重载交通下空心板桥梁承载能力安全性

黄平明; 袁阳光; 赵建峰; 韩万水; 李永庆; 武隽

重载交通下空心板桥梁承载能力安全性

1.
长安大学陕西省公路桥梁与隧道重点实验室, 陕西西安 710064
2.
浙江交通职业技术学院路桥学院, 浙江杭州 311112
3.
中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司, 陕西西安 710075

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51278064

国家自然科学基金项目 51408053

详细信息

作者简介:
黄平明(1965-), 男, 湖北宜昌人, 长安大学教授, 工学博士, 从事桥梁工程研究

通讯作者:
袁阳光(1991-), 男, 河南开封人, 长安大学工学博士研究生, 从事桥梁车辆荷载与结构评估研究

中图分类号: U441.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 1100
- HTML全文浏览量: 118
- PDF下载量: 1602
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-04-21
- 刊出日期: 2017-06-25

Bearing capacity safety of hollow slab bridge under heavy traffic load

1.
Shaanxi Provincial Major Laboratory for Highway Bridge and Tunnel, Chang'an University
2.
College of Road and Bridge Engineering, Zhejiang Institute of Communications
3.
CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd

More Information

Author Bio:
HUANG Ping-ming(1965-), male, professor, PhD, +86-29-82336336, Hpming@vip.sina.com

YUAN Yang-guang(1991-), male, doctoral student, +86-29-82336336, yuanyg31@163.com

摘要

摘要: 基于河北省宣大高速长达18个月的动态称重数据, 从中分离出特重车辆荷载数据, 分析了车辆的质量、速度、到达时间与位置等关键荷载参数的分布特性; 提取了特重车辆典型车型, 分析了各车型轴重分布; 采用桥梁动力分析系统对883个特重车辆荷载工况进行动态可视化仿真, 通过空心板桥结构响应与设计汽车荷载效应的对比, 分析了特重车辆荷载与设计汽车荷载的差异, 并通过考虑恒载效应与特重车辆荷载效应的组合, 研究了重载下空心板桥梁的承载能力安全性。分析结果发现: 正弯矩效应极值与设计值之比达到了2.09, 剪力效应极值与设计值之比达到了1.97, 说明实际中最大特重车辆荷载已明显超越设计汽车荷载; 正弯矩效应均值、剪力效应均值与设计值之比接近1.0, 说明实际中平均特重车辆荷载与设计值比较接近; 抗弯与抗剪承载力评估指标分别在0.50、0.40上下浮动, 其极值分别在0.72、0.50上下浮动, 说明按照当前设计水平建造的空心板桥梁能够满足重载交通下的运营安全性, 抗弯承载能力较抗剪承载能力具有更大的冗余度; 承载能力评估指标随跨径变化未出现明显的增减趋势, 说明冗余度水平随跨径的增大基本保持稳定。
- 桥梁工程 /
- 空心板桥梁 /
- 重载交通 /
- 动态称重 /
- 承载能力安全性
Abstract: Based on the 18-month weigh-in-motion (WIM) data of Xuanda Expressway in Hebei Province, the load data of extra-heavy trucks were extracted, the key load parameters including the mass, speed, arrival time and lane distribution of vehicle were investigated, the types of extra-heavy trucks were classified, and the axle load distributions were analyzed. The load cases of 883 extra-heavy trucks were dynamically and visually simulated by using Bridge Dynamics Analysis System, the responses of hollow slab bridges were compared with the design vehicle load effects, and the differences between extra-heavy truck loads and corresponding design loads were investigated. The bearing capacity safety of hollow slab bridges under heavy traffic was investigated by considering the effect combination of dead load and extra-heavy truck load. Analysis result shows that the ratios of extreme values of positive bending moment and shearforce to the corresponding design values are 2.09 and 1.97, respectively, which indicates that the maximum extra-heavy truck loads are obviously higher than vehicle design loads.the ratios of average values of positive bending moment and shear force to the corresponding design values are close to 1.0, which indicates that the average extra-heavy truck load is close to the design vehicle load. The average values of evaluation indexes of bending and shearing bearing capacities fluctuate around 0.50 and 0.40, respectively, the extreme values fluctuate around 0.72 and 0.50, which indicates that the hollow slab bridge at the current design level can satisfy the operation safety requirement under heavy traffic, and the bending capacity has a higher redundancy than the shearing capacity. The evaluation indexes of bearing capacity don't change obviously with the increase of span length, which indicates that the redundancy of bearing capacity remain stable when the span length increases.
- bridge engineering /
- hollow slab bridge /
- heavy traffic /
- weigh-in-motion /
- bearing capacity safety

HTML全文

图 1 RC8m桥梁横断面

Figure 1. Typical cross section of RC8mbridge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 PC10m桥梁横断面

Figure 2. Typical cross section of PC10mbridge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 实体有限元模型

Figure 3. Entity finite element model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 梁格有限元模型

Figure 4. Grillage finite element model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 工况1的跨中竖向位移对比

Figure 5. Vertical displacement comparison under case 1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 工况2的跨中竖向位移对比

Figure 6. Vertical displacement comparison under case 2

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 监测系统

Figure 7. Detecting system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 车辆质量分布

Figure 8. Mass distribution of extra-heavy trucks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 到达时间分布

Figure 9. Arrival time distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 速度分布

Figure 10. Speed distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 行驶车道分布

Figure 11. Lane distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 V_T5-Ⅰ轴重分布

Figure 12. Axle load distributions of V_T5-Ⅰ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 动态可视化仿真分析流程

Figure 13. Flowchart of dynamic and visual simulation analysis

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 特重车辆荷载动态可视化仿真分析结果

Figure 14. Dynamic and visual simulation analysis result of extra-heavy truck load

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 空心板桥梁设计汽车荷载效应

Figure 15. Design vehicle load effects of hollow slab bridges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 特重车辆荷载效应与设计值之比

Figure 16. Ratios of load effects to design load effects of extra-heavy trucks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 动力放大系数计算值与设计值对比

Figure 17. Comparison of computation and design values of dynamic amplification factors

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 RC6m抗弯承载力评估指标

Figure 18. Safety indices of bending bearing capacity of RC6m

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 承载力评估指标特征值

Figure 19. Characteristic values of safety indices

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 简支空心板桥梁关键参数

Table 1. Key parameters of simply supported hollow slab bridges

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 特重车辆车型分类

Table 2. Classification of extra-heavy truck types

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 轴重与轴距分布类型与参数

Table 3. Distribution types and parameters of axle loads and axle distances

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 特重车辆荷载工况

Table 4. Extra-heavy truck load cases

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 抗力与恒载效应

Table 5. Resistances and dead load effects

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	SASAKI K K, PARET T, ARAIZA J C, et al. Failure of concrete T-beam and box-girder highway bridges subjected to cyclic loading from traffic[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32 (7): 1838-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.006
[2]	XU Fu-you, ZHANG Ming-jie, WANG Lei, et al. Recent highway bridge collapses in China: review and discussion[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2016, 30 (5): 1-8.
[3]	刘凤山, 杨琪. 装配式简支空心板梁桥体外横向预应力加固效果分析[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化, 2014, 31 (9): 79-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-033X.2014.09.030 LIU Feng-shan, YANG Qi. Analysis on reinforcement effect of external transverse prestress on fabricated simplysupported hollow-slab bridge[J]. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, 2014, 31 (9): 79-82. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-033X.2014.09.030
[4]	胡大琳, 高军, 任勇. 超重交通对府店公路影响分析及控制对策[J]. 中外公路, 2008, 28 (5): 247-251. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL200805067.htm HU Da-lin, GAO Jun, REN Yong. The influences of extraheavy traffic in Fu-Dian Road and the countermeasures[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 2008, 28 (5): 247-251. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL200805067.htm
[5]	秦禄生. 重载条件下小跨径简支板桥的横向铰接能力分析[J]. 公路, 2007 (10): 14-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2007.10.004 QIN Lu-sheng. Horizontal articulated ability analysis of small span simply supported slab bridge under heavy load[J]. Highway, 2007 (10): 14-16. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2007.10.004
[6]	余志武, 朱红兵, 蒋丽忠, 等. 公路桥梁车辆荷载随机过程模型[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 42 (10): 3131-3135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201110041.htm YU Zhi-wu, ZHU Hong-bing, JIANG Li-zhong, et al. Vehicles load stochastic process model of highway bridges[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42 (10): 3131-3135. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201110041.htm
[7]	闫磊, 吕颖钊, 贺拴海, 等. 在役混凝土桥梁构件可靠性实用评估方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2009, 9 (5): 13-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2009.05.003 YAN Lei, LU Ying-zhao, HE Shuan-hai, et al. Practical evaluation method of component reliability for existing concrete bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9 (5): 13-19. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2009.05.003
[8]	VIGH A, KOLLAR L P. Routing and permitting techniques of overweight vehicles[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2007, 12 (6): 774-784. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(774)
[9]	ZHANG Jian-ren, PENG Hui, CAI C S. Field study of overload behavior of an existing reinforced concrete bridge under simulated vehicle loads[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16 (2): 226-237. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000140
[10]	HAUGEN T, LEVY J R, AAKRE E, et al. Weigh-in-motion equipment—experiences and challenges[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2016, 14: 1423-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.215
[11]	YU Yang, CAI C S, DENG Lu. State-of-the-art review on bridge weigh-in-motion technology[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2016, 19 (9): 1514-1530. doi: 10.1177/1369433216655922
[12]	CONNOR A O, ENEVOLDSEN I. Probability based modeling and assessment of an existing post-tensioned concrete slab bridge[J]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30 (5): 1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.023
[13]	MEI G, QIN Q, LIN D J. Bimodal renewal processes models of highway vehicle loads[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004, 83 (3): 333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.10.002
[14]	GUO T, FRANGOPOL D M, CHEN Y W. Fatigue reliability assessment of steel bridge details integrating weigh-in-motion data and probabilistic finite element analysis[J]. Computers and Structures, 2012, 112-113, 245-257.
[15]	阮欣, 周可攀, 周军勇. 某八车道高速公路车流特性及荷载效应[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 43 (4): 555-561. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201504011.htm RUAN Xin, ZHOU Ke-pan, ZHOU Jun-yong. Vehicle flow characteristics and load effect of a eight-lane highway[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2015, 43 (4): 555-561. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201504011.htm
[16]	OBRIEN E J, ENRIGHT B, GETACHEW A. Importance of the tail in truck weight modeling for bridge Assessment[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010, 15 (2): 210-213. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000043
[17]	赵士良, 韩万水, 鲁永飞, 等. 重载交通条件下装配式RC板桥抗裂性分析[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2015, 32 (4): 73-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBJG201504012.htm ZHAO Shi-liang, HAN Wan-shui, LU Yong-fe, et al. Crack resistance analysis on prefabricated RC slab bridge under heavy traffic[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2015, 32 (4): 73-79. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBJG201504012.htm
[18]	ROSCHKE P N, PRUSKI K R. Overload and ultimate load behavior of posttensioned slab bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2000, 5 (2): 148-155. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(148)
[19]	韩万水, 王涛, 李永庆, 等. 基于模型修正梁格法的车桥耦合振动分析系统[J]. 中国公路学报, 2011, 24 (3): 47-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201105010.htm HAN Wan-shui, WANG Tao, LI Yong-qing, et al. Analysis system of vehicle-bridge coupling vibration with grillage method based on model updating[J]. China Journal of Highway Transport, 2011, 24 (3): 47-55. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201105010.htm
[20]	HAN Wan-shui, WU Jun, CAI C S, et al. Characteristics and dynamic impact of overloaded extra heavy trucks on typical highway bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20 (2): 1-11.
[21]	HAN Wan-shui, YUAN Yang-guang, HUANG Ping-ming, et al. Dynamic impact of heavy traffic load on typical T-beam bridges based on WIM data[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2017, 31 (3): 1-14.
[22]	韩万水, 闫君媛, 武隽, 等. 基于长期监测的特重车交通荷载特性及动态过桥分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27 (2): 54-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201402007.htm HAN Wan-shui, YAN Jun-yuan, WU Jun, et al. Extraheavy truck load features and bridge dynamic response based on long-term traffic monitoring record[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27 (2): 54-61. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL201402007.htm
[23]	阮欣, 周小燚, 郭济. 基于合成车流的桥梁车辆荷载效应极值预测[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 40 (10): 1458-1462. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201210003.htm RUAN Xin, ZHOU Xiao-yi, GUO Ji. Extreme valueextrapolation for bridge vehicle load effect based on synthetic vehicle flow[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2012, 40 (10): 1458-1462. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ201210003.htm
[24]	YUAN Yang-guang, HAN Wan-shui, HUANG Ping-ming, et al. Structure safety assessment under heavy traffic based on weigh in motion and simulation analysis[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2017, DOI: 10.1177/13694332-17695623.
[25]	袁明, 余钱华, 颜东煌, 等. 基于车-桥系统耦合振动理论的大跨PC连续刚构桥冲击系数研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2008, 21 (1): 72-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200801014.htm YUAN Ming, YU Qian-hua, YAN Dong-huang, et al. Research on impact coefficient for PC continuous rigid frame bridges with long-span under theory of vehicle-bridge system coupling vibration[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2008, 21 (1): 72-76. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL200801014.htm