Multi-mode competitiveness game model in regional comprehensive passenger transportation corridor
-
摘要: 为了研究综合客运通道内多方式价格竞争对市场分担率与利润的影响, 基于非集计NL模型与博弈理论, 构建了各客运方式市场分担率与运输价格关系的双矩阵博弈模型。以成渝通道为基础, 研究了高速铁路和高速公路大巴2种典型运输方式不同情景下的市场竞争均衡价格与分担率的变化特征。分析结果表明: 在采用双矩阵博弈模型所计算的均衡价格条件下, 高速铁路和高速公路大巴平均市场分担率分别增加了56.15%和80.58%, 有利于发挥二者的规模效益; 当出行模式结构相同时, 时间价值的变化会影响运营利润和市场分担率, 随着时间价值系数的增大, 高速铁路的平均运营利润增加34.60%, 平均市场分担率增加9.98%, 同时高速公路大巴平均运营利润减少29.70%, 平均市场分担率减少3.49%;对于出行时间处于劣势的高速公路大巴, 适当降低票价有利于增加营运利润; 该博弈模型的计算结果符合区域综合运输通道客运市场实际变化规律, 高速铁路和高速公路大巴不可能通过无限制降价的方式来追求最大利润, 运营利润都呈现先增后减的趋势, 在某个价格下运营利润最大; 该博弈模型具有价格均衡解, 在外界情况变化时, 通过博弈高速铁路和高速公路大巴价格可以达到利润最优状态。Abstract: In order to study the effect of multi-mode price competition on the market share rates and profits in comprehensive passenger transportation corridor, based on the non-aggregated NL model and the game theory, a bi-matrix game model was build to describe the relationship between market share rate and transportation price of each transportation mode. Taking Chengdu-Chongqing Transportation Channel as an example, the variation characteristics of market competition equilibrium prices and market share rates of two typical modes of high-speed railway and highway bus were studied.Analysis result shows that under the condition of equilibrium price calculated by the bi-matrix game model, the average market share rates of highspeed railway and highway bus increase by 56.15% and 80.58%, respectively, which is beneficial to improve their scale efficiencies.Under the same travel mode structure, the change of timevalue influences operating profit and market share rate. With the increase of time value coefficient, the average operating profit and market share rate of high-speed railway increase by 34.60% and 9.98%, respectively.At the same time, the average operating profit and market share rate of highway bus decrease by 29.70% and 3.49%, respectively.When the highway bus has a disadvantage time value, an appropriate reduction of fare is conducive to increase the operating profit.Therefore, the result computed by the game model is consistent with the actual changing law of passenger transport market in regional comprehensive passenger transportation corridor.It's impossible to pursue the maximum profits through unrestricted price cuts for highspeed railway and highway bus.The operating profits increase first and then decrease, finally reach the maximum operating profits at a certain price.The game model has a price equilibrium solution, and when the external situation changes, the high-speed railway and highway bus would achieve the best profit state through the game model.
-
Key words:
- traffic management /
- multi-mode price competition /
- game theory /
- NL model /
- market evolution /
- market share rate
-
[1] CHANG I, CHANG G L. Calibration of intercity trip time value with a network assignment model: a case study for the Korean NW-SE corridor[J]. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 2002, 5 (3): 57-72. [2] BHATTA B P, LARSEN O I. Errors in variables in multinomial choice modeling: a simulation study applied to a multinomial logit model of travel mode choice[J]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18 (2): 326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.002 [3] 叶玉玲, 王艺诗. 沪杭运输通道内旅客出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2010, 32 (4): 13-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2010.04.003YE Yu-ling, WANG Yi-shi. Research on travel mode choice behavior in Shanghai-Hangzhou Transport Corridor[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2010, 32 (4): 13-17. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2010.04.003 [4] 温惠英, 曾文创. 适于交通方式划分的NL模型巢式层次结构研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2010, 28 (4): 35-38. doi: 10.3963/j.ISSN1674-4861.2010.04.009WEN Hui-ying, ZENG Wen-chuang. Nested structure of NL model suitable for traffic mode split[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2010, 28 (4): 35-38. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.ISSN1674-4861.2010.04.009 [5] 杨励雅, 邵春福, HAGHANI A. 出行方式与出发时间联合选择的分层Logit模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2012, 12 (2): 76-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2012.02.013YANG Li-ya, SHAO Chun-fu, HAGHANI A. Nested logit model of combined selection for travel mode and departure time[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12 (2): 76-83. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2012.02.013 [6] BELL M G H. A game theory approach to measuring the performance reliability of transport networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2000, 34 (6): 533-545. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00042-9 [7] ALJARAD S N, BLACK W R. Modeling Saudi ArabiaBahrain Corridor mode choice[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1995, 3 (4): 257-268. doi: 10.1016/0966-6923(95)00025-9 [8] LEVINSON D M, GILLEN D, KANAFANI A. The social costs of intercity transportation: a review and comparison of air and highway[J]. Transport Reviews, 1998, 18 (3): 215-240. [9] 陈宽民, 罗小强. 城市快速轨道交通合理票价的博弈分析[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 25 (4): 52-55. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2005.04.013CHEN Kuan-min, LUO Xiao-qiang. Game theory of reasonable ticket price for urban railway transport[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 25 (4): 52-55. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8879.2005.04.013 [10] 卞长志, 陆化普, 尉欣欣. 城际铁路和公路长途客运的定价博弈[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2010, 10 (1): 184-189. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2010.01.029BIAN Chang-zhi, LU Hua-pu, YU Xin-xin. Price game between intercity railway and bus[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10 (1): 184-189. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2010.01.029 [11] 余孝军, 方春华. 公路客运监管的进化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22 (2): 243-248. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3221.2013.02.036YU Xiao-jun, FANG Chun-hua. Evolutionary game analysis of the supervision of highway passenger transport[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2013, 22 (2): 243-248. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3221.2013.02.036 [12] 关宏志, 浦亮. 基于演化博弈理论的有限理性交通选择行为模型[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2010, 36 (8): 1077-1083. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD201008013.htmGUAN Hong-zhi, PU Liang. A drivers'choice behavior model based on evolutionary game theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2010, 36 (8): 1077-1083. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD201008013.htm [13] 卢方元, 李奎. 中短途汽车客运问题博弈分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2009, 39 (13): 32-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJS200913007.htmLU Fang-yuan, LI Kui. Game theory analysis on short and medium distance passenger transportation's problem[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2009, 39 (13): 32-37. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJS200913007.htm [14] 陈星光, 周晶, 朱振涛. 城市交通出行方式选择的演化博弈分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2009, 23 (2): 140-142, 130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2009.02.026CHEN Xing-guang, ZHOU Jing, ZHU Zhen-tao. Evolutionary game analysis of the travel mode choice for urban travelers[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009, 23 (2): 140-142, 130. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2009.02.026 [15] 林佳妮. 成渝通道客运市场竞争博弈分析[J]. 交通科技与经济, 2013, 15 (5): 66-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5696.2013.05.018LIN Jia-ni. Analysis of Chengdu-Chongqing Corridor passenger market based on game theory[J]. Technology and Economy in Areas of Communications, 2013, 15 (5): 66-70. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5696.2013.05.018 [16] 孙剑萍, 耿彪, 汤兆平, 等. 基于非合作博弈的城际运输通道客运分担率及定价策略研究[J]. 中国科技论文, 2016, 11 (7): 823-827, 842. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2016.07.020SUN Jian-ping, GENG Biao, TANG Zhao-ping, et al. Research on the sharing rate and pricing strategy of inter city transportation channel based on non-cooperative game theory[J]. China Science Paper, 2016, 11 (7): 823-827, 842. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2016.07.020 [17] CASTELLI L, LONGO G, PESENTI R, et al. Two-player noncooperative games over a freight transportation network[J]. Transportation Science, 2004, 38 (2): 149-159. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1030.0072 [18] MARTN J C, ROMN C. Hub location in the South-Atlantic airline market: a spatial competition game[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2003, 37 (10): 865-888. [19] ROSENTHAL R W. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash Equilibria[J]. International Journal of Game Theory, 1973, 2 (1): 65-67. [20] COLONY D C. An application of game theory to route selection[J]. Highway Research Record, 1970 (334): 39-47. [21] 周灵, 黄义. 客运通道市场中的竞争博弈分析[J]. 公路与汽运, 2013 (3): 80-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNQY201303023.htmZHOU Ling, HUANG Yi. Competitive game analysis in passenger channel market[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation, 2013 (3): 80-84. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNQY201303023.htm [22] 余孝军. 客运问题的进化博弈分析[J]. 经济数学, 2011, 28 (1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJSX201101002.htmYU Xiao-jun. Evolutionary game analysison passenger transport[J]. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2011, 28 (1): 1-4. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJSX201101002.htm [23] 胡志兵. 中国民航运输业缝隙市场竞争博弈分析[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2010, 28 (3): 54-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMH201003013.htmHU Zhi-bing. Game model analysis on niche market competition of civil aviation industry in China[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2010, 28 (3): 54-59. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMH201003013.htm [24] ROMN C, ESPINO R, MARTIN J C. Competition of highspeed train with air transport: the case of Madrid-Barcelona[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2007, 13 (5): 277-284. [25] 邓岩. 未来京沪高速铁路与京沪空中快线间的博弈[J]. 空运商务, 2009 (3): 40-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYSW200903024.htmDENG Yan. Future game between Beijing-Shanghai highspeed railway and Beijing-Shanghai air express line[J]. Air Transport and Business, 2009 (3): 40-43. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYSW200903024.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(3) / 表(11)
计量
- 文章访问数: 871
- HTML全文浏览量: 201
- PDF下载量: 563
- 被引次数: 0
