留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

气动载荷影响下的高速列车车体疲劳强度评估方法

卢耀辉 冯振 陈天利 曾京 邬平波 PANJ

卢耀辉, 冯振, 陈天利, 曾京, 邬平波, PANJ. 气动载荷影响下的高速列车车体疲劳强度评估方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(6): 44-50.
引用本文: 卢耀辉, 冯振, 陈天利, 曾京, 邬平波, PANJ. 气动载荷影响下的高速列车车体疲劳强度评估方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(6): 44-50.
LU Yao-hui, FENG Zhen, CHEN Tian-li, CENG Jing, WU Ping-bo, PAN J. Evaluation method of fatigue strength for carbody of high-speed train under influence of aerodynamic loads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(6): 44-50.
Citation: LU Yao-hui, FENG Zhen, CHEN Tian-li, CENG Jing, WU Ping-bo, PAN J. Evaluation method of fatigue strength for carbody of high-speed train under influence of aerodynamic loads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(6): 44-50.

气动载荷影响下的高速列车车体疲劳强度评估方法

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 51275428

牵引动力国家重点实验室开放课题 TPL1213

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 SWJTU12CX035

中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划课题 2014J012-C

详细信息
    作者简介:

    卢耀辉(1973-), 男, 甘肃民勤人, 西南交通大学副教授, 工学博士, 从事车辆结构疲劳强度可靠性与动力学研究

  • 中图分类号: U270.12

Evaluation method of fatigue strength for carbody of high-speed train under influence of aerodynamic loads

More Information
  • 摘要: 对比了国内外高速列车车体设计标准中气动载荷的设计要求, 分析了明线会车侧墙压力波, 采用时间积分法, 将车体瞬态压强转化为侧墙气动载荷, 参照标准BS EN 12663-1—2010确定了包括气动载荷的车体疲劳载荷工况, 以某型动车组头车为研究对象, 建立了车体有限元模型, 基于车体Goodman疲劳强度曲线编写了车体疲劳强度后处理程序, 研究了车体疲劳特性。计算结果表明: 在不考虑气动载荷时计算的较大应力幅值出现在底架上, 而在考虑气动载荷时计算的车体较大应力幅值出现在侧墙门角和窗角上, 最大应力幅值为33.63 MPa, 疲劳强度安全系数为2.26, 相对于侧墙, 底架的应力幅值较小, 小于10.00 MPa, 疲劳强度安全系数大于10.00。在垂向载荷作用下, 侧墙最大当量应力为68.17 MPa, 叠加气动载荷后侧墙最大当量应力为85.31 MPa, 应力增大了25.14%, 因此, 气动载荷对侧墙影响较大, 容易导致侧墙发生疲劳失效。可见, 在高速列车车体设计时, 应将气动载荷与其他疲劳载荷相组合对车体疲劳强度进行评定。

     

  • 图  1  车体模型

    Figure  1.  Carbody model

    图  2  车体测点压力曲线

    Figure  2.  Pressure curve of measurement point on carbody

    图  3  计算区域时间步长

    Figure  3.  Time steps in calculation area

    图  4  车身分区

    Figure  4.  Carbody subareas

    图  5  Goodman疲劳曲线

    Figure  5.  Goodman fatigue curves

    图  6  工况9车体当量应力

    Figure  6.  Von-Mises stress of carbody under condition 9

    图  7  工况6车门部位当量应力

    Figure  7.  Von-Mises stress of car door under condition 6

    图  8  工况8车窗部位当量应力

    Figure  8.  Von-Mises stress of car window under condition 8

    图  9  车体疲劳强度评估结果

    Figure  9.  Evaluation result of fatigue strength for carbody

    表  1  气动载荷

    Table  1.   Aerodynamic loads  kPa

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  车体疲劳强度载荷

    Table  2.   Loads of fatigue strength for carbody

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  车体材料基本性能参数

    Table  3.   Basic performance parameters of carbody materials

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  车体疲劳强度计算结果

    Table  4.   Computational result of carbody fatigue strength

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] RAGHUNATHANA R S, KIM H D, SETOGUCHI T. Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38 (6/7): 469-514. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376042102000295
    [2] 李雪冰, 侯传伦, 张曙光, 等. 高速列车交会时的风致振动研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2009, 28 (7): 81-84, 94, 214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ200907019.htm

    LI Xue-bing, HOU Chuan-lun, ZHANG Shu-guang, et al. Flow-induced vibration of high-speed trains in passing events[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2009, 28 (7): 81-84, 94, 214. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ200907019.htm
    [3] FUJII K, OGAWA T. Aerodynamics of high speed trains passing by each other[J]. Computer and Fluids, 1995, 24 (8): 897-908. doi: 10.1016/0045-7930(95)00024-7
    [4] 熊小慧, 梁习锋. CRH2型动车组列车交会空气压力波试验分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2009, 31 (6): 15-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200906004.htm

    XIONG Xiao-hui, LIANG Xi-feng. Analysis of air pressure pulses in meeting of CRH2EMU trains[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2009, 31 (6): 15-20. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200906004.htm
    [5] 田红旗, 贺德馨. 列车交会压力波三维数值的计算[J]. 铁道学报, 2001, 23 (3): 18-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2001.03.004

    TIAN Hong-qi, HE De-xin. 3-D numerical calculation of the air pressure pulse from two trains passing by each other[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2001, 23 (3): 18-22. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8360.2001.03.004
    [6] ZHOU Dan, TIAN Hong-qi, ZHANG Jian, et al. Pressure transients induced by a high-speed train passing through a station[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 135: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.09.006
    [7] YAO Shuan-bao, GUO Di-long, SUN Zhen-xu, et al. Optimization design for aerodynamic elements of high speed trains[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2014, 95: 56-73. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.02.018
    [8] JEON K W, SHINB K B, KIM J S. A study on fatigue life and strength of a GFRP composite bogie frame for urban subway trains[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 10: 2405-2410. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.396
    [9] ZHANG Wei-hua, WU Ping-bo, WU Xue-jie, et al. An investigation into structural failures of Chinese high-speed trains[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2006, 13 (3): 427-441. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.037
    [10] 吴丹, 商跃进, 王红, 等. 高速列车车体强度计算方法对比分析[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2012, 32 (1): 6-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201201005.htm

    WU Dan, SHANG Yue-jin, WANG Hong, et al. Comparison and analysis of the calculation methods for the car-body strength of high-speed train[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2012, 32 (1): 6-9. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDJC201201005.htm
    [11] 缪炳荣, 张立民, 张卫华, 等. 考虑整车动力学特性的高速列车车体结构疲劳仿真[J]. 铁道学报, 2010, 32 (6): 101-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2010.06.017

    MIAO Bing-rong, ZHANG Li-min, ZHANG Wei-hua, et al. High-speed train carbody structure fatigue simulation based on dynamic characteristics of the overall vehicle[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2010, 32 (6): 101-108. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2010.06.017
    [12] 修瑞仙, 肖守讷, 阳光武, 等. 基于PSD方法的点焊轨道客车车体随机振动疲劳寿命分析[J]. 机械, 2013, 40 (8): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MECH201308008.htm

    XIU Rui-xian, XIAO Shou-ne, YANG Guang-wu, et al. The analysis of random vibration fatigue life of spot welding passenger car-body based on PSD method[J]. Machinery, 2013, 40 (8): 27-31. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MECH201308008.htm
    [13] 王立航, 方吉, 马纪军. 铝合金车体疲劳寿命预测新方法及其应用[J]. 大连交通大学学报, 2010, 31 (3): 9-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLTD201003002.htm

    WANG Li-hang, FANG Ji, MA Ji-jun. Design principle and new method of fatigue life prediction for aluminum-alloy carbody[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2010, 31 (3): 9-11. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLTD201003002.htm
    [14] 于梦阁, 张继业, 张卫华. 侧风下高速列车车体与轮对的运行姿态[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11 (4): 48-55. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201104008

    YU Meng-ge, ZHANG Ji-ye, ZHANG Wei-hua. Running attitudes of car body and wheelset for high-speed train under cross wind[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11 (4): 48-55. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201104008
    [15] 余思均. 高速列车气动载荷车体疲劳强度研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011.

    YU Si-jun. Study of carbody fatigue strength of high-speed train under aerodynamic load[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011. (in Chinese).
    [16] JUN H K, JUNG H S, LEE D H, et al. Fatigue crack evaluation on the underframe of EMU carbody[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 2: 893-900. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705810000974
    [17] KIM J S, JEONG J C, LEE S J. Numerical and experimental studies on the deformational behavior a composite train carbody of the Korean tilting train[J]. Composite Structures, 2007, 81 (2): 168-175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822306003084
    [18] 吴会超, 邬平波, 曾京, 等. 车下设备对车体振动的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2012, 12 (5): 50-56. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201205007

    WU Hui-chao, WU Ping-bo, ZENG Jing, et al. Influence of equipment under car on carbody vibration[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12 (5): 50-56. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201205007
    [19] 何德华. 350 km·h-1高速动车组空气动力学仿真研究[D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2011.

    HE De-hua. Research of aerodynamic simulation on 350 km·h-1 high-speed EMU[D]. Beijing: China Academy of Railway Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese).
    [20] 邱英政. 高速列车交会压力波数值模拟计算与测试研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2007.

    QIU Ying-zheng. The numerical and experimental investigation on crossing air pressure pulse by passing high-speed trains[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2007. (in Chinese).
    [21] 卢耀辉. 铁道客车转向架焊接构架疲劳可靠性研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011.

    LU Yao-hui. Study on fatigue reliability of welded bogie frame for railway vehicle[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011. (in Chinese).
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  764
  • HTML全文浏览量:  194
  • PDF下载量:  1351
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-07-13
  • 刊出日期:  2014-12-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回