Orthogonal analysis of influence factors for foundation pit support approaching existing railway line
-
摘要: 以既有线的轨道水平作为控制标准, 对基坑尺寸、既有线形式与支护形式等影响因素进行正交优化分析, 并与现场沉降结果进行对比。根据极差和方差分析方法, 确定了临近既有线轨道水平的影响因素的重要性顺序, 分析了是否考虑渗流影响下的的轨道水平。分析结果表明: 临近既有线轨道水平的影响因素的重要性顺序依次为基坑宽度、既有线路基高度、既有线股道数量(路基面宽度)、基坑深度、支撑点位置、支撑强度、桩长和基坑距坡脚距离; 在支护参数中, 第1道支撑点位置是主导因素; 当考虑渗流后, 轨道水平将大大增加。建议在施工过程中, 优先考虑基坑宽度因素, 且临近既有线的开挖必须在止水条件下进行, 应采用优化参数的结构形式, 使得轨道水平在3.0mm范围内。Abstract: The track level of existing railway line was taken as control standard, the influence factors including foundation pit size, existing railway line form and support form were orthogonally analyzed, and the calculation results and field settlement situation were compared. Based on the analysis methods of range and variance, the importance order of influence factors on track level approaching existing railway line was determined, and the track levels were analyzed with and without seepage.Analysis result shows that the importance order of influence factors on track level approaching existing railway line are the width of foundation pit, the subgrade height of existing railway line, the track number of existing railway line (the width of subgrade surface), the depth of foundation pit, support point position, support strength, pile length and the distance from foundation pit to slope toe.For support parameters, the first support position is dominant influence factor.When seepage is considered, the railway track level increases greatly.It is suggested to consider the width of foundation pit preferentially in construction process.The excavation approaching existing railway line should be done under sealing condition.The structure type with optimized parameters should be used to make railway track level less than 3.0 mm.
-
表 1 地基土物理力学参数
Table 1. Physical and mechanical parameters of foundation soils
表 2 试验参数
Table 2. Test parameters
表 3 模型参数
Table 3. Model parameters
表 4 极差分析分析结果
Table 4. Extreme difference analysis result
表 5 方差分析结果
Table 5. Variance analysis results
-
[1] 雷震宇, 周顺华, 许恺. 铁路下穿式结构施工受轮轨作用力的影响分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2003, 24 (6): 70-73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.06.017LEI Zhen-yu, ZHOU Shun-hua, XU Kai. Dynamic analysis of wheel/rail interation during construction of tunnel under railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2003, 24 (6): 70-73. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.06.017 [2] 高伟君, 姚燕明, 蔚俊霞. 列车荷载对平行换乘地铁车站深基坑变形影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25 (增2): 375-379, 382. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2004S2025.htmGAO Wei-jun, YAO Yan-ming, WEI Jun-xia. Study on deep deformation of parallel transfer metro station caused by vehicle load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25 (S2): 375-379, 382. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2004S2025.htm [3] 毕湘利, 周顺华. 列车振动荷载对邻近深基坑的既有站变形影响[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 32 (12): 1599-1602. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2004.12.010BI Xiang-li, ZHOU Shun-hua. Analysis on deformation of old metro station close to deep excavation by vehicle dynamic load[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2004, 32 (12): 1599-1602. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2004.12.010 [4] 林刚. 列车振动对地铁重叠隧道结构力学行为的影响[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2006 (3): 9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2006.03.003LIN Gang. Influence of train vibration on structural mechnical behavior of metro overlapping tunnel[J]. Railway Construction Techology, 2006 (3): 9-11. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2006.03.003 [5] 张晨明, 董秀竹. 新线施工对既有线车站影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2006 (9): 85-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2006.09.019ZHANG Chen-ming, DONG Xiu-zhu. Analysis of effect on exisiting line station due to new line construction[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2006 (9): 85-88. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2006.09.019 [6] 曹艳梅, 夏禾. 运行列车对高层建筑结构的振动影响[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23 (3): 162-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2006.03.027CAO Yan-mei, XIA He. Vibration of high-rise buildings induced running trains[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23 (3): 162-167. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2006.03.027 [7] 罗锟, 雷晓燕. 沪宁城际铁路基坑开挖对既有线动态影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2010 (9): 5-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2010.09.002LUO Kun, LEI Xiao-yan. The dynamic analysis of the existing railway's subgrade settlement caused by excavation pit on Hu-Ning Line[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2010 (9): 5-8. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2010.09.002 [8] 潘杰麟. 车辆移动荷载作用下基坑支护桩-土相互作用研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2011.PAN Jie-lin. The interaction of support pile-soil under vehicle moving loads in deep foundation pit[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2011. (in Chinese). [9] 李梅芳, 肖军华, 宫全美, 等. 邻近既有线深基坑开挖过程中的动力响应分析[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2011, 28 (5): 93-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDJT201105021.htmLI Mei-fang, XIAO Jun-hua, GONG Quan-mei, et al. Dynamic analysis of the interaction between the existed line and the foundation system during excavation[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2011, 28 (5): 93-97. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDJT201105021.htm [10] 王菲, 禚一. 基坑开挖对既有铁路桥基础变位的影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2012 (8): 28-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201208007.htmWANG Fei, ZHUO Yi. Analysis of influence of foudation pit excavation on displacement of exisited railway bridge foundation[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2012 (8): 28-33. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDGC201208007.htm [11] 付宏渊, 刘建华, 张立, 等. 基于正交试验的岩质边坡动力稳定性分析[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 42 (9): 2853-2859. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201109050.htmFU Hong-yuan, LIU Jian-hua, ZHANG Li, et al. Dynamic stability analysis for rock slope based on orthogonal test[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42 (9): 2853-2859. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201109050.htm [12] 何本贵, 高谦, 刘芳. 公路路堑边坡稳定性影响因素正交分析与数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27 (6): 716-719. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.06.022HE Ben-gui, GAO Qian, LIU Fang. Orthogonal analysis and numerical simulation on influential factors of freeway slope stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27 (6): 716-719. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.06.022 [13] 张旭辉, 龚晓南, 徐日庆. 边坡稳定影响因素敏感性的正交法计算分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16 (1): 36-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200301008.htmZHANG Xu-hui, GONG Xiao-nan, XU Ri-qing. Orthogonality analysis method of sensibility on factor of slope stability[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2003, 16 (1): 36-39. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200301008.htm [14] 王屏, 黄卫. 路面结构设计中关键因素的正交分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2002, 19 (3): 20-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200203005.htmWANG Ping, HUANG Wei. Orthogonal analysis of key factors in pavement structure design[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2002, 19 (3): 20-22. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200203005.htm [15] TB 10082—2005, 铁路轨道设计规范[S].TB 10082—2005, code for design of railway track[S]. (in Chinese). [16] PYHADES E, VAZQUEN-SUNE E, CARRERA J, et al. Deep enclosures versus pumping to reduce settlements during shaft excavations[J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 169 (4): 100-111. [17] TB 10001—2005, 铁路路基设计规范[S].TB 10001—2005, code for design on subgrade of railway[S]. (in Chinese). [18] 潘雪峰. 高速公路深挖方路段高边坡处治方案设计与施工[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化, 2013, 30 (12): 62-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201312027.htmPAN Xue-feng. Scheme design and construction of high slope treatment in deeply excavated section of expressway[J]. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, 2013, 30 (12): 62-65. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLJX201312027.htm