留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

临近既有线基坑支护影响因素的正交分析

沈宇鹏 王辉煌 荆鹏 田亚护 付小雁

沈宇鹏, 王辉煌, 荆鹏, 田亚护, 付小雁. 临近既有线基坑支护影响因素的正交分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(2): 14-20.
引用本文: 沈宇鹏, 王辉煌, 荆鹏, 田亚护, 付小雁. 临近既有线基坑支护影响因素的正交分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(2): 14-20.
SHEN Yu-peng, WANG Hui-huang, JING Peng, TIAN Ya-hu, FU Xiao-yan. Orthogonal analysis of influence factors for foundation pit support approaching existing railway line[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 14-20.
Citation: SHEN Yu-peng, WANG Hui-huang, JING Peng, TIAN Ya-hu, FU Xiao-yan. Orthogonal analysis of influence factors for foundation pit support approaching existing railway line[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 14-20.

临近既有线基坑支护影响因素的正交分析

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 50908012

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 2011JBZ009

详细信息
    作者简介:

    沈宇鹏(1977-), 男, 浙江嵊州人, 北京交通大学副教授, 工学博士, 从事路基工程研究

  • 中图分类号: U213.1

Orthogonal analysis of influence factors for foundation pit support approaching existing railway line

More Information
    Author Bio:

    SHEN Yu-peng (1977-), male, associate professor, PhD, +86-10-51683954, ypshen@bjtu.edu.cn

  • 摘要: 以既有线的轨道水平作为控制标准, 对基坑尺寸、既有线形式与支护形式等影响因素进行正交优化分析, 并与现场沉降结果进行对比。根据极差和方差分析方法, 确定了临近既有线轨道水平的影响因素的重要性顺序, 分析了是否考虑渗流影响下的的轨道水平。分析结果表明: 临近既有线轨道水平的影响因素的重要性顺序依次为基坑宽度、既有线路基高度、既有线股道数量(路基面宽度)、基坑深度、支撑点位置、支撑强度、桩长和基坑距坡脚距离; 在支护参数中, 第1道支撑点位置是主导因素; 当考虑渗流后, 轨道水平将大大增加。建议在施工过程中, 优先考虑基坑宽度因素, 且临近既有线的开挖必须在止水条件下进行, 应采用优化参数的结构形式, 使得轨道水平在3.0mm范围内。

     

  • 图  1  基坑开挖断面

    Figure  1.  Excavation section of foundation pit

    图  2  场地平面布置

    Figure  2.  Field plane layout

    图  3  模拟结果与试验数据的比较

    Figure  3.  Comparation of simulation results and test data

    图  4  轨道水平计算结果对比

    Figure  4.  Comparation of calculation results for track levels

    表  1  地基土物理力学参数

    Table  1.   Physical and mechanical parameters of foundation soils

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  试验参数

    Table  2.   Test parameters

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  模型参数

    Table  3.   Model parameters

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  极差分析分析结果

    Table  4.   Extreme difference analysis result

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  方差分析结果

    Table  5.   Variance analysis results

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 雷震宇, 周顺华, 许恺. 铁路下穿式结构施工受轮轨作用力的影响分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2003, 24 (6): 70-73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.06.017

    LEI Zhen-yu, ZHOU Shun-hua, XU Kai. Dynamic analysis of wheel/rail interation during construction of tunnel under railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2003, 24 (6): 70-73. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.06.017
    [2] 高伟君, 姚燕明, 蔚俊霞. 列车荷载对平行换乘地铁车站深基坑变形影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25 (增2): 375-379, 382. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2004S2025.htm

    GAO Wei-jun, YAO Yan-ming, WEI Jun-xia. Study on deep deformation of parallel transfer metro station caused by vehicle load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25 (S2): 375-379, 382. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2004S2025.htm
    [3] 毕湘利, 周顺华. 列车振动荷载对邻近深基坑的既有站变形影响[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 32 (12): 1599-1602. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2004.12.010

    BI Xiang-li, ZHOU Shun-hua. Analysis on deformation of old metro station close to deep excavation by vehicle dynamic load[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2004, 32 (12): 1599-1602. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2004.12.010
    [4] 林刚. 列车振动对地铁重叠隧道结构力学行为的影响[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2006 (3): 9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2006.03.003

    LIN Gang. Influence of train vibration on structural mechnical behavior of metro overlapping tunnel[J]. Railway Construction Techology, 2006 (3): 9-11. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2006.03.003
    [5] 张晨明, 董秀竹. 新线施工对既有线车站影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2006 (9): 85-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2006.09.019

    ZHANG Chen-ming, DONG Xiu-zhu. Analysis of effect on exisiting line station due to new line construction[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2006 (9): 85-88. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2006.09.019
    [6] 曹艳梅, 夏禾. 运行列车对高层建筑结构的振动影响[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23 (3): 162-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2006.03.027

    CAO Yan-mei, XIA He. Vibration of high-rise buildings induced running trains[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23 (3): 162-167. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2006.03.027
    [7] 罗锟, 雷晓燕. 沪宁城际铁路基坑开挖对既有线动态影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2010 (9): 5-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2010.09.002

    LUO Kun, LEI Xiao-yan. The dynamic analysis of the existing railway's subgrade settlement caused by excavation pit on Hu-Ning Line[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2010 (9): 5-8. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2010.09.002
    [8] 潘杰麟. 车辆移动荷载作用下基坑支护桩-土相互作用研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2011.

    PAN Jie-lin. The interaction of support pile-soil under vehicle moving loads in deep foundation pit[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2011. (in Chinese).
    [9] 李梅芳, 肖军华, 宫全美, 等. 邻近既有线深基坑开挖过程中的动力响应分析[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2011, 28 (5): 93-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDJT201105021.htm

    LI Mei-fang, XIAO Jun-hua, GONG Quan-mei, et al. Dynamic analysis of the interaction between the existed line and the foundation system during excavation[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2011, 28 (5): 93-97. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDJT201105021.htm
    [10] 王菲, 禚一. 基坑开挖对既有铁路桥基础变位的影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2012 (8): 28-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201208007.htm

    WANG Fei, ZHUO Yi. Analysis of influence of foudation pit excavation on displacement of exisited railway bridge foundation[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2012 (8): 28-33. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201208007.htm
    [11] 付宏渊, 刘建华, 张立, 等. 基于正交试验的岩质边坡动力稳定性分析[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 42 (9): 2853-2859. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201109050.htm

    FU Hong-yuan, LIU Jian-hua, ZHANG Li, et al. Dynamic stability analysis for rock slope based on orthogonal test[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42 (9): 2853-2859. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201109050.htm
    [12] 何本贵, 高谦, 刘芳. 公路路堑边坡稳定性影响因素正交分析与数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27 (6): 716-719. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.06.022

    HE Ben-gui, GAO Qian, LIU Fang. Orthogonal analysis and numerical simulation on influential factors of freeway slope stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27 (6): 716-719. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.06.022
    [13] 张旭辉, 龚晓南, 徐日庆. 边坡稳定影响因素敏感性的正交法计算分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16 (1): 36-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200301008.htm

    ZHANG Xu-hui, GONG Xiao-nan, XU Ri-qing. Orthogonality analysis method of sensibility on factor of slope stability[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2003, 16 (1): 36-39. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200301008.htm
    [14] 王屏, 黄卫. 路面结构设计中关键因素的正交分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2002, 19 (3): 20-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200203005.htm

    WANG Ping, HUANG Wei. Orthogonal analysis of key factors in pavement structure design[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2002, 19 (3): 20-22. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200203005.htm
    [15] TB 10082—2005, 铁路轨道设计规范[S].

    TB 10082—2005, code for design of railway track[S]. (in Chinese).
    [16] PYHADES E, VAZQUEN-SUNE E, CARRERA J, et al. Deep enclosures versus pumping to reduce settlements during shaft excavations[J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 169 (4): 100-111.
    [17] TB 10001—2005, 铁路路基设计规范[S].

    TB 10001—2005, code for design on subgrade of railway[S]. (in Chinese).
    [18] 潘雪峰. 高速公路深挖方路段高边坡处治方案设计与施工[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化, 2013, 30 (12): 62-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201312027.htm

    PAN Xue-feng. Scheme design and construction of high slope treatment in deeply excavated section of expressway[J]. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, 2013, 30 (12): 62-65. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201312027.htm
  • 加载中
图(4) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  687
  • HTML全文浏览量:  143
  • PDF下载量:  811
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-12-17
  • 刊出日期:  2014-04-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回