-
摘要: 采用区间数描述出行者出行信息的不确定性, 提出了多属性出行方式决策模型。基于互补判断矩阵的最小平方法计算不同出行方式的权重, 建立了离差最大化模型计算特性变量的权重, 进而获得出行方式的组合权重, 并根据调查数据筛选小汽车出行和公交出行的样本进行模型有效性检验。分析结果表明: 当小汽车出行权重达到0.65以上时, 出行者往往采用小汽车出行; 当公交车出行权重达到0.68以上, 往往采用公交车出行。可见, 该模型可有效模拟出行者出行方式选择。Abstract: The uncertainty of travel information was described by using interval numbers, and a travel mode choice model with multiple attributes was put forward.The least-square method based on complementary judgment matrix was used to obtain the weights of different travel modes, the weight of each attribute variable was computed based on a dispersion maximization model, and the composite weight of each travel mode was obtained.The efficiency of the choice model was validated according to car and public transit travel samples.Analysis result shows that car is usually chosen when its travel weight exceeds 0.65, and public transit is usually chosen when its travel weight exceeds 0.68, so the model can simulate the travel mode choices of travelers effectively.
-
Key words:
- traffic planning /
- travel mode /
- multiple attribute decision-making /
- interval number
-
表 1 模糊语言的评定值
Table 1. Assessment values of fuzzy language
模糊语言 优 良 中 差 极差 区间数评定值 (0.8, 1.0] (0.6, 0.8] (0.4, 0.6] (0.2, 0.4] [0, 0.2] 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] ARSLAN T, KHISTY C J. A rational reasoning methodfromfuzzy perceptions in route choice[J]. Fuzzy Sets andSystems, 2005, 150(3): 419-435. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.03.021 [2] TEODOROVIC D. Fuzzy logic systems for transportationengineering: the state of the art[J]. Transportation ResearchPart A, 1999, 33(5): 337-364. [3] ARSLAN T, KHISTY C J. Arational approach to handlingfuzzy perceptions in route choice[J]. European Journal ofOperational Research, 2006, 168(2): 571-583. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.043 [4] VYTHOULKAS P C, KOUTSOPOULOS H N. Modelingdiscrete choice behavior using concepts fromfuzzy set theory, approxi mate reasoning and neural networks[J]. Transporta-tion Research Part C, 2003, 11(1): 51-73. doi: 10.1016/S0968-090X(02)00021-9 [5] BRYSON N, MOBOLURIN A. An action learning evaluationprocedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 379-386. [6] SENGUPTA A, PAL T K. On comparinginterval numbers[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 127(1): 28-43. [7] 徐泽水. 互补判断矩阵的两种排序方法——权的最小平方法及特征向量法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2002, 22(7): 71-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL200207011.htmXU Ze-shui. Two methods for priorities of complementaryjudgment matrices—weighted least-square method and eigen-vector method[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & amp; amp; Practice, 2002, 22(7): 71-75. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTLL200207011.htm [8] 许叶军, 达庆利. 不确定型多属性决策的权系数确定及其应用[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2005, 14(5): 434-436, 442. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGL200505009.htmXU Ye-jun, DA Qing-li. Determine the weights of uncertainmulti-attribute decision-making and its application[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory Methodology Applications, 2005, 14(5): 434-436, 442. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGL200505009.htm [9] 徐泽水, 达庆利. 基于模糊语言评估的多属性决策方法[J]. 东南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 32(4): 656-658. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX200204026.htmXU Ze-shui, DA Qing-li. Multi-attribute decision makingbased on fuzzy linguistic assessments[J]. Journal of SoutheastUniversity: Natural Science Edition, 2002, 32(4): 656-658. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX200204026.htm -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 692
- HTML全文浏览量: 123
- PDF下载量: 450
- 被引次数: 0
