-
摘要: 为优化城市道路网络布局, 以若干个城市高德地图实时路况的交通出行数据为基础, 研究了主干路、次干路、支路等不同等级道路的路段状态相关性, 设置了考虑相关性的道路间距, 计算了城市路网密度与等级级配。分析结果表明: 主干路和主干路、主干路和次干路、主干路和支路相关单元的平行距离均服从对数正态分布, 平行距离的85%分位值分别为2.4、1.0、0.9km; 主干路间距取为2.4~2.5km, 主干路间设置2条次干路, 次干路与主干路的间距为0.8~1.2km, 支路间距为0.2km或0.3km; 次干路和支路对应平行距离的85%分位值比较接近, 实际路网中次干路和支路的功能区分尚不明确。所得路网结构布局符合相关性、路网密度与等级级配的要求, 可为路网规划提供参考。Abstract: In order to optimize the urban road network layout, based on the traffic trip data of several cities from AMAP real-time traffic road condition, the correlations of road section states with different road grades, including major road, minor road and branch road, were studied.The distances between roads considering the correlations were set.Urban road network density and grade proportion were calculated.Analysis result shows that parallel distances of related units between major roads, between major road and minor road and between major road and branch road, all obey log-normal distribution.The 85 percentile values of parallel distances are 2.4, 1.0 and 0.9 km, respectively.The distance between major roads is set as 2.4-2.5 km.2 minor roads are set between major roads.The distance between minor road and major road is 0.8-1.2 km, and the distance between branch roads is 0.2 km or 0.3 km.The corresponding 85 percentile values of parallel distances for minor road and branch road are relatively close, which shows that the functional distinction of minor road and branch road in actual road network is not clear.The proposed road network structure layout meets the requirements of correlation, road network density and grade proportion.It can provide reference for road network planning.
-
图 2 主干路和主干路相关单元平行距离的概率密度
Figure 2. Probability density of parallel distance between related units of major roads
图 3 主干路和次干路相关单元平行距离的概率密度
Figure 3. Probability density of parallel distance between related units of major road and minor road
图 4 主干路和支路相关单元平行距离的概率密度
Figure 4. Probability density of parallel distance between related units of major road and branch road
表 4 不同等级道路间距的推荐值
Table 4. Recommended values of distances between roads withdifferent grades
Km 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 李小静, 刘立舰. 失效相关的道路网络系统连通可靠度向量[J]. 兰州交通大学学报, 2013, 32 (6): 123-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4373.2013.06.027LI Xiao-jing, LIU Li-jian. Connectivity reliability vector of road network system with failure dependence[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2013, 32 (6): 123-128. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4373.2013.06.027 [2] 陈琨, 于雷. 基于对数正态和分布的路径行程时间可靠性模型[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2009, 33 (3): 35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0291.2009.03.008CHEN Kun, YU Lei. Route travel time reliability model based on lognormal sum distribution[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2009, 33 (3): 35-39. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0291.2009.03.008 [3] 张勇. 考虑路段关联失效的路网行程时间可靠性估计[J]. 土木工程学报, 2008, 41 (8): 87-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200808016.htmZHANG Yong. Estimation of travel time reliability in transportation networks with dependent link failures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41 (8): 87-92. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200808016.htm [4] 熊志华, 姚智胜, 邵春福. 基于路段相关的路网行程时间可靠性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14 (10): 81-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2004.10.019XIONG Zhi-hua, YAO Zhi-sheng, SHAO Chun-fu. Travel time reliability in road network associated with road section[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14 (10): 81-84. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2004.10.019 [5] SESHADRI R, SRINIVASAN K K. Algorithm for determining most reliable travel time path on network with normally distributed and correlated link travel times[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010 (2196): 83-92. [6] JENELIUS E, KOUTSOPOULOS H N. Travel time estimation for urban road networks using low frequency probe vehicle data[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2013, 53 (4): 64-81. [7] FOSGERAU M, FUKUDA D. Valuing travel time variability: characteristics of the travel time distribution on an urban road[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2012, 24: 83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.02.008 [8] JENELIUS E. The value of travel time variability with trip chains, flexible scheduling and correlated travel times[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2012, 46 (6): 762-780. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.02.003 [9] 王正武, 王杰, 黄中祥. 考虑级联失效影响的城市道路网络容量研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48 (3): 121-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201503018.htmWANG Zheng-wu, WANG Jie, HUANG Zhong-xiang. Study on capacity of urban road network considering cascading failure[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48 (3): 121-127. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201503018.htm [10] ZHENG Jian-feng, GAO Zi-you, ZHAO Xiao-mei. Modeling cascading failures in congested complex networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007, 385 (2): 700-706. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.031 [11] WU J J, SUN H J, GAO Z Y. Cascading failures on weighted urban traffic equilibrium networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007, 386 (1): 407-413. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.034 [12] XING Tao, ZHOU Xue-song. Finding the most reliable path with and without link travel time correlation: a Lagrangian substitution based approach[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2011, 45 (10): 1660-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.06.004 [13] 张勇, 屠宁雯, 陶骏杰. 道路交通网络脆弱性动态辨识方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14 (5): 74-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2014.05.010ZHANG Yong, TU Ning-wen, TAO Jun-jie. Identification method of dynamic road traffic network vulnerability[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14 (5): 74-81. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2014.05.010 [14] FAN Y Y, KALABA R E, MOORE J E. Shortest paths in stochastic networks with correlated link costs[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2005, 49 (9/10): 1549-1564. [15] DONG Wei, LI Min-yi, VO B Q, et al. Reliability in stochastic time-dependent traffic networks with correlated link travel times[C]//IEEE. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. New York: IEEE, 2012: 1626-1631. [16] DONG Wei, VU H L, VO B Q. Real time route guidance with correlated link cost[C]//IEEE. Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. New York: IEEE, 2011: 1039-1044. [17] NIE Y M, WU X. Reliable a priori shortest path problem with limited spatial and temporal dependencies[C]//LAM W H K, WONG S C, LO H K. Proceedings of 18th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Berlin: Springer, 2009: 169-195. [18] JI Zhao-wang, KIM Y S, CHEN A. Multi-objectiveα-reliable path finding in stochastic networks with correlated link costs: a simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm approach (SMOGA)[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38 (3): 1515-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.064 [19] WU Y J, HALLENBECK M E, WANG Y H, et al. Evaluation of arterial and freeway interaction for determining the feasibility of traffic diversion[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2011, 137 (8): 509-519. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000235 [20] WU J J, GAO Z Y, SUN H J. Effects of the cascading failures on scale-free traffic networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007, 378 (2): 505-511. [21] INTIRUK N, SINTHUPINYO S, PATTARA-ATIKOM W. Travel time estimation on a link without real-time data by correlated links[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 931-932: 531-535. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.931-932.531 [22] 邹志云, 毛保华, 龚全州, 等. 城市道路网络失效(堵塞) 相关性分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2009, 9 (2): 110-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT200902019.htmZOU Zhi-yun, MAO Bao-hua, GONG Quan-zhou, et al. Failure correlation analysis of urban road network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2009, 9 (2): 110-114. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT200902019.htm [23] 邹海翔, 乐阳, 李清泉. 城市交通状态的空间依懒性和异质性分析[J]. 城市交通, 2015, 13 (3): 9-16, 23.ZOU Hai-xiang, YUE Yang, LI Qing-quan. Spatial dependence and heterogeneity of urban traffic state[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2015, 13 (3): 9-16, 23. (in Chinese). [24] 任刚, 张水潮. 基于费用最小化的城市各级道路合理间距模型[J]. 东南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 38 (3): 531-534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX200803034.htmREN Gang, ZHANG Shui-chao. Cost-minimizing-based model for reasonable spacing of different class of urban roads[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2008, 38 (3): 531-534. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX200803034.htm [25] 蔡军. 居民出行效率与合理路网间距的确定[J]. 城市交通, 2005, 3 (3): 58-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJT200503014.htmCAI Jun. Efficiency of the traveler and reasonable distance between roads[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2005, 3 (3): 58-63. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJT200503014.htm [26] 卓曦, 施文荣, 施群. 城市干道信控交叉口最小间距计算[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14 (5): 81-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201405012.htmZHUO Xi, SHI Wen-rong, SHI Qun. Minimum spacing calculation for signalized intersections on the urban arterial[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2014, 14 (5): 81-86. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT201405012.htm [27] 庄斌, 杨晓光, 李克平. 道路交通拥挤事件判别准则与检测算法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19 (3): 82-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200603014.htmZHUANG Bin, YANG Xiao-guang, LI Ke-ping. Criterion and detection algorithm for road traffic congestion incidents[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19 (3): 82-86. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200603014.htm [28] 石飞, 王炜. 城市路网结构分析[J]. 城市规划, 2007, 31 (8): 68-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH200708014.htmSHI Fei, WANG Wei. Urban road network structure analysis[J]. City Planning Review, 2007, 31 (8): 68-73. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH200708014.htm [29] 蔡军, 刘平, 张奕. 城市道路分级与设置条件研究[J]. 城市交通, 2015, 13 (4): 44-55, 7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJT201504010.htmCAI Jun, LIU Ping, ZHANG Yi. Urban roadway classification and settings[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2015, 13 (4): 44-55, 7. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJT201504010.htm -
点击查看大图
图(9) / 表(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 713
- HTML全文浏览量: 131
- PDF下载量: 976
- 被引次数: 0
