-
摘要: 针对地质灾害危险度评价中评价因子权重确定方法的缺陷, 依据最小熵分析理论, 将评价因子形成线性无关的成分, 根据评价因子对泥石流系统贡献率的大小进行评价因子优选与权重的确定, 将权重代入经典的泥石流危险度评价模型进行评估, 并将评估结果与计算结果进行了对比。分析结果表明: 优选出的主要评价因子为一次泥石流最大冲出量、频率、流域面积、主沟长度、主沟床弯曲系数、植被覆盖率、松散固体物质储量、流域切割密度和泥沙补给段长度比, 得到的权重分别为0.235 3、0.235 3、0.079 1、0.079 1、0.079 1、0.079 1、0.073 0、0.073 0、0.073 0;极度、重度、中度和轻度危险的泥石流沟分别为3、3、6、0条, 评价结果与研究区泥石流的实际情况和发展趋势吻合度较高, 从而证明将最小熵分析理论应用到地质灾害评价领域的可行性。Abstract: Aiming at solving the deficiencies of index weight determination in evaluating risk of geological disaster, the theory of minimum entropy analysis was used to form nonlinear independent components.The index optimization and weight determination were done based on their contributions to debris flow.The index weights were evaluated in the classic debris flow risk evaluation model.The evaluation results were compared with the calculated results.Analysis result shows that the main optimal indexes are the maximum rushed amount for a debris flow, frequency, basin area, main gully length, main gully bed tortuosity coefficient, vegetation coverage, the reserve of loose solid material, basin cutting density and sediment supply length ratio.The corresponding weight values of these indexes are 0.235 3, 0.235 3, 0.079 1, 0.079 1, 0.079 1, 0.079 1, 0.073 0, 0.073 0 and 0.073 0 respectively.The numbers of extreme, heavy, moderate and slight debris flows are 3, 3, 6 and 0 respectively.The calculated results are consistent with the real situation and development trend of studied debris flow area.It proves thereasonability of minimum entropy analysis theory applied in geological disaster risk evaluation.
-
Key words:
- debris flow /
- minimum entropy analysis theory /
- evaluation index /
- contribution rate
-
[1] BADOUX A, GRAF C, RHYNER J, et al. A debris-flow alarm system for the Alpine Illgraben catchment: design and performance[J]. Natural Hazards, 2009, 49 (3): 517-539. doi: 10.1007/s11069-008-9303-x [2] 蔡文. 可拓学概述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1998, 18 (1): 76-84. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.1998.01.014CAI Wen. Introduction of extenics[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice, 1998, 18 (1): 76-84. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.1998.01.014 [3] 肖伟, 黄丹, 黎华, 等. 地质灾害气象预报预警方法研究[J]. 地质与资源, 2005, 14 (4): 274-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD200504008.htmXIAO Wei, HUANG Dan, LI Hua, et al. Research on the early warning of geo-hazards based on weather forecasting[J]. Geology and Resources, 2005, 14 (4): 274-278. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD200504008.htm [4] 刘希林. 泥石流危险度判定的研究[J]. 灾害学, 1988 (3): 10-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU198803001.htmLIU Xi-lin. Study on assessment of debris flow hazards[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 1988 (3): 10-15. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU198803001.htm [5] 张文, 陈剑平, 秦胜伍, 等. 基于主成分分析的FCM法在泥石流分类中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2010, 40 (2): 368-372. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201002019.htmZHANG Wen, CHEN Jian-ping, QIN Sheng-wu, et al. Application of FCM based on principal components analysis in debris flow classification[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2010, 40 (2): 368-372. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201002019.htm [6] 谷复光, 王清, 张晨. 基于投影寻踪与可拓学方法的泥石流危险度评价[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2010, 40 (2): 373-377. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201002020.htmGU Fu-guang, WANG Qing, ZHANG Chen. Debris flow risk assessment by PPC and extenics[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2010, 40 (2): 373-377. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201002020.htm [7] 苏鹏程, 倪长健, 孔纪名, 等. 区域泥石流危险度评价的影响因子识别[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009, 29 (1): 128-132. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STTB200901029.htmSU Peng-cheng, NI Chang-jian, KONG Ji-ming, et al. Factor identification for regional danger degree of debris flow[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29 (1): 128-132. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STTB200901029.htm [8] 孟凡奇, 李广杰, 李明, 等. 逐步判别分析法在筛选泥石流评价因子中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31 (9): 2925-2929. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201009047.htmMENG Fan-qi, LI Guang-Jie, LI Ming, et al. Application of stepwise discriminant analysis to screening evaluation factors of debris flow[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31 (9): 2925-2929. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201009047.htm [9] 张晨, 王清, 陈剑平, 等. 金沙江流域泥石流的组合赋权法危险度评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32 (3): 831-836. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201103033.htmZHANG Chen, WANG Qing, CHEN Jian-ping, et al. Evaluation of debris flow risk in Jinsha River based on combined weight process[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32 (3): 831-836. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201103033.htm [10] 陈鹏宇, 乔景顺, 彭祖武, 等. 基于等级相关的泥石流危险因子筛选与危险度评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34 (5): 1409-1415. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201305027.htmCHEN Peng-yu, QIAO Jing-shun, PENG Zu-wu, et al. Screening of debris flow risk factors and risk evaluation based on rank correlation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34 (5): 1409-1415. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201305027.htm [11] CHIEN C C, TSENG C Y, DONG J J. New entropy-based method for variables selection and its application to the debris-flow hazard assessment[J]. Engineering Geology, 2007, 94 (1): 19-26. [12] PARESCHI M T, SANTACROCE R, SULPIZIO R, et al. Volcaniclastic debris flows in the Clanio Valley (Campania, Italy): insights for the assessment of hazard potential[J]. Geomorphology, 2002, 43 (3/4): 219-231. [13] HURLIMANN M, RICKENMANN D, MEDINA V, et al. Evaluation of approaches to calculate debris-flow parameters for hazard assessment[J]. Engineering Geology, 2008, 102 (3): 152-163. [14] RUPERT M G, CANNON S H, GARTNER J E, et al. Using logistic regression to predict the probability of debris flows in areas burned by wildfires, Southern California, 2003-2006[R]. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2008. -
下载: 
点击查看大图
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 513
- HTML全文浏览量: 93
- PDF下载量: 786
- 被引次数: 0
