Safety evaluation method of freeway segment based on accident data and safety service level
-
摘要: 分析了高速公路路段的基本划分方法, 提出了基于事故点集疏程度的动态聚类路段不定长划分方法, 依据负二项分布标定了事故预测模型, 提出了基于负二项分布的路段安全性评价方法。引入交通安全服务的水平概念, 确定了分级标准, 提出了基于安全服务水平的路段安全性评价方法, 并进行了实例验证。验证结果表明: 分别利用2种方法对京珠高速公路109个路段进行安全性评价时, 57.8%的路段评价结果相同; 利用基于负二项分布的安全性评价方法评价的安全状况良好、较好、较差、差的路段分别为5、63、36、5个, 利用基于安全服务水平的安全性评价方法评价的结果分别为1、64、26、18个, 基于负二项分布的安全性评价方法评价的安全等级更符合实际高速公路安全状况。基于负二项分布的安全性评价方法考虑了交通量与线形条件, 适用于线形条件复杂的高速公路, 基于安全服务水平的安全性评价方法考虑了交通量与事故次数, 更适合于线形条件较好的高速公路。Abstract: The basic division method of freeway segment was analyzed, the unequal-length division method of dynamic clustering segment based on the concentration and dispersion degrees of accident point was put forward.The accident prediction model was calibrated based on negative binomial distribution, the safety evaluation method of freeway segment based on negative binomial distribution was proposed.The concept of safety service level was introduced, the classification standard was determined, the safety evaluation method of freeway segment based on safety service level was proposed, and the example verification was carried out.Verification result indicates that when the 109 segments of Jingzhu Freeway are evaluated by using the two methods respectively, the 57.8% of segments have the same results, the segment amounts of safety conditions in great, good, normal, poor are 5, 63, 36 and 5 respectively by using the safety evaluation method based on negative binomial distribution, while the segment amounts of safety conditions in great, good, normal, poor are 1, 64, 26 and 18 respectively by using the safety evaluation method bassed on safety service level.The evaluation result of safety evaluationmethod based on negative binomial distribution is more in line with freeway actual safety situation.The safety evaluation method based on negative binomial distribution considers traffic volume and geometric alignment, and is more suitable for the freeway with complex geometric alignment conditions.The safety evaluation method based on safety service level considers traffic volume and accident frequency, and is more suitable for the freeway with better geometric alignment conditions..
-
图 2 粤赣高速公路安全服务水平分级标准
Figure 2. Classification standard of safety service level for Yuegan Freeway
图 3 京珠高速公路安全服务水平分级标准
Figure 3. Classification standard of safety service level for Jingzhu Freeway
-
[1] HAUER E, KONONOV J, ALLERY B, et al. Screening the road network for sites with promise[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2002 (1784): 27-32. [2] 孟祥海, 李梅, 麦强, 等. 高速公路事故多发点鉴别及诱发因素识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2011, 11 (1): 114-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2011.01.019MENG Xiang-hai, LI Mei, MAI Qiang, et al. Research on identification of black spot and accident inducing factor for freeway[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2011, 11 (1): 114-120. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2011.01.019 [3] 胡江碧, 王维利, 王健. 高速公路不同线形组合路段划分研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2010, 23 (增): 53-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL2010S1011.htmHU Jiang-bi, WANG Wei-li, WANG Jian. Research on classification of various combined alignment section on expressway[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23 (S): 53-57. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL2010S1011.htm [4] AHMED M, HUANG H, ABDEL-ATY M, et al. Exploring a Bayesian hierarchical approach for developing safety performance functions for a mountainous freeway[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 43 (4): 1581-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.021 [5] 陈毕伍, 石宝林, 雷茂锦. 基于物元模型的高速公路交通安全评价体系[J]. 长安大学学报: 社会科学版, 2008, 10 (4): 20-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6248.2008.04.005CHEN Bi-wu, SHI Bao-lin, LEI Mao-jin. Traffic safety assessment for expressway based on matter element model[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Social Science Edition, 2008, 10 (4): 20-24. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6248.2008.04.005 [6] 孟祥海, 盛洪飞, 陈天恩. 事故多发点鉴别本质及基于BP神经网络的鉴别方法研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2008, 25 (3): 124-129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2008.03.025MENG Xiang-hai, SHENG Hong-fei, CHEN Tian-en. Essence and an approach to identify the hazardous locations of urban arterial link based on BP artificial neural network[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2008, 25 (3): 124-129. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2008.03.025 [7] 孟祥海, 黄宝安, 宋春花. 事故多发点鉴别及其成因分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2009, 27 (3): 108-111, 128. doi: 10.3963/j.cn.42-1781.U.2009.03.028MENG Xiang-hai, HUANG Bao-an, SONG Chun-hua. Hazardous locations identification and causes analysis[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2009, 27 (3): 108-111, 128. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.cn.42-1781.U.2009.03.028 [8] 张驰, 杨少伟, 潘兵宏, 等. 基于空间有效视野的高速公路线形安全性评价[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27 (9): 132-137. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2010.09.024ZHANG Chi, YANG Shao-wei, PAN Bing-hong, et al. Safety evaluation of expressway alignment based on spatial valid vision[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27 (9): 132-137. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2010.09.024 [9] 孟祥海, 关志强, 郑来. 基于几何线形指标的山区高速公路安全性评价[J]. 中国公路学报, 2011, 24 (2): 103-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2011.02.017MENG Xiang-hai, GUAN Zhi-qiang, ZHENG Lai. Safety evaluation of mountainous expressway based on geometric alignment indexes[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24 (2): 103-108. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2011.02.017 [10] 吴焱, 钱振邦, 王建军, 等. 高速公路交通安全风险评价与敏感性分析[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 34 (4): 134-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201404022.htmWU Yan, QIAN Zhen-bang, WANG Jian-jun, et al. Traffic safety risk assessment and sensitivity analysis on expressway[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2014, 34 (4): 134-141. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201404022.htm [11] 刘建蓓, 郭忠印, 胡江碧, 等. 公路路线设计安全性评价方法与标准[J]. 中国公路学报, 2010, 23 (增): 28-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL2010S1007.htmLIU Jian-bei, GUO Zhong-yin, HU Jiang-bi, et al. Safety evaluation method and standard of highway alignment design[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23 (S): 28-35. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL2010S1007.htm [12] 董城, 邹静蓉, 高琼, 等. 基于运行速度的高速公路安全性评价探讨[J]. 公路工程, 2009, 34 (4): 64-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGL201305032.htmDONG Cheng, ZOU Jing-rong, GAO Qiong, et al. Study on the highway alignment audit based on operating speed[J]. Highway Engineering, 2009, 34 (4): 64-67. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGL201305032.htm [13] 符锌砂, 龙昱. 公路线形安全性模糊综合评价[J]. 公路, 2009 (6): 88-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL200806023.htmFU Xin-sha, LONG Yu. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of highway alignment safety[J]. Highway, 2009 (6): 88-92. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL200806023.htm [14] IVAN J N, WANG C, BERNARDO N R. Explaining two-lane highway crash rates using land use and hourly exposure[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2000, 32 (6): 787-795. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00132-3 [15] BERHANU G. Models relating traffic safety with road environment and traffic flows on arterial roads in Addis Ababa[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2004, 36 (5): 697-704. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457503000939 [16] PARK E S, PARK J, LOMAX T J. A fully Bayesian multivariate approach to before-after safety evaluation[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42 (4): 1118-1127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457509003406 [17] QIN Xiao, IVAN J N, RAVISHANKER N, et al. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of safety performance functions for two-lane highways using Markov chain Monte Carlo modeling[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2005, 131 (5): 345-351. doi: 10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-947X%282005%29131%3A5%28345%29 [18] KONONOV J, ALLERY B K. Explicit consideration of safety in transportation planning and project scoping[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2004 (1897): 116-125. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=749628 [19] ZHANG Lin, PREVEDOUROS P D. Signalized intersection level of service incorporating safety risk[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003 (1852): 77-86. doi: 10.3141/1852-11 [20] LU Jian, PAN Fu-quan, XIANG Qiao-jun. Level-of-safety service for safety performance evaluation of highway intersections[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2008 (2075): 24-33. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=848345 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(8)
计量
- 文章访问数: 600
- HTML全文浏览量: 62
- PDF下载量: 782
- 被引次数: 0
