留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

桩锚支护体系竖向土拱效应分析与桩后土压力计算

武崇福 李玉 张志军

武崇福, 李玉, 张志军. 桩锚支护体系竖向土拱效应分析与桩后土压力计算[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(3): 24-33.
引用本文: 武崇福, 李玉, 张志军. 桩锚支护体系竖向土拱效应分析与桩后土压力计算[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(3): 24-33.
WU Chong-fu, LI Yu, ZHANG Zhi-jun. Vertical soil arch effect analysis and soil pressure calculation behind piles for pile-anchor supporting system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(3): 24-33.
Citation: WU Chong-fu, LI Yu, ZHANG Zhi-jun. Vertical soil arch effect analysis and soil pressure calculation behind piles for pile-anchor supporting system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(3): 24-33.

桩锚支护体系竖向土拱效应分析与桩后土压力计算

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 51074140

河北省科技计划项目 12217650

详细信息
    作者简介:

    武崇福(1966-), 男, 河北秦皇岛人, 燕山大学副教授, 工学博士, 从事岩土力学研究

  • 中图分类号: U417.1

Vertical soil arch effect analysis and soil pressure calculation behind piles for pile-anchor supporting system

More Information
    Author Bio:

    WU Chong-fu (1966-), male, associate professor, PhD, +86-335-8067926, wcfysu@163.com

  • 摘要: 针对桩锚支护桩后竖向土拱效应, 利用土拱力学平衡条件分析了土拱的形成机理、几何特性与其对土体应力分布的影响。采用室内模型试验, 监测得到不同阶段下土体的应力场分布, 通过与现场监测数据和经典理论计算值的比较, 验证竖向土拱的存在。基于竖向土拱效应, 采用斜土层单元法, 推导了桩后土体应力分布表达式, 并与经典理论计算值和模型试验数据进行了对比分析。研究结果表明: 土体自重应力曲线在2层锚杆间发生衰减, 桩侧土压力在锚杆支点处出现相对峰值, 锚杆上部形成了竖向土拱, 对土体应力重分布影响显著。采用考虑竖向土拱效应的斜土层单元法得到的土压力分布规律与室内试验结果一致, 2条曲线同深度处桩侧土压力最大差值不超过15%, 表明利用该方法计算出的土压力具有较高的准确性。

     

  • 图  1  桩后竖向土拱形成机理

    Figure  1.  Formation mechanism of vertical soil arch behind pile

    图  2  竖向土拱计算模型

    Figure  2.  Calculation model of vertical soil arch

    图  3  λ影响因素

    Figure  3.  Influence factors of λ

    图  4  半拱模型

    Figure  4.  Semi-arch model

    图  5  模型箱

    Figure  5.  Model box

    图  6  堆载

    Figure  6.  Heap load

    图  7  位移监测装置

    Figure  7.  Displacement monitoring device

    图  8  微型土压力盒

    Figure  8.  Miniature earth pressure cell

    图  9  填土层分布

    Figure  9.  Distribution of filling soil layers

    图  10  土压力盒布置

    Figure  10.  Positions of soil pressure cells

    图  11  测点1自重应力曲线

    Figure  11.  Gravity stress curves at measuring point 1

    图  12  测点2自重应力曲线

    Figure  12.  Gravity stress curves at measuring point 2

    图  13  桩1侧向土压力曲线

    Figure  13.  Lateral soil pressure curves of pile 1

    图  14  桩2侧向土压力曲线

    Figure  14.  Lateral soil pressure curves of pile 2

    图  15  斜土层微分计算模型

    Figure  15.  Differential computation model of oblique soil layer

    图  16  土压力变化曲线

    Figure  16.  Soil pressure change curves

    图  17  土压力计算值与实测值比较

    Figure  17.  Comparison between calculated soil pressures and measured values

    表  1  土压力合力与作用点比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of resultant soil pressures and action points

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] TANG Yu-geng, KUNG G T C. Application of nonlinear optimization technique to back analyses of deep excavation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36 (1/2): 276-290.
    [2] 马平, 秦四清, 张勇, 等. 深基坑桩锚支护体系主动区土压力试验研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2006, 14 (2): 245-248. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2006.02.018

    MA Ping, QIN Si-qing, ZHANG Yong, et al. In-situ test on active earth pressure zone in piles and anchor supporting system for deep foundation pit[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006, 14 (2): 245-248. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2006.02.018
    [3] 李成芳, 叶晓明, 李有文. 考虑土拱效应预应力锚拉桩土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32 (6): 1683-1689. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.06.015

    LI Cheng-fang, YE Xiao-ming, LI You-wen. Study of earth pressure of prestressed anchor pile considering soil arching[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32 (6): 1683-1689. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.06.015
    [4] 刘忠玉, 马德遂, 何盛东. 层状填土的主动土压力计算[J]. 郑州大学学报: 工学版, 2004, 25 (3): 56-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2004.03.014

    LIU Zhong-yu, MA De-sui, HE Sheng-dong. Active earth pressure acting on retaining walls with layered backfills[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University: Engineering Science, 2004, 25 (3): 56-59. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2004.03.014
    [5] SALMAN1FA, AL-SHAKARCHI Y J, HUSAIN H M, et al. Distribution of earth pressure behind retaining walls considering different approaches[J]. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 2010, 5 (9): 1389-1400.
    [6] 章瑞文, 徐日庆, 郭印. 考虑挡土墙墙体平移的墙后分层填土主动土压力分布[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39 (2): 250-255. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.02.021

    ZHANG Rui-wen, XU Ri-qing, GUO Yin. Distribution of active earth pressure acting on retaining walls with soil placed in layers and considering the displacement of wall[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39 (2): 250-255. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.02.021
    [7] BOLTON M D, STEEDMAN R S. The behavior of fixed cantilever walls subject to lateral shaking[C]∥TRB. Proceedings of a Symposium on the Application of Centrifuge Modelling to Geotechnical Design. Manchester: TRB, 1985: 301-313.
    [8] 周健, 张刚, 曾庆有. 主动侧向受荷桩模型试验与颗粒流数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29 (5): 650-656. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.05.004

    ZHOU Jian, ZHANG Gang, ZENG Qing-you. Model tests and PFC2Dnumerical analysis of active laterally loaded piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29 (5): 650-656. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.05.004
    [9] DANNO K, KIMURA M. Evaluation of long-term displacements of pile foundation using coupled FEM and centrifuge model test[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2009, 49 (6): 941-958. doi: 10.3208/sandf.49.941
    [10] 陈锦剑, 吴琼, 王建华, 等. 开挖卸荷条件下单桩承载力特性的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32 (增2): 85-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2010S2023.htm

    CHEN Jin-jian, WU Qiong, WANG Jian-hua, et al. Model tests on bearing capacity of single pile influenced by excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32 (S2): 85-88. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2010S2023.htm
    [11] 吕庆, 孙红月, 尚岳全. 抗滑桩桩后土拱效应的作用机理及发育规律[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41 (4): 471-476. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB201004014.htm

    LU Qing, SUN Hong-yue, SHANG Yue-quan. Mechanism and development law of soil arch effect behind anti-slide piles[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41 (4): 471-476. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB201004014.htm
    [12] 向先超, 张华, 蒋国盛, 等. 基于颗粒流的抗滑桩土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33 (3): 386-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201103015.htm

    XIANG Xian-chao, ZHANG Hua, JIANG Guo-sheng, et al. Soil arching effect of anti-slide piles based on particle flow method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33 (3): 386-391. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201103015.htm
    [13] ESKISAR T, OTANI J, HIRONAKA J. Visualization of soil arching on reinforced embankment with rigid pile foundation using X-ray CT[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2012, 32 (1): 44-54.
    [14] 蒋良潍, 黄润秋, 蒋忠信. 黏性土桩间土拱效应计算与桩间距分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27 (3): 445-450. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.03.021

    JIANG Liang-wei, HUANG Run-qiu, JIANG Zhong-xin. Analysis of soil arching effect between adjacent piles and their spacing in cohesive soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27 (3): 445-450. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.03.021
    [15] LI S J, CHEN J, FENG X T. Analytic solution to soil arching effect and its application based on interaction of slope soil and piles[J]. Materials Research Innovations, 2011, 15 (S1): 578-581.
    [16] 赵恒惠. 挡土墙后粘性填土的土压力计算[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1983, 5 (1): 134-146. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1983.01.012

    ZHAO Heng-hui. The computation of earth pressure of cohesive backfill on retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 5 (1): 134-146. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1983.01.012
  • 加载中
图(17) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  584
  • HTML全文浏览量:  161
  • PDF下载量:  628
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-01-26
  • 刊出日期:  2014-06-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回