时速250km以上高速列车制动模式曲线算法

上官伟; 蔡伯根; 王晶晶; 王剑; 王利

doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.03.008

时速250km以上高速列车制动模式曲线算法

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.03.008

上官伟^{1, 2,},
蔡伯根¹,
王晶晶¹,
王剑^{1, 2},
王利¹

1.
北京交通大学电子信息工程学院, 北京 100044
2.
北京交通大学轨道交通控制与安全国家重点实验室, 北京 100044

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 60736047

铁道部科技研究开发计划项目 2009X003-G

铁道部科技研究开发计划项目 2010X001-A

铁道部科技研究开发计划项目 Z2009-059

轨道交通控制与安全国家重点实验室自主研究课题 RCS2009ZT013

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目 2009JBM005

详细信息

作者简介:
上官伟（1979-）, 男, 陕西乾县人, 北京交通大学讲师, 工学博士, 从事交通信息工程及控制研究

中图分类号: U260.138
计量
- 文章访问数: 1260
- HTML全文浏览量: 220
- PDF下载量: 727
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-01-07
- 刊出日期: 2011-06-25

Braking mode curve arithmetic of high-speed train above 250 km·h^-1

1.
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

More Information

Author Bio:
SHANGGUAN Wei(1979-), male, lecturer, PhD, +86-10-51687111, wshg@bjtu.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 研究了时速250 km以上高速列车制动系统, 分析了高速列车的运行阻力、制动力与制动距离。根据目标距离模式曲线理论, 建立了高速列车的制动模式曲线分段迭代模型。应用MAT-LAB/Simulink软件, 分析了CRH2-300型高速列车在平直道上、15‰与25‰直坡道上的运行阻力的变化, 对比了CRH2-300型和CRH3型高速列车在制动初速为300 km.h^-1时的常用和紧急制动曲线。计算结果表明: 在平直道上, CRH2-300型高速列车紧急制动距离为2 786.68 m, CRH3型高速列车紧急制动距离为3 319.37 m, 均满足紧急制动距离小于3 700 m的制动要求; 仿真制动曲线和实际制动曲线基本一致, 验证了分段迭代算法的有效性。
- 高速列车 /
- 制动模式 /
- 常用制动 /
- 紧急制动 /
- 制动距离 /
- 运行阻力 /
- 模式曲线
Abstract: The braking system of high-speed train above 250 km·h^-1 was studied, and the running resistance, braking force and braking distance of high-speed train were analyzed. Based on curve theory of target distance mode, the piecewise iteration model of braking mode curve for high-speed train was proposed. With MATLAB/Simulink software, the changes of running resistances on flat-straight line, direct ramp with grade 15‰ and direct ramp with grade 25‰ for CRH2-300 type high-speed train were analyzed, and the normal braking curves and emergency braking curves of CRH2-300 type and CRH3 type high-speed trains at initial braking speed 300 km·h^-1 were compared. Calculation result indicates that the emergency braking distance of CRH2-300 type high-speed train is 2 786. 68 m on direct ramp, the emergency braking distance of CRH3 type high-speed train is 3 319. 37 m on direct ramp, and both of them are less than 3 700 m, which is the maximum braking distance of braking requirement. Simulation braking curves almost consistent with actual braking curves, which verifies the validity of piecewise iteration algorithm.
- high-speed train /
- braking mode /
- service brake /
- emergency brake /
- braking distance /
- running resistance /
- mode curve

HTML全文

图 1 运行阻力构成

Figure 1. Composition of running resistance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 受力分析

Figure 2. Force analysis

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 制动力比较

Figure 3. Comparison of braking forces

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 制动过程

Figure 4. Braking process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 目标距离模式曲线

Figure 5. Mode curves of target distance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 迭代原理

Figure 6. Iterative principle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 算法流程

Figure 7. Algorithm flow

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 运行阻力和单位运行阻力

Figure 8. Running resistances and unit running resistances

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 运行阻力

Figure 9. Running resistances

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 再生制动曲线

Figure 10. Regenerative braking curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 制动曲线

Figure 11. Braking curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 紧急制动曲线

Figure 12. Emergency braking curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 基本阻力计算公式

Table 1. Calculation formulae of basic resistances

型号	基本阻力计算公式
CRH1	W₀₁= (0.53+0.002 6V₀₁+0.000 069V $_{01}^{2}$ ) M₀₁
CRH2-300	W₀₂= (0.88+0.007 4V₀₂+0.000 114V $_{02}^{2}$ ) M₀₂
CRH3	W₀₃= (0.79+0.006 4V₀₃+0.000 115V $_{03}^{2}$ ) M₀₃
CRH5	W₀₄= (0.69+0.006 3V₀₄+0.000 146V $_{04}^{2}$ ) M₀₄

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(10)

[1]	黄问盈, 孙中央. 高速列车制动计算中值得关注的问题[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2006, 26 (1): 24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2006.01.007 HUANG Wen-ying, SUN Zhong-yang. Noticeable problems of braking calculation for high speed train[J]. Rail way Loco-motive and Car, 2006, 26 (1): 24-27. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7842.2006.01.007
[2]	黄问盈, 张中央. 铁道列车制动限速[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2007, 28 (6): 91-95. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2007.06.017 HUANG Wen-ying, ZHANG Zhong-yang. Speed limits of railway train braking[J]. China Rail way Science, 2007, 28 (6): 91-95. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2007.06.017
[3]	ZHUAN X, XI A Xia-hua. Optimal scheduling and control of heavy haul trains equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic braking systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2007, 15 (6): 1159-1166. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2007.899721
[4]	马大炜, 王成国, 张波. 我国重载列车制动技术的研究[J]. 铁道车辆, 2009, 47 (5): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL200905001.htm MA Da-wei, WANG Cheng-guo, ZHANG Bo. Research on braking technology for heavy haul train in China[J]. Rolling Stock, 2009, 47 (5): 8-11. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDCL200905001.htm
[5]	李和平, 林祜亭. 高速列车基础制动系统的设计研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2003, 24 (2): 8-13. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.02.002 LI He-ping, LI N Hu-ting. A study on the design of fundamental brake system for high-speed train[J]. China Railway Science, 2003, 24 (2): 8-13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.02.002
[6]	魏伟, 刘涛, 张军. KZ1型控制阀仿真模型及列车制动性能仿真研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2010, 31 (1): 105-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201001021.htm WEI Wei, LI U Tao, ZHANGJun. The simulation model of KZ1 control valve and the simulation study on train brakin performance[J]. China Rail way Science, 2010, 31 (1): 105-110. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201001021.htm
[7]	吴萌岭, 程光华, 王孝延, 等. 列车制动减速度控制问题的探讨[J]. 铁道学报, 2009, 31 (1): 94-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200901023.htm WU Meng-ling, CHENG Guang-hua, WANG Xiao-yan, et al. Discussion of braking deceleration control of railway vehicles[J]Journal of the China Railway Society, 2009, 31 (1): 94-97. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDXB200901023.htm
[8]	BU Fan-ping, TAN HS. Pneumatic brake control for precision stopping of heavy-duty vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2007, 15 (1): 53-64.
[9]	郑循皓, 张继业, 张卫华. 高速列车转向架空气阻力的数值模拟[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2011, 11 (2): 45-50. http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201102008 ZHENG Xun-hao, ZHANG Ji-ye, ZHANG Wei-hua. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic drag for high-speed train bogie[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11 (2): 45-50. (in Chinese) http://transport.chd.edu.cn/article/id/201102008
[10]	陈哲明, 曾京, 关庆华. 高速列车再生制动防滑控制及仿真研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2010, 31 (1): 93-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201001019.htm CHEN Zhe-ming, ZENGJing, GUAN Qing-hua. Simulation research on the anti-skid control under the regenerative braking of high-speed train[J]. China Railway Science, 2010, 31 (1): 93-98. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTK201001019.htm