Risk probability assessment of seismic damage for embankment based on Monte Carlo method
-
摘要: 以连云港-霍尔果斯高速公路K1125+470处路堤为研究对象, 在路堤震害损伤判别、路堤结构形式和地震动输入确定的基础上, 采用增量动力分析和概率性地震需求分析相结合的方法绘制了路堤震害易损性曲线, 评价了路堤震害易损性; 将路堤震害风险概率定义为场地地震危险性与路堤震害易损性的卷积, 并提出相关计算方法; 研究了场地地震烈度概率分布模型和地震烈度与地震动峰值加速度转换关系, 提出了未来50年内地震动峰值加速度的概率分布函数; 基于Monte Carlo方法进行了无挡土墙和有挡土墙路堤的震害风险概率评价, 验证了挡土墙对提高路堤抗震性能的积极作用。研究结果表明: 当地震动峰值加速度达到0.6g时, 无挡土墙路堤超越严重损伤的概率为65.910%, 达到0.8g时, 超越严重损伤的概率为99.995%, 说明无挡土墙路堤的震害易损性较高; 未来50年内无挡土墙路堤发生严重损伤和毁坏的风险概率为29.07%, 发生基本完好和轻微损伤的风险概率为31.97%;未来50年内有挡土墙路堤超越严重损伤的风险概率比无挡土墙路堤低7.9%, 发生基本完好和轻微损伤的风险概率比无挡土墙路堤高12.14%, 说明挡土墙可以显著降低路堤震害风险; 以路堤未来50年发生毁坏的风险概率40%为风险可接受度对路堤进行抗震设计和加固。Abstract: The embankment of Lianyungang-Horgos Expressway at K1125+470 was taken as research object, the seismic damage, embankment structure form and ground motion input were determined, the seismic vulnerability curves were drawn by combining incremental dynamic analysis and probabilistic seismic demand analysis, and the seismic vulnerability of embankment was evaluated.Embankment's seismic risk probability was defined as the convolution of seismic hazard and embankment seismic vulnerability, and its calculation method was put forward.The probability distribution model of seismic intensity and the relationship between seismic intensity and PGA were studied, and the probability distribution function of PGA was propssed in the next 50 years.The risk probabilities of embankment seismic were evaluated by using the Monte Carlo method for embankments with and without retaining wall, and the positive effect of retaining wall on improving embankment's seismic performance was verified.Analysis result shows that when PGA is 0.6g, the probability exceeding severe damage of embankment without retaining wall is 65.910%;When PGA is 0.8g, the probability is 99.995%, so the seismic vulnerability of embankment without retaining wall is high.The risk probability of exceeding severe damage for embankment without retaining wall is 29.07% and the risk probability of main integrity and minor damage is 31.97% in the next 50 years.In the next 50 years, the risk probability exceeding severe damage for embankment with retaining wall is 7.9% lower than the value without retaining wall, and the risk probability of main integrity and minor damage is 12.14%higher than the value without retaining wall, which indicates that retaining wall can significantly reduce the seismic damage risk of embankment.The acceptable risk probability exceeding severe damage in the next 50 years is defined as 40%in order for new embankments' aseismic design and existing embankments' aseismic reinforcement.
-
图 3 无挡土墙路堤震害易损性曲线
Figure 3. Seismic vulnerability curves of embankment without retaining wall
图 7 有挡土墙路堤震害易损性曲线
Figure 7. Seismic vulnerability curves of embankment with retaining wall
％ 表 1 路堤震害等级与震害损伤参数对应关系
Table 1. Corresponding relationship between embankments seismic damage grades and seismic damage parameter
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 无挡土墙路堤未来50年内震害风险概率评价结果
Table 4. Risk probability assessment result of embankment without retaining wall in next 50years
％ 
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 有挡土墙路堤未来50年内震害风险评价结果
Table 5. Risk probability assessment result of embankment with retaining wall in next 50years
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 王建, 姚令侃, 陈强. 汶川地震路堤成灾模式及土工格栅加筋变形控制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增1): 3387-3394. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2010S1116.htmWANG Jian, YAO Ling-kan, CHEN Qiang. Research on failure mode of road embankment in Wenchuan great earthquake and deformation control of georgic reinforcement[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(S1): 3387-3394. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2010S1116.htm [2] 刘妮娜, 刘军涛, 黄强兵, 等. 柔性接头地铁隧道穿越地裂缝的地震响应[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2015, 15(4): 34-42. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.04.005LIU Ni-na, LIU Jun-tao, HUANG Qiang-bing, et al. Seismic response of segmented metro tunnel with flexible joints passing through ground fissures[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(4): 34-42. (in Chinese). doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2015.04.005 [3] LIU Jing-wei, WANG Zhen-ming, XIE Fu-ren, et al. Seismic hazard assessment for greater North China from historical intensity observations[J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 164(12): 117-130. [4] 周旺保, 蒋丽忠, 李方方, 等. 钢-混凝土组合箱梁抗震性能试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(6): 1-9. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201406001ZHOU Wang-bao, JIANG Li-zhong, LI Fang-fang, et al. Experiment of seismic performance for steel-concrete composite box-beam[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(6): 1-9. (in Chinese). http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201406001 [5] MARUYAMA Y, YAMAZAKI F, MIZUNO K, et al. Fragility curves for expressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1158-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.024 [6] TSOMPANAKIS Y, LAGAROS N D, PSARROPOULOS P N, et al. Simulating the seismic response of embankments via artificial neural networks[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2009, 40(8): 640-651. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.11.005 [7] MELANI A, KHARE R, DHAKAL R P, et al. Seismic risk assessment of low rise RC frame structure[J]. Structures, 2016, 5: 13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2015.07.003 [8] BERTO L, SAETTA A, SIMIONI P. Structural risk assessment of corroding RC structures under seismic excitation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 30(5): 803-813. [9] 谷音, 钟华, 卓卫东. 基于性能的矮塔斜拉桥结构地震易损性分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(增1): 218-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2012S1043.htmGU Yin, ZHONG Hua, ZHUO Wei-dong. Lower tower cable stayed bridge seismic vulnerability analysis[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(S1): 218-222. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2012S1043.htm [10] 谷音, 郑文婷, 卓卫东. 基于LHS-MC方法的矮塔斜拉桥地震风险概率分析[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(8): 96-102, 110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201308017.htmGU Yin, ZHENG Wen-ting, ZHUO Wei-dong. Analysis of seismic risk probability assessment of lower tower cable stayed bridge based on LHS-MC method[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(8): 96-102, 110. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201308017.htm [11] 吕大刚, 于晓辉. 基于地震易损性解析函数的概率地震风险理论研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(10): 41-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201310005.htmLU Da-gang, YU Xiao-hui. Theoretical study of probabilistic seismic risk assessment based on analytical functions of seismic fragility[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(10): 41-48. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201310005.htm [12] 陈鲲, 高孟潭. 中国大陆地区一般建设工程抗地震倒塌风险研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(1): 23-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201501004.htmCHEN Kun, GAO Meng-tan. Controlling seismic collapse risk of general construction projects in China mainland[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(1): 23-29. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201501004.htm [13] 沈怀至, 金峰, 张楚汉. 基于性能的重力坝-地基系统地震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(12): 86-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX200812018.htmSHEN Huai-zhi, JIN Feng, ZHANG Chu-han. Erformance based seismic fragility analysis of concrete gravity foundation system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(12): 86-91. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX200812018.htm [14] RAMANATHAN K, PADGETT J E, DESROCHES R. Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 97: 29-46. [15] 宗亮, 王元清, 杨赛霓, 等. 基于HAZUS平台的中国公路桥梁震害评估模型研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(增1): 263-268. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2014S1045.htmZONG Liang, WANG Yuan-qing, YANG Sai-ni, et al. Research on highway bridges seismic damage assessment system for China based on HAZUS[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(S1): 263-268. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC2014S1045.htm [16] 汪旭, 康飞, 李俊杰. 土石坝地震永久变形参数反演方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(1): 279-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201401042.htmWANG Xu, KANG Fei, LI Jun-jie. Back analysis of earthquake-induced permanent deformation parameters of earth-rock dams[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(1): 279-286. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201401042.htm [17] 孙发权. 公路填方路基结构的振动台模拟试验研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2010.SUN Fa-quan. The vibration of highway subgrade filled physical simulation tests[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2010. (in Chinese). [18] TANG Chuan, ZHU Jing, LIANG Jing-tao. Emergency assessment of seismic landslide susceptibility: a case study of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake affected area[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2009, 8(2): 207-217. [19] WU D, TESFAMARIAM S, STIEMER S F, et al. Seismic fragility assessment of RC frame structure designed according to modern Chinese code for seismic design of buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 11(3): 331-342. [20] 高小旺, 鲍霭斌. 地震作用的概率模型及其统计参数[J]. 地震工程与工程震动, 1985, 5(1): 13-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC198501001.htmGAO Xiao-wang, BAO Ai-bin. Probabilistic model and its statistical parameters for seismic load[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1985, 5(1): 13-22. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC198501001.htm [21] 刘恢先, 卢荣俭, 陈达生, 等. 修订我国地震烈度表的一个建议方案[R]. 北京: 中国科学院力学研究所, 1981.LIU Hui-xian, LU Rong-jian, CHEN Da-sheng, et al. A proposal scheme of revision of seismic intensity table in China[R]. Beijing: Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1981. (in Chinese). [22] WANG Qiang, WU Zi-yan, LIU Shu-kui. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges considering multi-dimensional performance limit state[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 11(2): 185-193. [23] 冯清海, 袁万城. 基于IDA-MC的桥梁地震风险概率评估方法[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 30(3): 60-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201003015.htmFENG Qing-hai, YUAN Wan-cheng. Method and application of seismic risk probability analysis for large-long span bridge based on IDA-MC[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2010, 30(3): 60-65. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201003015.htm [24] 杨海清, 杨秀明, 周小平. 地震作用下挡土墙主动土压力及转动位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(增2): 139-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2012S2020.htmYANG Hai-qing, YANG Xiu-ming, ZHOU Xiao-ping. Analysis of active earth pressure and rotational displacement at retaining wall under seismic loads[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(S2): 139-144. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2012S2020.htm [25] 齐洪亮. 公路自然灾害评价系统的研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2011.QI Hong-liang. Study on evaluation system of highway natural disaster[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2011. (in Chinese). -
点击查看大图
图(8) / 表(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3385
- HTML全文浏览量: 225
- PDF下载量: 2455
- 被引次数: 0
