] 秦寿康. 综合评价原理与应用[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2003. [14] 刘浩学, 周, 杨俊儒. 危险货物运输路线模糊综合评判模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006, 6(2): 80-82. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200602018Liu Hao-xue, Zhou Xun, Yang Jun-ru. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation model of transportation routes of dangerous goods[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(2): 80-82. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/200602018 [15] 许树柏. 层次分析法原理: 决策实用方法[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 1988. [16] 吴育华, 杜纲. 管理科学基础[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 2001. -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 225
- HTML全文浏览量: 51
- PDF下载量: 633
- 被引次数: 0
