Application of GIS and multiple attribute decision theory in highway runway locating
-
摘要: 通过对影响公路飞机跑道建设、使用和保障3个方面因素进行分析, 得到了公路机场跑道选址评价指标体系。运用公路网地理信息系统的信息管理与空间分析功能, 获取了若干可行待选方案的样本集, 构建了多属性决策模型, 根据最优化理论确定各属性要素的权重值, 进而确定各备选方案考核目标值及最优方案, 最后以某公路飞机跑道选址为例进行了实例验证。分析结果表明: 4个备选方案的考核目标值依次为0.0226、0.0843、0.0158、0.0229, 比较得出最佳方案为方案3, 符合实际, 因此, 该选址方法有效。Abstract: The influencing factors of construction, use and safeguard for highway runway were analyzed, and the evaluating index system of highway runway locating was brought out.The functions of information management and spatial analysis for highway network GIS were used, and the sample set of feasible locations for highway runway was obtained.The attribute weights of the factors were ascertained by establishing multiple attribute decision model and using optimization theory, and the check-up values of alternatives and the best scheme were gotten.The method of selecting site was examined with an example.Analysis result indicates that the check-up values of four alternatives are 0.022 6, 0.084 3, 0.015 8, 0.022 9 respectively, the best one is scheme 3, which accords with fact, so the method is available.
-
表 1 可行待选方案评价指标
Table 1. Evaluating indexes of available schemes
-
[1] 黄伟业, 仁廷兵, 俞宁一. 应加快高速公路飞机跑道建设[J]. 国防, 2002(8): 47-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4484.2002.08.027HUANG Wei-ye, REN Ting-bing, YU Ning-yi. Promoting the construction of highway runway[J]. National Defence, 2002(8): 47-48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4484.2002.08.027 [2] 康亚林, 邱延俊, 张波. 新建高速公路跑道几何参数的研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2007(2): 106-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2007.02.041KANG Ya-lin, QIU Yan-jun, ZHANG Bo. Research on geometric parameters of newly-built highway runway[J]. Railway Engineering, 2007(2): 106-108. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2007.02.041 [3] 周桂新. 浅谈高速公路军用飞机跑道建设及养护管理[J]. 甘肃科技, 2003, 19(9): 102-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2003.09.056ZHOU Gui-xin. On construction and maintenance management of highway runway from relying[J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2003, 19(9): 102-103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2003.09.056 [4] 高和生, 韦武举, 戴鹏, 等. 高等级公路改建飞机跑道加铺层材料性能试验研究[J]. 国防交通工程与技术, 2007(4): 21-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GFJT200704010.htmGAO He-sheng, WEI Wu-ju, DAI Peng, et al. Experimental research into the performance of over-laid materials for high-grade pavement transformed into airstrip[J]. Traffic Engineering and Technology for National Defence, 2007(1): 21-24. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GFJT200704010.htm [5] 王金华, 岑国平. 公路飞机跑道改建各基本要素研究[J]. 国防交通工程与技术, 2005(1): 6-9, 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3953.2005.01.002WANG Jin-hua, CEN Guo-ping. A summary of the research into various factors in rebuilding highways into airfield runways[J]. Traffic Engineering and Technology for National Defence, 2005(1): 6-9, 13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3953.2005.01.002 [6] MCNERNEY M T, RIOUX T. Geographic information system (GIS)needsassessment for txdot pavement management information systems[R]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2000. [7] 暨育雄, 阚胜男, 孙立军, 等. 基于GIS的机场道面管理系统[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2004, 4(1): 70-74. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2004.01.018JI Yu-xiong, KAN Sheng-nan, SUN Li-jun, et al. Airport pavement management system based on GIS[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(1): 70-74. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-1637.2004.01.018 [8] 徐泽水. 求解不确定型多属性决策问题的一种新方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2002, 17(2): 177-181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2002.02.015XU Ze-shui. New method for uncertain multi-attribute decision making problems[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2002, 17(2): 177-181. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2002.02.015 [9] 贾宏, 周波, 刘广兵. 基于层次分析法的风险模型优势分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2009, 44(1): 72-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.01.014JIA Hong, ZHOU Bo, LIU Guang-bing. Advantage analysis of risk model based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 44(1): 72-76. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.01.014 [10] 荆洪英, 张利, 闻邦椿. 基于层次分析法的产品设计质量权重分配[J]. 东北大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 30(5): 712-715. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DBDX200905026.htmJING Hong-ying, ZHANG Li, WEN Bang-chun. AHP-based assignment of weight in product design quality[J]. Journal of Northeastern University: Natural Science, 2009, 30(5): 712-715. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DBDX200905026.htm [11] 滕兆新, 张旭. 基于理想点的仿真结果评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(5): 1377-1379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTFZ200805068.htmTENG Zhao-xin, ZHANG Xu. Evaluation for simulation result based on ideal point[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(5): 1377-1379. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTFZ200805068.htm [12] ZHANG Ji-jun, WU De-sheng, OLSON D L. The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2005, 42(9/10): 991-998. [13] 杨明, 阳亮. 主成分分析法在高速公路沥青路面使用性能评价中的应用[J]. 中南公路工程, 2006, 31(6): 55-57, 89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGL200606014.htmYANG Ming, YAGN Liang. Application of primary component analysis to the evaluation of expressway asphalt pavement life[J]. Central South Highway Engineering, 2006, 31(6): 55-57, 89. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGL200606014.htm [14] 俞峰, 杨成梧. 基于熵权的图像分割性能灰色评判[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(8): 930-934. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2008.08.008YU Feng, YANG Cheng-wu. Entropy weight-based grey evaluation of performance of image segmentation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(8): 930-934. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2008.08.008 [15] 邹进, 张勇传. 三峡梯级电站短期优化调度的模糊多目标动态规划[J]. 水利学报, 2005, 36(8): 925-931. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2005.08.006ZOU Jin, ZHAGN Yong-chuan. Short-term optimal scheduling of cascade hydropower stations using fuzzy multi-objective dynamic programming[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, 36(8): 925-931. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2005.08.006 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(3) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 721
- HTML全文浏览量: 86
- PDF下载量: 540
- 被引次数: 0
