留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

高速列车抗风的抽吸减载方法

郗艳红 毛军 高亮 杨国伟

郗艳红, 毛军, 高亮, 杨国伟. 高速列车抗风的抽吸减载方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2013, 13(6): 36-46.
引用本文: 郗艳红, 毛军, 高亮, 杨国伟. 高速列车抗风的抽吸减载方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2013, 13(6): 36-46.
XI Yan-hong, MAO Jun, GAO Liang, YANG Guo-wei. Load-shedding method based on suction effect to improve wind drag of high-speed train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(6): 36-46.
Citation: XI Yan-hong, MAO Jun, GAO Liang, YANG Guo-wei. Load-shedding method based on suction effect to improve wind drag of high-speed train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(6): 36-46.

高速列车抗风的抽吸减载方法

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 51278032

中国博士后科学基金项目 2013M530520

"十一五"国家科技支撑计划项目 2009BAG12A03C

详细信息
    作者简介:

    郗艳红(1980-), 女, 河北唐山人, 北京交通大学讲师, 工学博士, 从事高速列车空气动力学与行车安全研究

  • 中图分类号: U270.11

Load-shedding method based on suction effect to improve wind drag of high-speed train

More Information
  • 摘要: 为了提高列车在大风中运行的安全性, 利用抽吸气法控制列车绕流边界层分离, 以减小横风气动力。以中国CRH型高速列车为原型, 在车体内设计了腔室, 并通过条缝与列车表面相连, 使列车表面的绕流经列车表面条缝流入腔室内, 形成抽吸效应。研究结果表明: 抽吸气腔室和条缝的设置能够在列车高速行驶时产生低于车体外部绕流的压力, 有效地控制边界层的分离和减小列车的横风气动力。条缝倾角对气动减载效果有明显影响, 当条缝倾角为30°时, 总阻力的减载幅度可达7.21%;头车、中间车与尾车的横向力分别减载4.85%、2.71%与90.48%;头车、中间车与尾车的升力分别减载8.21%、12.56%与7.69%;头车、中间车与尾车的倾覆力矩减载幅度分别为5.29%、8.84%与57.56%。条缝倾角对不同车段气动减载率的影响不同, 尾车受条缝倾角影响的程度最大。

     

  • 图  1  气体绕流管道的内、外流的速度和压力沿程变化

    Figure  1.  Changes of velocity and pressure of airflow inside and outside pipes along pipeline

    图  2  吸气条缝位置与尺寸

    Figure  2.  Locations and sizes of suction slots

    图  3  计算域与网格

    Figure  3.  Computational domains and grids

    图  4  横风作用下的列车气动力与力矩

    Figure  4.  Aerodynamic forces and moments of train under crosswind condition

    图  5  无风时管腔内的压力与条缝外的压力

    Figure  5.  Pressures of internal chambers and external slots without crosswind

    图  6  中间车S9截面的压力和速度分布

    Figure  6.  Pressure and velocity distributions of section S9of middle vehicle

    图  7  尾车上S12截面的压力和速度分布

    Figure  7.  Pressure and velocity distributions of section S12 of last vehicle

    图  8  列车纵向横截面位置

    Figure  8.  Positions of sections along train

    图  9  带抽吸装置的截面流场

    Figure  9.  Flow fields of sections with suction device

    图  10  不同截面流线对比

    Figure  10.  Streamline comparison of different sections

    图  11  中间车上S7截面的压力和速度分布

    Figure  11.  Pressure and velocity distributions of section S7of middle vehicle

    图  12  有风时管腔内的压力与条缝外的压力对比

    Figure  12.  Pressure comparison of internal chambers and external slots under crosswind condition

    图  13  不同条缝方案的减载效果对比

    Figure  13.  Comparison of load-shedding effects of different slot projects

    图  14  条缝方案在不同横风风速下的减载效果对比

    Figure  14.  Comparison of load-shedding effects of slot projects at different crosswind speeds

    表  1  倾角选择方案

    Table  1.   Selection projects of inclination angle

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  气动力比较

    Table  2.   Comparison of aerodynamic forces

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  几何位置选择方案

    Table  3.   Selection projects of geometric positions

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] BAKER C J. The simulation of unsteady aerodynamic cross wind forces on trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98 (2): 88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.09.006
    [2] CARRARINI A. Reliability based analysis of the crosswind stability of railway vehicles[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007, 95 (7): 493-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2006.10.001
    [3] ANDERSSONL E, HAGGSTROM J, SIMA M, et al. Assessment of train-overturning risk due to strong crosswinds[J]. Proceeding of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2004, 218 (3): 213-223. doi: 10.1243/0954409042389382
    [4] BOCCIOLONE M, CHELI F, CORRADI R, et al. Cross-wind action on rail vehicles: wind tunnel experimental analyses[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96 (5): 584-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.030
    [5] WILSON J D, SWATERS G E, USTINA F. A perturbation analysis of turbulent flow through a porous barrier[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1990, 116 (494): 989-1004. doi: 10.1002/qj.49711649410
    [6] SANTIAGO J L, MARTIN F, CUERVA A, et al. Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41 (30): 6406-6420. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.014
    [7] 姜翠香, 梁习锋. 挡风墙高度和设置位置对车辆气动性能的影响[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2006, 27 (2): 66-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK200602013.htm

    JIANG Cui-xiang, LIANG Xi-feng. Effect of the vehicle aerodynamic performance caused by the height and position of wind-break wall[J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27 (2): 66-70. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK200602013.htm
    [8] 刘凤华. 不同类型挡风墙对列车运行安全防护效果的影响[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 37 (1): 176-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD200601033.htm

    LIU Feng-hua. Wind-proof effect of different kinds of windbreak walls on the security of trains[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2006, 37 (1): 176-182. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD200601033.htm
    [9] 董香婷, 党向鹏. 风障对侧风作用下列车行车安全影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2008, 30 (5): 36-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200805007.htm

    DONG Xiang-ting, DANG Xiang-peng. Study on influence of wind barriers on traffic safety of trains under crosswind by numerical simulation[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2008, 30 (5): 36-40. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200805007.htm
    [10] 任尊松, 徐宇工, 王璐雷, 等. 强侧风对高速列车运行安全性影响研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2006, 28 (6): 46-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200606008.htm

    REN Zun-song, XU Yu-gong, WANG Lu-lei, et al. Study on the running safety of high-speed trains under strong cross winds[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2006, 28 (6): 46-50. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200606008.htm
    [11] 郗艳红, 毛军, 高亮, 等. 横风作用下高速列车安全运行速度限值的研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2012, 34 (6): 8-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201206004.htm

    XI Yan-hong, MAO Jun, GAO Liang, et al. Research on the limited safe speed of a high-speed train under cross wind[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2012, 34 (6): 8-14. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201206004.htm
    [12] TSUTAHARA M, NAGAHISA N, TATSUMI Y, et al. Study of reduction of the fluid force due to side wind on a running train[J]. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1999, 65: 2595-2603.
    [13] WILLIAMS D R, MANSY H, AMATO C. The response and asymmetry properties of a cylinder wake subjected to localized surface excitation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1992, 234: 71-96.
    [14] LIN J C, TOWFIGHI J, ROCKWELL D. Near-wake of a circular cylinder: control by steady and unsteady surface injection[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1995, 9 (6): 659-669.
    [15] LING L M, RAMASWAMY B, COHEN R D, et al. Numerical analysis on strouhal frequencies in vortex shedding over square cylinders with surface suction and blowing[J]. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow, 1991, 3 (4): 357-375.
    [16] 凌国平, 方健雯. 速度-涡量法数值求解具有表面吹吸圆柱的绕流问题[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2002, 23 (9): 968-974. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSX200209011.htm

    LING Guo-ping, FANG Jian-wen. Numerical study on the flow around a circular cylinder with surface suction or blowing using vorticity-velocity method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2002, 23 (9): 968-974. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSX200209011.htm
    [17] MURALIDHARAN K, MUDDADA S, PATNAIK B S V. Numerical simulation of vortex induced vibrations and its control by suction and blowing[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37 (1/2): 284-307.
    [18] 毛军, 郗艳红, 杨国伟. 侧风风场特征对高速列车气动性能作用的研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2011, 33 (4): 22-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201104006.htm

    MAO Jun, XI Yan-hong, YANG Guo-wei. Research on influence of characteristics of cross wind field on aerodynamic performance of a high-speed train[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2011, 33 (4): 22-30. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB201104006.htm
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  680
  • HTML全文浏览量:  115
  • PDF下载量:  869
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-06-18
  • 刊出日期:  2013-12-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回